Tony Otim
Green
Suffering from Brexistential Despair
Posts: 11,892
|
Post by Tony Otim on Oct 31, 2022 15:09:58 GMT
Wednesday 23rd November:
ASHFIELD DC; Hucknall Central (Ashfield Ind died)
Candidates:
LEES, Jan (Conservative)
PARVIN, Nick (Ashfield Ind)
WILKINSON, John Hartley (Labour)
2019: Ashfield Ind 690, 671; Lab 559, 540; Con 356, 297; UKIP 279
2015: Lab 1363, 1196; Con 932, 652; UKIP 860, 652; Hucknall First 240, 229; LD 205
John Wilkinson was the top Labour candidate in 2019. The deceased councillor had stood for Hucknall First in 2015 before being elected for Ashfield Independents in 2019. Jan Lees stood for the Conservatives in Hucknall South division (which contains this ward) in 2021.
Current Council: Ashfield Ind 27; Con 3; Ind 2; Lab 2; 1 vacancy
Thursday 24th November:
BASSETLAW DC; Sutton ( Con resigned)
Candidates:
McFARLAND, Fraser Paul (Conservative)
PULK, Darrell Eduard (Labour)
RAY, Phil (Liberal Democrat)
May 21by: Con 422; Lab 134; LD 107
2019: Ind 381; Con 163; Lab 74
2015: Con 774; Lab 302; LD 97
2012: Con 340; Lab 163
2008: Con unopp.
2004: Con 572; LD 190;
Sep 03by: Con 335; Lab 48
2002: LD 461; Con 193
Current Council: Lab 34; Con 7; Ind 5; LD 1; 1 vacancy
ISLE OF WIGHT UA; Brighstone, Calbourne & Shalfleet (Con resigned)
Candidates:
ALLDRED, Doug (Green)
BRYAN, Carol (Conservative)
CLARKE, Gary Anthony (Labour)
PARKES, Stephen John (Vectis Party)
STUART, Nick (Liberal Democrat)
2021: Con 549; LD 377; Grn 335
The Lib Dem and Green candidates both stood in 2021.
Current Council: Alliance Grp 17 (12 Ind; 2 Grn, 2 Island Ind Network, 1 Our Island); Con 17; Ind Lab 1; Lab 1; LD 1; Vectis 1; 1 vacancy
SEFTON MBC; Linacre (Lab died)
Candidates:
McKEE, Dan (Labour)
SMITH, Ian Edward (No Description)
2022: Lab 1320; Ind 299; Con 114
2021: Lab 1560; Con 196
2019: Lab 1177; Ind 270; LD 106; Con 100; Soc Lab 65
2018: Lab 1536; Grn 108; Con 106; LD 75; Soc Lab 69
2016: Lab 1426; Grn 101; Ind 94; Con 89; Soc Lab 64
2015: Lab 3698; Grn 538; Soc Lab 126
2014: Lab 1410; UKIP 429; Soc Lab 129; Con 70
2012: Lab 1682; LD 74; Con 73
2011: Lab 1758; UKIP 191; LD 110; Con 93
2010: Lab 2699; LD 543; UKIP 457; Con 211
2008: Lab 1050; UKIP 219; LD 192; Con 140; Comm 45
2007: Lab 1350; Comm 214
2006: Lab 1130; LD 453
2004: Lab 1646, 1532, 1312; LD 561, 416, 400; Comm 120
Vacancy is for the 2022-26 term.
Current Council: Lab 45; LD 8; Con 5; Lydiate, Aintree, Maghull & Lunt Comm Ind 3; Ind Grp 2; Southport Councillors Grp 2; 1 vacancy
WARRINGTON UA; Rixton & Woolston (Con resigned)
Candidates:
COCKAYNE, Trish (Labour)
MEICHEN, Brian Alistair (Liberal Democrats)
TYNAN, Rob (Conservative)
2021: Con 1250, 1120,1064; Lab 1157, 1069, 970; Ind 412; LD 295, 294
2016: Lab 1314, 1214, 979; Ind 882, 717; Con 560, 460, 411; LD 168
Rob Tynan was the unsuccessful Conservative here last year and Brian Meichen was the second Liberal Democrat.
