|
Post by liverpoolliberal on Feb 8, 2019 0:41:27 GMT
Shadwell
Independent 119 Green 125 Lib Dem 484 Aspire 1012 Labour 914 WEP 65 Conservatives 185
|
|
|
Post by timrollpickering on Feb 8, 2019 0:41:34 GMT
|
|
|
Post by Davıd Boothroyd on Feb 8, 2019 0:43:29 GMT
TOWER HAMLETS Shadwell
MIAH, Mohammad Harun (Aspire) 1,012 RAHMAN, Asik (Labour) 914 MIAH, Abjol (Liberal Democrat) 484 STAFFORD, Daryl Martin (Conservative) 185 KIELY, Timothy Patrick (Green) 125 GOUS-MIAH, Kazi Mohammad (Independent) 119 SCHERBATYKH, Elena (Women’s Equality Party) 65
|
|
|
Post by timrollpickering on Feb 8, 2019 0:43:54 GMT
|
|
|
Post by timrollpickering on Feb 8, 2019 0:56:00 GMT
|
|
|
Post by No Offence Alan on Feb 8, 2019 1:21:40 GMT
OK, I'm trying to be careful here because none of this has been confirmed, but the arrest was alleged to have been about election offences. This has been covered in this thread. As I said, I have some actual practical knowledge of election petitions, I do know what is at least viable. However if found guilty of charge(s) relating to the offence referred to in the Police’s Tweet, then I’m guessing any discussion of Election Petitions is likely to be moot as the sentence is surely going to be of an automatic disqualification length anyway? This is a genuine question, but can the Electoral Court, even if it has to receive a complaint within 28 days of the election, usurp a criminal investigation? How do you overcome the potential of being declared innocent by one but guilty by the other? Would not a guilty verdict in an Electoral Court held before any criminal trial end the chances of a free and fair criminal trial (unless the verdict was embargoed until after any criminal trial)? Presumably the Electoral Court, if presented with an election petition, could just adjourn until the criminal proceedings are complete?
|
|
|
Post by middleenglander on Feb 8, 2019 1:33:06 GMT
Bradford, Bolton & Undercliffe - Liberal Democrat gain from LabourParty | 2019 votes | 2019 share | since 2018 | since 2016 | since 2015 | since 2014 | Liberal Democrat | 1,733 | 51.3% | +9.0% | -0.9% | +14.4% | +0.1% | Labour | 1,153 | 34.1% | -10.6% | +3.8% | +1.6% | -3.9% | Conservative | 418 | 12.4% | +2.4% | +7.9% | +1.7% | +1.7% | Green | 73 | 2.2% | -0.8% | +0.3% | -1.6% | from nowhere | UKIP |
|
|
| -11.1% | -16.2% |
| Total votes | 3,377 |
| 90% | 84% | 51% | 88% |
Swing Labour to Liberal Democrat 9¾% since 2018, 6½% since 2015 and 2% since 2014 but Liberal Democrat to Labour 2¼% since 2016 Council now 51 Labour, 21 Conservative, 9 Liberal Democrat, 7 Various Independents, 2 Green Buckinghamshire, Totteridge & Bowerdean - Labour (suspended by party) gain from East Wycombe IndependentParty | 2019 votes | 2019 share | since 2017 | since 2013 | Labour | 978 | 40.8% | +15.5% | +13.5% | East Wycombe Independent | 668 | 27.8% | -12.1% | from nowhere | Liberal Democrat | 508 | 21.2% | +6.4% | -17.6% | Conservative | 245 | 10.2% | -9.8% | -9.4% | UKIP |
|
|
| -14.4% | Total votes | 2,399 |
| 103% | 98% |
