|
Post by Pete Whitehead on Aug 7, 2012 21:09:57 GMT
| 1991 | 1995 | 1999 | 2003 | 2007 | 2011 | South Yorkshire | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Adwick | Lab | Lab | Lab | Lab | Lab | Lab | Armthorpe | Lab | Lab | Lab | Lab | Ind | Lab | Askern | Lab | Lab | Lab | Lab | Lab | Lab | Barnsley North | Lab | Lab | Lab | Lab | Ind | Ind | Barnsley South | Lab | Lab | Lab | Lab | Lab | Lab | Bentley | Lab | Lab | Lab | Lab | Lab | Lab | Conisbrough | Lab | Lab | Lab | Lab | Lab | Lab | Cudworth | Lab | Lab | Lab | Lab | Lab | Lab | Darton | Lab | Lab | Lab | Lab | Lab | Lab | Dearne | Lab | Lab | Lab | Lab | Lab | Lab | Doncaster Bessacar | Con | Lab | Con | Con | LD | Con | Doncaster North | Lab | Lab | Lab | Lab | Lab | Lab | Doncaster West | Lab | Lab | Lab | Lab | Lab | Lab | Ecclesfield | LD | LD | LD | LD | LD | Lab | Hatfield | Lab | Lab | Lab | Cty | Cty | Lab | Kiveton | Lab | Lab | Lab | Lab | Lab | Lab | Maltby | Lab | Lab | Lab | Lab | Lab | Lab | Mexborough | Lab | Lab | Lab | Lab | Lab | Lab | Penistone | Lab | Lab | Lab | Lab | Con | Con | Rawmarsh | Lab | Lab | Lab | Lab | Lab | Lab | Rossington & Tickhill | Con | Lab | Con | Con | Con | Lab | Rotherham East | Lab | Lab | Lab | Lab | Lab | Lab | Rotherham West | Lab | Lab | Lab | Lab | Lab | Lab | Sheffield Attercliffe | Lab | Lab | Lab | Lab | Lab | Lab | Sheffield Beauchief | LD | LD | LD | LD | LD | LD | Sheffield Birley | Lab | Lab | Lab | Lab | Lab | Lab | Sheffield Brightside | Lab | Lab | Lab | Lab | Lab | Lab | Sheffield Broomhill | Lab | Lab | LD | LD | LD | Lab | Sheffield Ecclesall | Con | LD | LD | LD | LD | LD | Sheffield Gleadless | Lab | Lab | LD | Lab | Lab | Lab | Sheffield Hallam | Con | LD | LD | LD | LD | LD | Sheffield Hillsborough | Lab | Lab | LD | Lab | Lab | Lab | Sheffield Mosborough | Lab | Lab | Lab | Lab | Lab | Lab | Sheffield Neepsend | Lab | Lab | LD | LD | Lab | Lab | Sheffield Park | Lab | Lab | Lab | Lab | Lab | Lab | Stocksbridge | Lab | LD | LD | LD | LD | Lab | Wath | Lab | Lab | Lab | Lab | Lab | Lab | Wickersley | Lab | Lab | Lab | Lab | Con | Lab | Wombwell | Lab | Lab | Lab | Lab | Lab | Lab | | | | | | | | East Yorkshire | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Beverley | Con | Lab | Lab | Lab | Con | Con | Bridlington | Con | Lab | Lab | Con | Con | Con | Cottingham | Con | LD | Con | LD | Con | Con | Driffield | Ind | Lab | Con | Con | Con | Con | Goole | Lab | Lab | Lab | Lab | Lab | Lab | Haltemprice | LD | LD | LD | LD | LD | Con | Hornsea | Ind | LD | Con | LD | Con | Con | Howden | Con | Con | LD | Con | Con | Con | Hull Beverley | Lab | Lab | Lab | Lab | LD | Lab | Hull Boothferry | Lab | Lab | Lab | Lab | LD | Lab | Hull Bransholme | Lab | Lab | Lab | Lab | LD | Lab | Hull Holderness | Lab | Lab | Lab | Lab | LD | Lab | Hull Newland | Lab | Lab | Lab | LD | LD | Lab | Hull Southcoates | Lab | Lab | Lab | Lab | Lab | Lab | Hull St Andrews | Lab | Lab | Lab | Lab | Lab | Lab | Hull Sutton | Lab | Lab | Lab | Lab | LD | Lab | Pocklington | Ind | Con | Con | Con | Con | Con | Skidby | Con | LD | Con | Con | Con | Con | Withernsea | Ind | Lab | Ind | Ind | Con | Con | | | | | | | | North Yorkshire | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Derwent | Ind | Lab | Lab | LD | Con | Con | Harrogate East | LD | LD | LD | LD | LD | LD | Harrogate West | Con | LD | LD | Con | Con | Con | Haxby | LD | LD | LD | LD | LD | Con | Knaresborough | Con | LD | LD | Con | Con | Con | Malton | Ind | Ind | Con | Con | Con | Con | New Earswick | LD | LD | LD | LD | LD | LD | Nidderdale | Con | LD | Con | Con | Con | Con | Northallerton | Ind | Con | Con | Con | Con | Con | Norton & Filey | Ind | Con | Con | Con | Con | Con | Osgoldcross | Lab | Lab | Lab | Con | Con | Con | Pickering | Ind | Ind | LD | Con | Con | Con | Richmond | Ind | LD | LD | Con | LD | Ind | Ripon | Con | LD | Con | Con | Con | Con | Scarborough North | LD | Lab | Con | Ind | Ind | Ind | Scarborough South | Lab | Lab | Con | Con | Con | Ind | Selby | Lab | Lab | Lab | Con | Con | Con | Settle | LD | LD | Con | Con | Con | Con | Skipton | Con | Con | Con | Con | Con | Con | Stokesley | Con | Con | Con | Con | Con | Con | Swaledale | Ind | Ind | Con | Con | Ind | Con | Tadcaster | Con | Con | LD | Con | Con | Con | Thirsk | Ind | Con | Con | Con | Con | Con | Whitby | Ind | Con | Con | Con | Con | Con | York Central | Lab | Lab | Lab | Lab | Lab | Lab | York East | Lab | Lab | Lab | Lab | Lab | Lab | York West | Lab | Lab | LD | LD | LD | Lab | | | | | | | | West Yorkshire | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Baildon | Con | LD | LD | LD | LD | Con | Batley | Lab | Lab | Lab | LD | Lab | Lab | Bingley | Con | Lab | Con | Con | Con | Con | Bradford Clayton | Con | Lab | Con | Con | Con | Lab | Bradford Heaton | Lab | Lab | Lab | Lab | Lab | Lab | Bradford Horton | Lab | Lab | Lab | Lab | Lab | Lab | Bradford Manningham | Lab | Lab | Lab | Lab | Lab | Lab | Bradford Moor | Lab | Lab | Lab | LD | LD | Lab | Bradford Tong | Lab | Lab | Lab | Lab | Lab | Lab | Bradford Undercliffe | Con | Lab | LD | LD | LD | LD | Bradford Wibsey | Lab | Lab | Lab | Lab | Lab | Lab | Brighouse | Con | Lab | Con | Con | Con | Con | Castleford | Lab | Lab | Lab | Lab | Lab | Lab | Colne Valley | LD | Lab | LD | LD | LD | Lab | Denby Dale | Lab | Lab | Lab | Lab | Con | Con | Dewsbury East | Lab | Lab | Lab | Lab | Lab | Lab | Dewsbury West | Lab | Lab | Lab | Lab | Lab | Lab | Elland | Lab | Lab | Con | LD | Con | Con | Elmsall | Lab | Lab | Lab | Lab | Ind | Lab | Halifax North | Lab | Lab | Lab | Lab | Lab | Lab | Halifax South | Con | Lab | Con | Lab | Lab | Lab | Haworth | Con | Lab | Lab | Con | Con | Lab | Hemsworth | Lab | Lab | Lab | Lab | Lab | Lab | Holmfirth | Con | Lab | Con | Con | Con | Con | Huddersfield East | Lab | Lab | Lab | Lab | Lab | Lab | Huddersfield South | Lab | Lab | Lab | Grn | Lab | Lab | Huddersfield West | Con | Lab | LD | LD | Lab | Lab | Ilkley | Con | Con | Con | Con | Con | Con | Keighley | Lab | Lab | Lab | Lab | Con | Lab | Kirkburton | Con | Lab | LD | Con | Con | Con | Knottingley | Lab | Lab | Lab | Lab | Lab | Lab | Leeds Armley | Lab | Lab | Lab | Lab | Lab | Lab | Leeds Harehills | Lab | Lab | Lab | Lab | Lab | Lab | Leeds Headingley | Lab | Lab | Lab | LD | LD | Lab | Leeds Hunslet | Lab | Lab | Lab | Lab | Lab | Lab | Leeds Moortown | Con | Lab | Lab | LD | LD | Lab | Leeds Seacroft | Lab | Lab | Lab | Lab | Lab | Lab | Mirfield | Con | Lab | Lab | Con | Con | Con | Morley | Lab | Lab | Lab | Lab | MBI | Lab | Normanton | Lab | Lab | Lab | Lab | Lab | Lab | Ossett | Lab | Lab | Lab | Lab | Con | Lab | Otley | Con | Lab | Con | Con | Con | Con | Pontefract | Lab | Lab | Lab | Lab | Con | Lab | Pudsey | Con | Lab | Con | Con | Con | Lab | Rothwell | Lab | Lab | Lab | Lab | Lab | Lab | Shipley | Lab | Lab | Lab | Grn | Grn | Lab | Sowerby | Con | Lab | Con | LD | Con | Con | Spenborough | Con | Lab | Lab | Con | Con | Con | Stanley | Lab | Lab | Lab | Lab | Lab | Lab | Thornton | Con | Lab | Con | Con | Con | Con | Todmorden | Lab | Lab | LD | LD | LD | Lab | Wakefield East | Lab | Lab | Con | Con | Con | Lab | Wakefield West | Lab | Lab | Lab | Lab | Con | Lab | Wetherby | Con | Con | Con | Con | Con | Con |
|
|
|
Post by Pete Whitehead on Sept 16, 2012 10:23:00 GMT
Essex-East Anglia 2011 | | | Change | seats | change | Con | 565990 | 43.9% | -2.4 | 112 | -9 | Lab | 291255 | 22.6% | +7.3 | 25 | +13 | LD | 208775 | 16.2% | -6.3 | 8 | -5 | Ind | 90732 | 7.0% | +0.3 | 4 | +1 | Grn | 66316 | 5.1% | +1.1 | 1 | | UKIP | 46296 | 3.6% | +2.2 | | | Oth | 21136 | 1.6% | -2.1 | | |
Lab Gain from Con Basildon East Basildon West Cambridge South Great Yarmouth North Harlow West Ipswich South West Kings Lynn Lowestoft West Ockendon Peterborough North Lab Gain from LD Cambridge North Colchester South Norwich South Con Gain from LD Chelmsford West Fakenham Samford Southend Westborough Taverham Con Gain from Ind Frinton & Walton Ind Gain from Con Southend Shoebury Southend Southchurch LD Gain from Con Brentwood Coltishall Ely The LDs appear to have held onto their (admittedly lower) base better her than in the other regions so far examined. They did duly lose more than half the seats they were defending but unusually were able to partly offset this with a few gains from the Conservatives (in all of the other three regions previously posted the LDs gained a single seat (Appleby) whereas here they gained three). This does though rather reflect the extent to which they were already close to their core here. Labour, also reduced to their core by 2007 made a semi-decent recovery. They did well in the larger towns especially Cambridge