|
Post by Pete Whitehead on Jan 10, 2013 11:21:26 GMT
|
|
|
Post by Philip Davies on Jan 10, 2013 11:49:11 GMT
What is the seat called between Southall East and the two Ealings? Ealing West?
|
|
|
Post by Pete Whitehead on Jan 10, 2013 11:49:59 GMT
That is Hanwell. I always seem to manage to miss one off the map
|
|
|
Post by iainbhx on Jan 10, 2013 11:59:39 GMT
Awesome stuff, Pete. Have an exalt.
|
|
|
Post by erlend on Jan 10, 2013 13:15:49 GMT
Impressive.
Is there a name missing in a West Hampstead seat? Do you have seats crossing Watling Street breaching Borough boundaries, such as Kilburn and hendon South. I thought you would disapprove of that! I might have done but am less pure on such things!
|
|
|
Post by Pete Whitehead on Jan 10, 2013 13:23:12 GMT
Impressive. Is there a name missing in a West Hampstead seat? Do you have seats crossing Watling Street breaching Borough boundaries, such as Kilburn and hendon South. I thought you would disapprove of that! I might have done but am less pure on such things! Yes the name missing from the West Hampstead seat is West Hampstead There are five seats that cross borough boundaries. It is not necessarily ideal (especially as in most cases they also cross the old LCC boundary) but was partly done for reaons of electoral equality (some boroughs with odd numbers of wards made it difficult to draw seats wholly within them). More often however the reason was because natural communities cross borough boundaries The five cross borough seats are Kilburn (Brent/Camden) Highgate (Camden/Haringey) Shoreditch (Hackney/Tower Hamlets) Mottingham (Greenwich/Bromley) Thamesmead (Greenwich/Bexley)
|
|
|
Post by erlend on Jan 10, 2013 13:27:21 GMT
That Highgate would be Camden Islingto I guess or is it Camden Haringry?
|
|
cibwr
Plaid Cymru
Posts: 3,589
|
Post by cibwr on Jan 10, 2013 17:48:51 GMT
Awesome stuff, Pete. Have an exalt. Seconded!
|
|
johnloony
Conservative
Posts: 24,566
Member is Online
|
Post by johnloony on Jan 11, 2013 3:58:05 GMT
If i were pedantic and squaggulous, would disagree with many (or even most) of the boundaries (i.e. ward pairings) in Croydon, but otherwise awesome and amazing and et cetera as usual
|
|
|
Post by Pete Whitehead on Jan 11, 2013 8:38:52 GMT
If i were pedantic and squaggulous You are so feel free to give me your suggestions. I probably won't change anything at this stage because its a faff changing all the maps, but there were a number of different alternatives in Croydon and I'm happy to hear which of these you think would be better
|
|
|
Post by erlend on Jan 11, 2013 8:44:01 GMT
Having done the odd piece of questioning yesterday I just realised I hadn't exalted Pete for his next thrilling installment. Have now done so!!!
|
|
johnloony
Conservative
Posts: 24,566
Member is Online
|
Post by johnloony on Jan 11, 2013 9:20:36 GMT
If i were pedantic and squaggulous You are so feel free to give me your suggestions. I probably won't change anything at this stage because its a faff changing all the maps, but there were a number of different alternatives in Croydon and I'm happy to hear which of these you think would be better Coulsdon is OK. Next: Purley should be paired with Kenley, which is a sort-of extension of Purley along the valley between the hill ridges. Next: Croham and Sanderstead (for the same reason). Then: Croydon Central needs no change Then: The outer ring of Croydon North needs to be shifted round, so that: (a) Selhurst is paired with South Norwood*; (b) Upper Norwood is paired with Norbury*; (c) West Thornton is paired with Broad Green**. * both having "Norwood" in the name doesn't mean they are like a continuing community: there is a cultural boundary between them ** they are culturally & ehtnically similar and are joined along the London Road which goes north-south. Specifically, Broad Green and West Thornton are predominantly slightly more Asian than average, whereas Bensham Manor and Thornton Heath are predominantly slightly more Black than average. --------- OR --------- Purley and Kenley Sanderstead and Selsdon & Ballards (they used to be in the same ward decades ago) Heathfield and Shirley (there is more of a continuum from Shirley to Heathfield than there is from Shirley to Ashburton) Ashburton and Addiscombe (Ashburton is a sort-of eastern extension of Addiscombe) Fairfield and Croham (joined along the Brighton Road) Waddon and Broad Green (they used to be paired in the Neighbourhood Partnership system) Woodside and South Norwood (there is more continuity between SN and W. than there is between SN and UN) Selhurst and Thornton Heath Bensham Manor and West Thornton* Upper Norwood and Norbury * both are separated from Thornton Heath ward by the railway. -------------------- On balance, my first list is probably slightly less sguaggulous and combobulatory than the second. The second list would be better for Croydon Central, and the first list would be better for Croydon North - but of course they are mutually exclusive.
