|
Post by andrewp on Jun 13, 2019 6:26:01 GMT
Broxtowe, Stapleford South East Lib Dem 43, Con 30, Lab 27 ( 2 x Lib Dem win) North Devon, Chittlehampton Lib Dem 43, Con 38, Green 11, Lab 8 North Kesteven, Billinghay, Martin and North Kyme Lin Ind 35, Con 33, Lib Dem 11, Ind Greetham 9, Lab 7, Ind Shanahan-Kluth 5
|
|
|
Post by Right Leaning on Jun 13, 2019 6:36:37 GMT
Broxtowe, Stapleford SE: LD 42, C 32, Lab 26 (LD x2 to win) North Devon, Chittlehampton: LD 42, C 38, Gn 12, Lab 8 North Kesteven, Billinghay Martin & North Kyme: Linc Ind 39, Con 33, LD 11, Lab 7, Ind Geetham 5, Ind S-K 5
|
|
|
Post by carlton43 on Jun 13, 2019 6:47:14 GMT
I wonder if it is too early for there to be a post-May effect giving the Conservatives an uptick? There is the major media concentration on the party and quite a few policy elements that are grass-roots-friendly have been aired. Could there be some surprises here? Or at least one?
|
|
|
Post by yellowperil on Jun 13, 2019 6:59:23 GMT
I wonder if it is too early for there to be a post-May effect giving the Conservatives an uptick? There is the major media concentration on the party and quite a few policy elements that are grass-roots-friendly have been aired. Could there be some surprises here? Or at least one? Yes I had wondered whether that might be the case, improbable though it seems, but decided I would prefer to discount it, as it seems had most of my peers , though a few have gone for Con wins in rural Kesteven and a couple in rural Devon, areas which in more Tory -friendly times would have looked nailed on.I have chosen to ignore such nonsense
|
|
|
Post by olympian95 on Jun 13, 2019 7:21:26 GMT
Broxtowe: LD 41, Lab 31, Con 28 (LD win x 2)
North Devon: LD 55, Con 29, Green 11, Lab 5
North Kesteven: Lincs Ind 40, C 29, L Dem 12, Lab 8, Ind Greetham 7, Ind Shanahan-Kluth 4
|
|
|
Post by middleenglander on Jun 13, 2019 21:34:32 GMT
14 entrants this week, all within time and adding to 100%.
Broxtowe, Stapleford South East: 100% Liberal Democrat ahead: 10 predict 2 Liberal Democrat wins, Tony Otim 1 Conservative, 1 Liberal Democrat - greenrobinhood, John Loony and priceofdawn did not specify who would win North Devon, Chittlehampton: 12 Liberal Democrat gain from Independent, iainbhx and Robert Waller Conservative gain North Kesteven, Billinghay, Martin & North Kyme: 9 Lincolnshire Independent hold, greenrobinhood, iainbhx, John Loony, priceofdawn & Robert Waller Conservative gain - price of dawn did not differentiate between Lincolnshire Independent and other 2 Independents so gets 29 additional faults - John Loony likewise did not differentiate but gave all three 10% so is not penalised.
|
|
Tony Otim
Green
Suffering from Brexistential Despair
Posts: 11,901
|
Post by Tony Otim on Jun 14, 2019 6:10:32 GMT
Congratulations to Iain for the week and Yellowperil for the month to date.
I had a last minute change of heart in North Kesteven and swapped the Conservative and the Lincs Ind round - should have stuck with my original thought.
|
|
|
Post by carlton43 on Jun 14, 2019 7:55:49 GMT
I wonder if it is too early for there to be a post-May effect giving the Conservatives an uptick? There is the major media concentration on the party and quite a few policy elements that are grass-roots-friendly have been aired. Could there be some surprises here? Or at least one? Yes I had wondered whether that might be the case, improbable though it seems, but decided I would prefer to discount it, as it seems had most of my peers , though a few have gone for Con wins in rural Kesteven and a couple in rural Devon, areas which in more Tory -friendly times would have looked nailed on.I have chosen to ignore such nonsense Well? What is your view now? I think it is too early to consider this evidence of a recovery for us but it is certainly evidence of the end of decline at least. I thought we would see a bit of a bounce with the demise of May, but a better bounce on the election of a replacement virtually whoever is in place. If it is to be Johnson then that will be the best news tactically for us in electoral terms even though I see a lot of dissent in these columns for that view.
