hedgehog
Non-Aligned
Enter your message here...
Posts: 6,826 
|
Post by hedgehog on Nov 17, 2016 23:47:05 GMT
Bath results cons 350, lib dems 273, green 252, lab 126
|
|
|
|
Post by Robert Waller on Nov 17, 2016 23:48:24 GMT
That's 1001, so the percentages are easy ...or would be, if there weren't two candidates missing
|
|
mboy
Liberal
Listen. Think. Speak.
Posts: 23,764
|
Post by mboy on Nov 17, 2016 23:50:37 GMT
Blast it!
|
|
|
|
Post by Davıd Boothroyd on Nov 17, 2016 23:50:45 GMT
Looks like it could be a Tory clean sweep this week.
|
|
|
|
Post by carlton43 on Nov 17, 2016 23:50:47 GMT
Bath results cons 350, lib dems 273, green 252, lab 126 Excellent result but pity about the Greens mucking up my forecast.....Labour have disappointed me! |
|
mboy
Liberal
Listen. Think. Speak.
Posts: 23,764
|
Post by mboy on Nov 18, 2016 0:05:36 GMT
The full figures for the Bath result are: Con 350 Lib 273 Grn 252 Lab 126 UKIP 23 Edit: Ind ? Perhaps Davıd Boothroyd knows the procedure for calculating vote changes from the 2015 election, where the parties all fielded different numbers of candidates? 2015 result |
|
|
|
Post by marksenior on Nov 18, 2016 0:11:08 GMT
The full figures for the Bath result are: Con 350 Lib 273 Grn 252 Lab 126 UKIP 23 Perhaps Davıd Boothroyd knows the procedure for calculating vote changes from the 2015 election, where the parties all fielded different numbers of candidates? 2015 result Independent ? ? ? There is no correct way of calculating vote changes from an election where some parties fielded incomplete numbers of candidates . |
|
|
|
Post by andrew111 on Nov 18, 2016 0:18:56 GMT
The full figures for the Bath result are: Con 350 Lib 273 Grn 252 Lab 126 UKIP 23 Perhaps Davıd Boothroyd knows the procedure for calculating vote changes from the 2015 election, where the parties all fielded different numbers of candidates? 2015 result Independent ? ? ? There is no correct way of calculating vote changes from an election where some parties fielded incomplete numbers of candidates . True, but Britain Elects use the top votes for each party.. Abbey (Bath & NE Somerset) result: CON: 32.8% (+2.4) LD: 25.6% (+4.7) GRN: 23.6% (-4.5) LAB: 11.8% (-4.9) IND: 4.0% (+4.0) UKIP: 2.2% (+2.2) |
|
|
|
Post by justin124 on Nov 18, 2016 0:39:16 GMT
The Bath result is not particularly impressive for the LibDems given that thet did win the seat in 2011 - a year into the Coalition. Perhaps Labour's candidature stopped the Greens hanging on to the seat!
|
|
Khunanup
Lib Dem
Portsmouth Liberal Democrats
Posts: 12,021
Member is Online
|
Post by Khunanup on Nov 18, 2016 0:54:26 GMT
The Bath result is not particularly impressive for the LibDems given that thet did win the seat in 2011 - a year into the Coalition. Perhaps Labour's candidature stopped the Greens hanging on to the seat! We won one of the two seats in 2011, the only time we have ever won a seat in the Ward since it was created for the 2003 local elections. The Tories have won all of the other seats since then bar the Green seat they have just gained. I'm disappointed with the result, sure, but it's clear that the Tories have a resilient team in this area of Bath which is capable of doing just enough time and time again. |
|
|
|
Post by marksenior on Nov 18, 2016 0:55:18 GMT
The Bath result is not particularly impressive for the LibDems given that thet did win the seat in 2011 - a year into the Coalition. Perhaps Labour's candidature stopped the Greens hanging on to the seat! Not disagreeing but Abbey is normally a marginal Conservative ward which they won both seats in in 2003 and 2007 before the Coalition . The Lib Dems did win Abbey ward in 1999 although the boundaries were slightly different - part of Conservative Bathwick ward was added to Abbey ward . |
|
|
|
Post by Pete Whitehead on Nov 18, 2016 0:59:07 GMT
Haldens (Welwyn Hatfield) result: CON: 34.1% (-1.3) LAB: 30.8% (-6.9) LDEM: 29.6% (+17.8) GRN: 5.5% (-9.5) Where the hell did the Lib Dems come from ?  |
|
mboy
Liberal
Listen. Think. Speak.
Posts: 23,764
|
Post by mboy on Nov 18, 2016 1:01:50 GMT
Both the Tory and Green literature in Bath pushed the idea that the Lib Dems were out of it, and I suspect that hurt the LD vote.
|
|
|
|
Post by justin124 on Nov 18, 2016 1:05:13 GMT
But the Greens might just have won had Labour not put up a candidate!
|
|
|
|
Post by middleenglander on Nov 18, 2016 1:06:14 GMT
Haldens (Welwyn Hatfield) result: CON: 34.1% (-1.3) LAB: 30.8% (-6.9) LDEM: 29.6% (+17.8) GRN: 5.5% (-9.5) Where the hell did the Lib Dems come from ? Think there was some local issue about building a large number of houses on an old aerodome. |
|
|
|
Post by finsobruce on Nov 18, 2016 1:23:59 GMT
Haldens (Welwyn Hatfield) result: CON: 34.1% (-1.3) LAB: 30.8% (-6.9) LDEM: 29.6% (+17.8) GRN: 5.5% (-9.5) Where the hell did the Lib Dems come from ? Watford? |
|
|
|
Post by finsobruce on Nov 18, 2016 1:28:27 GMT
But the Greens might just have won had Labour not put up a candidate! Or it might have helped the Lib Dems.. |
|
|
|
Post by uhurasmazda on Nov 18, 2016 3:52:40 GMT
Haldens (Welwyn Hatfield) result: CON: 34.1% (-1.3) LAB: 30.8% (-6.9) LDEM: 29.6% (+17.8) GRN: 5.5% (-9.5) Where the hell did the Lib Dems come from ? Approximately 11.8%, I would expect. |
|
|
|
Post by andrew111 on Nov 18, 2016 7:30:28 GMT
The Bath result is not particularly impressive for the LibDems given that thet did win the seat in 2011 - a year into the Coalition. Perhaps Labour's candidature stopped the Greens hanging on to the seat! Not disagreeing but Abbey is normally a marginal Conservative ward which they won both seats in in 2003 and 2007 before the Coalition . The Lib Dems did win Abbey ward in 1999 although the boundaries were slightly different - part of Conservative Bathwick ward was added to Abbey ward . I suspect Parliamentary by-elections may have affected the effort the Lib Dems put into this seat and some others in the south and Midlands compared to earlier in the year. To win from 3rd place takes a lot of effort if the other parties are active. |
|
mboy
Liberal
Listen. Think. Speak.
Posts: 23,764
|
Post by mboy on Nov 18, 2016 8:53:16 GMT
Yes, I hear the outside help was split with Richmond.
|
|
