|
Post by johnloony on Feb 23, 2014 1:41:21 GMT
Does it revert to 5 otherwise? No, the issue is whether having a threshold for European elections is constitutionnal. So, it's 0 or 3. I thought that EU rules required countries to have a threshold (of about 3% ish) for EP elections anyway? Obviously the UK doesn't need a specific threshold because the district magnitude is too small.
|
|
maxque
Non-Aligned
Posts: 9,312
|
Post by maxque on Feb 23, 2014 1:54:55 GMT
No, the issue is whether having a threshold for European elections is constitutionnal. So, it's 0 or 3. I thought that EU rules required countries to have a threshold (of about 3% ish) for EP elections anyway? Obviously the UK doesn't need a specific threshold because the district magnitude is too small. From what I read, EU rules are only specifying 3 things. 1. A form of PR must be used. 2. It's not possible to be an MP and an MEP at the same time. 3. The threshold can't be higher than 5%. EDIT: Here is the European rule: link
|
|
|
Post by Devonian on Feb 24, 2014 0:10:55 GMT
|
|
|
Post by Davıd Boothroyd on Feb 24, 2014 0:26:39 GMT
I wouldn't think less of Cameron if he had deliberately allowed rumours of an AfD affiliation to the ECR to be stoked up, only so he could squash them and then present it as a gesture of support for Angela Merkel.
|
|
|
Post by Devonian on Feb 24, 2014 20:27:08 GMT
I wouldn't think less of Cameron if he had deliberately allowed rumours of an AfD affiliation to the ECR to be stoked up, only so he could squash them and then present it as a gesture of support for Angela Merkel. There could be one potential problem with that plan. The other day a website called Pollwatch2014 made a prediction on the results of the May elections based on opinion polls in all the member states. It can be found here
blog.electio2014.eu/wp-content/uploads/2014/01/Prediction-summary-table-19-Feb-CORR.pdf
Now notice that the prediction is that the ECR parties will win seats in 7 member states 1 Czech 1 Latvia 1 Luxembourg 2 Netherlands 20 Poland 1 Slovakia 16 UK
the minimum requirements to form a group is that it must have at least 25 MEPs from at least 7 member states. If this prediction is accurate then that is no problem. However if one of the smaller parties fails to get elected and there are only 6 countries on that list then there would be a problem. The AfD would then be needed to form a group and I can't imagine the ECR MEPs being happy to break up their group. If Cameron vetoed a deal they would only need one of the UK ECR MEPs to form a group without him. Of course this scenario would be dependent on the ECR electing MEPs from exactly 6 countries which may very likely not happen. The polls however suggest it is possible
|
|
|
Post by iainbhx on Feb 26, 2014 11:28:01 GMT
The Bundesverfassungsgericht in Karlsruhe says "no threshold" in European elections. FDP breathe a sigh of relief.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 26, 2014 14:59:27 GMT
The Bundesverfassungsgericht in Karlsruhe says "no threshold" in European elections. FDP breathe a sigh of relief. This quite a big deal isn't it. Der Spiegel has a graphic showing what it would have done to the 2009 result. Who knows what parties will sneak an MEP. Could potentially be useful for group formation in the Parliament.
|
|
|
Post by slicesofjim on Feb 26, 2014 15:14:36 GMT
I thought that EU rules required countries to have a threshold (of about 3% ish) for EP elections anyway? Obviously the UK doesn't need a specific threshold because the district magnitude is too small. From what I read, EU rules are only specifying 3 things. 1. A form of PR must be used. 2. It's not possible to be an MP and an MEP at the same time. 3. The threshold can't be higher than 5%. EDIT: Here is the European rule: linkThat's quite interesting, because you can easily construct a threshold higher than 5% (that's exactly what our system is), but as long as it's de facto rather than de jure it's ok? Odd.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 26, 2014 15:21:12 GMT
From what I read, EU rules are only specifying 3 things. 1. A form of PR must be used. 2. It's not possible to be an MP and an MEP at the same time. 3. The threshold can't be higher than 5%. EDIT: Here is the European rule: linkThat's quite interesting, because you can easily construct a threshold higher than 5% (that's exactly what our system is), but as long as it's de facto rather than de jure it's ok? Odd. Does this mean the NPD will gain a seat? I am sure the Germans will be keen to stop them gaining any seats. FPD need a good result to boost morale in the party after the disastrous general election result.
|
|
|
Post by Devonian on Feb 26, 2014 17:39:50 GMT
The Bundesverfassungsgericht in Karlsruhe says "no threshold" in European elections. FDP breathe a sigh of relief. This quite a big deal isn't it. Der Spiegel has a graphic showing what it would have done to the 2009 result. Who knows what parties will sneak an MEP. Could potentially be useful for group formation in the Parliament. Any chance of the Republikaners getting a seat this time? They sat with the Front National before. They might help Le Pen reach the 7 country threashold to form a group.
|
|
maxque
Non-Aligned
Posts: 9,312
|
Post by maxque on Feb 26, 2014 18:12:02 GMT
Republikaners got 0.2% last time, so, I would say no.
|
|
|
Post by Devonian on Feb 26, 2014 18:21:24 GMT
Any idea who the Freie Wählers would group with if elected?
