Sibboleth
Labour
'Sit on my finger, sing in my ear, O littleblood.'
Posts: 16,044
|
Post by Sibboleth on Aug 5, 2013 15:20:22 GMT
Thinking about this, wasn't it something more like 'but intellectually they are scum'? I'm fairly sure there was another word anyway even if it wasn't 'intellectually'. But the basic tone was the same.
|
|
|
Post by Pete Whitehead on Sept 16, 2013 17:06:06 GMT
I've seen some mention of a Yougov poll putting UKIP on 30% ahead of Labour on 25%. Does anyone know the details? Can't see mention of it on the UKPR site
|
|
Andrew_S
Top Poster
Posts: 28,241
Member is Online
|
Post by Andrew_S on Sept 16, 2013 17:12:33 GMT
I've seen some mention of a Yougov poll putting UKIP on 30% ahead of Labour on 25%. Does anyone know the details? Can't see mention of it on the UKPR site It's all over Twitter but can't find a reliable link yet.
|
|
Andrew_S
Top Poster
Posts: 28,241
Member is Online
|
Post by Andrew_S on Sept 16, 2013 17:23:14 GMT
Guess what? It's not a poll at all but Peter Kellner's prediction.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 16, 2013 17:31:31 GMT
and a fair one at that, I expect Ukip on a turnout of about 25% to get 30% or maybe even 35%.
|
|
|
Post by Pete Whitehead on Sept 16, 2013 18:24:18 GMT
Personally speaking 25% is at the upper end of my expectations and touch and go whetehr we beat Labour with that - difficult due to our relative weakness in London and especially Scotland (to a lesser extent Wales too)
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 16, 2013 18:30:58 GMT
but Pete balance that up with I expect higher turnouts in parts of the country where you are strong - Kent for example and where UKIP voters are the ones motivated to vote more.
|
|
|
Post by Pete Whitehead on Sept 16, 2013 18:34:11 GMT
The latter point certainly true - differential turnout may help Labour a bit relative to last time as there's local elections in the Met boroughs and London and not in most of our stronger areas (most of Kent for example). Not to say that this means the turnout will be higher in eg Liverpool than it will be in eg Lincolnshire, but it will reduce the differential a bit
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 16, 2013 19:05:38 GMT
ah I forget the local elections at the same time, the question in the mets is whether people will split vote.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 16, 2013 19:06:01 GMT
ah I forget the local elections at the same time, the question in the mets is whether people will split vote between labour and UKIP
|
|
J.G.Harston
Lib Dem
Leave-voting Brexit-supporting Liberal Democrat
Posts: 14,808
|
Post by J.G.Harston on Sept 16, 2013 20:15:57 GMT
ah I forget the local elections at the same time, the question in the mets is whether people will split vote between labour and UKIP In 2004 in Sheffield there was certainly split voting ( ref): Party Local Euro Labour 38.3% 32.28% LibDem 34.3% 18.52% Cons 17.7% 14.68% Green 7.2% 7.37% BNP 1.3% 8.19% UKIP 0.6% 13.48% Ind 0.5% 0.47% Soc 0.2% 0.97% Respect - 2.44% EngDem - 1.58%
Of course, the locals are skewed by only the the top four parties having candidates across the whole city.
|
|
Tony Otim
Green
Suffering from Brexistential Despair
Posts: 11,915
|
Post by Tony Otim on Sept 17, 2013 12:30:42 GMT
I'm amazed how level the Green vote is there - I would have thought it would be a bit higher for the Euros.
|
|
|
Post by carlton43 on Sept 19, 2013 9:26:41 GMT
but Pete balance that up with I expect higher turnouts in parts of the country where you are strong - Kent for example and where UKIP voters are the ones motivated to vote more. "To vote more"! Surely that's illegal?
|
|