|
|
Post by lancastrian on May 18, 2019 22:02:58 GMT
Has anyone done Stoke-on-Trent yet? Won't be the prettiest map but... |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 18, 2019 22:12:45 GMT
Has anyone done Stoke-on-Trent yet? Won't be the prettiest map but... Delightful |
|
|
|
Post by andrewteale on May 18, 2019 23:54:46 GMT
Is it that extraordinary? Guildford was a Lib Dem held seat in the not-so distant past, and they've been strong in the locals in Guildford and Waverley for years. Yes (first local election after we took the parliamentary seat in '01 for example...) www.andrewteale.me.uk/leap/results/2003/340/That 2003 map:  |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 19, 2019 9:41:40 GMT
 Bournemouth, Christchurch & Poole and Dorset results, on the same map. I'm currently rather busy but I have similar maps for Somerset and Devon nearly ready to go. Host URL: imgur.com/gallery/tmalqbHIn general: poor result for the Conservatives and a good result for the Liberal Democrats and Independents; Greens did really well whilst Labour didn't really meet expectations. On a lower level, I hadn't realised until making this map, but whilst the Conservatives did win seats in the former Christchurch borough, they didn't top the poll anywhere. In Bournemouth, the Conservatives held up really well and Labour made gains but much fewer than expected (3 up from 0), whilst the Greens did very well to win 2 seats by a huge margin. An absolutely terrible night for the Conservatives in the Weymouth/Dorchester area, but actually a very good one in the North Dorset constituency (the Lib Dems notionally gained Cranborne and Alderholt on the Hampshire border, but only narrowly and the rest were equivalent to the 2017 county results with regards to who won. Blandford was narrowly gained by the Conservatives in the County elections and I was expecting the Lib Dems to win the identical 2 seat division, but the Conservatives won it by a very big margin). I'm aware of the Poole Harbour issue with the basemap I've used here. |
|
yorkshireluke
Lib Dem
I run @polmapsinfoUK, @YorkshireElects and /r/PoliticalMaps/
Posts: 775 
|
Post by yorkshireluke on May 20, 2019 21:45:22 GMT
Derby City Council, Derbyshire, East Midlands. NOC HOLD.
Map of results:
Map of full council after election:
|
|
yorkshireluke
Lib Dem
I run @polmapsinfoUK, @YorkshireElects and /r/PoliticalMaps/
Posts: 775
|
Post by yorkshireluke on May 20, 2019 23:44:41 GMT
Malvern Hills District Council, Worcestershire, West Midlands. Conservative LOSE to NOC.
|
|
|
|
Post by Delighted Of Tunbridge Wells on May 21, 2019 23:54:11 GMT
Not just B and W, you could argu ably put Coronation,Loddon,South Lake,Maiden Erleigh,Hillside,Hawkedon,Shinfield North and parts of Sonning Ward in Reading Borough. They all get served by Reading Buses,a lot describe themselves as living in Reading,go shopping in Reading town centre, work in Reading. The same goes for a large eastern swathe of West Berkshire. Personally I consider Woodley as a separate town, given that it has its own proper town centre and a fairly clear divide between it and Reading. It's more along the same lines as Winnersh—which is also in a continuous urban area with Reading, served by Reading buses, and has its citizens regularly shop/work in Reading—than places like Earley or Shinfield North (or Purley, western Tilehurst or Holybrook) in that respect. However I would draw the boundary through the allotments and the various fields and woods around Bulmershe that actually provide that divide (the railway and A3290 also provide more of a distinct boundary to the east of Earley station than to the west of it) rather than following the railway all the way up to the Kennet - a line that splits B&W neatly in two, while leaving the other three Woodley wards entirely on the Woodley side. Yes,but there are differences between Winnersh and Woodley,Winnersh people I feel look towards Wokingham and call themselves people who live in part of Wokingham or outside Reading. Winnersh is served by RB's long distance routes when Woodley are on RB's short distance,more frequent routes. |
|
|
|
Post by andrewteale on May 21, 2019 23:56:38 GMT
Gloucester 2016. C 22 Lab 10 LD 7. New ward boundaries.   Split wards in 2016 were: Barnwood: C/LD Barton and Tredworth: 2Lab/1C
|
|
yorkshireluke
Lib Dem
I run @polmapsinfoUK, @YorkshireElects and /r/PoliticalMaps/
Posts: 775
|
Post by yorkshireluke on May 22, 2019 22:09:40 GMT
Eden District Council, Cumbria, North West. Conservative LOSE to NOC.
