|
|
Post by doktorb🏳️🌈🏳️⚧️ on Oct 26, 2024 6:56:42 GMT
|
|
|
|
Post by Andrew_S on Oct 30, 2024 1:02:45 GMT
Only part 1 is available at the moment. Hope it isn't blocked because it was when I tried to upload it previously a couple of years ago. Part 2 has been uploaded but parts 3 and 4 have been blocked. (Each is 15 mins long). |
|
nodealbrexiteer
Forum Regular
non aligned favour no deal brexit!
Posts: 4,447
|
Post by nodealbrexiteer on Oct 30, 2024 13:04:08 GMT
Only part 1 is available at the moment. Hope it isn't blocked because it was when I tried to upload it previously a couple of years ago. Part 2 has been uploaded but parts 3 and 4 have been blocked. (Each is 15 mins long). Hopefully somehow you can break the log jam |
|
Georg Ebner
Non-Aligned
Roman romantic reactionary Catholic
Posts: 9,796 
|
Post by Georg Ebner on Nov 7, 2024 1:29:05 GMT
Concerning the US-electionNight i found at YouTube already videos of - Sky - ABC - CBC (Canada) A routinier like Andrew_S will deliver us far more, i hope. The reActions of the woke journaille in 2016 were highly hilarious, this time Trump's win was less unexpected, of course. |
|
|
|
Post by johnloony on Nov 7, 2024 11:58:49 GMT
Concerning the US-electionNight i found at YouTube already videos of - Sky - ABC - CBC (Canada) A routinier like Andrew_S will deliver us far more, i hope. The reActions of the woke journaille in 2016 were highly hilarious, this time Trump's win was less unexpected, of course. It would be fun to see modern media-style and TV-style coverage of the various elections in the 19th century, when there were often multiple candidates, presumably a bigger variety in the methods of selection of the Electors, and how the results were transmitted and reported. One thing that puzzles me is that the rules were set so that the Electoral College only has one chance to vote, and that it only works if one candidate gets an absolute majority. I don’t know why the original Constitutional rules didn’t allow for repeated ballots. The difficulties in travelling over long distances in the early years would have been a big reason, but as conditions became easier they could have done a Constitutional amendment to provide for repeated ballots. |
|
Foggy
Non-Aligned
Yn Ennill Yma
Posts: 6,135
|
Post by Foggy on Nov 8, 2024 0:46:07 GMT
Concerning the US-electionNight i found at YouTube already videos of - Sky - ABC - CBC (Canada) A routinier like Andrew_S will deliver us far more, i hope. The reActions of the woke journaille in 2016 were highly hilarious, this time Trump's win was less unexpected, of course. It would be fun to see modern media-style and TV-style coverage of the various elections in the 19th century, when there were often multiple candidates, presumably a bigger variety in the methods of selection of the Electors, and how the results were transmitted and reported. One thing that puzzles me is that the rules were set so that the Electoral College only has one chance to vote, and that it only works if one candidate gets an absolute majority. I don’t know why the original Constitutional rules didn’t allow for repeated ballots. The difficulties in travelling over long distances in the early years would have been a big reason, but as conditions became easier they could have done a Constitutional amendment to provide for repeated ballots. What's remarkable is that winner-take-all, generally tight ballot access rules and extremely limited media coverage of minor candidates have served to keep the USA as an overwhelmingly two-party system. In almost any other mature democracy, we'd have ended up with at least the last half dozen presidential elections seeing no candidate make it to the magic 270 figure, then the Constitution's back-up plan would've come into play and people would've been debating in the aftermath of 21st-century elections whether to pass an amendment altering that provision instead. |
|
|
|
Post by Davıd Boothroyd on Nov 10, 2024 13:59:19 GMT
Just going over the BBC coverage of the 2024 election and three seats seem to have taken many hours from the declaration before they were added to the BBC's results.
Lowestoft: Declared around 3:30 AM, appeared on screen at 6:45 AM
Sleaford and North Hykeham: Declarared around 3:15 AM, appeared on screen at 6:38 AM
Stafford: Declared around 3:45 AM, appeared on screen at 6:37 AM
|
|
