|
Post by yellowperil on Jul 28, 2017 8:12:03 GMT
If I were Labour I'm not sure I'd be happy being told losing by 3 votes was a great result. Looks as though Noc who gave us all so much mirth may have had the last laugh. But this is Blandford and the Bastards always come out on top in the end
|
|
|
Post by Davıd Boothroyd on Jul 28, 2017 8:22:54 GMT
North Dorset remained a Liberal Parliamentary seat into the early 1950s so Labour never displaced the Liberals as the main challengers to the Conservatives. The 2017 election was the first time Labour had finished higher than third.
|
|
peterl
Green
Congratulations President Trump
Posts: 8,473
|
Post by peterl on Jul 28, 2017 8:27:09 GMT
If I were Labour I'm not sure I'd be happy being told losing by 3 votes was a great result. Looks as though Noc who gave us all so much mirth may have had the last laugh. But this is Blandford and the Bastards always come out on top in the end Almost 600 votes off winning two years ago, so great progress made. If Labour can get this close, they can win next time. If they can win in Blandford, there are several Dorset towns where they can win: Wareham, Verwood, Dorchester even. Combining this with the General Election results in Bournemouth and Poole, I can see a huge Labour surge in Dorset in the next few years.
|
|
thetop
Labour
[k4r]
Posts: 945
|
Post by thetop on Jul 28, 2017 8:51:54 GMT
|
|
|
Post by marksenior on Jul 28, 2017 8:53:35 GMT
Unconfirmed but reported as Conservative GAIN from Independent in North Dorset DC, Blandford Central Conservatives 310 Labour 307 LD Hugo Mieville 229 Turnout: 25% If true, this is a great result for Labour and upholds the Electoral Calculus guess for this ward at the General Election which put Labour at second p!ace with 28.7% of the vote behind the Tories on 42.4, the Lib Dems on 25.04%, with the Greens trailing on 3.86%. If Labour are putting in the work in wards like this, it makes politics interesting in this part of South West, confirming Labour's move ahead of the Lib Dems in constituencies like North Dorset. It indicates nothing of the sort . When turn out is so low , all it shows is which party's core supporters are most enthused to vote . Yes Labour came 2nd but their 307 votes was fewer than they polled in the ward in 2015 and less than half the prediction Electoral Calculus give for Labour in this ward in June . .
|
|
Adrian
Co-operative Party
Posts: 1,742
|
Post by Adrian on Jul 28, 2017 9:10:56 GMT
Wait so it's OK not to vote if you live in a safe area or are a student... It's the principle dam it It's okay not to vote, period.
|
|
The Bishop
Labour
Down With Factionalism!
Posts: 38,979
|
Post by The Bishop on Jul 28, 2017 9:25:08 GMT
Labour's almost successful candidate in Blandford - is it the same person who stood for the N Dorset parliamentary seat back in 1970 (!)?
For the record, I believe our sole success on the council is one member elected in 1995 (can't remember where, but somewhere else I think)
|
|
|
Post by yellowperil on Jul 28, 2017 11:10:30 GMT
I till think its a failing (usually seen in Lb Dems,tbh) to rejoice in a near miss when you should be asking what went wrong. If you can get within 3 votes, you could have won, and at that stage its a matter of belief.
|
|
The Bishop
Labour
Down With Factionalism!
Posts: 38,979
|
Post by The Bishop on Jul 28, 2017 11:35:29 GMT
True, but I suspect this one really does fall into the "if only enough people had thought we could win, we would have" category. At least it sets things up nicely for 2019
|
|
|
Post by andrew111 on Jul 28, 2017 12:11:32 GMT
I think that was a very bad night for the Lib Dems despite small increases in their vote in all three seats. In the period between the referendum and Theresa May calling the General Election they would certainly have won in Lincolnshire and Dorset and might have won in Fallowfield when you consider how many Lib Dem leaflets have been delivered there this year. However as I recall things were similar for a few months after the 2015 Election
For the time being at least the landscape has been changed since the GE was called as we saw first in the May elections. Hopefully from my point of view things change before next May or there will be another round of Lib Dem losses from the already low base of 2014....
|
|
|
Post by marksenior on Jul 28, 2017 12:32:06 GMT
True, but I suspect this one really does fall into the "if only enough people had thought we could win, we would have" category. At least it sets things up nicely for 2019 All Labour needed to do was get out the 350 people who voted Labour in 2015 . With a normal turnout in 2019 , Labour will fall back and not be close to winning .
|
|
|
Post by yellowperil on Jul 28, 2017 13:01:36 GMT
Agree with Andrew111 that this was a bad night for the LibDems -we would certainly have gobbled up both Blandford and the Linconshire seat only a few months ago and even our Forum predictors had Blandford down as a LD gain by 8 to 1, so third place there was poor by any standard. Yes maybe a post-election slough but we really do need to go away and analyse what went wrong, or we are in real trouble. We did drop to third place in the GE here and the Tory majority in North Dorset was some 25k, but this still remains the sort of seat the LibDems traditionally do well in (i.e these days, don't lose a deposit). Not so sure Fallowfield was ever realistic though, even for a respectable second - I know Andrew has in mind all those leaflets from the Gorton non-by-election and hoping they would have had some impact but, realistically, no chance.
|
|
seanf
Non-Aligned
Posts: 631
|
Post by seanf on Jul 28, 2017 13:08:16 GMT
It does seem that in the South West, the anti-Conservative vote is switching from Lib Dem to Labour, albeit the Conservatives now have a very big lead.
