Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 15, 2017 7:04:32 GMT
I rate Ashfield as a more likely gain. More votes to squeeze. Here are two words which should warn you to be careful of projecting Ashfield results into the future - Jason Zadrozny. Underestimate his machine at your peril. His chance to win was in 2010. Given that he didn’t stand in 2015 or 2017, I don’t expect he’ll make such a big splash ever again.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 15, 2017 7:12:56 GMT
Good results for the Conservatives in Newcastle-under-Lyme.
Clearly the Tory challenge hasn’t gone away just yet.
|
|
maxque
Non-Aligned
Posts: 9,308
Member is Online
|
Post by maxque on Dec 15, 2017 8:01:45 GMT
Here are two words which should warn you to be careful of projecting Ashfield results into the future - Jason Zadrozny. Underestimate his machine at your peril. His chance to win was in 2010. Given that he didn’t stand in 2015 or 2017, I don’t expect he’ll make such a big splash ever again. He got busy in court troubles just before the 2015 election, which were dismissed recently and his party (Ashfield Independents) won the last local by-election by a landslide.
|
|
|
Post by andrewteale on Dec 15, 2017 8:38:14 GMT
Still trying to find the full result from Portsoken, but Goyal's winning score was 228 votes and almost 60%.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 15, 2017 9:13:17 GMT
His chance to win was in 2010. Given that he didn’t stand in 2015 or 2017, I don’t expect he’ll make such a big splash ever again. He got busy in court troubles just before the 2015 election, which were dismissed recently and his party (Ashfield Independents) won the last local by-election by a landslide. The independents already got a high vote there in June - let’s assume he’s there candidate next time - how many more votes do you expect him to pick up?
|
|
|
Post by stananson on Dec 15, 2017 9:33:08 GMT
|
|
|
Post by yellowperil on Dec 15, 2017 9:45:33 GMT
Good results for the Conservatives in Newcastle-under-Lyme. Clearly the Tory challenge hasn’t gone away just yet. It is pretty obvious that NuL is a special case where the Labour administration had just disintegrated for particular reasons and where the Conservatives were best placed locally to gather up a protest vote. In the circumstances the Tories failing to take both seats is a poor performance imo , and how well they do from here might depend on whether they can make a fist out of running a minority administration-succeed and they are there for some while, fail and they could disintegrate fast, to be replaced by someone else ( revamped Lab? Lib Dems? Indies? who knows?).
|
|
|
Post by Pete Whitehead on Dec 15, 2017 9:57:25 GMT
Good results for the Conservatives in Newcastle-under-Lyme. Clearly the Tory challenge hasn’t gone away just yet. It is pretty obvious that NuL is a special case where the Labour administration had just disintegrated for particular reasons and where the Conservatives were best placed locally to gather up a protest vote. In the circumstances the Tories failing to take both seats is a poor performanceimo , and how well they do from here might depend on whether they can make a fist out of running a minority administration-succeed and they are there for some while, fail and they could disintegrate fast, to be replaced by someone else ( revamped Lab? Lib Dems? Indies? who knows?). Sorry - Bradwell has voted Conservative only once ever - in 2008 when the Brown government was in the lowest depths of unpopularity and in every other election they never even came close or even close to as close as they came yesterday. That sort of desperate spinning is reminiscent of Mark Senior in his heyday, but I knew Mark Senior.. (you known the rest)
|
|
|
Post by andrewteale on Dec 15, 2017 10:07:46 GMT
He got busy in court troubles just before the 2015 election, which were dismissed recently and his party (Ashfield Independents) won the last local by-election by a landslide. The independents already got a high vote there in June - let’s assume he’s there candidate next time - how many more votes do you expect him to pick up? OK, you've provoked me. Let's have a look at May's county elections, in which the Ashfield constituency is the following eight-and-a-half divisions of Nottinghamshire: Ashfields, Eastwood, the two Kirkby divisions, Selston, the three Sutton divisions and half of Greasley and Brinsley. If we divide the Greasley and Brinsley votes by two and aggregate, we get: Ashfield Independents 10,554 (5 candidates, all elected including Zadrozny himself in Ashfields) Labour 7,278 (full slate, 1 elected in Kirkby North) Conservative 4,271 (six candidates, 2 elected in Eastwood and Greasley/Brinsley) Independent 2,053 (three candidates, mostly from Selston) UKIP 2,020 (eight candidates) Selston Independents 1,848 (only in Selston, elected) Liberal Democrat 1,156 (four candidates) Green 84 (only in Eastwood) Rather different picture, don't you think? I'm no supporter of Zadrozny but with a track record like that you cannot simply write him off.