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 26, 2014 20:10:52 GMT
Republikaners got 0.2% last time, so, I would say no. No, they got 1.3% in 2009 Euro.
|
|
|
Post by slicesofjim on Feb 26, 2014 20:14:31 GMT
That's quite interesting, because you can easily construct a threshold higher than 5% (that's exactly what our system is), but as long as it's de facto rather than de jure it's ok? Odd. Does this mean the NPD will gain a seat? I am sure the Germans will be keen to stop them gaining any seats. FPD need a good result to boost morale in the party after the disastrous general election result. And I would rather the NPD in Germany, in the BNP in the UK, didn't get any seats, but that doesn't I think thresholds (direct or indirect) should exist to deny them proper proportional representation. One of the worst arguments against PR in Britain is the fear of the BNP getting seats, which reflects the near-hysterical approach taken by the political establishment and the Left to them, an anti-democratic attitude, and a complete lack of ability to deal with such parties politically, rather than through bureaucratic fixes.
|
|
maxque
Non-Aligned
Posts: 9,312
|
Post by maxque on Feb 26, 2014 21:31:39 GMT
Republikaners got 0.2% last time, so, I would say no. No, they got 1.3% in 2009 Euro. I meant than they got 0.2% in the 2013 Bundestag elections.
|
|
|
Post by iainbhx on Feb 26, 2014 23:16:46 GMT
I think it depends if the various varieties of "I can't believe it's not fascist" can get their act together and only run one party list. If they can, they may get a seat, a single seat - which is the problem.
If you take the 2013 Bundeswahl and apply the Euro seats and rules its
CDU 34, SPD 25, SED 8, GRÜ 8, CSU 7, FDP 5, AfD 5, PIR 2, NPD 1, FW 1
|
|
|
Post by iainbhx on Feb 26, 2014 23:18:19 GMT
Any idea who the Freie Wählers would group with if elected? Which ever group has the most free beer.
|
|
|
Post by Arthur Figgis on Feb 26, 2014 23:46:30 GMT
Any idea who the Freie Wählers would group with if elected? Which ever group has the most free beer. I'm coming round to their way of thinking...
|
|
|
Post by erlend on Feb 27, 2014 19:46:39 GMT
I think it depends if the various varieties of "I can't believe it's not fascist" can get their act together and only run one party list. If they can, they may get a seat, a single seat - which is the problem. If you take the 2013 Bundeswahl and apply the Euro seats and rules its CDU 34, SPD 25, SED 8, GRÜ 8, CSU 7, FDP 5, AfD 5, PIR 2, NPD 1, FW 1 But even in the German context I think the position that 2013 had a 5% threshold must have squeezed the hard right vote (actually I suspect that some of those votes may have voted Linke). I could imagine that with an open goal there is room for more than 1 Neo Nazi (my wording even if they are legal) as there was I think in 2009 even when there was a threshold.
|
|
|
Post by Devonian on Mar 5, 2014 14:43:21 GMT
I wouldn't think less of Cameron if he had deliberately allowed rumours of an AfD affiliation to the ECR to be stoked up, only so he could squash them and then present it as a gesture of support for Angela Merkel. There could be one potential problem with that plan. The other day a website called Pollwatch2014 made a prediction on the results of the May elections based on opinion polls in all the member states. It can be found here
blog.electio2014.eu/wp-content/uploads/2014/01/Prediction-summary-table-19-Feb-CORR.pdf
Now notice that the prediction is that the ECR parties will win seats in 7 member states 1 Czech 1 Latvia 1 Luxembourg 2 Netherlands 20 Poland 1 Slovakia 16 UK
the minimum requirements to form a group is that it must have at least 25 MEPs from at least 7 member states. If this prediction is accurate then that is no problem. However if one of the smaller parties fails to get elected and there are only 6 countries on that list then there would be a problem. The AfD would then be needed to form a group and I can't imagine the ECR MEPs being happy to break up their group. If Cameron vetoed a deal they would only need one of the UK ECR MEPs to form a group without him. Of course this scenario would be dependent on the ECR electing MEPs from exactly 6 countries which may very likely not happen. The polls however suggest it is possible
New PollWatch2014 prediction blog.electio2014.eu/wp-content/uploads/2014/01/PollWatch2014-tables-5-March-2014-forecast.pdfIn this the prediction is that the ECR parties will win seats in 6 member states 2 Czech Republic 1 Latvia 2 Netherlands 20 Poland 1 Slovakia 19 UK A better prediction for the Conservative Party in terms of their own MEP numbers however if this turns out to be accurate in means they'll need at least one MEP from another country to form a group.
|
|