Current Council: Lab 36; Con 9; LD 8; Ind 4; 1 vacancy
|
|
|
|
Post by johnloony on Oct 31, 2022 23:01:26 GMT
SEFTON MBC; Linacre 2022: Lab 1320; Ind 299; Con 114 2021: Lab 1560; Con 196 2019: Lab 1177; Ind 270; LD 106; Con 100; Soc Lab 65 2018: Lab 1536; Grn 108; Con 106; LD 75; Soc Lab 69 2016: Lab 1426; Grn 101; Ind 94; Con 89; Soc Lab 64 2015: Lab 3698; Grn 538; Soc Lab 126 2014: Lab 1410; UKIP 429; Soc Lab 129; Con 70 2012: Lab 1682; LD 74; Con 732011: Lab 1758; UKIP 191; LD 110; Con 93 2010: Lab 2699; LD 543; UKIP 457; Con 211 2008: Lab 1050; UKIP 219; LD 192; Con 140; Comm 45 2007: Lab 1350; Comm 2142006: Lab 1130; LD 453 2004: Lab 1646, 1532, 1312; LD 561, 416, 400; Comm 120 Haha Omg… those results are like some of the very safe wards in Barking & Dagenham in the 1960s. It makes me wonder what sort of demographics there are in the local community. There must be some people (more than those numbers suggest) who are functionally - even if not politically - of the capitalist / employer / business / reactionary / traditionalist / conservative class(es), and who would “normally” vote Conservative in any other geographical location. |
|
|
|
Post by Merseymike on Nov 1, 2022 9:40:10 GMT
SEFTON MBC; Linacre 2022: Lab 1320; Ind 299; Con 114 2021: Lab 1560; Con 196 2019: Lab 1177; Ind 270; LD 106; Con 100; Soc Lab 65 2018: Lab 1536; Grn 108; Con 106; LD 75; Soc Lab 69 2016: Lab 1426; Grn 101; Ind 94; Con 89; Soc Lab 64 2015: Lab 3698; Grn 538; Soc Lab 126 2014: Lab 1410; UKIP 429; Soc Lab 129; Con 70 2012: Lab 1682; LD 74; Con 732011: Lab 1758; UKIP 191; LD 110; Con 93 2010: Lab 2699; LD 543; UKIP 457; Con 211 2008: Lab 1050; UKIP 219; LD 192; Con 140; Comm 45 2007: Lab 1350; Comm 2142006: Lab 1130; LD 453 2004: Lab 1646, 1532, 1312; LD 561, 416, 400; Comm 120 Haha Omg… those results are like some of the very safe wards in Barking & Dagenham in the 1960s. It makes me wonder what sort of demographics there are in the local community. There must be some people (more than those numbers suggest) who are functionally - even if not politically - of the capitalist / employer / business / reactionary / traditionalist / conservative class(es), and who would “normally” vote Conservative in any other geographical location. North Korean style results Linacre ward is largely terraced housing, some estates - very white working class. The thing is that it's Bootle, and it's "normal" to vote Labour as those results indicate. So it's hard to know what they might vote elsewhere. This time there's a good local Labour candidate in his twenties and an Independent. That's it. The Tories and the LibDems aren't standing and I think it fair to say that neither would have made 100 votes. |
|
|
|
Post by November_Rain on Nov 1, 2022 10:02:20 GMT
Who are the Vectis Party? Is this a localist movement?
|
|
|
|
Post by finsobruce on Nov 1, 2022 10:10:56 GMT
Who are the Vectis Party? Is this a localist movement? Yup.
And there was a previous one the Vectis National party who stood at the 1970 General Election and a few council elections after that.
Vectis, of course, being the Roman name for the Isle of Wight.
|
|
|
|
Post by jm on Nov 1, 2022 19:33:24 GMT
Bassetlaw is counting overnight.
|
|
Khunanup
Lib Dem
Portsmouth Liberal Democrats
Posts: 12,005
|
Post by Khunanup on Nov 3, 2022 0:09:31 GMT
Who are the Vectis Party? Is this a localist movement? Thus is a joke right?! |
|
Tony Otim
Green
Suffering from Brexistential Despair
Posts: 11,892
|
Post by Tony Otim on Nov 4, 2022 22:02:14 GMT
As reported on the defections thread, but also somewhat relevant here: Gerald Bowers (Ranskill, Bassetlaw District Council) Conservative to Independent. Cllr Bowers was the leader of the Conservative Group on Bassetlaw District Council. In his resignation statement, he says that he cannot support the Conservative candidate in the forthcoming Sutton by-election on 24th November. "The in-fighting and name calling and blame culture is not something I want to be involved with. Here in Bassetlaw we currently have a local By Election taking place. The Conservative Party candidate Mr Fraser McFarland is also the Chairman of the local Conservative Association in addition he’s also the Chief of Staff for the Bassetlaw MP – Brendan Clarke-Smith.
I do NOT support the Conservative Party candidate in this election. As the Leader of the Bassetlaw District Council Conservative Group (Elected Councillors), I made it very clear to Fraser McFarland that we did not want him as a councillor in our group.
He does not possess the personal skills or communication skills to represent residents of Sutton Ward on the District Council or on any other council. (Although one of the elected Conservative Councillors has decided to support him)
...
