Georg Ebner
Non-Aligned
Roman romantic reactionary Catholic
Posts: 9,831 
|
Post by Georg Ebner on Nov 13, 2017 8:04:23 GMT
Comparison of SPÖ and FPÖ:  |
|
Georg Ebner
Non-Aligned
Roman romantic reactionary Catholic
Posts: 9,831
|
Post by Georg Ebner on Nov 13, 2017 8:07:05 GMT
Changes 2013-2017 (of all eligible voters!): ÖVP:  SPÖ:  FPÖ:  GREENS:  |
|
Georg Ebner
Non-Aligned
Roman romantic reactionary Catholic
Posts: 9,831
|
Post by Georg Ebner on Nov 13, 2017 8:10:46 GMT
|
|
Georg Ebner
Non-Aligned
Roman romantic reactionary Catholic
Posts: 9,831
|
Post by Georg Ebner on Nov 13, 2017 8:13:13 GMT
ÖVP 2017 & SPÖ 2013:  ÖVP 2017 & FPÖ 2013:  ÖVP 2017 & GREENS 2013:  |
|
Georg Ebner
Non-Aligned
Roman romantic reactionary Catholic
Posts: 9,831
|
Post by Georg Ebner on Nov 13, 2017 8:15:02 GMT
SPÖ 2017 & ÖVP 2013:  SPÖ 2017 & FPÖ 2013:  SPÖ 2017 & GREENS 2013:  |
|
Georg Ebner
Non-Aligned
Roman romantic reactionary Catholic
Posts: 9,831
|
Post by Georg Ebner on Nov 13, 2017 8:16:41 GMT
FPÖ 2017 & ÖVP 2013:  FPÖ 2017 & SPÖ 2013:  FPÖ 2017 & GREENS 2013:  |
|
Georg Ebner
Non-Aligned
Roman romantic reactionary Catholic
Posts: 9,831
|
Post by Georg Ebner on Nov 13, 2017 8:18:22 GMT
GREENS 2017 & ÖVP 2013:  GREENS 2017 & SPÖ 2013:  GREENS 2017 & FPÖ 2013:  |
|
Georg Ebner
Non-Aligned
Roman romantic reactionary Catholic
Posts: 9,831
|
Post by Georg Ebner on Nov 22, 2017 9:48:58 GMT
"Tender Branson", a user from another forum, had the good idea to make a map of Left vs. Right:  So, Austria did not really vote left-radically... |
|
The Bishop
Labour
Down With Factionalism!
Posts: 38,925
|
Post by The Bishop on Nov 22, 2017 11:17:05 GMT
Though you could quibble if NEOS are really "right" I suppose.....
|
|
|
|
Post by Pete Whitehead on Nov 22, 2017 14:11:30 GMT
Though you could quibble if NEOS are really "right" I suppose..... True - what would it look like if you put them on the Left Georg? (or left them out of the equation altogether) |
|
Georg Ebner
Non-Aligned
Roman romantic reactionary Catholic
Posts: 9,831
|
Post by Georg Ebner on Nov 23, 2017 0:02:01 GMT
Though you could quibble if NEOS are really "right" I suppose..... True - what would it look like if you put them on the Left Georg? (or left them out of the equation altogether) I had intended to make a map with ÖVP&FPÖ&FLÖ (=exFPÖ), but then i saw this one ... Perhaps i will make one without NEOS. The campaign of NEOS avoided attacking Austria's favorite SonInLaw (by the way: Kurz was once taught in the ÖVP-academy in rhetorics by Strolz...) and also didn't go aggressively after those many leftliberal voters, who were made homeless by the inferiority of SPÖ and GREENS. As written earlier, most NEOS-politicians derive from prominent ÖVP-members, what plays a big role of course, but being openly "neoliberal" - supportive of the Austrian School of NationalEconomics - is totally toxic and as a consequence they have focussed on more left issues. |
|
|
|
Post by mrpastelito on Nov 23, 2017 12:03:25 GMT
As written earlier, most NEOS-politicians derive from prominent ÖVP-members, what plays a big role of course, but being openly "neoliberal" - supportive of the Austrian School of NationalEconomics - is totally toxic and as a consequence they have focussed on more left issues. 'Neoliberal' is but a euphemism for communist state bailouts on an unprecedented scale, it has nothing to do with the Austrian School or liberalism, and everything with despicable scum filling their pockets with taxpayers' money. |
|
|
|
Post by greenchristian on Nov 23, 2017 17:43:19 GMT