Swing East Wycombe Independent to Labour 13¾% since 2017 otherwise not meaningful Council now 41 Conservative, 4 Liberal Democrat, 1 Labour, 1 East Wycombe Independent, 1 Independent, 1 suspended Labour Lambeth, Thornton - Labour hold Party | 2019 votes | 2019 share | since 2018 "top" | since 2018 "average" | since 2014 "top" | since 2014 "average" | Labour | 1,154 | 44.7% | -18.2% | -19.0% | -7.8% | -8.8% | Liberal Democrat | 845 | 32.8% | +23.1% | +23.5% | +26.5% | +26.6% | Green | 251 | 9.7% | -1.7% | -1.1% | +1.4% | +1.9% | Conservative | 247 | 9.6% | -6.4% | -6.5% | -5.7% | -4.3% | Women's Equality | 46 | 1.8% | from nowhere | from nowhere | from nowhere | from nowhere | UKIP | 36 | 1.4% | from nowhere | from nowhere | -16.2% | -17.2% | Total votes | 2,579 |
| 76% | 81% | 59% | 63% |
Swing Labour to Liberal Democrat 20¾% / 21½% since 2018 and 17½% / 17¾% since 2014 Council now 57 Labour, 5 Green, 1 Conservative with an impending vacancy (Labour) Tower Hamlets, Lansbury - Labour hold Party | 2019 votes | 2019 share | since 2018 "top" | since 2018 "average" | since 2014 "top" | since 2014 "average" | Labour | 1,308 | 40.8% | +2.5% | -0.3% | +2.2% | +2.4% | Aspire * | 1,002 | 31.3% | +7.0% | +8.6% | from nowhere | from nowhere | Liberal Democrat | 290 | 9.0% | +0.0% | +0.4% | +4.9% | +4.6% | UKIP | 176 | 5.5% | from nowhere | from nowhere | -7.4% | -8.6% | Conservative | 175 | 5.5% | -1.7% | -1.8% | -1.4% | -0.6% | Green | 166 | 5.2% | -1.6% | -2.3% | from nowhere | from nowhere | House | 89 | 2.8% | from nowhere | from nowhere | from nowhere | from nowhere | People's Alliance |
|
| -11.6% | -9.4% |
|
| Independent |
|
| -3.0% | -3.5% |
|
| Tower Hamlets First |
|
|
|
| -34.2% | -33.3% | TUSC |
|
|
|
| -3.4% | -3.7% | Total votes | 3,206 |
| 57% | 68% | 57% | 62% |
* elected as Labour in 2006 and Tower Hamlets First in 2014 Swing Labour to Aspire 2¼% / 4½% since 2018 Council now 41 Labour, 2 Conservative, 1 Liberal Democrat, 1 Aspire Tower Hamlets, Shadwell - Aspire gain from LabourParty | 2019 votes | 2019 share | since 2018 "top" | since 2018 "average" | since 2014 "top" | since 2014 "average" | Aspire * | 1,012 | 34.8% | +13.3% | +16.1% | from nowhere | from nowhere | Labour | 914 | 31.5% | +4.0% | -0.3% | -0.1% | +4.4% | Liberal Democrat ** | 484 | 16.7% | +13.1% | +12.6% | +13.6% | +13.4% | Conservative | 185 | 6.4% | +2.5% | +2.1% | -0.9% | -1.3% | Green | 125 | 4.3% | +0.0% | +0.1% | -3.3% | -3.8% | Independent | 119 | 4.1% | -1.2% | -2.3% | from nowhere | from nowhere | Women's Equality | 65 | 2.2% | from nowhere | from nowhere | from nowhere | from nowhere | People's Alliance |
|
| -33.9% | -30.5% |
|
| Tower Hamlets First |
|
|
|
| -47.4% | -50.6% | TUSC |
|
|
|
| -3.0% | -3.2% | Total votes | 2,904 |
| 63% | 76% | 63% | 67 |
* elected as Respect in 2010 and Tower Hamlets First in 2014 ** elected as Respect in 2006 Swing Labour to Aspire 4¾% / 8¼% since 2018 Council now 41 Labour, 2 Conservative, 1 Liberal Democrat, 1 Aspire Wokingham, Evendons - Liberal Democrat hold Party | 2019 votes | 2019 share | since 2018 | since 2016 | since 2015 | since 2014 | Liberal Democrat | 1,441 | 63.1% | +16.3% | +24.9% | +42.6% | +40.3% | Conservative | 729 | 31.9% | -8.8% | -11.3% | -18.9% | -14.8% | Labour | 115 | 5.0% | -7.5% | -8.3% | -5.8% | -6.1% | No Description |
|
|
| -5.2% |
|
| UKIP |
|
|
|
| -10.1% | -16.6% | Green |
|
|
|
| -7.8% |
| Independent |
|
|
|
|
| -2.7% | Total votes | Row 9 column 2 |
| 78% | 104% | 45% | 87% |
Swing Conservative to Liberal Democrat 12½% since 2018, 18% since 2016, 30¾% since 2015 and 27½% since 2014 Council now 41 Conservative, 8 Liberal Democrat, 3 Labour, 2 Independent
|
|
timmullen1
Labour
Closing account as BossMan declines to respond to messages seeking support.
