|
Post by middleenglander on Dec 30, 2017 16:44:31 GMT
It looks like 9 10 by-elections in January: * 1 on 4 January * 4 on 11 * 3 4 on 18 * 1 on 25
4 of the by-elections are in District Councils - 3 last having "all-out" elections in 2015 and 1 in 2016 3 are for Unitary Authorities - 1 where the last election was in May - 1 with annual elections, the last in 2016 - 1 with "all-out" elections in 2015 2 are for County Councils last contested in May 1 is for a Metropolitan Authority last contested in 2016
Conservatives are defending 7 seats, - 5 following the death of the previous councillor, 1 a resignation after becoming a MP and 1 a disqualification for non-attendance Labour is defending 1 seat following the death of the previous Councillor Liberal Democrats and Independent each defend 1 seat following a resignation
With all nominations known, there are 9 10 Conservative candidates,8 9 Labour, 7 8 Liberal Democrat, 6 7 Green, 3 4 UKIP and 3 Independents contesting 2 seats - a total of 36 41 candidates for the 9 10 seats.
Predictions on this thread by 9.00 am on day of the by-election.
|
|
|
Post by casualobserver on Jan 1, 2018 17:24:48 GMT
First in with a prediction for the New Year!
Hertsmere: Borehamwood Cowley Hill
Lab 39% Con 35% LDem 11% UKIP 9% Grn 6%
|
|
|
Post by Robert Waller on Jan 2, 2018 23:13:21 GMT
Hertsmere: Borehamwood Cowley Hill
Lab 48% Con 33% LDem 10% UKIP 6% Grn 3%
|
|
|
Post by yellowperil on Jan 3, 2018 7:25:07 GMT
Hertsmere, Borehamwood Cowley Hill: Lab 59, Con 29, LD 6, UKIP 4, Green 2
|
|
ricmk
Lib Dem
Posts: 2,615
Member is Online
|
Post by ricmk on Jan 3, 2018 10:06:04 GMT
Don't know if I will stick at this for very long but let's try LAB 50 CON 30 LD 10 GREEN 5 UKIP 5
|
|
|
Post by robbienicoll on Jan 3, 2018 11:50:25 GMT
Hertsmere - Borehamwood Cowley Hill
Lab 46 Con 40 LD 8 UKIP 4 Green 2
|
|
|
Post by carlton43 on Jan 3, 2018 12:23:44 GMT
COWLEY HILL
Con 43 Lab 41 LD 9 UKIP 4 Green3
|
|
|
Post by yellowperil on Jan 3, 2018 13:22:50 GMT
Lovely to see so many new (and old) faces coming forward to the prediction competition and hope they will keep going especially as the start of a new year ahead of May elections is a good quiet period to get into the feel of things. And voting early is good,too, as towards the end of last year we were all leaving it to very late and then coming up with very similar results. Already we seem to have a lot more variety of expectations in what had looked a pretty straightforward election...
|
|
|
Post by hempie on Jan 3, 2018 13:41:29 GMT
Hertsmere, Borehamwood Cowley Hill: Lab 58, Con 28, LD 7, UKIP 4, Green 3
|
|
|
Post by andrewp on Jan 3, 2018 17:13:22 GMT
Hertsmere, Borehamwood Cowley Hill Lab52, Con 34, Lib Dem 7, UKIP 4, Green 3
|
|
sirbenjamin
IFP
True fame is reading your name written in graffiti, but without the words 'is a wanker' after it.
Posts: 4,979
|
Post by sirbenjamin on Jan 3, 2018 18:21:09 GMT
Cowley Hill:
LAB 42 CON 42 LD 11 UKIP 3 GREEN 2
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 3, 2018 19:45:05 GMT
Hertsmere DC: Borehamwood Cowley Hill - Con 27, Lab 49, LD 12, Green 9, UKIP 3
|
|
|
Post by lancastrian on Jan 3, 2018 22:59:38 GMT
Hertsmere: Lab 49 Con 32 LD 9 Green 5 UKIP 5
|
|
|
Post by greenhert on Jan 3, 2018 23:03:36 GMT
Hertsmere DC, Borehamwood Cowley Hill: Labour 48, Conservative 32, Liberal Democrat 10, Green 6, UKIP 4.
|
|
|
Post by Davıd Boothroyd on Jan 4, 2018 0:23:45 GMT
HERTSMERE Borehamwood Cowley Hill: Lab 46, C 38, L Dem 7, UKIP 6, GP 3
|
|
|
Post by Andrew_S on Jan 4, 2018 0:35:40 GMT
Hertsmere, Borehamwood Cowley Hill:
Lab: 47% Con: 41% LD: 6% UKIP: 4% Greens: 2%
|
|
|
Post by olympian95 on Jan 4, 2018 8:17:32 GMT
Hertsmere Borehamwood
Lab: 45% Con: 34% LD: 8% UKIP: 7% Green: 6%
|
|
|
Post by Pete Whitehead on Jan 4, 2018 9:11:26 GMT
Hertsmere BC, Borehamwood Cowley Hill Lab 54.7% Con 33.6% UKIP 5.1% LD 4.2% Grn 2.4%
|
|
|
Post by hempie on Jan 4, 2018 11:16:09 GMT
Good to see you back in the competition Pete.
|
|
|
Post by carlton43 on Jan 4, 2018 11:19:46 GMT
Good to see you back in the competition Pete. It certainly is, but I fear for my own prediction as he is closer to the ward and does not have a close projection at all on it!
|
|