|
|
|
Post by andrewteale on Dec 15, 2017 10:16:18 GMT
Portsoken result: Goyal 228 Campbell-Taylor (Lab) 143 Barker 20 Samuels 2
|
|
The Bishop
Labour
Down With Factionalism!
Posts: 38,925
Member is Online
|
Post by The Bishop on Dec 15, 2017 10:33:00 GMT
It is pretty obvious that NuL is a special case where the Labour administration had just disintegrated for particular reasons and where the Conservatives were best placed locally to gather up a protest vote. In the circumstances the Tories failing to take both seats is a poor performanceimo , and how well they do from here might depend on whether they can make a fist out of running a minority administration-succeed and they are there for some while, fail and they could disintegrate fast, to be replaced by someone else ( revamped Lab? Lib Dems? Indies? who knows?). Sorry - Bradwell has voted Conservative only once ever - in 2008 when the Brown government was in the lowest depths of unpopularity and in every other election they never even came close or even close to as close as they came yesterday. That sort of desperate spinning is reminiscent of Mark Senior in his heyday, but I knew Mark Senior.. (you known the rest) Yes, its actually the Bradwell result that stands out even though the Tories didn't win it. Would be interested in some locally based perspectives here.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 15, 2017 10:41:53 GMT
Sorry - Bradwell has voted Conservative only once ever - in 2008 when the Brown government was in the lowest depths of unpopularity and in every other election they never even came close or even close to as close as they came yesterday. That sort of desperate spinning is reminiscent of Mark Senior in his heyday, but I knew Mark Senior.. (you known the rest) Yes, its actually the Bradwell result that stands out even though the Tories didn't win it. Would be interested in some locally based perspectives here. Both results were good. Conservatives holding up well in north Staffordshire.
|
|
The Bishop
Labour
Down With Factionalism!
Posts: 38,925
Member is Online
|
Post by The Bishop on Dec 15, 2017 10:43:50 GMT
Rockingham (Barnsley) result: LAB: 66.6% (-9.8) CON: 19.3% (+6.9) LDEM: 14.1% (+14.1) No BNP (-7.4) and TUSC (-3.8) as prev. These changes are of course wholly incorrect (and it was the English Dems who stood last time, not the BNP) Still no correction on the Britain Elects account, though.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 15, 2017 10:44:02 GMT
The independents already got a high vote there in June - let’s assume he’s there candidate next time - how many more votes do you expect him to pick up? OK, you've provoked me. Let's have a look at May's county elections, in which the Ashfield constituency is the following eight-and-a-half divisions of Nottinghamshire: Ashfields, Eastwood, the two Kirkby divisions, Selston, the three Sutton divisions and half of Greasley and Brinsley. If we divide the Greasley and Brinsley votes by two and aggregate, we get: Ashfield Independents 10,554 (5 candidates, all elected including Zadrozny himself in Ashfields) Labour 7,278 (full slate, 1 elected in Kirkby North) Conservative 4,271 (six candidates, 2 elected in Eastwood and Greasley/Brinsley) Independent 2,053 (three candidates, mostly from Selston) UKIP 2,020 (eight candidates) Selston Independents 1,848 (only in Selston, elected) Liberal Democrat 1,156 (four candidates) Green 84 (only in Eastwood) Rather different picture, don't you think? I'm no supporter of Zadrozny but with a track record like that you cannot simply write him off. I just think in the next GE the closeness of the result in June will limit the potential for independents.