As written earlier, most NEOS-politicians derive from prominent ÖVP-members, what plays a big role of course, but being openly "neoliberal" - supportive of the Austrian School of NationalEconomics - is totally toxic and as a consequence they have focussed on more left issues. 'Neoliberal' is but a euphemism for communist state bailouts on an unprecedented scale, it has nothing to do with the Austrian School or liberalism, and everything with despicable scum filling their pockets with taxpayers' money. The term is usually used to refer to the kind of small state ideology espoused by the likes of Keith Joseph, Margaret Thatcher, and Ronald Reagan. I'm surprised you associate the term with the slightly odd concept of "communist state bailouts on an unprecedented scale". |
|
Georg Ebner
Non-Aligned
Roman romantic reactionary Catholic
Posts: 9,831
|
Post by Georg Ebner on Nov 23, 2017 19:30:13 GMT
As written earlier, most NEOS-politicians derive from prominent ÖVP-members, what plays a big role of course, but being openly "neoliberal" - supportive of the Austrian School of NationalEconomics - is totally toxic and as a consequence they have focussed on more left issues. 'Neoliberal' is but a euphemism for communist state bailouts on an unprecedented scale, it has nothing to do with the Austrian School or liberalism, and everything with despicable scum filling their pockets with taxpayers' money. Yes, You are right: With reservatio mentalis i merged, what is called "neoliberal" by the shameless populace, with the "NewLiberalism" (contrary to the prodemocratic&left "OldLiberalism" in the XIX.) of E.v.KühneltLeddihn and others from MontPelerin. |
|
Georg Ebner
Non-Aligned
Roman romantic reactionary Catholic
Posts: 9,831
|
Post by Georg Ebner on Nov 24, 2017 12:07:19 GMT
Though you could quibble if NEOS are really "right" I suppose..... True - what would it look like if you put them on the Left Georg? (or left them out of the equation altogether) Your wish was my command: 
|
|
|
|
Post by Pete Whitehead on Nov 24, 2017 12:15:21 GMT
Excellent - so the first is with NEOS excluded and the second with them counted as on the left ?
|
|
Georg Ebner
Non-Aligned
Roman romantic reactionary Catholic
Posts: 9,831
|
Post by Georg Ebner on Nov 24, 2017 15:26:52 GMT
Excellent - so the first is with NEOS excluded and the second with them counted as on the left ? No, both are without NEOS. Firstly percentages, secondly deviances from AustrianAverage (-10%, +13.5%, ...). |
|
Georg Ebner
Non-Aligned
Roman romantic reactionary Catholic
Posts: 9,831
|
Post by Georg Ebner on Dec 27, 2017 13:41:25 GMT
Important issues last fall:  immigration & asylum security & terrorism economy & taxes pensions & health & care EU environment labour corruption WelFare relatively strong, what might explain, that SPÖ performed not as bad as polled. |
|
Georg Ebner
Non-Aligned
Roman romantic reactionary Catholic
Posts: 9,831
|
Post by Georg Ebner on Feb 20, 2018 18:38:50 GMT
|
|
Georg Ebner
Non-Aligned
Roman romantic reactionary Catholic
Posts: 9,831
|
Post by Georg Ebner on Jun 24, 2019 21:22:18 GMT
Revolution in Austria (at least in A.'s "PsephoLogy"): The institute SORA has conducted since 1986 VoteStream-research for the media. For LowerA. they made surveys for historic elections (i published some of them in my essay on LowerA.). Now they released studies for all elections since 1919!!! Their method was to collect from municipalities precinct-results (districts, regions and the federal HomeOffice do not have them collected!). Look at www.sora.atMost results do not surprise, but totally unexpected is, that the new FPÖ of 1956 got most voters not from VdU/WdU - instead from those, who had been NonVoters in 1953! Of those, who had 1945 been not eligible to vote (Nazis, refugees, imprisoned soldiers), 31% voted for ÖVP and SPÖ each and 24% for the VdU/WdU in 1949. |
|