|
|
|
Post by yellowperil on Jun 14, 2019 13:20:59 GMT
Yes I had wondered whether that might be the case, improbable though it seems, but decided I would prefer to discount it, as it seems had most of my peers , though a few have gone for Con wins in rural Kesteven and a couple in rural Devon, areas which in more Tory -friendly times would have looked nailed on.I have chosen to ignore such nonsense Well? What is your view now? I think it is too early to consider this evidence of a recovery for us but it is certainly evidence of the end of decline at least. I thought we would see a bit of a bounce with the demise of May, but a better bounce on the election of a replacement virtually whoever is in place. If it is to be Johnson then that will be the best news tactically for us in electoral terms even though I see a lot of dissent in these columns for that view. I accept that you have a good debating point about your Tory uptick in the light of May's departure, and these results seem at first to give some credence to it. I think I was conceding there was at least the possibility of some short term gain of that sort, though I was inclined to discount it. At first sight it looks as though I was wrong to do so and you were right. However..... the evidence comes mainly from two deeply rural areas of Devon and Lincolnshire, where there will undoubtedly be an innate conservatism, if not necessarily Conservatism. I did say that in normal times they would be nailed on for the Tories, and that might have been for official Conservatives or maybe Condependents. In the event the Conservatives were able to hang in there in the present climate mainly due to a split opposition: Green/ Lib Dem in Devon, and various breeds of independent in Kesteven. They probably would not have survived in either case against a single focussed opponent. And in Stapleford we won rather more comfortably and very much as I had expected, nothing to see there really. As for a Boris Bounce, time will tell, but I don't think if there is such a thing that it will last long in the face of reality.
|
|
|
Post by johnloony on Jun 14, 2019 23:13:45 GMT
Will it be necessary to re-calculate all the Broxtowe scores because of the misprint?
|
|
|
Post by middleenglander on Jun 14, 2019 23:43:06 GMT
Will it be necessary to re-calculate all the Broxtowe scores because of the misprint? Yes, but we are moving house tomorrow (after a year in rented we have found a house to buy) so will be some time next week before I amend the figures ahead of next Thursday.
|
|
|
Post by middleenglander on Jun 15, 2019 21:35:46 GMT
Week 2 - revised for amended second Labour vote in BroxtoweAuthority | Broxtowe | North Devon | North Kesteven | Week 2 | Week 2 | Week 1 | Week 1 & 2 | Week 1 & 2 | Ward | Stapleford South East | Chittlehampton | Billinghay, Martin & North Kyme | faults | position | faults | faults | position | andrewp
| 4.7 | 43.3+10 | 34.6+10 | 102.6 | 3rd | 67.7 | 170.3 | 4th | David Boothroyd | 15.4 | 47.3+10 | 46.6+10 | 129.4 | 8th | 41.7 | 171.0 | 5th | greenrobinhood | 16.6 | 49.3+10 | 35.0 | 110.9 | 7th | 82.3 | 193.3 | 9th | iainbhx | 21.4 | 14.0 | 43.2 | 78.7 | 1st | 79.3 | 158.0 | 3rd | John Loony | 10.6 | 61.3+10 | 60.0 | 141.9 | 12th | 86.3 | 228.2 | 13th | Olympian95 | 11.4 | 61.3+10 | 46.6+10 | 139.4 | 11th | 47.7 | 187.0 | 8th | priceofdawn | 29.3 | 65.3+10 | 75.8 | 180.4 | 14th | 81.5 | 261.9 | 14th | rickmk | 13.4 | 61.3+10 | 43.8+10 | 138.6 | 10th | 61.7 | 200.3 | 10th | Right Leaning | 6.7 | 41.3+10 | 42.6+10 | 110.6 | 6th | 75.5 | 186.1 | 7th | robbienicoll | 13.2 | 61.3+10 | 48.6+10 | 143.2 | 13th | 71.3 | 214.5 | 12th | Robert Waller | 18.7 | 31.4 | 30.6 | 80.7 | 2nd | 71.8 | 152.5 | 1st | Tony Otim | 14.0+2.5 | 51.3+10 | 43.0+10 | 130.9 | 9th | 80.7 | 211.6 | 11th | Toylyyev | 5.2 | 45.4+10 | 38.1+10 | 108.7 | 5th | 69.5 | 178.2 | 6th | Yellow Peril | 5.2 | 43.3+10 | 38.6+10 | 107.2 | 4th | 49.5 | 156.7 | 2nd | Total faults | 185.9+2.5 | 677.5+120 | 627.2+90 | 1,703.1 |
| 966.4 | 2,669.5 |
|
After consideration, I have not awarded priceofdawn any additional penalty faults as I have entered 0% for the Lincolnshire Independent and two Independent candidates in North Kesteven which I believe is a sufficient penalty. His total came to 100% but with insufficient information to determine the percentages for each of these three candidates. I have again been generous in not faulting greenrobinhood, John Loony and priceofdawn for failing to predict who the two elected in Broxtowe would be; however the percentage predictions would make it all but impossible for any other candidate than two Liberal Democrats to be elected. However, Tony Otim's forecast of 1 Conservative, 1 Liberal Democrat stands as his predicted percentages could have given this outcome and he gets 2½ additional faults. Objections please by noon Sunday. There are 4 by-elections and 3 postponed elections next week. Predictions on this thread by 9.00 am Thursday.