and Ipswich and made a decent recovery in seats in South Essex and in the ports (though Harwich which required only a small swing to gain actually swung slightly to the Conservatives). They continued to underperform in Peterborough (Their one gain there being somewhat of a fluke*) and notably in the smaller overspill towns which they used to be able to count on - Braintree/Bocking., Witham, Sudbury, Haverhill, Thetford. The Conservatives despite dropping 9 seats net remain in control of three-quarters of the total - a higher share than in neighbouring Thames-Chiltern though with a lower share of the popular vote * They won this seat with 23.9% of the vote, by far their lowest of the five urban Peterborough seats and the four wards which make up the division were won by four different parties, none of which was Labour
|
|
|
Post by Pete Whitehead on Sept 16, 2012 10:25:17 GMT
|
|
|
Post by Pete Whitehead on Sept 16, 2012 16:07:20 GMT
2007 | | | Change | seats | change | Con | 496711 | 46.3% | +4.1 | 121 | +16 | LD | 241477 | 22.5% | -2.6 | 13 | -11 | Lab | 163854 | 15.3% | -4.3 | 12 | -6 | Ind | 72161 | 6.7% | -1.4 | 3 | +1 | Grn | 42565 | 4.0% | +0.8 | 1 | +1 | BNP | 20137 | 1.9% | +1.5 | | | UKIP | 15210 | 1.4% | +1.1 | | | Oth | 19960 | 1.9% | +0.8 | | -1 |
|
|
|
Post by Pete Whitehead on Sept 16, 2012 16:56:50 GMT
2003 | | | Change | seats | change | Con | 408035 | 42.2% | +3.3 | 105 | +27 | LD | 242565 | 25.1% | +2.5 | 24 | -2 | Lab | 190059 | 19.6% | -10.3 | 18 | -24 | Ind | 77961 | 8.1% | +0.5 | 2 | -2 | Grn | 31150 | 3.2% | +2.4 | | | Oth | 17798 | 1.8% | +1.7 | 1 | +1 |
'Other' is Liberal in Peterborough North
|
|
|
Post by Pete Whitehead on Sept 16, 2012 17:00:17 GMT
1999 | | | Change | seats | change | Con | 355501 | 38.9% | +10.7 | 78 | +50 | Lab | 273912 | 29.9% | -9.7 | 42 | -44 | LD | 206751 | 22.6% | -1.2 | 26 | -5 | Ind | 69832 | 7.6% | +0.1 | 4 | -1 | Grn | 7586 | 0.8% | +0.2 | | | Oth | 1323 | 0.1% | -0.2 | | |
|
|
|
Post by Pete Whitehead on Sept 16, 2012 17:03:17 GMT
1995 | | | Change | seats | change | Lab | 435974 | 39.6% | +11.3 | 86 | +49 | Con | 309870 | 28.2% | -11.3 | 28 | -56 | LD | 261700 | 23.8% | +2.3 | 31 | +11 | Ind | 82866 | 7.5% | -1.4 | 5 | -4 | Grn | 6346 | 0.6% | -0.7 | | | Oth | 2981 | 0.3% | -0.3 | | |
|
|
|
Post by Pete Whitehead on Sept 16, 2012 17:05:21 GMT
1991 | | | seats | Con | 460570 | 39.5% | 84 | Lab | 329204 | 28.3% | 37 | LD | 250426 | 21.5% | 20 | Ind | 103937 | 8.9% | 9 | Grn | 14577 | 1.3% | | Oth | 6490 | 0.6% | |
|
|
|
Post by Pete Whitehead on Sept 16, 2012 17:17:22 GMT
