Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 22, 2024 9:05:51 GMT
Very few like a show off. He works at The Cock Tavern. Well that's a big red flag right there. The Chesham Arms is a much better pub. |
|
|
|
Post by doktorb🏳️🌈🏳️⚧️ on Jun 29, 2024 10:02:09 GMT
|
|
|
|
Post by doktorb🏳️🌈🏳️⚧️ on Jun 29, 2024 10:03:09 GMT
Try again  [/url]  |
|
Merseymike
Independent
Posts: 40,419
Member is Online
|
Post by Merseymike on Jun 29, 2024 10:08:13 GMT
Hehe....😀
|
|
|
|
Post by Yaffles on Jun 29, 2024 10:26:21 GMT
Try again [/url] [/quote] I like that he’s promising “Racism” seems an odd policy position but whatever |
|
The Bishop
Labour
Down With Factionalism!
Posts: 38,889
|
Post by The Bishop on Jun 29, 2024 10:59:23 GMT
Somebody stood as "New Labour" in Cardiff South and Penarth at the 1997 GE and got nearly 4k votes. But in that case, they actually appeared as such on the ballot paper.
|
|
|
|
Post by iainbhx on Jun 29, 2024 11:12:20 GMT
He could have saved us from reading all those words and just written "Hallo, I'm mental"
|
|
|
|
Post by LDCaerdydd on Jun 29, 2024 11:27:00 GMT
No imprint? Unlikely to be problematic as it’s clear who he is and how to contact him etc.
Interestingly he uses the phrase “Election Communication” I doubt this was delivered by the Royal Mail though? Presumably he’s not that organised/knowledgable.
But still he got some use out of that professional photo shoot.
|
|
|
|
Post by froome on Jun 29, 2024 11:32:25 GMT
No imprint? Unlikely to be problematic as it’s clear who he is and how to contact him etc. Interestingly he uses the phrase “Election Communication” I doubt this was delivered by the Royal Mail though? Presumably he’s not that organised/knowledgable. But still he got some use out of that professional photo shoot. Is that the case? I thought the imprint was legally essential even if all details already appear in the leaflet. |
|
|
|
Post by LDCaerdydd on Jun 29, 2024 12:28:59 GMT
No imprint? Unlikely to be problematic as it’s clear who he is and how to contact him etc. Interestingly he uses the phrase “Election Communication” I doubt this was delivered by the Royal Mail though? Presumably he’s not that organised/knowledgable. But still he got some use out of that professional photo shoot. Is that the case? I thought the imprint was legally essential even if all details already appear in the leaflet. You need an imprint by law on all printed material, however given this leaflet isn’t libellous nor is it hiding who published it, I can’t see the electoral commission/police bothering especially given it’s now the last week of the election and this is a well meaning (all be it exentric) candidate on his first outing. |
|
J.G.Harston
Lib Dem
Leave-voting Brexit-supporting Liberal Democrat
Posts: 14,759 
|
Post by J.G.Harston on Jun 29, 2024 14:06:51 GMT
No imprint? Unlikely to be problematic as it’s clear who he is and how to contact him etc. Interestingly he uses the phrase “Election Communication” I doubt this was delivered by the Royal Mail though? Presumably he’s not that organised/knowledgable. But still he got some use out of that professional photo shoot. Is that the case? I thought the imprint was legally essential even if all details already appear in the leaflet. I think it's marginal. It can be argued it carries the required content of a required imprint. All that is omitted is the words "printed by and on behalf of". |
|
J.G.Harston
Lib Dem
Leave-voting Brexit-supporting Liberal Democrat
Posts: 14,759
|
Post by J.G.Harston on Jun 29, 2024 14:09:30 GMT
The photos remind me of a chap I knew in Hong Kong who had a "side hustle" in bitpart acting.
|
|
Tony Otim
Green
Suffering from Brexistential Despair
Posts: 11,892
|
Post by Tony Otim on Jun 29, 2024 17:01:36 GMT
Am I the only one who almost hears Trump's voice (or at a Trump impersonator) reading some of those sentences...
|
|
|
|
Post by Devil Wincarnate on Jun 29, 2024 20:23:40 GMT
For those who remember it, his look and turn of phrase are remarkably similar to mid-2000s comedy character Garth Marenghi.
|
|
right
Conservative
Posts: 18,762
|
Post by right on Jul 10, 2024 6:35:26 GMT
There was a lot of talk about Abbott's health. Is this seat likely to be an early by-election?
|
|
|
|
Post by batman on Jul 10, 2024 6:53:12 GMT
I wouldn't rule it out
|
|
|
|
Post by Pete Whitehead on Jul 10, 2024 7:27:22 GMT
It would be a fun by-election but @weld would be unbearable (I mean even more so)
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 10, 2024 7:50:12 GMT
Please stop this. I made the mistake of morbidly speculating about Kaufman when he was Father of the House. I wish Diane well. Green Party will surge here in 2026.
|
|
|
|
Post by norflondon on Jul 10, 2024 10:43:25 GMT
Saw her speech - she rather looked like a woman in her late 40s. She was shaking a little - well, her right hand was - but then is it any wonder? the most abused vilified and threatened member of Parliament ever, by country mile, and recently ignored by Mr Hoyle despite rising to her feet 44 times in a debate about herself. Then by convention having to praise him.
The caged bird will sing for some time yet.
|
|
|
|
Post by johnloony on Jul 10, 2024 11:13:30 GMT
There was a lot of talk about Abbott's health. Is this seat likely to be an early by-election? Just because she’s old and ill doesn’t mean she’s very old or exceptionally ill. Experience over the last four decades shows that by-elections are caused by the deaths of MPs in their 40s 50s and 60s just as much as those in their 70s or 80s. |
|
