mrtoad
Labour
He is a toad. Who knows what a toad thinks?
Posts: 254
Member is Online
|
Post by mrtoad on Jan 22, 2023 11:25:38 GMT
I've not blocked anyone on this forum before, but seeing a member whose profile picture celebrates a brutal war criminal has crossed that threshold. Absolutely vile.
|
|
|
Post by carlton43 on Jan 22, 2023 11:45:57 GMT
I've not blocked anyone on this forum before, but seeing a member whose profile picture celebrates a brutal war criminal has crossed that threshold. Absolutely vile. Vulnerable Forum Member confesses to being being menaced by a photograph!
|
|
The Bishop
Labour
Down With Factionalism!
Posts: 33,285
Member is Online
|
Post by The Bishop on Jan 22, 2023 11:50:25 GMT
Any poster is entitled to block anybody else, and others questioning their motives in doing so is bad form.
|
|
|
Post by greatkingrat on Jan 22, 2023 11:55:52 GMT
Any poster is entitled to block anybody else, and others questioning their motives in doing so is bad form. Of course they are, but do they need to ostentatiously announce that they are blocking someone as some sort of virtue signalling exercise?
|
|
The Bishop
Labour
Down With Factionalism!
Posts: 33,285
Member is Online
|
Post by The Bishop on Jan 22, 2023 11:57:46 GMT
In this particular case, there may be at least an argument for it.
|
|
|
Post by carlton43 on Jan 22, 2023 12:33:34 GMT
Any poster is entitled to block anybody else, and others questioning their motives in doing so is bad form. Oh! I say, Your Grace! Bad Form, wot! Frightful fax pas! You are quite correct. I don't have anyone on block and I don't report anyone for anything they do. But I have had people on block and I used to report people for a time when I felt very vulnerable to being banned.
|
|
|
Post by johnyorks on Jan 23, 2023 1:49:19 GMT
Clearly Rosie Duffield is a potential defector, though perhaps more likely to 'Independent' than anything else.
I will say, the persistent claim by some on the left that 'the culture wars' are effectively an invention of the right, driven by the right, is quite disingenuous.
The right is being (appropriately enough) reactionary on this. It is literally reacting to ideas and policies pushed by elements of the left which are specifically designed to challenge and change 'the norm,' whether that be in a historical context, a societal one, a biological one, or whatever. The so-called culture wars are driven by those wanting the change. To me that seems self-evident.
You need two sides to have a war, and certainly there are elements of the right that aim to exploit these issues for political gain, but by gum if these issues are not being exploited on the left for political gain... then my name is Lloyd Russell-Sturgeon.
|
|
|
Post by East Anglian Lefty on Jan 23, 2023 9:41:35 GMT
I'm not sure what the electoral gain is - most of the electorate aren't interested in the issue and to the very limited extent they have opinions, they're split and often not especially coherent. Those segments of the electorate that are particularly in favour of trans rights (broadly, young, socially liberal voters) were already not predisposed to support the right and since the issue has arisen they have acquired increasingly strong economic interests in not doing so.
When you add in that the issue was much less controversial when GRA reform started being discussed (May was in favour, let's recall) and that there are plenty of voices of the left that are not in favour of increasing trans rights, it becomes clear that this isn't something it would make sense to push for partisan gain. It is a divisive, vituperative debate because it is something people feel strongly about as an issue of either principle or affection for those affected (or perceived to be). That applies on both sides, but to the extent there is an attempt at running a culture war it's more likely to be on the side that has a plausible path to partisan gains on the issue and that is better able to drive the argument in the media.
|
|
|
Post by Davıd Boothroyd on Feb 25, 2023 18:18:25 GMT
Notable ex-Parliamentarian.
|
|
|
Post by Old Fashioned Leftie on Feb 25, 2023 18:35:20 GMT
Notable ex-Parliamentarian. and given how she fought in the 2019 election for the Liberal Democrats against the official Labour Party candidate in Finchley and Golders Green may she long remain an ex-parliamentarian.