|
|
|
Post by tucson on Dec 15, 2017 10:45:24 GMT
As a NuL resident..... It’s amazing that the Cons ever won a borough seat here in Bradwell. Definitely not a *typical* Conservative leaning seat. They did win the County seat recently, but that’s due to the other borough wards it’s linked with which are far more Conservative leaning. For the Conservatives to come close here is surprising. My own thoughts had Labour winning by around 200.
Just to note, Newchapel Ward (which the Conservatives took off Labour last night) is in Staffordshire Moorlands constituency.
|
|
The Bishop
Labour
Down With Factionalism!
Posts: 38,925
Member is Online
|
Post by The Bishop on Dec 15, 2017 10:57:02 GMT
Yes, its actually the Bradwell result that stands out even though the Tories didn't win it. Would be interested in some locally based perspectives here. Both results were good. Conservatives holding up well in north Staffordshire. Of course a gain is always a good result, but Newchapel was "only" a small swing to the Tories since last year and actually a significant one to Labour since 2015.
|
|
|
Post by yellowperil on Dec 15, 2017 11:44:17 GMT
It is pretty obvious that NuL is a special case where the Labour administration had just disintegrated for particular reasons and where the Conservatives were best placed locally to gather up a protest vote. In the circumstances the Tories failing to take both seats is a poor performanceimo , and how well they do from here might depend on whether they can make a fist out of running a minority administration-succeed and they are there for some while, fail and they could disintegrate fast, to be replaced by someone else ( revamped Lab? Lib Dems? Indies? who knows?). Sorry - Bradwell has voted Conservative only once ever - in 2008 when the Brown government was in the lowest depths of unpopularity and in every other election they never even came close or even close to as close as they came yesterday. That sort of desperate spinning is reminiscent of Mark Senior in his heyday, but I knew Mark Senior.. (you known the rest) Honoured of course to be compared to Mark. You rely for your assumptions about Bradwell on the lessons of history, and I accept of course what you say about the electoral history of this ward, including the fact that in exceptional circumstances Labour did manage to lose it once before. But it is a truism that all history tells us is about the past, not about the future. My belief always is that if a party comes near to winning a seat which it would seem it had no chance of winning, the question always has to be if you can get that close why don't you actually go on and win, and its often a lack of self -belief in the final analysis. Believe me , I've asked this hard question of a lot of my own candidates ( and myself!) when they are inclined to celebrate a near miss and don't want to be told they have failed. And I have that awkward Lib Dem belief that no seat anywhere is unwinnable. So many people look at past results and think that's the way it has to be. I have never believed that.
