john07
Labour & Co-operative
Posts: 15,837
|
Post by john07 on Jul 12, 2024 15:03:56 GMT
And local byelections in Scotland are de facto conducted by AV. Unless, presumably, a double vacancy occurred?
|
|
Crimson King
Lib Dem
Be nice to each other and sing in tune
Posts: 9,871
|
Post by Crimson King on Jul 12, 2024 16:54:21 GMT
So, if the Welsh government were to collapse leading to an election before 2026, under what system would the election be held? The current system, here's the relevant part of the explanatory note: On a separate note I'd imagine now the GE is out of the way we will see an announcement (unlikely to be any public consultation) on the parings this side of Christmas. will that be subject to a peel?
|
|
stb12
Top Poster
Posts: 8,409
|
Post by stb12 on Jul 12, 2024 19:18:54 GMT
And local byelections in Scotland are de facto conducted by AV. Unless, presumably, a double vacancy occurred? Has happened now and then
|
|
Harry Hayfield
Green
Cavalier Gentleman (as in 17th century Cavalier)
Posts: 2,922
|
Post by Harry Hayfield on Jul 14, 2024 6:40:27 GMT
The newly empowered Democracy and Boundary Commission Cymru formerly known as the Local Democracy and Boundary Commission for Wales has announced its timetable for the pairing exercise for the new Senedd.
July 19th 2024: Publication of "Da Rules" September 2024: Inital Recommendations December 2024: Secondary Recommendations based on consultation responses March 2025: Final Recommendations based on consultation responses
And believes that the order of council will be done in May 2025, a year before the elections
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 15, 2024 11:24:51 GMT
If a bigger Senedd, probably costing more money for the taxpayer, is the answer, then what is the question?
|
|
peterl
Green
Congratulations President Trump
Posts: 8,474
|
Post by peterl on Jul 15, 2024 14:06:51 GMT
If a bigger Senedd, probably costing more money for the taxpayer, is the answer, then what is the question? How can we make ourselves seem more important?
|
|
|
Post by Davıd Boothroyd on Jul 15, 2024 15:47:37 GMT
If a bigger Senedd, probably costing more money for the taxpayer, is the answer, then what is the question? How can we properly cope with the massive increase in powers and responsibilities that Senedd Cymru has, given that it was created as the 'National Assembly for Wales' and originally intended to be run like a super all-Wales county council, and was never intended to go anywhere near making primarly legislation.
|
|
Harry Hayfield
Green
Cavalier Gentleman (as in 17th century Cavalier)
Posts: 2,922
|
Post by Harry Hayfield on Jul 15, 2024 18:29:43 GMT
If a bigger Senedd, probably costing more money for the taxpayer, is the answer, then what is the question? My belief is that the question is "How can the Senedd and the Welsh Government govern Wales effectively, when of the 30 members of the Welsh Labour Party, 19 are involved in government?"
|
|
|
Post by LDCaerdydd on Jul 15, 2024 18:33:51 GMT
If a bigger Senedd, probably costing more money for the taxpayer, is the answer, then what is the question? My belief is that the question is "How can the Senedd and the Welsh Government govern Wales effectively, when of the 30 members of the Welsh Labour Party, 19 are involved in government?" 14 Labour members are ministers not 19. The figure is higher when you include the Deputy Presiding Officer and I assume you’re also including Committee Chairs? You are correct in highlighting the lack of genuine back backbenchers.
|
|
peterl
Green
Congratulations President Trump
Posts: 8,474
|
Post by peterl on Jul 15, 2024 18:42:36 GMT
My belief is that the question is "How can the Senedd and the Welsh Government govern Wales effectively, when of the 30 members of the Welsh Labour Party, 19 are involved in government?" 14 Labour members are ministers not 19. The figure is higher when you include the Deputy Presiding Officer and I assume you’re also including Committee Chairs? You are correct in highlighting the lack of genuine back backbenchers. Maybe cutting the number of ministers would be a better solution. The Scottish Parliament has the same number and more responsibilities to cover, so Wales should be able to make do with say 10.
|
|
|
Post by LDCaerdydd on Jul 15, 2024 18:55:23 GMT
You are correct in highlighting the lack of genuine back backbenchers. Maybe cutting the number of ministers would be a better solution. The Scottish Parliament has the same number and more responsibilities to cover, so Wales should be able to make do with say 10. Scottish Government has: 11 Cabinet Ministers 14 Deputy Ministers Wales has 11 Cabinet and 3 Deputies.
