maxque
Non-Aligned
Posts: 9,306
Member is Online
|
Post by maxque on Jul 24, 2016 11:30:09 GMT
Is letting voters vote at any polling station really a necessity (if you're away for work, couldn't you just get a postal)? Or does it just mean people don't bother checking where their designated polling station is? They don't have a designated polling station. You are just expected to show up at one (and only one). Before someone asks, yes, it allows to vote twice, but that's forecasted in law and in the majority is lower than the number of persons who voted twice (easy to find, they get marked on the register when they vote, so, if a name is marked twice in different offices, they know) election is rerun (and such cases are reported to the police, which can prosecute up to 6 months in jail).
|
|
|
Post by dizz on Jul 25, 2016 17:20:31 GMT
|
|
Sibboleth
Labour
'Sit on my finger, sing in my ear, O littleblood.'
Posts: 16,029
Member is Online
|
Post by Sibboleth on Jul 25, 2016 23:54:54 GMT
|
|
Sibboleth
Labour
'Sit on my finger, sing in my ear, O littleblood.'
Posts: 16,029
Member is Online
|
Post by Sibboleth on Jul 26, 2016 0:04:58 GMT
|
|
|
Post by Davıd Boothroyd on Jul 26, 2016 7:31:04 GMT
|
|
|
Post by John Chanin on Jul 27, 2016 19:07:33 GMT
Is letting voters vote at any polling station really a necessity (if you're away for work, couldn't you just get a postal)? Or does it just mean people don't bother checking where their designated polling station is? The point as I have posted elsewhere is that voting is compulsory in Australia. People are called away from their home location on short notice all the time. I'm sure you can think of examples in your own experience. It is therefore the reponsibility of the authorities to ensure that everyone can cast their (compulsory) vote, and that means alllowing people to vote whwerever they happen to be. As a supporter of compulsory voting perhaps I have a better grasp on the realitiea of it.
It really isn't the end of the world if it takes a few days to figure out the final totals of votes in each constituency. The government will last for 3 years (in Australia - longer almost everywhere else).
|
|
|
Post by andrewteale on Jul 27, 2016 20:19:39 GMT
The Senate count in Tasmania has finished. On first preferences Labor and the Coalition had four quotas each with a quota each for the Greens and Jacqui Lambie; the final two seats went to the fifth Labor candidate and the second Green candidate, who finished just 141 votes ahead of One Nation. Labour senator Lisa Singh was re-elected on preferences despite being demoted to what should have been an unwinnable sixth on the Labor ticket.
|
|
|
Post by timrollpickering on Jul 27, 2016 22:25:20 GMT
Tasmania is almost the only state where voters sometimes overturn the agreed party order(s) in the Senate - in the era of Group Voting Tickets the BTL voters sometimes neutralised the party deals. As the smallest state it usually has the fewest number of candidates standing, the use of STV for the state house gets the voters in the habit of preferencing, and because there are only five House seats it's possible for state media to cover them all and move deep into the Senate race in a way that you can't really in most mainland states.
|
|
|
Post by Andrew_S on Jul 29, 2016 22:07:19 GMT
|
|
|
Post by Andrew_S on Jul 29, 2016 22:45:22 GMT
|
|
john07
Labour & Co-operative
Posts: 15,786
|
Post by john07 on Jul 29, 2016 23:52:49 GMT
And when can we expect the count to be completed?
Not far off a month now.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 1, 2016 0:19:30 GMT
Herbert result finally confirmed: Labor gain by 37 votes.
This confirms the HoR as Coalition 76, ALP 69, others 5.
|
|
|
Post by Andrew_S on Aug 1, 2016 1:26:06 GMT
How many times has the winner of the 2PP vote lost the election?
|
|
|
Post by timrollpickering on Aug 1, 2016 9:53:50 GMT
Conventionally five times since the war - 1954, 1961, 1969, 1990 and 1998. However the full distributions in seats settled before the final two (or where the final two were something different) weren't done until 1983 (technically 1984 but the previous year's papers were still in storage) and so some of these are estimates. One of the early elections had some Labor-Communist only contests but if a party declines to offer a candidate in a seat it throws away the chance to collect votes for that seat.
|
|
The Bishop
Labour
Down With Factionalism!
Posts: 38,925
Member is Online
|
Post by The Bishop on Aug 1, 2016 10:18:05 GMT
So I think 1990 is the only time it has happened to the centre right, the other four occasions it was the ALP losing out?
|
|
iain
Lib Dem
Posts: 11,435
|
Post by iain on Aug 1, 2016 10:50:14 GMT
Antony Green has tweeted that the Coalition will likely win the 2PP - it's missing the votes of 8 electorates, 7 of which will be safely Liberal:
Missing Barker, Grayndler, Grey, Indi, Maranoa, Mayo , New England, Warringah
|
|
|
Post by andrewteale on Aug 1, 2016 21:48:14 GMT
The Western Australia Senate count is finished. On first preferences the Liberals had five seats, Labor three and the Greens one; the final three seats went to the fourth Labor candidate, One Nation and the second Green candidate, with the lead Nationals candidate as runner-up a long way behind. There is a question mark over whether the One Nation senator is disqualified (he has a conviction for larceny).
The Territories have also finished counting with no change to the usual 1 Labor/1 Liberal split. The Northern Territory count was finished in the first round.
|
|
iain
Lib Dem
Posts: 11,435
|
Post by iain on Aug 1, 2016 22:14:13 GMT
If the One Nation candidate is disqualified, his seat should just pass on to second on the list.
|
|
Khunanup
Lib Dem
Portsmouth Liberal Democrats
Posts: 12,012
|
Post by Khunanup on Aug 2, 2016 11:49:32 GMT
If the One Nation candidate is disqualified, his seat should just pass on to second on the list. The Aussie senate is done by STV.
|
|
iain
Lib Dem
Posts: 11,435
|
Post by iain on Aug 2, 2016 12:44:08 GMT
If the One Nation candidate is disqualified, his seat should just pass on to second on the list. The Aussie senate is done by STV. Yet there are lists, and what I wrote is correct.
|
|