stb12
Top Poster
Posts: 8,379 
|
Post by stb12 on Mar 13, 2024 22:26:59 GMT
North Durham
|
|
|
|
Post by Davıd Boothroyd on May 29, 2024 19:55:09 GMT
Luke Akehurst is selected as Labour candidate.
This means, deliciously, he is now standing for a small part of the seat which would-be Corbynite successor Laura Pidcock lost in 2019.
|
|
jamie
Top Poster
Posts: 7,054
|
Post by jamie on May 29, 2024 19:59:02 GMT
Luke Akehurst is selected as Labour candidate. This means, deliciously, he is now standing for a small part of the seat which would-be Corbynite successor Laura Pidcock lost in 2019. I believe it’s the bit where Pidcock actually lived as an MP. |
|
|
|
Post by ClevelandYorks on May 29, 2024 20:02:04 GMT
What an awful choice. It’s like we’ve unlearned all the lessons of the past two decades.
|
|
|
|
Post by doktorb🏳️🌈🏳️⚧️ on May 29, 2024 20:02:22 GMT
The left of the Party won't be happy with that.
|
|
|
|
Post by doktorb🏳️🌈🏳️⚧️ on May 30, 2024 5:45:51 GMT
|
|
|
|
Post by norflondon on May 30, 2024 6:39:41 GMT
A new low.
Would be surprised - nay shocked - if Laura P doesn't stand here
|
|
|
|
Post by gerrardwinstanley on May 30, 2024 7:49:29 GMT
I'd be interested to know if Akehurst has ever even visited Durham.
|
|
|
|
Post by Defenestrated Fipplebox on May 30, 2024 7:51:04 GMT
Why discuss some random post, by some random Twitterer?
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 30, 2024 8:06:23 GMT
Much unlike Starmer and most of the centre/centre-left faction of the PLP, the way that Akehurst behaves is often rather confrontational and unprofessional. Too much of a liability that I don't think he'll be helpful for Starmer despite being being closely aligned policy-wise.
|
|
|
|
Post by willpower3 on May 30, 2024 8:10:40 GMT
Much unlike Starmer and most of the centre/centre-left faction of the PLP, the way that Akehurst behaves is often rather confrontational and unprofessional. Too much of a liability that I don't think he'll be helpful for Starmer despite being being closely aligned policy-wise. Akehurst is a proper Right-Winger (not right-winger and not centre/centre-left) in a way that Starmer isn't. |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 30, 2024 8:19:13 GMT
Why discuss some random post, by some random Twitterer? It asks the right questions, IMO. The most Interesting part of this is whether Akehurst's selection for this safe seat (with which he has no connections AFAIK) is a political mistake that Labour may regret down the line. I think they just might. |
|
|
|
Post by rcronald on May 30, 2024 8:21:42 GMT
Why discuss some random post, by some random Twitterer? It's a good tweet regardless of whether you may or may not now the author. The most. nteresting part of this is whether Akehurst's selection for this safe seat (with which he has no connections AFAIK) is a political mistake that Labour may regret down the line. I think they just might. They are eventually going to regret loading the NE with Londoners. |
|
|
|
Post by batman on May 30, 2024 8:26:10 GMT
Forgive my ignorance but which other Labour candidate in the NE is a Londoner?
|
|
|
|
Post by rcronald on May 30, 2024 8:28:29 GMT
Forgive my ignorance but which other Labour candidate in the NE is a Londoner? I’m not talking about Starmer, but Labour over the decades. |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 30, 2024 9:04:35 GMT
Forgive my ignorance but which other Labour candidate in the NE is a Londoner? Isn't Akehurst based in Oxford? |
|
|
|
Post by doktorb🏳️🌈🏳️⚧️ on May 30, 2024 9:15:58 GMT
Not deleted this one yet:  |
|
|
|
Post by batman on May 30, 2024 9:24:06 GMT
Forgive my ignorance but which other Labour candidate in the NE is a Londoner? Isn't Akehurst based in Oxford? he is but previously he was a Labour councillor in Hackney. |
|
graham
Non-Aligned
Posts: 1,345
|
Post by graham on May 30, 2024 9:30:29 GMT
Corrupt cronyism is clearly rife in Starmer's party now. In itself that is sufficient reason not to vote Labour.
|
|
|
|
Post by Yaffles on May 30, 2024 9:32:08 GMT
Corrupt cronyism is clearly rife in Starmer's party now. In itself that is sufficient reason not to vote Labour. Cronyism exists in all parties and always has… but corruption requires a slightly higher burden of proof than you personally not liking the beneficiaries of said cronyism. |
|
