Merseymike
Independent
Posts: 40,437
Member is Online
|
Post by Merseymike on Oct 13, 2014 22:25:20 GMT
Oh, remember him well - the member for Windsor and Maidenhead who went out to lunch and never returned. The problem was that he did this in about 1986 and his local party fully expected a dignified retirement in 1987, but he had other ideas and the blue rinsers voted to keep him. They had to try and keep him away from the public during the 87 election, but then he managed to serve out an entire full term until 92 when the seat was redistributed! By all accounts he was never invited to anything at the Windsors pad because the Queen loathed him! Was he the one who basically spent the last ten years of his career as a pisscan without anyone outside Parliament noticing? Matthew Parris said in his memoirs, Chance Witness: "Dr Alan Glyn MP looked a little like Adolf Hitler, but greyer and droopier, with an ill-cut walrus moustache. Unfortunately, he lacked the great dictator's gaiety and charm."
|
|
neilm
Non-Aligned
Posts: 25,023
|
Post by neilm on Oct 13, 2014 22:34:27 GMT
Yes, he went campaigning somewhere and fell asleep in wardrobe, having apparently believed it was the bathroom. The wardrobe toppled with him in it.
|
|
|
Post by finsobruce on Oct 13, 2014 22:51:02 GMT
|
|
Merseymike
Independent
Posts: 40,437
Member is Online
|
Post by Merseymike on Oct 13, 2014 23:16:02 GMT
That sort of sums him up. I recall his daughter standing against David Blunkett in Sheffield Brightside.
I think he also hoped for preferment as he married into aristocracy - his wife was already a Lady while he remained a Doctor until he got his Sir .
|
|
|
Post by Devonian on Oct 22, 2014 20:40:44 GMT
Sheffield Star PCC hustings from earlier tonight
|
|
Crimson King
Lib Dem
Be nice to each other and sing in tune
Posts: 9,843
|
Post by Crimson King on Oct 23, 2014 13:40:39 GMT
I assumed this had happened already and I hadn't noticed
|
|
|
Post by Devonian on Oct 25, 2014 9:57:57 GMT
New UKIP poster for next week's vote
|
|
|
Post by Devonian on Oct 25, 2014 14:48:19 GMT
|
|
|
Post by Pete Whitehead on Oct 25, 2014 15:58:27 GMT
a few familiar names posting on there. Does anyone (Andy) know if 'another Richard' there is 'our' Richard or another Richard
|
|
Sibboleth
Labour
'Sit on my finger, sing in my ear, O littleblood.'
Posts: 16,029
|
Post by Sibboleth on Oct 25, 2014 16:24:57 GMT
Wait... people are betting on the outcome of a police commissioner by-election? That seems tragic. Probably they should be contacted by Gamblers Anonymous?
|
|
YL
Non-Aligned
Either Labour leaning or Lib Dem leaning but not sure which
Posts: 4,908
|
Post by YL on Oct 25, 2014 17:33:15 GMT
So far the only evidence I've seen of this by-election (other than polling cards) is a single Labour poster in a window of a house on Ecclesall Road.
|
|
|
Post by David Ashforth on Oct 25, 2014 18:47:20 GMT
So far the only evidence I've seen of this by-election (other than polling cards) is a single Labour poster in a window of a house on Ecclesall Road. I've seen one other poster, also Labour and also in Ecclesall ward. Probably because I'm a postal voter I've received the following: Labour1x addressed letter 1x addressed leaflet Conservative1x addressed leaflet UKIP1x addressed letter, which arrived after I'd returned my postal ballot. Also, there is an advert for the Conservative candidate on page 5 of this week's Sheffield Telegraph.
|
|
neilm
Non-Aligned
Posts: 25,023
|
Post by neilm on Oct 26, 2014 1:51:39 GMT
Aah, the Sheffield Telegraph. The paper you only get for the property supplement.
|
|
|
Post by Pete Whitehead on Oct 26, 2014 8:28:06 GMT
Taste is a matter of taste. 1400 is an underestimate of course, or rather it refers specifically to only the (known) number of victims in Rotherham, not in South Yorkshire as a whole
|
|
maxque
Non-Aligned
Posts: 9,306
|
Post by maxque on Oct 26, 2014 8:44:55 GMT
The issue with that sign is than anybody deciding to vote on that shouldn't vote for any of them. Labour didn't protected them. UKIP is using them for political gain.
|
|
|
Post by Devonian on Oct 26, 2014 8:49:54 GMT
The issue with that sign is than anybody deciding to vote on that shouldn't vote for any of them. Labour didn't protected them. UKIP is using them for political gain. I have to say it has puzzled me as to why the grooming issue should be thought by some people to be off limits to political discussion. For example Labour frequently criticise other parties over the issue of the NHS. They have done this for decades. I have never heard anyone 'how can you politicise health, do you understand you are talking about the treatment of some very ill people who are suffering terribly right now. Some of them are Conservative supporters, how do you suppose they feel about you exploiting their suffering for political gain?' Multi-party politics inevitably involves political parties criticising other parties for their failings in various areas. This includes things like criminal justice, war, healthcare for the seriously ill and other extremely grave matters. How exactly is this any different?
|
|
maxque
Non-Aligned
Posts: 9,306
|
Post by maxque on Oct 26, 2014 8:52:03 GMT
I have to say it has puzzled me as to why the grooming issue should be thought by some people to be off limits to political discussion. For example Labour frequently criticise other parties over the issue of the NHS. They have done this for decades. I have never heard anyone 'how can you politicise health, do you understand you are talking about the treatment of some very ill people who are suffering terribly right now. Some of them are Conservative supporters, how do you suppose they feel about you exploiting their suffering for political gain?' Multi-party politics inevitably involves political parties criticising other parties for their failings in various areas. This includes things like criminal justice, war, healthcare for the seriously ill and other extremely grave matters. How exactly is this any different? The issue isn't attacking the failures of other parties, but faillure to propose any solution. What UKIP would do differently?
|
|
|
Post by Devonian on Oct 26, 2014 9:06:50 GMT
The issue isn't attacking the failures of other parties, but faillure to propose any solution. What UKIP would do differently? Well the poster doesn't talk about what UKIP would do differently. However the UKIP election statement does. In fact all four election statements talk about the issue
|
|
|
Post by Devonian on Oct 26, 2014 9:08:04 GMT
|
|
|
Post by Devonian on Oct 26, 2014 9:10:08 GMT
|
|