|
Post by Adam in Stroud on Jan 2, 2017 23:07:10 GMT
The problem with these jokes is that the US has just elected a big government liberal (using the modern America meaning) as President. It is getting increasingly tricky to know what anyone means by "liberal". John Gray seems to include in it almost anyone who believes in capitalism, lumping together pretty much everyone from Ed Milliband to Margaret Thatcher as if that makes some sort of coherent political movement. Possibly called the "People I don't Agree With" Party.
|
|
neilm
Non-Aligned
Posts: 25,023
|
Post by neilm on Jan 3, 2017 0:27:57 GMT
The problem with these jokes is that the US has just elected a big government liberal (using the modern America meaning) as President. It is getting increasingly tricky to know what anyone means by "liberal". John Gray seems to include in it almost anyone who believes in capitalism, lumping together pretty much everyone from Ed Milliband to Margaret Thatcher as if that makes some sort of coherent political movement. Possibly called the "People I don't Agree With" Party. I've just Googled John Gray, not having heard of him before. He seems like the kind of person who wouldn't have lasted long in the Cultural Revolution, or Cambodia in the 1970s. I describe myself as a liberal (despite Davıd Boothroyd once- correctly- suggesting Henry Addington was likely my favourite Home Secretary) but because we often see things through an economic window, people see me as a rightwinger. However, an American conservative of my acquaintance thinks I'm basically a pinko commie. The definition of liberal- whilst very clear to me- is definitely a 'through a glass, darkly' issue, especially for our cousins across the pond.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 3, 2017 2:19:34 GMT
It is getting increasingly tricky to know what anyone means by "liberal". John Gray seems to include in it almost anyone who believes in capitalism, lumping together pretty much everyone from Ed Milliband to Margaret Thatcher as if that makes some sort of coherent political movement. Possibly called the "People I don't Agree With" Party. I've just Googled John Gray, not having heard of him before. He seems like the kind of person who wouldn't have lasted long in the Cultural Revolution, or Cambodia in the 1970s. I describe myself as a liberal (despite Davıd Boothroyd once- correctly- suggesting Henry Addington was likely my favourite Home Secretary) but because we often see things through an economic window, people see me as a rightwinger. However, an American conservative of my acquaintance thinks I'm basically a pinko commie. The definition of liberal- whilst very clear to me- is definitely a 'through a glass, darkly' issue, especially for our cousins across the pond. I think you are a pinko commie but take advantage of cheap pints at the Conservative Club
|
|
|
Post by Adam in Stroud on Jan 3, 2017 10:45:28 GMT
I've just Googled John Gray, not having heard of him before. He seems like the kind of person who wouldn't have lasted long in the Cultural Revolution, or Cambodia in the 1970s. I describe myself as a liberal (despite Davıd Boothroyd once- correctly- suggesting Henry Addington was likely my favourite Home Secretary) but because we often see things through an economic window, people see me as a rightwinger. However, an American conservative of my acquaintance thinks I'm basically a pinko commie. The definition of liberal- whilst very clear to me- is definitely a 'through a glass, darkly' issue, especially for our cousins across the pond. FWIW I've always had you down as a liberal Conservative. I don't really think it is that hard to define "liberal" so long as we allow for a broad-ish church, just as we should for conservative. Just now there's a trend of opinion (mainly on the left, I think,) that has its knickers in a twist about Brexit and rump (and no doubt Le Pen's performance in the forthcoming French elections) and is busy proclaiming the death of Metropolitan Liberal Elitism. As MLE is supposed to be a bad thing I suppose inevitably people identify it with whatever they dislike most. I daresay a sense of perspective will eventually prevail.
|
|
The Bishop
Labour
Down With Factionalism!