| Con | Lab | LD | Ind | Grn | Oth | seats | Con | Lab | LD | Ind | Grn | Oth | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 1991 | 39.5% | 28.3% | 21.5% | 8.9% | 1.3% | 0.6% | | 84 | 37 | 20 | 9 | | | 1995 | 28.2% | 39.6% | 23.8% | 7.5% | 0.6% | 0.3% | | 28 | 86 | 31 | 5 | | | 1999 | 38.9% | 29.9% | 22.6% | 7.6% | 0.8% | 0.1% | | 78 | 42 | 26 | 4 | | | 2003 | 42.2% | 19.6% | 25.1% | 8.1% | 3.2% | 1.8% | | 105 | 18 | 24 | 2 | | 1 | 2007 | 46.3% | 15.3% | 22.5% | 6.7% | 4.0% | 5.2% | | 121 | 12 | 13 | 3 | 1 | | 2011 | 43.9% | 22.6% | 16.2% | 7.0% | 5.1% | 5.2% | | 112 | 25 | 8 | 4 | 1 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| 1991 | 1995 | 1999 | 2003 | 2007 | 2011 | Cambridgeshire | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Barton | Con | LD | LD | LD | Con | Con | Brampton | Con | Con | Con | Con | Con | Con | Cambridge East | Lab | Lab | Lab | Lab | Lab | Lab | Cambridge North | Lab | Lab | Lab | LD | LD | Lab | Cambridge South | Lab | Lab | Con | LD | Con | Lab | Cambridge West | LD | LD | LD | LD | LD | LD | Chatteris | Con | Ind | Ind | Con | Con | Con | Ely | Ind | LD | LD | Con | Con | LD | Fletton | Lab | Lab | Lab | Con | Con | Con | Fulbourn | Con | LD | LD | Con | Con | Con | Histon | Con | Lab | Con | Con | Con | Con | Huntingdon & Godmanchester | Con | Con | Con | Con | Con | Con | March | Con | Lab | Con | Con | Con | Con | Melbourn | Ind | Con | Ind | LD | Con | Con | Orton | Con | Lab | Con | Con | Con | Con | Papworth | Ind | Con | Con | Con | Con | Con | Peterborough East | Con | Lab | Con | Con | Con | Con | Peterborough North | Con | Lab | LD | Lib | Con | Lab | Peterborough West | Con | Lab | Con | Con | Con | Con | Ramsey | Con | Con | Con | Con | Con | Con | Sawston | Con | Con | Con | Con | Con | Con | Soham | Ind | Ind | LD | LD | Con | Con | St Ives | Con | Con | Con | Con | Con | Con | St Neots | Con | LD | Con | Con | Con | Con | Werrington | Con | Con | Con | Con | Con | Con | Whittlesey | Con | Con | Con | Con | Con | Con | Wisbech | Con | Lab | Con | Con | Con | Con | Yaxley | Con | Con | Con | Con | Con | Con | | | | | | | | Suffolk | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Aldeburgh | Con | Con | Con | Con | Con | Con | Beccles | Lab | Lab | Lab | Con | Con | Con | Bury St Edmunds | Lab | Lab | Con | Con | Con | Con | Clare | Con | Con | Con | Con | Con | Con | Eye | Con | Lab | Con | Con | Con | Con | Felixstowe | Con | Lab | Con | Con | Con | Con | Gipping | Con | LD | Con | Con | Con | Con | Hadleigh (Suffolk) | Con | Ind | Ind | Con | Con | Con | Haverhill | Lab | Lab | Lab | Lab | Con | Con | Ipswich Central | Lab | Lab | Lab | Lab | Lab | Lab | Ipswich East | Con | Lab | Con | Con | Con | Con | Ipswich North | Con | Lab | Lab | Con | Con | Con | Ipswich SE | Lab | Lab | Lab | Con | Lab | Lab | Ipswich SW | Lab | Lab | Lab | Con | Con | Lab | Kesgrave | Con | Lab | Con | Con | Con | Con | Lothingland | Con | Lab | Lab | Con | Con | Con | Lowestoft East | Lab | Lab | Lab | Lab | Lab | Lab | Lowestoft West | Lab | Lab | Lab | Con | Con | Lab | Mildenhall | Ind | Con | Con | Con | Con | Con | Newmarket | Con | Con | Con | Con | Con | Con | Samford | Ind | Ind | LD | LD | LD | Con | Southwold | Con | Lab | Con | Con | Con | Con | Stowmarket | Lab | Lab | Lab | Con | Con | Con | Sudbury | Lab | Lab | Con | Con | Con | Con | Thedwastre | Con | Lab | Con | Con | Con | Con | Thingoe | Con | Con | Con | Con | Con | Con | Woodbridge | Con | LD | Con | Con | Con | Con | | | | | | | | Norfolk | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Acle | Con | Lab | Con | Con | Con | Con | Attleborough | Con | Con | Con | Con | Con | Con | Aylsham | Con | Lab | Con | Con | Con | Con | Bradwell | Con | Lab | Con | Con | Con | Con | Coltishall | Con | Lab | Con | Con | Con | LD | Cromer & Sheringham | Con | LD | LD | Con | Con | Con | Dereham | Con | Lab | Con | Con | Con | Con | Diss | Con | LD | Con | Con | Con | Con | Downham Market | Con | Lab | Con | Con | Con | Con | Fakenham | Con | Lab | Con | LD | LD | Con | Flegg | Con | Con | Con | Con | Con | Con | Freebridge Lynn | Con | Lab | Con | Con | Con | Con | Harleston | LD | LD | LD | LD | Con | Con | Hethersett | Con | LD | LD | LD | Con | Con | Hunstanton | Con | Lab | Con | Con | Con | Con | Kings Lynn | Lab | Lab | Lab | Lab | Con | Lab | Launditch | Ind | Lab | Con | Con | Con | Con | Loddon | Con | LD | Con | Con | Con | Con | Marshland | Con | Lab | Con | Con | Con | Con | North Walsham | Con | Lab | LD | LD | LD | LD | Norwich Central | Lab | Lab | Lab | LD | Grn | Grn | Norwich East | Lab | Lab | Lab | Lab | Lab | Lab | Norwich North | Con | Lab | Con | Con | Con | Con | Norwich South | Lab | Lab | LD | LD | LD | Lab | Norwich West | Lab | Lab | Lab | Lab | Lab | Lab | Sprowston | Con | Lab | Con | Con | Con | Con | Swaffham | Ind | Con | Con | Con | Con | Con | Taverham | LD | LD | Con | Con | LD | Con | Thetford | Lab | Lab | Lab | Con | Con | Con | Wymondham | LD | LD | Con | Con | Con | Con | Yarmouth North | Lab | Lab | Con | Lab | Con | Lab | Yarmouth South | Lab | Lab | Lab | Lab | Lab | Lab | | | | | | | | Essex | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Basildon East | Lab | Lab | Lab | Lab | Con | Lab | Basildon North | Lab | Lab | Lab | Lab | Lab | Lab | Basildon West | Con | Lab | Lab | Con | Con | Lab | Benfleet | Con | Lab | Lab | Con | Con | Con | Billericay | Con | LD | Con | Con | Con | Con | Bocking | Lab | Lab | Lab | Lab | Con | Con | Braintree | LD | Lab | Lab | Con | Con | Con | Brentwood | LD | LD | LD | LD | Con | LD | Brightlingsea & Wivenhoe | LD | Lab | Lab | LD | Con | Con | Burnham on Crouch | Ind | Con | Con | Con | Con | Con | Canvey Island | Con | Lab | Lab | Con | Ind | Ind | Chafford | Lab | Lab | Lab | Con | Con | Con | Chelmsford East | Con | LD | LD | Con | Con | Con | Chelmsford North | LD | Lab | Lab | LD | LD | LD | Chelmsford West | LD | LD | LD | LD | LD | Con | Chigwell | Con | LD | LD | LD | Con | Con | Chipping Ongar | Con | LD | LD | LD | Con | Con | Clacton East | LD | Lab | Ind | Con | Con | Con | Clacton west | LD | Lab | Lab | LD | Con | Con | Coggeshall | Con | Lab | Lab | Con | Con | Con | Colchester East | LD | Lab | LD | LD | LD | LD | Colchester North | LD | Lab | LD | LD | LD | LD | Colchester South | LD | Lab | LD | LD | LD | Lab | Colchester West | LD | LD | LD | Con | Con | Con | Corringham | Lab | Lab | Lab | Con | Con | Con | Epping | Con | Ind | Con | Con | Con | Con | Fordham & Manningtree | Con | Con | Con | Con | Con | Con | Frinton & Walton | Con | Con | Con | Con | Ind | Con | Grays | Con | Lab | Lab | Con | Lab | Lab | Great Baddow | LD | LD | LD | LD | Con | Con | Great Dunmow | Con | LD | LD | Con | Con | Con | Hadleigh (Essex) | Con | Lab | Con | Con | Con | Con | Halstead | Con | Lab | Con | Con | Con | Con | Hanningfield | Con | Con | Con | Con | Con | Con | Harlow East | Lab | Lab | Lab | Con | Con | Con | Harlow North | Lab | Lab | Lab | Lab | Lab | Lab | Harlow West | Lab | Lab | Lab | Lab | Con | Lab | Harwich | Lab | Lab | Lab | Lab | Con | Con | Hockley | Con | Lab | Con | Con | Con | Con | Hutton | LD | LD | Con | Con | Con | Con | Laindon | Con | Lab | Con | Con | Con | Con | Loughton | Lab | Lab | Lab | Ind | Ind | Ind | Maldon | LD | Lab | Con | Con | Con | Con | Mersea & Winstree | Con | Con | Con | Con | Con | Con | Ockendon | Lab | Lab | Lab | Con | Con | Lab | Orsett | Con | Con | Con | Con | Con | Con | Rayleigh | LD | LD | LD | Con | Con | Con | Rochford | Con | Lab | Con | Con | Con | Con | Saffron Walden | Con | LD | LD | LD | Con | Con | South Woodham ferrers | Con | Con | Con | Con | Con | Con | Southend Belfairs | Con | LD | Con | Con | Con | Con | Southend Leigh | Con | LD | Con | Con | Con | Con | Southend Shoeburyness | Con | Con | Con | Con | Con | Ind | Southend Southchurch | Con | Lab | Con | Con | Con | Ind | Southend Victoria | Lab | Lab | Lab | Lab | Lab | Lab | Southend Westborough | LD | LD | LD | LD | LD | Con | Stansted | Con | LD | Con | Con | Con | Con | Thaxted | Con | Con | Con | Con | Con | Con | Tilbury | Lab | Lab | Lab | Ind | Lab | Lab | Tiptree | Con | Con | Con | Con | Con | Con | Waltham Abbey | Lab | Lab | Con | Con | Con | Con | Wickford | Con | LD | Con | Con | Con | Con | Witham | Lab | Lab | Lab | Lab | Con | Con |
|
|
|
Post by Pete Whitehead on Sept 16, 2012 18:03:57 GMT
I've just realised that the time I spent living in this region almost exactly corresponded to the period of Labour control between 1995 adn 1999
|
|
Khunanup
Lib Dem
Portsmouth Liberal Democrats
Posts: 12,014
|
Post by Khunanup on Sept 16, 2012 18:12:46 GMT
That Labour performance in North Norfolk is just mind blowing in '95. One of those places that has changed politically beyond all recognition. The last hurrah for them there I suppose.
|
|
The Bishop
Labour
Down With Factionalism!
Posts: 38,931
|
Post by The Bishop on Sept 16, 2012 18:27:32 GMT
The contrast between the Labour performance in 1995 and *all* other years is pretty amazing, actually.