The good spirit inside me tells me that dark forces are at play within the Bassetlaw Conservative Association and I no longer wish to be a member of this organisation." |
|
|
|
Post by batman on Nov 4, 2022 23:26:36 GMT
Who are the Vectis Party? Is this a localist movement? Thus is a joke right?! not everybody knows that Vectis is the Latin for the Isle of Wight & that it's still used today for certain things appertaining to the island, although clearly you & I do. |
|
|
|
Post by simonb on Nov 17, 2022 13:34:45 GMT
|
|
|
|
Post by John Chanin on Nov 21, 2022 9:36:03 GMT
I wonder if the turnout in Bootle will break the 10% barrier.
|
|
|
|
Post by phil156 on Nov 21, 2022 15:41:59 GMT
They are all counting on the night of the end of poll
|
|
|
|
Post by andrewteale on Nov 23, 2022 15:11:49 GMT
|
|
|
|
Post by owainsutton on Nov 23, 2022 18:22:07 GMT
SEFTON MBC; Linacre 2022: Lab 1320; Ind 299; Con 114 2021: Lab 1560; Con 196 2019: Lab 1177; Ind 270; LD 106; Con 100; Soc Lab 65 2018: Lab 1536; Grn 108; Con 106; LD 75; Soc Lab 69 2016: Lab 1426; Grn 101; Ind 94; Con 89; Soc Lab 64 2015: Lab 3698; Grn 538; Soc Lab 126 2014: Lab 1410; UKIP 429; Soc Lab 129; Con 70 2012: Lab 1682; LD 74; Con 732011: Lab 1758; UKIP 191; LD 110; Con 93 2010: Lab 2699; LD 543; UKIP 457; Con 211 2008: Lab 1050; UKIP 219; LD 192; Con 140; Comm 45 2007: Lab 1350; Comm 2142006: Lab 1130; LD 453 2004: Lab 1646, 1532, 1312; LD 561, 416, 400; Comm 120 Haha Omg… those results are like some of the very safe wards in Barking & Dagenham in the 1960s. It makes me wonder what sort of demographics there are in the local community. There must be some people (more than those numbers suggest) who are functionally - even if not politically - of the capitalist / employer / business / reactionary / traditionalist / conservative class(es), and who would “normally” vote Conservative in any other geographical location. A multi-decade boycott of The Sun is a factor. Seriously. |
|
|
|
Post by lackeroftalent on Nov 23, 2022 23:58:55 GMT
Jason seems pleased.
|
|
carlton43
Reform Party
Posts: 50,885 
Member is Online
|
Post by carlton43 on Nov 24, 2022 0:22:52 GMT
Stunning and excellent result to utterly stuff Labour and Conservative and the fuckwit police. A good honest 'Up Yours' vote. Delighted. |
|
|
|
Post by batman on Nov 24, 2022 9:50:12 GMT
how do we know the police are fuckwits in this instance? Maybe we should find out the details of the cases before we jump to such conclusions one way or another.
|
|
carlton43
Reform Party
Posts: 50,885
Member is Online
|
Post by carlton43 on Nov 24, 2022 10:25:32 GMT
how do we know the police are fuckwits in this instance? Maybe we should find out the details of the cases before we jump to such conclusions one way or another. I have long taken it to be an absolute 'Given' that is their total status on everything most of the time. Largely now fat plonkers with rainbow laces, smiling at Albanian criminals and serving tea the gormless protester arseholes glued to the road. Fat, useless, unfit for any purpose. Maybe we should always take that as our given starting poinr and let them prove that they are right? Surprised they have time for such an investigation when there are pensioners to push about for not wearing masks, Albanians to be helped, protesters to be serviced, and innocent home dwellers to be assaulted mob-handed because of some light-hearted tweet. Default position being the police are always in the wrong until they demonstrate otherwise. |
|
|
|
Post by andrewp on Nov 24, 2022 10:49:50 GMT
I went for an Zardozny win in Ashfield. I don’t think I would predict against them winning very lightly
Whether they are in the wrong, or whether the police are, at the stage where we don’t know, I didn’t think a bit of police involvement would do them any electoral harm.
|
|
|
|
Post by johnloony on Nov 24, 2022 11:12:32 GMT
how do we know the police are fuckwits in this instance? Maybe we should find out the details of the cases before we jump to such conclusions one way or another. I have long taken it to be an absolute 'Given' that is their total status on everything most of the time. Largely now fat plonkers with rainbow laces, smiling at Albanian criminals and serving tea the gormless protester arseholes glued to the road. Fat, useless, unfit for any purpose. Maybe we should always take that as our given starting poinr and let them prove that they are right? Surprised they have time for such an investigation when there are pensioners to push about for not wearing masks, Albanians to be helped, protesters to be serviced, and innocent home dwellers to be assaulted mob-handed because of some light-hearted tweet. Default position being the police are always in the wrong until they demonstrate otherwise. I can understand your attitude to the police, but what has that got to do with the fact that a local council by-election has been won by an Ashfield Independents candidate rather than any other party candidate? |
|