|
|
|
Post by middleenglander on Dec 15, 2017 18:06:39 GMT
Barnsley, Rockingham - Labour hold Party | 2017 votes | 2017 share | since 2016 | since 2015 | since 2014 | since 2012 | Labour | 938 | 66.6% | +15.0% | +10.6% | +30.2% | +9.2% | Conservative | 272 | 19.3% | +10.9% | +7.1% | +12.5% | +13.3% | Liberal Democrat | 199 | 14.1% | from nowhere | from nowhere | from nowhere | from nowhere | UKIP |
|
| -32.5% | -25.4% | -29.2% |
| English Democrat |
|
| -5.0% | -3.8% | -2.4% | -9.0% | TUSC |
|
| -2.6% | -2.7% | -2.3% |
| Barnsley Independent |
|
|
|
| -23.0% | -27.6% | Total Votes | 1,409 |
| 58% | 28% | 50% | 50% |
Swing not particularly meaningful Council now 55 Labour, 4 Conservative, 4 Barnsley Independent Newcastle-under-Lyme, Bradwell - Labour hold Party | 2017 votes | 2017 share | since 2016 | since 2015 | since 2014 | since 2012 | Labour | 396 | 50.7% | -3.1% | +4.6% | +1.2% | -17.1% | Conservative | 360 | 46.1% | +27.4% | +22.1% | +31.8% | +18.8% | Liberal Democrat | 25 | 3.2% | -0.1% | +0.6% | from nowhere | -1.7% | UKIP |
|
| -24.2% | -23.3% | -32.2% |
| Green |
|
|
| -3.2% |
|
| Independent |
|
|
| -0.8% |
|
| Total votes | 781 |
| 57% | 26% | 54% | 55% |
Swing Labour to Conservative 15¼% since 2016 and 2014, 8¾% since 2015 and 18% since 2012 Council now 25 Labour, 23 Conservative, 5 Independent Group. 3 Liberal Democrat, 2 Kidsgrove Independent, 1 UKIP, 1 Newcastle Independent Newcastle-under-Lyme, Newchapel - Conservative gain from Labour
Party | 2017 votes | 2017 share | since 2016 | since 2015 | since 2012 | since 2011 | Conservative | 216 | 43.3% | -6.3% | -9.7% | +9.2% | +15.9% | Labour | 197 | 39.5% | -10.9% | +3.3% | -13.6% | +6.8% | Independent | 86 | 17.2% | from nowhere | from nowhere | from nowhere | from nowhere | Green |
|
|
| -10.8% |
|
| Liberal Democrat |
|
|
|
| -7.4% | -6.5% | Previous Independents |
|
|
|
| -5.4% | -18.1% | UKIP |
|
|
|
|
| -15.4% | Total votes | 499 |
| 65% | 28% | 69% | 54% |
Swing Labour to Conservative 2¼% since 2016, 11½% since 2012 and 4½% since 2011 but Conservative to Labour 6½% since 2015 Council now 25 Labour, 23 Conservative, 5 Independent Group, 3 Liberal Democrat, 2 Kidsgrove Independent, 1 UKIP, 1 Newcastle Independent Salford, Langworthy - Labour hold Party | 2017 votes | 2017 share | since 2016 | since 2015 | since 2014 | since 2012 | Labour | 601 | 58.0% | +8.9% | +2.8% | +7.5% | -3.2% | Conservative | 183 | 17.7% | +11.2% | +7.2% | +9.3% | +10.6% | Liberal Democrat | 125 | 12.1% | from nowhere | from nowhere | from nowhere | -8.0% | Green | 72 | 6.9% | +1.0% | -0.8% | from nowhere | from nowhere | Independent | 55 | 5.3% | from nowhere | from nowhere | from nowhere | from nowhere | UKIP |
|
| -25.2% | -24.3% | -35.7% |
| Previous Independent |
|
| -11.3% |
|
|
| TUSC |
|
| -1.9% | -2.2% |
|
| BNP
|
|
|
|
| -3.5%
| -11.7%
| Motorcycle Alliance |
|
|
|
| -2.0% |
| Total votes | 1,036 |
| 45% | 24% | 42% | 50% |
Swing not particularly meaningful apart from Labour to Conservative ~ 7% since 2012 Council now 49 Labour, 9 Conservative, 2 Independent
|
|
|
Post by middleenglander on Dec 15, 2017 18:07:07 GMT