|
|
ilerda
Conservative
Posts: 1,114
|
Post by ilerda on Jul 15, 2024 21:58:35 GMT
If a bigger Senedd, probably costing more money for the taxpayer, is the answer, then what is the question? How can we properly cope with the massive increase in powers and responsibilities that Senedd Cymru has, given that it was created as the 'National Assembly for Wales' and originally intended to be run like a super all-Wales county council, and was never intended to go anywhere near making primarly legislation. I’d be more sympathetic if they didn’t spend their time on secondary issues like blanket 20mph speed limits and banning free drink refills. There seems to be a concerted effort to avoid the serious work of national government in favour of acting like a supercharged local authority.
|
|
nyx
Non-Aligned
Posts: 1,067
|
Post by nyx on Jul 15, 2024 22:54:50 GMT
I'm of the opinion that expanding the Senedd makes sense, but the electoral system does not.
I'd have gone for 96 single-member constituencies elected by AV, thus ensuring that even rural communities get genuinely local representation. Party-list seats twice the size of Westminster constituencies aren't the way to be representative.
|
|
|
Post by Davıd Boothroyd on Jul 15, 2024 23:14:44 GMT
How can we properly cope with the massive increase in powers and responsibilities that Senedd Cymru has, given that it was created as the 'National Assembly for Wales' and originally intended to be run like a super all-Wales county council, and was never intended to go anywhere near making primarly legislation. I’d be more sympathetic if they didn’t spend their time on secondary issues like blanket 20mph speed limits and banning free drink refills. There seems to be a concerted effort to avoid the serious work of national government in favour of acting like a supercharged local authority. If that's the argument, I think it should be turned round. If you think the legislation coming from the Senedd is bad, that may be because it was never properly examined. One of the arguments for expansion of the Senedd is that it will mean more backbench and opposition MSs more time to scrutinise proposed legislation.
|
|
Foggy
Non-Aligned
Yn Ennill Yma
Posts: 6,144
|
Post by Foggy on Jul 16, 2024 0:40:44 GMT
I'm of the opinion that expanding the Senedd makes sense, but the electoral system does not. I'd have gone for 96 single-member constituencies elected by AV, thus ensuring that even rural communities get genuinely local representation. Party-list seats twice the size of Westminster constituencies aren't the way to be representative. If you're going down that route you might as well go for a lower figure than 96, and make it odd while you're at it. The reason we've ended up with such a big increase is (other than kicking things into the long grass - gradual increases since 1999 might've been easier to swallow) a combination of timescales and the particular system demanded by Plaid in order to get the bill through with the required two-thirds majority. As for mundane things like yesterday's drinks refills announcement: the party of inertia and the status quo are desperately trying to find things to fill a five-year legislative programme. Fortunately this will be going back down to four years from 2026.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 16, 2024 9:06:04 GMT
If a Welsh Parliament is the answer, what's the question? We don't need it. The Welsh NHS is a basket case, isn't it? It's just a more humdrum version of the Midlands.
|
|
|
Post by greatkingrat on Jul 16, 2024 9:10:54 GMT
I’d be more sympathetic if they didn’t spend their time on secondary issues like blanket 20mph speed limits and banning free drink refills. There seems to be a concerted effort to avoid the serious work of national government in favour of acting like a supercharged local authority. If that's the argument, I think it should be turned round. If you think the legislation coming from the Senedd is bad, that may be because it was never properly examined. One of the arguments for expansion of the Senedd is that it will mean more backbench and opposition MSs more time to scrutinise proposed legislation. Although even with 650 MPs, scrutiny of Westminster legislation isn't exactly great!
|
|
|
Post by LDCaerdydd on Jul 16, 2024 9:50:15 GMT
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 16, 2024 10:13:24 GMT
Libellous comment. I live in Highgate lol
|
|
|
Post by East Anglian Lefty on Jul 16, 2024 13:50:19 GMT
It doesn't particularly matter where in the N postcode area the poorly thought-through reckons are coming from. Parties have stood on a policy of abolishing Wales's devolved institutions and have uniformly done poorly. The Welsh electorate reckon that the Welsh Parliament is required, it makes very little difference that weld has his own uninformed opinions.
|
|