Posts: 11,823
|
Post by timmullen1 on Feb 8, 2019 1:33:19 GMT
However if found guilty of charge(s) relating to the offence referred to in the Police’s Tweet, then I’m guessing any discussion of Election Petitions is likely to be moot as the sentence is surely going to be of an automatic disqualification length anyway? This is a genuine question, but can the Electoral Court, even if it has to receive a complaint within 28 days of the election, usurp a criminal investigation? How do you overcome the potential of being declared innocent by one but guilty by the other? Would not a guilty verdict in an Electoral Court held before any criminal trial end the chances of a free and fair criminal trial (unless the verdict was embargoed until after any criminal trial)? Presumably the Electoral Court, if presented with an election petition, could just adjourn until the criminal proceedings are complete? Yes, that’s what I was trying to get, which takes precedence?
|
|
|
Post by timrollpickering on Feb 8, 2019 1:39:32 GMT
If you treat Aspire and Tower Hamlets First as the same thing, what are the changes since 2014?
|
|
andrewp
Non-Aligned
Posts: 9,623
Member is Online
|
Post by andrewp on Feb 8, 2019 7:50:17 GMT
That’s a pretty good week for the Lib Dem’s.
|
|
Chris from Brum
Lib Dem
What I need is a strong drink and a peer group.
Posts: 9,746
|
Post by Chris from Brum on Feb 8, 2019 9:13:28 GMT
That’s a pretty good week for the Lib Dem’s. Agreed. Two wins, one a gain, with vote share up in five of six contests, and unchanged in the other one. I'll take that happily. Thornton will definitely be interesting next time.
|
|
|
Post by middleenglander on Feb 8, 2019 9:14:10 GMT
If you treat Aspire and Tower Hamlets First as the same thing, what are the changes since 2014? Lansbury: swing Tower Hamlets First / Aspire to Labour 2½% / 2¼% since 2014 Shadwell: swing Tower Hamlets First / Aspire to Labour 6¼% / 10% since 2014
|
|
|
Post by carlton43 on Feb 8, 2019 9:26:47 GMT
That’s a pretty good week for the Lib Dem’s. Agreed. Two wins, one a gain, with vote share up in five of six contests, and unchanged in the other one. I'll take that happily. Thornton will definitely be interesting next time. It is always interesting. I prefer the Continental Selection to anything else.
|
|
|
Post by No Offence Alan on Feb 8, 2019 9:28:38 GMT
That’s a pretty good week for the Lib Dem’s. The extra week of campaigning and the better weather made all the difference.
|
|
Chris from Brum
Lib Dem
What I need is a strong drink and a peer group.
Posts: 9,746
|
Post by Chris from Brum on Feb 8, 2019 9:57:27 GMT
Agreed. Two wins, one a gain, with vote share up in five of six contests, and unchanged in the other one. I'll take that happily. Thornton will definitely be interesting next time. It is always interesting. I prefer the Continental Selection to anything else.
|
|
|
Post by yellowperil on Feb 8, 2019 11:05:53 GMT
That’s a pretty good week for the Lib Dem’s. The extra week of campaigning and the better weather made all the difference.
|
|
The Bishop
Labour
Down With Factionalism!
Posts: 38,952
|
Post by The Bishop on Feb 8, 2019 11:14:15 GMT
I have to nominate a potential for the dodgy bar competition of 2019.Leaflet headed "It's Lib Dem or Labour in Shadwell on February 7" currently being circulated. Last year the Liberal Democrat candidate secured 4.3% of the vote. Even with a five times defector as candidate. I suspect exceeding Labour's 41% might be a long haul. The feelings on the ground (and the data) is it really is a two-horse race between us and Labour in Shadwell. While we didn't do well in the ward last year, having Rabina Khan come over to us (who represents this ward) has helped immensely and I'd be very surprised if we didn't come first or second. Are you surprised, then? In reality it was a case of "vote LibDem, get Rahman"
|
|
peter
Conservative
Posts: 47
|
Post by peter on Feb 8, 2019 11:41:56 GMT
The Tower Hamlets results have to be looked at in the context of Tower Hamlets. Four former Rahman supporting councillors standing for two different parties won 2,786 votes. The combined Labour vote was 2,222. That will not be lost on Lutfur Rahman and his backers. Knowing how flexible the party affiliations are of many of these people I am confident that the Liberal Democrats have got all they can from the former Rahman candidates and councillors.
