Tony Otim
Green
Suffering from Brexistential Despair
Posts: 11,901
|
Post by Tony Otim on Sept 20, 2021 15:46:33 GMT
FALKIRK UA; Falkirk South (Lab resigned)
Candidates:
DUFFIN, Stuart (Green)
MARSHALL, James (Labour)
PATRICK, Sarah (Conservative)
RUSSELL, Emma Lindsey (SNP)
2017: SNP 2216; Con 1993; Lab 1686; Grn 315
Sarah Patrick (Con) is the daughter of John Patrick the sitting Conservative councillor for the ward since 2007 and prior to that for the old Woodlands ward.
Current Council: SNP 12; Lab 8; Con 7; Ind 1; Non-aligned 1; 1 vacancy
HARROW LBC; Pinner South (Con died)
Candidates:
KARIA, Hitesh Kantilal (Conservative)
KARIA, Sanjay (Liberal Democrat)
LEE, Alexander Eng Soon (Green)
MOHANTY, Brahma Mihir (Labour)
2018: Con 2156, 2024, 2019; Lab 965, 941, 910; LD 542, 487
2014: Con 1889, 1751, 1659; Lab 1062, 1007, 949; UKIP 511
2010: Con 3400, 3002, 2801; Lab 1740, 1535, 1343; LD 1527
2006: Con 2226, 2068, 1886; LD 670, 612, 549; Lab 609, 591, 537
2002: Con 1812, 1766, 1734; Lab 897, 818, 795
Current Council: Lab 35; Con 27; 1 vacancy
SURREY HEATH DC; Frimley Green (Lib Dem resigned)
Candidates:
BLACK, Stuart (Conservative)
OLMO, Jacques (Liberal Democrat)
RICHARDS, Christine Eleanor (Labour)
2019: LD 1019, 1012, 889; Con 601, 568, 519; UKIP 269; Pirate 109
Jacques Olmo and Christine Richards both stood unsuccessfully for their parties in Frimley Green & Mytchett division (Surrey CC) in May.
Current Council: Con 17; LD 8; Ind 6; Grn 2; Lab 1; 1 vacancy
WIGAN MBC; Leigh West (Lab died)
Candidates:
BROWN, Samantha C (Labour)
GEDDES, James F (Conservative)
HARGREAVES, Jayson A (Leigh West Independent)
HONEY, Sharron L (Liberal Democrat)
2021: Lab 1582; Con 714; Leigh, Atherton & Tyldesley Together (LATT) 394; LD 104
2019: Lab 1049; UKIP 613; LATT 412; Con 196; LD 161
2018: Lab 1308; Ind 578; Con 374; LD 158
2016: Lab 1610; UKIP 738; Con 205; Grn 129
2015: Lab 3066; UKIP 1418; Con 645; Grn 278
2014: Lab 2005; Con 658
2012: Lab 1761; Ind 650; Con 195
2011: Lab 1844; Ind 430; Con 334; BNP 239
2010: Lab 2509; LD 828; BNP 693; Con 557; Ind 280, 255: UKIP 247
2008: Lab 1543; Con 817
2007: Lab 1380; Ind 600; Con 289; Comm Action 280
2006: Lab 1377; LD 721; Con 410
2004: Lab 1708, 1624, 1503; Comm Action 669, 549, 508; BNP 513
Sharron Honey stood here in May, when Jayson Hargreaves was the Leigh, Atherton & Tyldesley Together candidate, as he was in 2019; in 2018 he was the Independent and in 2016 the UKIP candidate.
The deceased Labour councillor, Peter Smith, was last elected in 2018, meaning this seat will up again next May.
Current Council: Lab 56; Con 8; Ind 6; Ind Network 4; 1 vacancy
|
|
ColinJ
Labour
Living in the Past
Posts: 2,126
|
Post by ColinJ on Sept 20, 2021 22:14:17 GMT
Some extra information on the Pinner South candidates:
Lib Dem candidate Sanjay Karia is one of two of the four nominees who is not standing for the first time. He stood for the ill-fated Independent Labour Group (ILG) in Queensbury ward in 2014, but jumped ship in 2018 to be the Lib Dem candidate in Harrow Weald ward. He was a GMB shop steward when he worked for Harrow Council.
The other is Alexander Lee of the Greens who stood in Wealdstone in 2018.
I was interested to note that Labour candidate Brahma Mohanty is standing as Labour and Co-operative. To my knowledge this is the first time since 1933 that there has been an 'official' Lab/Co-op council candidate in Harrow. This may be the 'Gareth Thomas effect', even though Pinner South is in Ruislip, Northwood and Pinner parliamentary constituency.
|
|
Khunanup
Lib Dem
Portsmouth Liberal Democrats
Posts: 12,012
|
Post by Khunanup on Sept 20, 2021 22:19:59 GMT
Disappointing that there's no by-election in Hastings or Rother on this day this year...
|
|
|
|
Post by bjornhattan on Sept 21, 2021 8:53:18 GMT
Disappointing that there's no by-election in Hastings or Rother on this day this year... In 2066, the 14th October will once again fall on a Thursday... |
|
|
|
Post by middleenglander on Sept 21, 2021 9:33:48 GMT
Disappointing that there's no by-election in Hastings or Rother on this day this year... In 2066, the 14th October will once again fall on a Thursday... Doubt there will be any by-elections that day as civilisation will be extinct due to climate change - or so we are being told. |
|
peterl
Green
Congratulations President Trump
Posts: 8,473 
|
Post by peterl on Sept 21, 2021 11:59:53 GMT
In 2066, the 14th October will once again fall on a Thursday... Doubt there will be any by-elections that day as civilisation will be extinct due to climate change - or so we are being told. Well that's up to all of us really isn't it. Do your bit. |
|
|
|
Post by finsobruce on Sept 21, 2021 12:14:34 GMT
Doubt there will be any by-elections that day as civilisation will be extinct due to climate change - or so we are being told. Well that's up to all of us really isn't it. Do your bit. How do you know he doesn't do his bit? |
|
peterl
Green
Congratulations President Trump
Posts: 8,473
|
Post by peterl on Sept 21, 2021 12:24:11 GMT
Well that's up to all of us really isn't it. Do your bit. How do you know he doesn't do his bit? He might. I said its up to all of us. "Your" was used in the plural sense. |
|
|
|
Post by finsobruce on Sept 21, 2021 12:28:30 GMT
How do you know he doesn't do his bit? He might. I said its up to all of us. "Your" was used in the plural sense. "We will do our bit".  |
|
cogload
Lib Dem
I jumped in the river and what did I see...