|
|
maxque
Non-Aligned
Posts: 7,756
|
Post by maxque on Feb 25, 2023 19:06:38 GMT
Notable ex-Parliamentarian. and given how she fought in the 2019 election for the Liberal Democrats against the official Labour Party candidate in Finchley and Golders Green may she long remain an ex-parliamentarian. She won't, the NEC will find her a nice plum seat.
|
|
|
Post by stb12 on Feb 25, 2023 19:14:51 GMT
Surprised this hasn’t happened with more of the defectors yet
|
|
CatholicLeft
Labour
2032 posts until I was "accidentally" deleted.
Posts: 5,112
|
Post by CatholicLeft on Feb 25, 2023 19:21:46 GMT
and given how she fought in the 2019 election for the Liberal Democrats against the official Labour Party candidate in Finchley and Golders Green may she long remain an ex-parliamentarian. She won't, the NEC will find her a nice plum seat. She couldn't have had a more plumb seat than Liverpool Wavertree.
|
|
|
Post by Davıd Boothroyd on Feb 25, 2023 19:31:58 GMT
And another ex-Parliamentarian (he retired from the Lords in 2021):
Lord Sainsbury donated £8m to the Liberal Democrats in 2019.
|
|
|
Post by tonyhill on Feb 25, 2023 19:33:20 GMT
Oh well, better that she lost and re-ratted than won and re-ratted.
|
|
|
Post by tonyhill on Feb 25, 2023 19:37:42 GMT
Re Sainsbury - not happy about individuals giving my party huge sums of money. With Brown it ended in tears, with Sainsbury it distorts party structures, even if only temporarily until the money is spent.
|
|
|
Post by batman on Feb 25, 2023 19:42:11 GMT
Ratted isn't very nice. She joined the Liberal Democrats mostly out of desperation at the state her former party had got into rather than a wholehearted support for every single Liberal Democrat policy. She has returned to what she regards as her natural political home. I for one welcome her even though inevitably we will not agree on absolutely everything. The abuse she received was truly shocking, with only Margaret Hodge having to endure quite that level of it - even Ruth Smeeth & Louise Ellman got off relatively lightly compared with her. If she gets selected in a fair contest for a winnable seat, great, but to me the most important thing is that she is once again a member of my party, as I thought was pretty likely happen once the 3rd anniversary of her candidacy in Finchley & Golders Green had passed.
|
|
cogload
Lib Dem
I jumped in the river and what did I see...
Posts: 7,204
|
Post by cogload on Feb 25, 2023 20:14:12 GMT
That Keir Starmer bloke...he is actually very good at (emphasis added) politics.
Not surprised she is back in the Labour fold. Best of luck too her and I wouldn't be surprised if she is back in the HoC if she so desires at a point in the future.
|
|
Khunanup
Lib Dem
Portsmouth Liberal Democrats
Posts: 10,600
|
Post by Khunanup on Feb 25, 2023 20:24:25 GMT
Ratted isn't very nice. She joined the Liberal Democrats mostly out of desperation at the state her former party had got into rather than a wholehearted support for every single Liberal Democrat policy. She has returned to what she regards as her natural political home. I for one welcome her even though inevitably we will not agree on absolutely everything. The abuse she received was truly shocking, with only Margaret Hodge having to endure quite that level of it - even Ruth Smeeth & Louise Ellman got off relatively lightly compared with her. If she gets selected in a fair contest for a winnable seat, great, but to me the most important thing is that she is once again a member of my party, as I thought was pretty likely happen once the 3rd anniversary of her candidacy in Finchley & Golders Green had passed. I have no comment on this.
|
|
Sibboleth
Labour
'Sit on my finger, sing in my ear, O littleblood.'
Posts: 14,506
Member is Online
|
Post by Sibboleth on Feb 25, 2023 20:25:43 GMT
This is good news. It isn't a surprise, but that does not make it any less heartening.
|
|