Staggeringly, despite the corruption and all that is well known about Lutfur Rahman and his supporters, without splits they are well placed in both the 2022 combined Mayoral elections in the borough. Lutfur Rahman himself was seen campaigning in both wards.
Noticing some of the interesting characters from the Rahman era who were around yesterday, there will be pressure for a united front. There is a serious public interest question here. How and why did the Liberal Democrats recruit these two candidates? Abjol Miah, an Respect activist, campaigned in Shadwell as he always has done. A large proportion of his votes would have come from people who had no affiliation to the principles of the Liberal Democrats and it is safe to say that they will melt away very quickly.
There were still problems yesterday at polling stations with groups of frequently aggressive males harassing voters. The police cleared them away several times. I witnessed a man inside a polling station photographing both sides of his completed ballot paper. He was made to delete both pictures by the presiding officer. The police officer on duty was disappointed that she had not been called earlier and only knew after he left the premises.
A disappointing day for my two candidates. Of concern is the work that still needs to be done to improve the politics of this borough. There remains far too much emphasis on what is known as "community politics." One lesson is that all mainstream political parties should be wary of what "gifts" the ex Rahman councillors may bring. Abjol Miah, along with supporters despite the press release was campaigning to the close of poll. Liberal Democrat scrutineers were in place throughout the Shadwell count.
We did see the former councillor whose resignation, amidst various allegations caused the Lansbury by election, walking along Cable Street in Shadwell. He was not campaigning, despite this being Tower Hamlets !
|
|
|
Post by carlton43 on Feb 8, 2019 13:34:04 GMT
The Tower Hamlets results have to be looked at in the context of Tower Hamlets. Four former Rahman supporting councillors standing for two different parties won 2,786 votes. The combined Labour vote was 2,222. That will not be lost on Lutfur Rahman and his backers. Knowing how flexible the party affiliations are of many of these people I am confident that the Liberal Democrats have got all they can from the former Rahman candidates and councillors. Staggeringly, despite the corruption and all that is well known about Lutfur Rahman and his supporters, without splits they are well placed in both the 2022 combined Mayoral elections in the borough. Lutfur Rahman himself was seen campaigning in both wards. Noticing some of the interesting characters from the Rahman era who were around yesterday, there will be pressure for a united front. There is a serious public interest question here. How and why did the Liberal Democrats recruit these two candidates? Abjol Miah, an Respect activist, campaigned in Shadwell as he always has done. A large proportion of his votes would have come from people who had no affiliation to the principles of the Liberal Democrats and it is safe to say that they will melt away very quickly. There were still problems yesterday at polling stations with groups of frequently aggressive males harassing voters. The police cleared them away several times. I witnessed a man inside a polling station photographing both sides of his completed ballot paper. He was made to delete both pictures by the presiding officer. The police officer on duty was disappointed that she had not been called earlier and only knew after he left the premises. A disappointing day for my two candidates. Of concern is the work that still needs to be done to improve the politics of this borough. There remains far too much emphasis on what is known as "community politics." One lesson is that all mainstream political parties should be wary of what "gifts" the ex Rahman councillors may bring. Abjol Miah, along with supporters despite the press release was campaigning to the close of poll. Liberal Democrat scrutineers were in place throughout the Shadwell count. We did see the former councillor whose resignation, amidst various allegations caused the Lansbury by election, walking along Cable Street in Shadwell. He was not campaigning, despite this being Tower Hamlets ! This is really in the wrong thread and wrong section. To all intents and purposes Tower Hamlets is a Foreign Election in a Foreign Country with all the attendant eccentricities, illegalities and damn nonsense one expects of Foreigners.
|
|
Crimson King
Lib Dem
Be nice to each other and sing in tune
Posts: 9,846
|
Post by Crimson King on Feb 8, 2019 15:59:15 GMT
can I just say I was v pleased with the result in the Jewel (once I had warmed up, it was bloody cold on the cliff edge which is Bolton)
|
|