|
Post by Andrew_S on Sept 14, 2014 19:45:10 GMT
LAB 35 (-1) CON 31 (+4) UKIP 19 (-3) LD 8 (+1) OTHER 8 (-2)
|
|
|
Post by Devonian on Sept 21, 2014 15:12:15 GMT
|
|
Pimpernal
Forum Regular
A left-wing agenda within a right-wing framework...
Posts: 2,873
|
Post by Pimpernal on Oct 11, 2014 20:56:38 GMT
Latest Opinion Poll (Survation): CON - 31% (=) LAB - 31% (-4) UKIP - 25% (+6) LDEM - 8% (=)
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 11, 2014 21:32:34 GMT
Latest Opinion Poll (Survation): CON - 31% (=) LAB - 31% (-4) UKIP - 25% (+6) LDEM - 8% (=) Interesting...
|
|
|
Post by Devonian on Oct 11, 2014 22:07:07 GMT
|
|
|
Post by Devonian on Oct 11, 2014 22:18:08 GMT
The Scottish sub sample (just for fun, I know all the usual caveats about sub samples)
SNP 50.0% Lab 30.0% Con 9.4% Lib Dem 4.8% Green 2.9% UKIP 2.8%
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 11, 2014 22:40:03 GMT
Subsample=meaningless data.
|
|
Tony Otim
Green
Suffering from Brexistential Despair
Posts: 11,931
Member is Online
|
Post by Tony Otim on Oct 12, 2014 13:29:11 GMT
Ok - 18 Nortern Ireland PC - maybe 4 or 5 on a good night Green - 1 SNP - 47 ? I don't think so.
|
|
iain
Lib Dem
Posts: 11,455
|
Survation
Oct 12, 2014 15:00:16 GMT
via mobile
Post by iain on Oct 12, 2014 15:00:16 GMT
Galloway too, so actually the SNP would only need a very achievable 46
|
|
Sibboleth
Labour
'Sit on my finger, sing in my ear, O littleblood.'
Posts: 16,059
Member is Online
|
Post by Sibboleth on Oct 12, 2014 17:06:10 GMT
I think it's fairly clear that those seat numbers were just made up for sensation.
|
|
Richard Allen
Banned
Four time loser in VUKPOTY finals
Posts: 19,052
|
Post by Richard Allen on Oct 12, 2014 17:30:59 GMT
Galloway too, so actually the SNP would only need a very achievable 46 Indeed. Besides, if we have a UKIP surge to the extent that some polls are suggesting it really is going to throw the seat calculations out of the window.
|
|
|
Post by manchesterman on Oct 13, 2014 23:14:50 GMT
Can anyone point me in the direction of the analysis which shows UKIP gaining 128 seats based on 25% of the vote?
I put the figures (with the Lab/Con/LD etc percentages) in the electoralcalculus predictor and they only came out with 2 seats - this assumes even swings across the country of course. Was there a more detailed breakdown which would account for the huge discrepancy? Is there a list of the "gained" seats based on this poll?
Thanks guys.
|
|
|
Post by Devonian on Oct 13, 2014 23:25:23 GMT
Can anyone point me in the direction of the analysis which shows UKIP gaining 128 seats based on 25% of the vote? I put the figures (with the Lab/Con/LD etc percentages) in the electoralcalculus predictor and they only came out with 2 seats - this assumes even swings across the country of course. Was there a more detailed breakdown which would account for the huge discrepancy? Is there a list of the "gained" seats based on this poll? Thanks guys. It was based on the regional sub samples. The subsample for the South (outside London) showed UKIP in first place.
|
|
|
Post by manchesterman on Oct 13, 2014 23:57:21 GMT
Thanks Devonian, but is there an actual breakdown stated anywhere. Do we know which 128 seats were the predicted "wins"?
|
|
|
Post by carlton43 on Oct 14, 2014 0:25:30 GMT
Can anyone point me in the direction of the analysis which shows UKIP gaining 128 seats based on 25% of the vote? I put the figures (with the Lab/Con/LD etc percentages) in the electoralcalculus predictor and they only came out with 2 seats - this assumes even swings across the country of course. Was there a more detailed breakdown which would account for the huge discrepancy? Is there a list of the "gained" seats based on this poll? Thanks guys. I don't think there could be any generalist model for a calculator to be based on if UKIP were to reach that level of support in the final lead-up to the GE. Such models are far too generalist with an inflator across all seats, whereas there are weak and strong areas and hot spots that could well develop very late in the campaign. Any forecasts predicated on a potential UKIP turnout of 25% or higher would suggest differential vote movement across many parties, whilst at the same time local influences could be working in contrarian directions, and the existence of local constituency polling would probably lead to massive incidence of tactical voting, mainly of a negative variety. I assume there will be considerable tactical voting against Labour, Conservative and UKIP candidates, but far less against LD and Green candidates unless they are incumbents.
|
|
|
Post by manchesterman on Oct 15, 2014 21:45:19 GMT
Thanks Carlton. I take on board all that you said as a general rule of thumb.... but does anyone know about these "128 seats" Survation was projecting they would/could win on 25% share of vote?
|
|
|
Post by carlton43 on Oct 15, 2014 21:57:23 GMT
Thanks Carlton. I take on board all that you said as a general rule of thumb.... but does anyone know about these "128 seats" Survation was projecting they would/could win on 25% share of vote? Even if you find it I would suggest that it is likely to be deeply flawed unless it has been most carefully nuanced to reflect differential voting switch in differing areas for differing reasons.
|
|
|
Post by Devonian on Nov 7, 2014 0:25:51 GMT
Tonight's Survation poll for the Mirror
Lab 31% Con 27% UKIP 24% LD 9% Other 9%
|
|
|
Post by Devonian on Nov 7, 2014 18:07:17 GMT
Details of the Survation poll here survation.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/11/Voting-Intention-Poll-Tables-6-November-2014.pdfOne noticale detail is the big difference in the UKIP vote between men and women. UKIP is in first place amongst men but some way behind amongst women. As might be expected the other party with a large disproportion of men/women voters is the Greens with many more women than men. Men UKIP 28.7% Lab 27.4% Con 25.8% LD 9.0% SNP 5.4% Grn 2.5% Women Lab 34.8% Con 29.3% UKIP 17.6% LD 8.8% Grn 4.2% SNP 3.9%
|
|
YL
Non-Aligned
Either Labour leaning or Lib Dem leaning but not sure which
Posts: 4,918
Member is Online
|
Post by YL on Nov 7, 2014 18:19:35 GMT
Do we know why the questions are Q9 and Q10? I would hope that they didn't ask the EU referendum question (which they must have asked, because there are crossbreaks for it) or indeed the 2010 vote question before the voting question.
|
|