|
Post by Davıd Boothroyd on Mar 10, 2015 15:38:30 GMT
|
|
|
Post by brothersideways on Mar 12, 2015 9:30:01 GMT
They cut the Greens I see, dissappointing. Could have been useful when canvassing survivalist gun nuts living in isolated and undiscovered communities.
|
|
|
Post by Devonian on Mar 16, 2015 16:17:03 GMT
|
|
The Bishop
Labour
Down With Factionalism!
Posts: 39,015
|
Post by The Bishop on Mar 16, 2015 18:29:00 GMT
Again, a reminder that these are "ABSOLUTELY certain to vote" figures - before that his Lordship had Lab 32 Con 30.
Hands up anybody who thinks this is going to be a low turnout election (by post-1990s standards, anyway)?
|
|
The Bishop
Labour
Down With Factionalism!
Posts: 39,015
|
Post by The Bishop on Mar 23, 2015 16:59:28 GMT
Latest headline figures from our noble lord - Con 33 Lab 33 UKIP 13 LibDem 8 Green 5.
|
|
nick
Non-Aligned
Posts: 108
|
Post by nick on Mar 30, 2015 15:46:59 GMT
Tories are two points ahead of Labour: Con 36%, Lab 34%, Lib Dem 6%, UKIP 10%, Green 7%
|
|
iain
Lib Dem
Posts: 11,452
|
Post by iain on Mar 30, 2015 16:38:25 GMT
Ashcroft appears to be one of the worst pollsters for us (looking through the wild fluctuations he shows) which makes it all the more positive that his marginal polls have tended to show us in a decent position.
|
|
|
Post by Andrew_S on Mar 30, 2015 17:11:05 GMT
England only figures, LordAshcroft poll:
CON 40 LAB 34 LD 7 UKIP 11 GN 7
|
|
|
Post by Davıd Boothroyd on Mar 31, 2015 15:19:48 GMT
Lord Ashcroft has announced he is retiring from the Lords. He's pledged to keep involved with politics, including polling and running his various websites.
He gets to keep the title, but am I being too cynical in looking towards section 41 of the Constitutional Reform and Governance Act 2010 as an explanation for the move?
|
|
|
Post by carlton43 on Mar 31, 2015 16:09:56 GMT
They cut the Greens I see, dissappointing. Could have been useful when canvassing survivalist gun nuts living in isolated and undiscovered communities. The canvassing of undiscovered communities?? Is that an example of an unknown known...or a known unknown? Probably the latter.
|
|
|
Post by greenchristian on Mar 31, 2015 16:44:34 GMT
Lord Ashcroft has announced he is retiring from the Lords. He's pledged to keep involved with politics, including polling and running his various websites. He gets to keep the title, but am I being too cynical in looking towards section 41 of the Constitutional Reform and Governance Act 2010 as an explanation for the move? Having just read that section, I still have no idea what it, or you, are on about.
|
|
|
Post by Arthur Figgis on Mar 31, 2015 17:10:05 GMT
Non-non-doms.
|
|
|
Post by Davıd Boothroyd on Mar 31, 2015 22:42:30 GMT
|
|
|
Post by tonygreaves on Apr 1, 2015 15:27:46 GMT
That makes 12 peers retiring before the new Parliament or just retired under the Steel Act.
Tony
|
|
|
Post by manchesterman on Apr 1, 2015 21:45:23 GMT
They cut the Greens I see, dissappointing. Could have been useful when canvassing survivalist gun nuts living in isolated and undiscovered communities. The canvassing of undiscovered communities?? Is that an example of an unknown known...or a known unknown? Probably the latter. More likely to be unknown "don't knows" in terms of canvassing!
|
|
|
Post by Andrew_S on Apr 4, 2015 23:38:38 GMT
|
|
|
Post by Davıd Boothroyd on Apr 4, 2015 23:40:38 GMT
That opening sentence reminded me of the Dave Rhodes "Make.Money.Fast" letter, if anyone was around on the internet in the early 90s.
|
|
|
Post by manchesterman on Apr 5, 2015 0:02:27 GMT
..or it could have come straight from the business files of Grant Shapps/Michael Green
|
|
|
Post by tonygreaves on Apr 5, 2015 13:45:04 GMT
Lucky man that in his early twenties IDS had not removed his dole.
|
|
neilm
Non-Aligned
Posts: 25,023
|
Post by neilm on Apr 6, 2015 8:01:04 GMT
If a peer retires, can they decide to un-retire or does it require a new creation?
|
|