|
|
|
|
Post by andrewteale on May 25, 2019 16:35:00 GMT
Dudley 2019. Changes based on 2015: C gain from Lab Brockmoor and Pensnett Lab gain from C Halesowen North   Dudley 2016 and 2018 are also on LEAP now. Split wards are (not taking account of by-elections or defections): Amblecote is 2C/1Lab and Labour are defending in 2020. Brockmoor and Pensnett is 2Lab/1C and Labour are defending in 2020. Halesowen North is 2Lab/1C and Labour are defending in 2020. Kingswinford North and Wall Heath is 2C/1Lab and Labour are defending in 2020. Upper Gornal and Woodsetton is 2Lab/1C and Labour are defending in 2020. Wordsley is 2C/1UKIP but the UKIP councillor has defected to the Conservatives and is up for re-election in 2020.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 25, 2019 20:17:39 GMT
|
|
|
|
Post by Pete Whitehead on May 25, 2019 20:22:02 GMT
You won the thread  |
|
|
|
Post by David Ashforth on May 25, 2019 20:34:25 GMT
This is the version in English. |
|
|
|
Post by bjornhattan on May 26, 2019 1:07:03 GMT
This is the version in English. Interestingly, several UK constituencies (including North East Fife, Kensington, Richmond Park, and Southampton Itchen) have stripes, indicating that the map thinks they were tied. The other point about the map is it makes me really wish we were more like France, at least in the level of detail of our election results. France (excluding big cities like Paris) is a beautiful tapestry of shades and colours, with real detail. Even if I am surprised at a few results, such as a city the size of Calais going for the former Front National. |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 26, 2019 1:20:29 GMT
This is the version in English. Interestingly, several UK constituencies (including North East Fife, Kensington, Richmond Park, and Southampton Itchen) have stripes, indicating that the map thinks they were tied. The other point about the map is it makes me really wish we were more like France, at least in the level of detail of our election results. France (excluding big cities like Paris) is a beautiful tapestry of shades and colours, with real detail. Even if I am surprised at a few results, such as a city the size of Calais going for the former Front National. I think it means that they were tied in terms of percentages? Personally, I wish we did what the Americans do and count votes and publish results by polling district. |
|
|
|
Post by bjornhattan on May 26, 2019 9:47:41 GMT
Interestingly, several UK constituencies (including North East Fife, Kensington, Richmond Park, and Southampton Itchen) have stripes, indicating that the map thinks they were tied. The other point about the map is it makes me really wish we were more like France, at least in the level of detail of our election results. France (excluding big cities like Paris) is a beautiful tapestry of shades and colours, with real detail. Even if I am surprised at a few results, such as a city the size of Calais going for the former Front National. I think it means that they were tied in terms of percentages? Personally, I wish we did what the Americans do and count votes and publish results by polling district. Yeah, it seems they only go to one decimal place of a percent. That is another downside of our system of counting: in a small European municipality one decimal place might represent one or two votes, whereas here, it could represent as many as 74 votes (if the Isle of Wight was a close race). |
|
|
|
Post by Pete Whitehead on May 26, 2019 9:54:07 GMT
I was thinking they had not updated the Finland map with the recent results with KESK ahead everywhere but it seems they've counted KOK as Liberals, which does not seem right
|
|
|
|
Post by syorkssocialist on May 28, 2019 15:11:19 GMT
Some of the boundaries are a mess because I had to draw them myself, but here is a map of the top party in each authority if LD + GRN + SNP + PLC + CHUK vote was combined as part of a Remain Alliance.
Yellow = Remain Alliance Blue = Brexit Party Red = Labour
|
|
|
|
Post by Pete Whitehead on May 28, 2019 16:44:43 GMT
Some of the boundaries are a mess because I had to draw them myself, but here is a map of the top party in each authority if LD + GRN + SNP + PLC + CHUK vote was combined as part of a Remain Alliance. Yellow = Remain Alliance Blue = Brexit Party Red = Labour
I don't really see what you're trying to prove with this. Well I do, obviously, but it's silly. If you're going to do this then at least be consistent. In Central Beds for example, yes your combination of parties outvotes the Brexit party by a fraction but then why would you not add the UKIP vote at least to that? BP+UKIP+ED erasily outvotes your 'Remain Alliance' there, likewise in Huntingdonshire and so on It's pretty obvious that anyone voting UKIP was voting in favour of Brexit. ON the other hand, hedgehog here can attest that not everyone who voted for the Green party was explicitly or even implicitly voting for Remain (i'm old enough to remember a time when the Greens were associated in the minds of most voters with concern about environemntal issues) |
|
|
|
Post by syorkssocialist on May 28, 2019 16:50:20 GMT
Some of the boundaries are a mess because I had to draw them myself, but here is a map of the top party in each authority if LD + GRN + SNP + PLC + CHUK vote was combined as part of a Remain Alliance. Yellow = Remain Alliance Blue = Brexit Party Red = Labour
I don't really see what you're trying to prove with this. Well I do, obviously, but it's silly. If you're going to do this then at least be consistent. In Central Beds for example, yes your combination of parties outvotes the Brexit party by a fraction but then why would you not add the UKIP vote at least to that? BP+UKIP+ED erasily outvotes your 'Remain Alliance' there, likewise in Huntingdonshire and so on It's pretty obvious that anyone voting UKIP was voting in favour of Brexit. ON the other hand, hedgehog here can attest that not everyone who voted for the Green party was explicitly or even implicitly voting for Remain (i'm old enough to remember a time when the Greens were associated in the minds of most voters with concern about environemntal issues) I'm not trying to prove anything, I'm not even a continuity Remainer - think I've made it clear enough that I'd prefer EFTA/EEA and did not vote for any of those parties at the election.
I simply wanted to see how many council areas a remain alliance between the five parties that explicitly support a second referendum might have topped the poll in.
|
|
