|
Post by gwynthegriff on Apr 14, 2022 12:13:53 GMT
I wouldn't even place it at "several" cycles. I can recall numerous cases where there were "I'll never vote xxx again, because of yyy" stramashes which (outside a handful of monomaniacs) were forgotten within a single cycle - the Child Support Agency, CB Radio (showing my age), the 25p pension increase (or whatever it was) etc. And they were policy issues rather than the behaviour of an individual.* * The niceties of party approval and selection procedures are lost on most people. People swore they'd never vote Conservative (I assume) because of the way that CB was legalised, meaning they couldn't use their gear from the US? Or did they object to legalisation? I honestly can't remember, but I do remember claims that thousands of CB activists were going to descend on key seats to swing the results. They didn't. Monomaniacs rarely do.
|
|
|
Wakefield
Apr 14, 2022 14:08:53 GMT
via mobile
Post by Ron Swanson on Apr 14, 2022 14:08:53 GMT
In fact Wakefield Rural ward is also proposed to move to Ossett & Denby Dale, meaning that that would contain the majority of the existing Wakefield constituency. The new Wakefield, effectively a new constituency, would include the two Outwood wards from Morley & Outwood as well as Rothwell and the three Wakefield (compass point) wards in the current constituency. That the current constituency is proposed to be effectively abolished and divided between two new constituencies makes me think that it is even less likely that there'll be a detectable long term effect of this case. I suspect that New Wakefield would have voted Tory in 2019, but perhaps more narrowly than the existing constituency, while Ossett & Denby Dale is more Tory. (Electoral Calculus, for what it's worth, has New Wakefield as Tory by 2,000 or so in 2019 and O&DD by over 11,000; on its current predictions it has New Wakefield as comfortably Labour and O&DD on a knife edge.) In local elections. It so happens that today my granddaughter is moving into her house in Rothwell - she exchanged contracts on Monday. Rothwell is quite strongly LibDem at local level, and she will have just added to that. I note that the Wiki entry for Rothwell "famous sons" has Lord Newby of Rothwell listed, and who could be more famous than Dick Newby ( I have known Dick since the early eighties)? Of course Rothwell town is not big enough in its own right to shape the result in a general election, regardless of which constituency it is attached to, but it may have more in common with Wakefield than Leeds even though it it comes under Leeds MBC. My first post for two months, btw. Yes, Rothwell does have more of a Wakefield feel, though I guess the motorway acts as a natural barrier… I dunno. It’s a nice place all the same. Was it Brian Walker who was ousted back in the day? Labour do sometimes have a terrible track record in Leeds of imposing non-local candidates - I suppose in a seat like this that isn’t inner city, Leeds proper, they can come unstuck. It certainly has more in common with Wakefield than Wetherby, with whom it shares an MP.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 14, 2022 16:14:30 GMT
Khan resigning
|
|
|
Wakefield
Apr 14, 2022 16:14:41 GMT
via mobile
Post by LDCaerdydd on Apr 14, 2022 16:14:41 GMT
|
|
|
Post by pinkglover on Apr 14, 2022 16:15:25 GMT
Confirmation:
|
|
|
Post by LDCaerdydd on Apr 14, 2022 16:15:32 GMT
Impending By-election confirmed
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 14, 2022 16:16:43 GMT
The Wakefield by-election will be this government's Corby 2012.
|
|
peterl
Green
Congratulations President Trump
Posts: 8,468
|
Post by peterl on Apr 14, 2022 16:18:54 GMT
My early prediction: Labour gain by 3,000-4,000 votes. Turnout circa 45%.
|
|
|
Post by markgoodair on Apr 14, 2022 16:19:24 GMT
|
|
CatholicLeft
Labour
2032 posts until I was "accidentally" deleted.
Posts: 6,712
|
Post by CatholicLeft on Apr 14, 2022 16:22:54 GMT
Impending By-election confirmed The right thing to do. I wonder when the byelection will be? If the Conservatives have a disastrous local elections followed by a bad loss here, it is a nightmare for the government, especially given the report still to be published, after more fines.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 14, 2022 16:24:27 GMT
1) BBC gets a Political Editor from Yorkshire 2) Yorkshire MP for a marginal seat to quit
Hmm
|
|
cogload
Lib Dem
I jumped in the river and what did I see...
Posts: 9,140
|
Post by cogload on Apr 14, 2022 16:29:30 GMT
Labour Gain.
|
|
|
Wakefield
Apr 14, 2022 16:31:31 GMT
via mobile
Post by willpower3 on Apr 14, 2022 16:31:31 GMT
Will he resurrect his career as an all rounder?
Oh wait wrong one.
|
|
|
Wakefield
Apr 14, 2022 16:37:21 GMT
via mobile
Post by agbutler on Apr 14, 2022 16:37:21 GMT
Does Galloway throw his hat in the ring?
|
|
|
Post by Strontium Dog on Apr 14, 2022 16:37:57 GMT
Will he resurrect his career as an all rounder? Unerring ability to hit the middle wicket.
|
|
CatholicLeft
Labour
2032 posts until I was "accidentally" deleted.
Posts: 6,712
|
Post by CatholicLeft on Apr 14, 2022 16:40:16 GMT
Will he resurrect his career as an all rounder? Oh wait wrong one. He would be stupid to do so with his views of Ukraine.
|
|
|
Wakefield
Apr 14, 2022 16:44:24 GMT
via mobile
Post by Wisconsin on Apr 14, 2022 16:44:24 GMT
What’s the earliest possible date for the by-election? Presumably the writ can’t be moved until after the recess. (And until after he actually resigns).
EDIT: Ignore me, I forgot which party he was formerly a member of.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 14, 2022 16:51:13 GMT
Does Galloway throw his hat in the ring? I'm not sure Wakefield is particularly a Galloway sort of place.
|
|
|
Post by markgoodair on Apr 14, 2022 16:53:44 GMT
Does Galloway throw his hat in the ring? I'm not sure Wakefield is particularly a Galloway sort of place. Definitely not.
|
|
|
Post by johnloony on Apr 14, 2022 16:54:36 GMT
Can this thread be merged with the new one so that we don't have to be continuously and repeatedly frenziedly deranged at the sight of the lower-case w?
|
|