|
Post by riccimarsh on Oct 24, 2023 15:36:53 GMT
The Speaker nomination race is down to four candidates now:
Previous ballot:
Tom Emmer - 100 Mike Johnson - 43 Byron Donalds - 32 Kevin Hern - 26 Austin Scott - 12 (drops out)
|
|
|
Post by minionofmidas on Oct 24, 2023 15:38:11 GMT
Round 2 Emmer 90 Johnson 37, Donalds 33, Hern 31 Scott 14, Bergman 7 Write in 3, abstain 2, not voting 4
Round 3 Emmer 100 Johnson 43, Donalds 32, Hern 26 Scott 12 Write in 3, abstain 3, not voting 2
|
|
|
Post by minionofmidas on Oct 24, 2023 15:42:13 GMT
I'm grouping them like that because that represents the far right basically. Emmer is getting a bare majority on the 4th or just possibly the 5th ballot, but it's clear that he has no more support than Scalise had. Time to start thinking about a cleanly divorce (not gonna happen).
|
|
|
Post by riccimarsh on Oct 24, 2023 15:52:11 GMT
I'm grouping them like that because that represents the far right basically. Emmer is getting a bare majority on the 4th or just possibly the 5th ballot, but it's clear that he has no more support than Scalise had. Time to start thinking about a cleanly divorce (not gonna happen). Emmer may have a same-sex marriage problem:
|
|
|
Post by minionofmidas on Oct 24, 2023 15:57:08 GMT
Emmer's "Trump considers him disloyal" problem dwarfs that one, I think.
|
|
iain
Lib Dem
Posts: 11,426
Member is Online
|
Post by iain on Oct 24, 2023 16:18:47 GMT
|
|
|
Post by minionofmidas on Oct 24, 2023 16:21:34 GMT
Emmer 107 Johnson 56 Hern, Donalds 25 each WI 4, abstentions 2, not voting 2
They've decided that writeins count towards determining 50%. They'd decided that last-place draws eliminate everybody, before they started (or so I seem to remember). So we're getting that Emmer-Johnson repeat of the Scalise-Jordan vote.
|
|
|
Post by minionofmidas on Oct 24, 2023 16:27:33 GMT
117-97 (5, 1, 1). Yeah, he's the nominee but he's also toast.
|
|
|
Post by jamesdoyle on Oct 24, 2023 16:30:15 GMT
So the Republican caucus is essentially split 50-50 between complete nutcases and nutcases-but-with-a-touch-of-pragmatism. This isn'ty going to end well (for them).
|
|
|
Post by riccimarsh on Oct 24, 2023 16:31:21 GMT
117-97 (5, 1, 1). Yeah, he's the nominee but he's also toast. Fewer votes than Jordan got last week.
|
|
|
Post by minionofmidas on Oct 24, 2023 16:35:21 GMT
Is it fair to consider him pre-cooked? According to wikipedia, the pre-cooked Emmer is fried in oil and then sautéed onions are added.
|
|
|
Post by minionofmidas on Oct 24, 2023 16:55:15 GMT
Also, language
|
|
|
Post by jamesdoyle on Oct 24, 2023 17:07:00 GMT
Jake Sherman has the anti-Emmers at 26
|
|
|
Post by 🏴☠️ Neath West 🏴☠️ on Oct 24, 2023 17:34:40 GMT
Isn't that how Warren Harding got to be nominated? Rounds and rounds of everyone else slugging it out and then emerging from the aftermath It's not an inspiring precedent, is it. On the contrary, I reckon America could do with a return to normalcy.
|
|
|
Post by minionofmidas on Oct 24, 2023 17:49:42 GMT
Jake Sherman has the anti-Emmers at 26 I've seen that 10 figure quoted since as "10 already up to that point" (in a roll call) so I guess there's some Chinese whispers involved in the quoted tweet
|
|
|
Post by jamesdoyle on Oct 24, 2023 18:27:33 GMT
Obviously Emmer had no chance of getting to 217. One of the GOP reps had floated the idea of voting to change the House rules to allow a winner with a plurality, on the theoretical basis that the Republicans would unite to stop Jeffries winning for the Dems. Good luck with that.
In the longer term, I had thought that a sensible, if implausible, end would have been for a two thirds of the caucus who were somewhat sensible to chuck out the maddest third, accept they'd be a minority hanging control to the Dems and start to win back their party. But with the party divided 50-50, even my wishful thinking can't make it work.
|
|
|
Post by minionofmidas on Oct 24, 2023 18:34:23 GMT
Obviously Emmer had no chance of getting to 217. One of the GOP reps had floated the idea of voting to change the House rules to allow a winner with a plurality, on the theoretical basis that the Republicans would unite to stop Jeffries winning for the Dems. Good luck with that. There's (19th century) precedent but would require a majority vote.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 24, 2023 19:04:11 GMT
I mean, Trump isn’t exactly wrong here.
|
|
|
Post by riccimarsh on Oct 24, 2023 19:44:22 GMT
Emmer's "Trump considers him disloyal" problem dwarfs that one, I think. You are correct:
|
|
|
Post by Davıd Boothroyd on Oct 24, 2023 20:34:27 GMT
And, like clockwork, Tom Emmer has now withdrawn as he evidently can't make it.
|
|