|
|
|
Post by Pete Whitehead on Jan 11, 2013 19:08:19 GMT
2006 | | | Change | seats | change | Con | 743945 | 34.9% | +0.8 | 118 | +29 | Lab | 592790 | 27.8% | -6.2 | 91 | -32 | LD | 442041 | 20.7% | +0.1 | 35 | | Grn | 165439 | 7.8% | +2.3 | 1 | +1 | Ind | 42505 | 2.0% | +0.7 | | | Resp | 37097 | 1.7% | +1.7 | 1 | +1 | Res | 23812 | 1.1% | -0.4 | 2 | -1 | BNP | 22085 | 1.0% | +0.7 | 1 | +1 | UKIP | 21038 | 1.0% | +0.5 | | | Oth | 40830 | 1.9% | -0.4 | 1 | +1 |
|
|
|
Post by Pete Whitehead on Jan 14, 2013 11:39:15 GMT
2002 | | | Change | seats | change | Con | 584832 | 34.1% | +1.9 | 89 | +17 | Lab | 582779 | 34.0% | -6.6 | 123 | -21 | LD | 353541 | 20.6% | -0.3 | 35 | +2 | Grn | 94598 | 5.5% | +2.6 | | | Res | 25489 | 1.5% | +0.2 | 3 | +2 | Ind | 21670 | 1.3% | +0.1 | | | Oth | 53119 | 3.1% | +2.1 | | |
|
|
Richard Allen
Banned
Four time loser in VUKPOTY finals
Posts: 19,052
|
Post by Richard Allen on Jan 14, 2013 12:31:54 GMT
Big time "wrong winner result" in 2002. How about a Con/LD/Res administration.
|
|
|
Post by Pete Whitehead on Jan 24, 2013 10:58:00 GMT
1998 | | | Change | seats | change | Lab | 701697 | 40.6% | -0.7 | 144 | +2 | Con | 556483 | 32.2% | +1.0 | 72 | -1 | LD | 361231 | 20.9% | -1.4 | 33 | -1 | Grn | 50575 | 2.9% | +0.7 | | | Res | 22437 | 1.3% | +0.2 | 1 | | Ind | 19979 | 1.2% | +/-0.0 | | | Oth | 17582 | 1.0% | +0.4 | | |
|
|
The Bishop
Labour
Down With Factionalism!
Posts: 38,931
|
Post by The Bishop on Jan 24, 2013 12:28:55 GMT
I had a feeling 1994 and 1998 might be similar, but not *that* much!!
|
|
|
Post by Pete Whitehead on Jan 24, 2013 14:26:25 GMT
Similar in total numbers of seats, but there's quite a number switching hands in various directions
|
|
|
Post by Pete Whitehead on Jan 29, 2013 21:48:01 GMT
So.. spot the difference 1994 | | | Change | seats | change | Lab | 913463 | 41.3% | +2.7 | 142 | +16 | Con | 691183 | 31.2% | -6.7 | 73 | -31 | LD | 494358 | 22.3% | +8.1 | 34 | +15 | Grn | 49437 | 2.2% | -3.6 | | | Ind | 26026 | 1.2% | +0.5 | | | Res | 24733 | 1.1% | -0.4 | 1 | | Oth | 13474 | 0.6% | -0.7 | | |
|
|
|
Post by Pete Whitehead on Feb 3, 2013 0:26:27 GMT
Another loose end to be tied 1990 | | | seats | Lab | 926011 | 38.6% | 126 | Con | 907789 | 37.9% | 104 | LD | 340487 | 14.2% | 19 | Grn | 138886 | 5.8% | | Res | 35440 | 1.5% | 1 | Ind | 17161 | 0.7% | | Oth | 30735 | 1.3% | |
|
|