|
|
Post by Pete Whitehead on May 31, 2012 12:49:26 GMT
They have one councillor now as one (sue Levell) became Independent last year. She has endorsed Claire Smith who is also a former LD councillor for another ward (North Kinson - as is LD candidate Pat Lewis) www.redhillandnorthbourne.com/ |
|
Tony Otim
Green
Suffering from Brexistential Despair
Posts: 11,892
Member is Online
|
Post by Tony Otim on May 31, 2012 13:43:25 GMT
And the Labour candidate is the independant who stood in this ward last year and came within 52 votes of the bottom placed Conservative (who is also their candidate this time). Hence why I think Labour might pull off a surprise with the LD vote splitting to the independant, the conservatives lose something of a personal vote whilst Labour perhaps gain one and a swing from Con to Lab generally since last May.
Given my form this month, it's not very likely though.
|
|
|
|
Post by Pete Whitehead on May 31, 2012 13:54:38 GMT
That I hadn't noticed. I did notice that the Independent candidate in Eastbourne was a former Labour candidate but that is probably rather less useful
|
|
Tony Otim
Green
Suffering from Brexistential Despair
Posts: 11,892
Member is Online
|
Post by Tony Otim on May 31, 2012 13:57:49 GMT
That I hadn't noticed. I did notice that the Independent candidate in Eastbourne was a former Labour candidate but that is probably rather less useful And I'd missed that one. Oh well. |
|
|
|
Post by Philip Davies on May 31, 2012 14:06:32 GMT
Despite the large number of candidates in the Bournemouth BE, only the Labour candidate appears to actually live in the ward.
|
|
|
|
Post by Davıd Boothroyd on May 31, 2012 14:09:19 GMT
Despite the large number of candidates in the Bournemouth BE, only the Labour candidate appears to actually live in the ward. I checked that when doing my prediction. Two of the others live very close to the ward but the Tory is on the other side of town. |
|
|
|
Post by marksenior on May 31, 2012 15:20:47 GMT
And the Labour candidate is the independant who stood in this ward last year and came within 52 votes of the bottom placed Conservative (who is also their candidate this time). Hence why I think Labour might pull off a surprise with the LD vote splitting to the independant, the conservatives lose something of a personal vote whilst Labour perhaps gain one and a swing from Con to Lab generally since last May. Given my form this month, it's not very likely though. We shall see tonight though many of the Ind votes last time probably came from the LD's who only fielded 2 candidates so they are starting nearer the 539 votes the Labour candidate polled rather than the 1027 of the Independent . |
|
|
|
Post by middleenglander on May 31, 2012 22:35:28 GMT
After 24th May:
Safc26 55.8 faults, greatkingrat 60.1, hempie 62.8, andyajs 63.0, LeicesterLad 69.5, PhilDav76 74.3, Dibs 75.5
Robert Waller 82.8, Pete Whitehead 88.6, Tonyotim 96.8, Mark Senior 101.9, erlend 114.8, David Boothroyd 129.0, Khunanup 150.7.
Cotswold:
Mark Senior 4.2 faults, Pete Whitehead b7.6, greatkingrat 9.6, Robert Waller 10.7, Dibs 11.8, Tonyotim 13.3
PhilDav76 14.5, LeicesterLad 14.7, Safc26 16.7, andyajs 20.4, hempie 24.2, David Boothroyd 26.4
North Lincolnshire:
David Boothroyd 2.7 faults, greatkingrat 13.4, Robert Waller 19.4, Tonyotim 21.0, hempie & LeicesterLad 21.4
Pete Whitehead 22.6, Dibs & Mark Senior 23.4, PhilDav76 25.2, andyajs & Safc26 25.4
|
|
|
|
Post by Davıd Boothroyd on May 31, 2012 22:38:19 GMT
Cotswold: Mark Senior 4.2 faults, Pete Whitehead b7.6, greatkingrat 9.6, Robert Waller 10.7, Dibs 11.8, Tonyotim 13.3 PhilDav76 14.5, LeicesterLad 14.7, Safc26 16.7, andyajs 20.4, hempie 24.2, David Boothroyd 26.4 North Lincolnshire: David Boothroyd 2.7 faults, greatkingrat 13.4, Robert Waller 19.4, Tonyotim 21.0, hempie & LeicesterLad 21.4 Pete Whitehead 22.6, Dibs & Mark Senior 23.4, PhilDav76 25.2, andyajs & Safc26 25.4 Alpha and omega. |
|
|
|
Post by middleenglander on May 31, 2012 22:59:51 GMT
After 24th May:
Safc26 55.8 faults, greatkingrat 60.1, hempie 62.8, andyajs 63.0, LeicesterLad 69.5, PhilDav76 74.3, Dibs 75.5
Robert Waller 82.8, Pete Whitehead 88.6, Tonyotim 96.8, Mark Senior 101.9, erlend 114.8, David Boothroyd 129.0, Khunanup 150.7.