The Lib Dems do have a chance of winning back North Devon, St. Ives, or Cheltenham, but they've fallen away elsewhere.
|
|
ColinJ
Labour
Living in the Past
Posts: 2,126
|
Post by ColinJ on Jul 28, 2017 13:59:12 GMT
Labour's almost successful candidate in Blandford - is it the same person who stood for the N Dorset parliamentary seat back in 1970 (!)? For the record, I believe our sole success on the council is one member elected in 1995 (can't remember where, but somewhere else I think) Good memory. Bulbarrow ward: R. Day (Lab) 179, J. Haynes (Con) 146. As for Labour candidate, Mr. Haydn R. White, we learn from The Times Guide 1970 that he was born in June 1940, so is now 77.
|
|
|
Post by yellowperil on Jul 28, 2017 14:27:14 GMT
Labour's almost successful candidate in Blandford - is it the same person who stood for the N Dorset parliamentary seat back in 1970 (!)? For the record, I believe our sole success on the council is one member elected in 1995 (can't remember where, but somewhere else I think) Good memory. Bulbarrow ward: R. Day (Lab) 179, J. Haynes (Con) 146. As for Labour candidate, Mr. Haydn R. White, we learn from The Times Guide 1970 that he was born in June 1940, so is now 77. So this young man has quite a political career in front of him . I have happy memories of Bulbarrow, but they date from the 40s and 50s long before the days of Day or Haynes. I am just wondering now whether the failure to produce the killer blow for Labour, falling just 3 votes short as I commented on above, may be caused by Haydn White realising he was in dire danger of actually getting elected
|
|
The Bishop
Labour
Down With Factionalism!
Posts: 38,979
|
Post by The Bishop on Jul 28, 2017 14:31:46 GMT
Labour's almost successful candidate in Blandford - is it the same person who stood for the N Dorset parliamentary seat back in 1970 (!)? For the record, I believe our sole success on the council is one member elected in 1995 (can't remember where, but somewhere else I think) Good memory. Bulbarrow ward: R. Day (Lab) 179, J. Haynes (Con) 146. As for Labour candidate, Mr. Haydn R. White, we learn from The Times Guide 1970 that he was born in June 1940, so is now 77. And has stood in most if not all regular DC elections since it was set up in 1973, it appears.
|
|
albion
Non-Aligned
Posts: 1,270
|
Post by albion on Jul 28, 2017 15:22:07 GMT
It does seem that in the South West, the anti-Conservative vote is switching from Lib Dem to Labour, albeit the Conservatives now have a very big lead. The Lib Dems do have a chance of winning back North Devon, St. Ives, or Cheltenham, but they've fallen away elsewhere. And, in the current circumstances of an imploding Conservative party, North Cornwall comes back into play as it remains a Labour-free zone.
|
|
Sibboleth
Labour
'Sit on my finger, sing in my ear, O littleblood.'
Posts: 16,038
|
Post by Sibboleth on Jul 28, 2017 15:25:59 GMT
Labour's almost successful candidate in Blandford - is it the same person who stood for the N Dorset parliamentary seat back in 1970 (!)? For the record, I believe our sole success on the council is one member elected in 1995 (can't remember where, but somewhere else I think) Good memory. Bulbarrow ward: R. Day (Lab) 179, J. Haynes (Con) 146. As for Labour candidate, Mr. Haydn R. White, we learn from The Times Guide 1970 that he was born in June 1940, so is now 77. Not to be confused with Hayden White, presumably
|
|
The Bishop
Labour
Down With Factionalism!
Posts: 38,979
|
Post by The Bishop on Jul 28, 2017 15:37:01 GMT
It does seem that in the South West, the anti-Conservative vote is switching from Lib Dem to Labour, albeit the Conservatives now have a very big lead. The Lib Dems do have a chance of winning back North Devon, St. Ives, or Cheltenham, but they've fallen away elsewhere. And, in the current circumstances of an imploding Conservative party, North Cornwall comes back into play as it remains a Labour-free zone. Historically speaking Labour's worst seat in England, though unlike many others it has actually had an MP from the people's party
|
|
|
Post by johnloony on Jul 28, 2017 17:42:21 GMT
Wait so it's OK not to vote if you live in a safe area or are a student... It's the principle dam it If you believe in compulsory voting as a principle, then it should be completely irrelevant whether current turnouts are very low, or very high, or something else. There is no logical basis for you to argue that a turnout of 9% is an argument for compulsory voting; if that is your belief then you need to justify it with reasons unrelated to turnout.
|
|