Has been postulated as the last gasp of their old E Anglian rural vote......
|
|
Khunanup
Lib Dem
Portsmouth Liberal Democrats
Posts: 12,014
|
Post by Khunanup on Sept 16, 2012 20:38:18 GMT
The contrast between the Labour performance in 1995 and *all* other years is pretty amazing, actually. Has been postulated as the last gasp of their old E Anglian rural vote...... I think part of the problem is that we probably didn't have to work very hard for those gains - they fell into our laps because the Tories were extraordinarily unpopular at the time. So there wouldn't have been much local organisation to sustain them in a more challenging political environment once we were in government. Also, I think we generally failed to connect with voters in rural areas when we were in power, even where the demographic was potentially favourable to us. We were seen as very metropolitan-focused, and were hit by issues like petrol prices and post office closures. Plus in many of those places we moved onto your turf to such an extent that your organisation there collapsed. I would consider as well that that chance was in some places a logical one because the nature of our party 'fits' non Tory rural voters better than yours (especially with the demographic change that Bish alluded to above). Your natural centralising instinct and rigid party structure probably didn't help either. That's not to say you can't do well in some of these places during a general election (after all, as you say there are plenty of potential voters receptive to your messages regardless of where they live) but it's unlikely you'll get the organisation to have a real impact consistantly unless you start to do things a bit differently.
|
|
|
Post by East Anglian Lefty on Sept 17, 2012 15:12:12 GMT
Thanks Pete. Very interesting, and the boundaries look sensible to me. There are one or two seats I might put together differently but I think that's primarily a matter of individual taste, and most seats will draw themselves.
What was your target size for seats and how much of a difference would that make towards totals? My impression is that the Tories would have weathered 1995 better with smaller seats, but in other years they'd have helped smaller parties.
|
|
|
Post by Pete Whitehead on Sept 17, 2012 17:43:57 GMT
The kind of electorate I'm looking for is around 20,000 but I have further constrained myself by insisting I have a round number of seats in each region, therefore the regions of Essex-East Anglia, Thames Chiltern and Sussex-Kent each have 150 seats which equates to average electorates of c. 20,000, 18,000 and 22,000 respectively. Larger regions obviously get more seats so for example the North West has 250 (average 21,000) - Yorkshire should have qualified for 200 seats (as the East and West Midlands do) but I went for 150 because of the difficulties otherwise presented by ward sizes and so has a larger average of around 24,000. Only Devon & Cornwall massively deviates from this average because it is a small region and I didn;t want to have fewer than 100 seats. Within regions I have allowed myself a certain leeway in order to respect natural comunities. At the most extreme, Kings Lynn has an electorate of 26,000 (compare with Maldon 17,000). Canvey Island is almost 27,000 but as with Isle of Wight it seems better to have an oversized seat than to break it up and link parts with the mainland. The vast majority of seats though don't deviate by much more than about 10% from the quota in each region
|
|
baloo
Conservative
Posts: 760
|
Post by baloo on Sept 17, 2012 18:35:00 GMT
Wow Pete, just discovered this and it's incredible! Just one question, what is it? I can't find an explantion in the thread.
|
|
|
Post by Pete Whitehead on Sept 17, 2012 18:47:19 GMT
Its kind of fantasy elections based on fantasy regional assemblies. I've drawn up FPTP seats for each region of England and calculated what the results would have been every four years since 1991 based on the local elections from those years. I've picked the cycle of seats which last voted in 2011 for the obvious reason that this is the only time that a large number of districts vote. For those wards which don't have elections those years (a fair number in the non-met districts) I've used figures for 2012 (2008, 2004 etc) and in some cases the earlier year (2006, 2002 etc)
|
|
baloo
Conservative
Posts: 760
|
Post by baloo on Sept 17, 2012 18:56:28 GMT
Impressive. Most impressive. Your Merseyside boundaries look very reasonable. How do you draw the maps? I've drawn a map of Liverpool's wards on Excel that looks like it was done by a six year old.
|
|
|
Post by Pete Whitehead on Sept 17, 2012 19:34:52 GMT
|
|
baloo
Conservative
Posts: 760
|
Post by baloo on Sept 17, 2012 21:29:16 GMT
Thanks Pete
|
|