Cotswold:
Mark Senior 4.2 faults, Pete Whitehead 7.6, greatkingrat 9.6, Robert Waller 10.7, Dibs 11.8, Tonyotim 13.3
PhilDav76 14.5, LeicesterLad 14.7, Safc26 16.7, andyajs 20.4, hempie 24.2, David Boothroyd 26.4
North Lincolnshire:
David Boothroyd 2.7 faults, greatkingrat 13.4, Robert Waller 19.4, Tonyotim 21.0, hempie & LeicesterLad 21.4
Pete Whitehead 22.6, Dibs & Mark Senior 23.4, PhilDav76 25.2+.2, andyajs & Safc26 25.4
Eastbourne:
Tonyotim 22.0 faults, greatkingrat 22.8, hempie & Pete Whitehead 23.3, PhilDav76 24.2, andyajs 25.3
Robert Waller 26.3, Dibs 28.8, Mark Senior & Safc26 29.3, David Boothroyd 30.9, LeicesterLad 31.3
Bournemouth:
LeicesterLad 27.9 faults, Safc26 28.9, Pete Whitehead 30.4, Mark Senior 31.4, Tonyotim 23.8+10, David Boothroyd 37.6
andyajs & greatkingrat 38.1, Robert Waller 41.4, PhilDav76 37.0+10, hempie 48.1, Dibs 49.6
Barnet:
PhilDav76 9.3+10 faults, andyajs 14.4+10, Tonyotim 19.7+10, greatkingrat 19.1+10+1, Pete Whitehead 22.3, Safc26 23.4+10+1
hempie & Robert Waller 24.1+10, LeicesterLad 24.4+10, Mark Senior 26.4 +10, David Boothroyd 31.1+10, Dibs 38.4+10
|
|
|
|
Post by middleenglander on May 31, 2012 23:58:11 GMT
And for the month of May, subject to verification:
174.1 greatkingrat
190.5 Safc26
196.6 andyajs
199.1 LeicesterLad
204.7 PhilDav76
204.9 Pete Whitehead
213.9 hempie
214.6 Robert Waller
216.6 Tonyotim
226.7 Mark Senior
237.4 Dibs
267.9 David Boothroyd
Confirmation of the result later today.
|
|
|
|
Post by Andrew_S on Jun 1, 2012 1:13:29 GMT
Congratulations to greatkingrat and Safc26. Pleased to get third place after a rather disappointing performance tonight.
|
|
Tony Otim
Green
Suffering from Brexistential Despair
Posts: 11,892
Member is Online
|
Post by Tony Otim on Jun 1, 2012 7:45:22 GMT
Congratulations to greatkingrat - it's been a long time coming, but thoroughly deserved.
Had a bad start this month and then a couple of gambles that didn't come off
|
|
|
|
Post by Pete Whitehead on Jun 1, 2012 10:19:02 GMT
Well done Gkr - I thought you had won the previous month or two as well
|
|
|
|
Post by middleenglander on Jun 1, 2012 10:46:25 GMT
Looks like 4 of the results reported last night had errors in some of the figures. I do not think they affect the monthly order but will double check later.
|
|
|
|
Post by leicesterlad on Jun 1, 2012 15:09:25 GMT
Congratulations to greatkingrat and Safc26.
I was pleased to get fourth place this month, as I'm a newbie to the competition.
|
|
The Bishop
Labour
Down With Factionalism!
Posts: 38,889
Member is Online
|
Post by The Bishop on Jun 1, 2012 15:14:24 GMT
Looks like 4 of the results reported last night had errors in some of the figures. I do not think they affect the monthly order but will double check later. Any further details?? You do wonder exactly how hard it is to get an election result right, tbh  |
|
Tony Otim
Green
Suffering from Brexistential Despair
Posts: 11,892
Member is Online
|
Post by Tony Otim on Jun 1, 2012 15:28:29 GMT
Looks like 4 of the results reported last night had errors in some of the figures. I do not think they affect the monthly order but will double check later. Any further details?? You do wonder exactly how hard it is to get an election result right, tbh I'd suspect that it's down to an over-reliance on twitter and tweeters who prize speed over accuracy. |
|
|
|
Post by greatkingrat on Jun 1, 2012 16:20:51 GMT
To be fair, if it wasn't for Twitter we wouldn't have any results at all until the Council got round to putting them on their website the next day.
|
|
|
|
Post by middleenglander on Jun 1, 2012 18:08:22 GMT
Looks like 4 of the results reported last night had errors in some of the figures. I do not think they affect the monthly order but will double check later. Any further details?? You do wonder exactly how hard it is to get an election result right, tbh Bournemouth Ind G 51 not 15, Ind W 15 not 51 Cotswold: Con 379 actual not 397 Eastbourne: Con 1783 not 1780, Lab 323 not 320, UKIP 322 not 321, Ind 100 not 98 North Lincolnshire: Con 856 not 956, BNP 133 not 143 |
|
