|
Post by greenchristian on Jul 2, 2022 14:21:55 GMT
Birmingham Erdington by-election expenditure figs (£100k limit): LAB: £93,049.95 CON: £87,289.93 REFUK: £18,811.74 TUSC: £3,053.37 LD: £411.97 What are the figures for everyone else?
|
|
bigfatron
Lib Dem
Posts: 1,670
Member is Online
|
Post by bigfatron on Jul 3, 2022 8:47:49 GMT
Birmingham Erdington by-election expenditure figs (£100k limit): LAB: £93,049.95 CON: £87,289.93 REFUK: £18,811.74 TUSC: £3,053.37 LD: £411.97 Lib Dems over-spending again...
|
|
batman
Labour
Posts: 8,333
Member is Online
|
Post by batman on Jul 3, 2022 9:07:22 GMT
that's quite silly. I have no doubt that in some elections the Lib Dems do overspend. But it's painfully obvious that they would never have dreamt of wasting huge amounts of money on the Birmingham Erdington by-election. The fact that they spent next to nothing here doesn't mean they don't ever overspend elsewhere.
|
|
|
Post by greenhert on Jul 3, 2022 9:11:23 GMT
Birmingham Erdington by-election expenditure figs (£100k limit): LAB: £93,049.95 CON: £87,289.93 REFUK: £18,811.74 TUSC: £3,053.37 LD: £411.97 So much money wasted because turnout was so poor (only 17,016 votes cast).
|
|
The Bishop
Labour
Down With Factionalism!
Posts: 36,309
|
Post by The Bishop on Jul 3, 2022 9:14:14 GMT
I doubt that Labour thinks they wasted their money, really.
|
|
bigfatron
Lib Dem
Posts: 1,670
Member is Online
|
Post by bigfatron on Jul 3, 2022 10:22:09 GMT
that's quite silly. I have no doubt that in some elections the Lib Dems do overspend. But it's painfully obvious that they would never have dreamt of wasting huge amounts of money on the Birmingham Erdington by-election. The fact that they spent next to nothing here doesn't mean they don't ever overspend elsewhere. It was a joke! I should have added a suitable emoji… Pounds to votes ratio doesn’t look too bad though!
|
|