Posts: 9,141
|
Post by cogload on Sept 21, 2021 13:02:25 GMT
Battle (Hastings Rape). Normans for equality in Inheritance Party Gain.
The Norman lads were over the comet after a long count with a large turnout. Sadly for the Anglo Saxons this campaign was stymied as their best managers were still at Stamford Bridge where they had fought a winning by election focussing on immigration, taxes paid to foreign overlords, despoilation of the local environment which overcame a heavy project fear counter campaign about England leaving the dark ages.
With a different electorate it was one in the eye for the governing party. Even a visit by the party leader couldn't save the seat in this dramatic loss.
The RO will be releasing the figures as soon as they are stitched together.
|
|
|
|
Post by froome on Sept 21, 2021 15:26:16 GMT
Presumably the Normans were then seen holding up their posters proclaiming "Normans Winning Here".
|
|
|
|
Post by finsobruce on Sept 21, 2021 15:33:25 GMT
Battle (Hastings Rape). Normans for equality in Inheritance Party Gain. The Norman lads were over the comet after a long count with a large turnout. Sadly for the Anglo Saxons this campaign was stymied as their best managers were still at Stamford Bridge where they had fought a winning by election focussing on immigration, taxes paid to foreign overlords, despoilation of the local environment which overcame a heavy project fear counter campaign about England leaving the dark ages. With a different electorate it was one in the eye for the governing party. Even a visit by the party leader couldn't save the seat in this dramatic loss. The RO will be releasing the figures as soon as they are stitched together. The Saxons for Stability party disputed the Norman election expenses which appeared to include sailing in several thousand 'out' voters whose connection with the constituency was tenuous at best.
Also, there was much bad feeling about their misleading tapestry bar charts.
|
|
|
|
Post by andrew111 on Sept 21, 2021 15:44:41 GMT
Battle (Hastings Rape). Normans for equality in Inheritance Party Gain. The Norman lads were over the comet after a long count with a large turnout. Sadly for the Anglo Saxons this campaign was stymied as their best managers were still at Stamford Bridge where they had fought a winning by election focussing on immigration, taxes paid to foreign overlords, despoilation of the local environment which overcame a heavy project fear counter campaign about England leaving the dark ages. With a different electorate it was one in the eye for the governing party. Even a visit by the party leader couldn't save the seat in this dramatic loss. The RO will be releasing the figures as soon as they are stitched together. The Saxons for Stability party disputed the Norman election expenses which appeared to include sailing in several thousand 'out' voters whose connection with the constituency was tenuous at best.
Also, there was much bad feeling about their misleading tapestry bar charts.
Their arrows did not carry a proper imprint either |
|
|
|
Post by carlton43 on Sept 21, 2021 20:16:30 GMT
The Saxons for Stability party disputed the Norman election expenses which appeared to include sailing in several thousand 'out' voters whose connection with the constituency was tenuous at best.
Also, there was much bad feeling about their misleading tapestry bar charts.
Their arrows did not carry a proper imprint either The returning officer was heard to remark that he had he eye out for this sort of thing. |
|
|
|
Post by finsobruce on Sept 21, 2021 21:23:42 GMT
Their arrows did not carry a proper imprint either The returning officer was heard to remark that he had he eye out for this sort of thing. Bet he quivered as he said it. |
|
peterl
Green
Congratulations President Trump
Posts: 8,473
|
Post by peterl on Sept 21, 2021 21:34:31 GMT
I heard it was mainly footsoldiers. So much so in fact that it was a two horse race!
|
|
|
|
Post by andrew111 on Sept 21, 2021 22:23:23 GMT
The Saxons were demoralised by a tapestry of a Shield Wall being broken with a small hammer
|
|
|
|
Post by Defenestrated Fipplebox on Sept 24, 2021 4:54:04 GMT
Battle (Hastings Rape). Normans for equality in Inheritance Party Gain. The Norman lads were over the comet after a long count with a large turnout. Sadly for the Anglo Saxons this campaign was stymied as their best managers were still at Stamford Bridge where they had fought a winning by election focussing on immigration, taxes paid to foreign overlords, despoilation of the local environment which overcame a heavy project fear counter campaign about England leaving the dark ages. With a different electorate it was one in the eye for the governing party. Even a visit by the party leader couldn't save the seat in this dramatic loss. The RO will be releasing the figures as soon as they are stitched together. For more information on the consequences of this election result, please refer to one of the earliest post election publications ever, the Domesday book*, published in 1086. *Unfortunately the single first edition cannot be bought. |
|
|
|
Post by shadsy on Oct 11, 2021 10:41:37 GMT
|
|
|
|
Post by carlton43 on Oct 11, 2021 21:31:22 GMT
They do no such thing. A commercial enterprise is setting out its rates to manage its book with a view to profit and in response to bets placed. Nothing more. Nothing less. Those bets and those responsive set rates show nothing, evidence nothing and are in no way any indicator of a possible result. |
|
