|
Post by greenchristian on Jul 2, 2022 14:21:55 GMT
Birmingham Erdington by-election expenditure figs (£100k limit): LAB: £93,049.95 CON: £87,289.93 REFUK: £18,811.74 TUSC: £3,053.37 LD: £411.97 What are the figures for everyone else?
|
|
|
Post by bigfatron on Jul 3, 2022 8:47:49 GMT
Birmingham Erdington by-election expenditure figs (£100k limit): LAB: £93,049.95 CON: £87,289.93 REFUK: £18,811.74 TUSC: £3,053.37 LD: £411.97 Lib Dems over-spending again...
|
|
|
Post by batman on Jul 3, 2022 9:07:22 GMT
that's quite silly. I have no doubt that in some elections the Lib Dems do overspend. But it's painfully obvious that they would never have dreamt of wasting huge amounts of money on the Birmingham Erdington by-election. The fact that they spent next to nothing here doesn't mean they don't ever overspend elsewhere.
|
|
|
Post by greenhert on Jul 3, 2022 9:11:23 GMT
Birmingham Erdington by-election expenditure figs (£100k limit): LAB: £93,049.95 CON: £87,289.93 REFUK: £18,811.74 TUSC: £3,053.37 LD: £411.97 So much money wasted because turnout was so poor (only 17,016 votes cast).
|
|
The Bishop
Labour
Down With Factionalism!
Posts: 38,889
|
Post by The Bishop on Jul 3, 2022 9:14:14 GMT
I doubt that Labour thinks they wasted their money, really.
|
|
|
Post by bigfatron on Jul 3, 2022 10:22:09 GMT
that's quite silly. I have no doubt that in some elections the Lib Dems do overspend. But it's painfully obvious that they would never have dreamt of wasting huge amounts of money on the Birmingham Erdington by-election. The fact that they spent next to nothing here doesn't mean they don't ever overspend elsewhere. It was a joke! I should have added a suitable emoji… Pounds to votes ratio doesn’t look too bad though!
|
|
|
Post by swingometer on May 12, 2024 23:45:14 GMT
Jack Brookes is standing for RefUK. This appears to be his first contest. He's from the Bruges Group. Can anyone help with the Bruges Group pamphlet ‘The Dispossed, The Never possessed and the Bastards’. Near the end, it has a list of Tory MPs from 1993 and their Europe persuasion, my question is how did they know every MP’s views on the matter. Peggy Fenner for instance, I cant see any evidence on Hansard on any speeches relating to Europe, David Madel being a Europhile despite no evidence to back it up.
|
|