Torbay, Watcombe - Liberal Democrat hold Party | 2017 votes | 2017 share | since 2015 "top" | since 2015 "average" | since 2011 "top" | since 2011 "average" | Liberal Democrat | 655 | 57.1% | +14.0% | +13.4% | +9.6% | +10.0% | Conservative | 355 | 30.9% | +7.7% | +7.8% | +6.6% | +7.3% | Labour | 121 | 10.5% | -8.5% | -6.3% | -8.8% | -9.5% | Green | 17 | 1.5% | -4.6% | -5.2% | -7.4% | -7.8% | UKIP |
|
| -8.6% | -9.6% |
|
| Total votes | 1,148 |
| 36% | 40%
| 49% | 50% |
Swing Conservative to Liberal Democrat 3¼% / 2¾% sing 2015 and ~ 1½% since 2011 Council now 20 Conservative, 8 Liberal Democrat, 4 Mayor's Group, 3 Independent, 1 UKIP Torridge, Westward Ho! - Independent gain from Conservative
Party | 2017 votes | 2017 share | since 2015 | since 2011 | since 2007 | Independent Law | 321 | 46.9% | from nowhere | from nowhere | from nowhere | Conservative | 128 | 18.7% | -21.5% | -26.2% | -10.3% | UKIP | 90 | 13.2% | from nowhere | from nowhere | from nowhere | Liberal Democrat | 63 | 9.2% | from nowhere | from nowhere | -1.3% | Independent Mason | 47 | 6.9% | from nowhere | from nowhere | from nowhere | Labour | 35 | 5.1% | from nowhere | from nowhere | from nowhere | Previous Independent |
|
| -36.1% | -55.1% | -60.5% | Green |
|
| -23.7% |
|
| Total votes | 684 |
| 52% | 79% | 100% |
Swing not meaningful Council now 18 Conservative, 8 Independent, 4 UKIP, 3 Liberal Democrat, 2 Green, 1 Labour Welwyn Hatfield, Handside - Liberal Democrat hold Party | 2017 votes | 2017 share | since 2016 "top" | since 2016 "average" | since 2015 | since 2014 | since 2012 | Liberal Democrat | 1,105 | 52.4% | +16.7% | +16.9% | +20.9% | +18.0% | +23.6% | Conservative | 691 | 32.8% | -9.3% | -9.3% | -14.8% | -4.4% | -15.6% | Labour | 260 | 12.3% | -3.5% | -3.4% | -2.1% | +0.4% | -2.8% | Green | 51 | 2.4% | -3.9% | -4.3% | -4.0% | -3.3% | -5.1% | UKIP |
|
|
|
|
| -10.6% |
| Total votes | 2,107 |
| 74% | 78% | 50% | 76% | 90% |
Swing Conservative to Liberal Democrat ~ 13% since 2016, ~ 18% since 2015, ~ 11% since 2014 and ~ 19½% since 2012 Council now 27 Conservative, 16 Labour, 5 Liberal Democrat Warrington, Wigan, Shevington with Lower Ground - Labour hold Party | 2017 votes | 2017 share | since 2016 | since 2015 | since 2014 | since 2012 | Labour | 765 | 43.4% | +3.4% | -0.2% | +10.1% | -5.9% | Shevington Independent | 552 | 31.3% | +5.0% | from nowhere | from nowhere | from nowhere | Conservative | 402 | 22.8% | +11.5% | -3.8% | +11.6% | +3.5% | Green | 30 | 1.7% | -1.9% | -5.1% | -3.2% | from nowhere | Liberal Democrat | 15 | 0.9% | from nowhere | from nowhere | from nowhere | from nowhere | UKIP |
|
| -18.9% | -23.0% | -25.3% | -16.3% | Wigan Independent Conservative |
|
|
|
| -25.3% | -8.0% | Independent |
|
|
|
|
| -7.2% | Total votes | 1,764 |
| 57% | 28% | 56% | 64% |
Swing Labour to Shevington Independent ¾% since 2016 otherwise not meaningful Council now 65 Labour, 5 Conservative, 5 various Independents
|
|
Sibboleth
Labour
'Sit on my finger, sing in my ear, O littleblood.'
Posts: 16,029
|
Post by Sibboleth on Dec 15, 2017 23:40:13 GMT
Yes, its actually the Bradwell result that stands out even though the Tories didn't win it. Would be interested in some locally based perspectives here. Turnout of 16% is probably the most relevant statistic. Which will be partially weather related - N.W. Midlands took the brunt of the snowfall and now the rain has come there's ice everywhere. At a guess the Tories tried a bit harder, which matters more the lower turnout goes.
|
|