|
|
|
Post by yellowperil on Jun 16, 2019 9:55:57 GMT
Congratulations to andrewp for taking the revised win in Stapleford and Robert Waller for the revised lead overall. ( He says through gritted teeth )
|
|
|
Post by andrewp on Jun 16, 2019 10:07:25 GMT
Congratulations to andrewp for taking the revised win in Stapleford and Robert Waller for the revised lead overall. ( He says through gritted teeth ) Err thanks, i havent been following this that closely. I assume we are using average vote for multiple vacancy elections then? Just out of pedantic interest, in a double election where the result was Party A 400/300 Party B 375/370 Who would attract the wrong winner faults? A?
|
|
|
Post by middleenglander on Jun 16, 2019 21:00:12 GMT
Congratulations to andrewp for taking the revised win in Stapleford and Robert Waller for the revised lead overall. ( He says through gritted teeth ) Err thanks, i havent been following this that closely. I assume we are using average vote for multiple vacancy elections then? Just out of pedantic interest, in a double election where the result was Party A 400/300 Party B 375/370 Who would attract the wrong winner faults? A? Assuming no other candidates, Party B gets a 51.56% share of the votes whilst Party A gets 48.44%. - anyone predicting Party A getting the larger share hence gets 5 additional faults whilst those predicting Party B gets no additional faults. Party A and Party B each get 1 Councillor. - anyone predicting either Party A or Party B is successful for both their candidate gets 2½ additional faults.
|
|
|
Post by johnloony on Jun 17, 2019 14:14:57 GMT
I predict:
Isle of Wight: IIN 30% Ind 20% Con 19% LD 16% Lab 8% UKIP 7% Merton: Lab 42% Con 35% LD 14% Green 6% UKIP3% NeathPT: IndHug 30% IndHur 29% PC 20% Lab 11% LD 10% Wandsworth: Lab 58% Con 15% LD 14% Green 13% Forest of Dean: Con 20% Lab 20% Green 20% Ind 20% LD 20% EDIT: predict Con win Salford: Con 47% Lab 37% LD 10% Green 3% UKIP 3% SRibble: Con 72% Lab 19% LD 9% Mansfield: MIF 44% Lab 39% Con 16% UKIP 1%
|
|
Tony Otim
Green
Suffering from Brexistential Despair
Posts: 11,901
|
Post by Tony Otim on Jun 17, 2019 14:35:55 GMT
I predict: Isle of Wight: IIN 30% Ind 20% Con 19% LD 16% Lab 8% UKIP 7% Merton: Lab 42% Con 35% LD 14% Green 6% LD 3% NeathPT: IndHug 30% IndHur 29% PC 20% Lab 11% LD 10% Wandsworth: Lab 58% Con 15% LD 14% Green 13% Forest of Dean: Con 20% Lab 20% Green 20% Ind 20% LD 20% Salford: Con 47% Lab 37% LD 10% Green 3% UKIP 3% SRibble: Con 72% Lab 19% LD 9% Mansfield: MIF 44% Lab 39% Con 16% UKIP 1% I assume that not picking actual winners in Forest of Dean is intentional, but is having 2 Lib Dems and no UKIP in Merton?
|
|
|
Post by johnloony on Jun 17, 2019 15:18:06 GMT
I predict: Isle of Wight: IIN 30% Ind 20% Con 19% LD 16% Lab 8% UKIP 7% Merton: Lab 42% Con 35% LD 14% Green 6% LD 3% NeathPT: IndHug 30% IndHur 29% PC 20% Lab 11% LD 10% Wandsworth: Lab 58% Con 15% LD 14% Green 13% Forest of Dean: Con 20% Lab 20% Green 20% Ind 20% LD 20% Salford: Con 47% Lab 37% LD 10% Green 3% UKIP 3% SRibble: Con 72% Lab 19% LD 9% Mansfield: MIF 44% Lab 39% Con 16% UKIP 1% I assume that not picking actual winners in Forest of Dean is intentional, but is having 2 Lib Dems and no UKIP in Merton? Oops - corrected
|
|
|
Post by andrewp on Jun 18, 2019 19:12:17 GMT
In the Forest of Dean, we have 13 candidates. 3 x Con, 3 x Green, 3 x Ld, 1x Lab, 3 x Ind
For clarification, are we treating the 3 X Ind as separate candidates or one slate?
|
|
|
Post by Davıd Boothroyd on Jun 18, 2019 19:31:01 GMT
It looks to me like they are entirely separate, unconnected Independents.
|
|