Posts: 38,925
Member is Online
|
Post by The Bishop on Jan 3, 2017 10:51:13 GMT
Left wingers are doing that largely because such "liberal elitists" tend to endlessly - and often condescendingly - lecture them about "electability".
|
|
nitory
Conservative
Posts: 941
Member is Online
|
Post by nitory on Jan 4, 2017 21:10:25 GMT
So I thought it would be fun to have a look at the numbers in the cities mentioned below and where.. well where it would have actually made a difference. Detroit | 2016 | Change from 2012 | Clinton Vote | 234,868
| -46,875
| Total Vote | 247,357
| -41,276
| Flint |
|
| Clinton Vote | 27,774
| -7,856
| Total Vote | 33,674
| -6,462
| Saginaw |
|
| Clinton Vote | 13,536
| -3,252
| Total Vote | 17,961
| -2,808
| Milwaukee |
|
| Clinton Vote | 188,700
| -39,110
| Total Vote | 246,609
| -40,734
| Chicago |
|
| Clinton Vote | 912943
| 59,841
| Total Vote | 1090343
| 74,709
| New Orleans* |
|
| Clinton Vote | 133,996
| 7,274
| Total Vote | 165,812
| 7,999
|
*Also likely to have caused the increase in NO is the city is still growing from the post-Katrina low.Worst campaign ever.
|
|
jamie
Top Poster
Posts: 7,054
Member is Online
|
Post by jamie on Jan 5, 2017 13:54:21 GMT
nitory Very much agree with your broader point but to be pedantic I'll add a couple some caveats. Firstly, Detroit is still losing population. Not exactly the right timeframe, but from 2010-2015 it lost 5.1% of its population. Same with Saginaw and very likely Flint over the past year. It's the Mileaukee number which is most frightening since that's a city which actually has had minor population growth. Hopefully everybody in the Clinton campaign who actively sought to avoid spending resources in these states is blacklisted from any future political campaign.
|
|
Richard Allen
Banned
Four time loser in VUKPOTY finals
Posts: 19,052
|
Post by Richard Allen on Jan 6, 2017 13:21:01 GMT
I would have thought that at least one Democratic senator (from a safely blue state) would see this as an opportunity to impress their base.
|
|
|
Post by timrollpickering on Jan 6, 2017 15:12:39 GMT
Back in 2000 no Democrat Senator would come forward to support challenges, mainly from the Congressional Black Caucus. ISTR Obama did support a challenge to one of the contentious results in 2004.
|
|
|
Post by Davıd Boothroyd on Jan 6, 2017 15:24:32 GMT
|
|
|
Post by Merseymike on Jan 10, 2017 22:05:24 GMT
Its almost worth having Trump in power if it prevents any further new albums from U2.
Almost. But not quite.
|
|
|
Post by Devil Wincarnate on Jan 10, 2017 22:36:32 GMT
Next time you hear "Beautiful Day" by U2, listen out for the bit where he suddenly sings "Touch me!"
With the lyric and tune, I defy you not to then sing "The sun always shines on TV".
|
|
|
Post by Pete Whitehead on Jan 11, 2017 12:54:59 GMT
I know what you're saying but I would sing "How can it be"
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 13, 2017 19:34:39 GMT
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 15, 2017 7:10:02 GMT
Turns out a Western series predicted it all back in 1958. A conman named Trump comes to town and promises to save the citizens from the end of the world by building a wall.
|
|
|
Post by finsobruce on Jan 15, 2017 10:04:59 GMT
Turns out a Western series predicted it all back in 1958. A conman named Trump comes to town and promises to save the citizens from the end of the world by building a wall. "It's funny how a big lie can make us all kids again".
|
|
|
Post by mrhell on Jan 15, 2017 21:28:31 GMT
The Sunday Herald gives a view on the Trump inauguration.
|
|
|
Post by Andrew_S on Feb 20, 2017 5:09:14 GMT
|
|
john07
Labour & Co-operative
Posts: 15,787
|
Post by john07 on Feb 22, 2017 16:26:48 GMT
|
|
|
Post by Arthur Figgis on Feb 22, 2017 17:21:18 GMT
I wonder what R originally stood for.
|
|