Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 15, 2014 18:33:07 GMT
Amber ValleyHeanor EastLabour resigned2008 - BNP 537, C 482, Lab 454 2010 - Lab 1,038, C 965, BNP 451, LD 440 2012 - Lab 744, C 391, BNP 284, LD 69 Candidates ( Source) Steven GRAINGER [The Conservative Party Candidate] Sheila OAKES [The Labour Party Candidate] Kate SMITH [Liberal Democrat] LichfieldChadsmeadConservative disqualified2003 - Con 328/289, Lab 300/250, LD 100 2007 - LD 407/366, Con 373/368, Lab 181/171 2011 - Con 416/385, LD 326/206, Lab 303/278 Candidates ( Source) Marion BLAND [Liberal Democrat] Bob GREEN [UK Independence Party (UKIP)] Jon O'HAGAN [The Conservative Party Candidate] Caroline WOOD [The Labour Party Candidate] MorayBuckieIndependent resigned2007 - SNP 1,118, Ind (1) 708, Ind (2) 698, Lab 507, Con 397, Ind (3) 169 2012 - SNP 967, Ind (1) 648, Ind (2), 557, Con 179, SNP 169 Candidates SourceGordon COWIE (Independent) Margaret Irene GAMBLES (Scottish Conservative and Unionist) Marc MACRAE (Independent) Linda MCDONALD (Scottish National Party (SNP))
|
|
Tony Otim
Green
Suffering from Brexistential Despair
Posts: 11,902
|
Post by Tony Otim on Jan 17, 2014 13:09:14 GMT
For completeness' sake, it's also worth including which party is defending the seat - in multi-member wards or in cases of defection this is not always apparent from the previous results.
|
|
Merseymike
Independent
Posts: 40,440
Member is Online
|
Post by Merseymike on Jan 17, 2014 15:06:22 GMT
Interesting that UKIP haven't got a candidate in a ward formerly held by the BNP
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 17, 2014 16:25:57 GMT
For completeness' sake, it's also worth including which party is defending the seat - in multi-member wards or in cases of defection this is not always apparent from the previous results. I knew I'd forget something. Thanks, I'll get on it now...
|
|
|
Post by David Ashforth on Jan 17, 2014 21:48:06 GMT
|
|
|
Post by timokane on Jan 19, 2014 3:57:37 GMT
Interesting that UKIP haven't got a candidate in a ward formerly held by the BNP I thought that as well. Difficult to see where the BNP vote has shifted to in that ward since 2008.
|
|
|
Post by AdminSTB on Jan 19, 2014 11:35:08 GMT
2012 - Lab 838, C 391, BNP 284, LD 69 Labour figure is wrong, should be 744.
|
|
|
Post by markgoodair on Jan 20, 2014 19:46:49 GMT
Can anyone explain the wide difference in Moray between the two SNP candidates results?
|
|
|
Post by East Anglian Lefty on Jan 20, 2014 19:54:34 GMT
Either a) the second candidate was a sweeper or b) he wasn't from Buckie.
|
|
piperdave
SNP
Dalkeith; Midlothian/North & Musselburgh
Posts: 911
|
Post by piperdave on Jan 20, 2014 21:07:58 GMT
EAL, candidate 2 was a she! And given both are called McDonald, there's a distinct possibility of a familial relationship. The Council have taken down the Notice of Poll so I can't check addresses. But given the SNP only got 32% in 2007 in a ward where you need 25% to get a seat, my hope would be that Buckie SNP actually understand STV and did everything they could to get the existing councillor re-elected and try to ensure all the votes in the surplus transferred to L McDonald.
Now you might think that the 12.7 percentage points increase to a combined 45% would mean they were likely to get both elected in the end. But two independents taking 25% and 22% respectively was just unlucky!
|
|
maxque
Non-Aligned
Posts: 9,308
|
Post by maxque on Jan 20, 2014 21:08:29 GMT
Either a) the second candidate was a sweeper or b) he wasn't from Buckie. The second candidate was the wife of the SNP councillor which was elected, so, we can suppose she was from Buckie. EDIT: Proof
|
|
|
Post by gwynthegriff on Jan 24, 2014 18:02:16 GMT
Interesting that UKIP haven't got a candidate in a ward formerly held by the BNP It's interesting - but not surprising - that the BNP hasn't got a candidate in a ward formerly held by the BNP.
|
|
Merseymike
Independent
Posts: 40,440
Member is Online
|
Post by Merseymike on Jan 24, 2014 23:58:11 GMT
Interesting that UKIP haven't got a candidate in a ward formerly held by the BNP It's interesting - but not surprising - that the BNP hasn't got a candidate in a ward formerly held by the BNP. For some things we can only be grateful!
|
|
|
Post by AdminSTB on Jan 28, 2014 21:07:37 GMT
|
|
|
Post by Ben Walker on Jan 30, 2014 23:34:36 GMT
Chadsmead (Lichfield) Result: LDem - 36.0% (+4.8) - 206 LAB - 27.4% (-1.6) - 157 UKIP - 18.8% (+18.8) - 108 CON - 17.8% (-22.0) - 102
|
|
|
Post by independentukip on Jan 30, 2014 23:46:44 GMT
A weekend treat for the Tories in Westminster who it was reported are pretty chipper at the moment.
|
|
|
Post by middleenglander on Jan 30, 2014 23:51:30 GMT
Amber Valley, Heanor East - Party | 2014 votes | 2014 share | since 2012 | since 2010 | since 2008 | Row 2 column 1 | Row 2 column 2 | Row 2 column 3 | Row 2 column 4 | Row 2 column 5 | Row 2 column 6 | Row 3 column 1 | Row 3 column 2 | Row 3 column 3 | Row 3 column 4 | Row 3 column 5 | Row 3 column 6 | Row 4 column 1 | Row 4 column 2 | Row 4 column 3 | Row 4 column 4 | Row 4 column 5 | Row 4 column 6 | BNP |
|
| -19.1% | -15.6% | -36.5% | Total votes | Row 6 column 2 |
| Row 6 column 4 | Row 6 column 5 | Row 6 column 6 |
Swing Lichfield, Chadsmead - Lib Dem gain from Conservative Party | 2014 votes | 2014 share | since 2011 "top" | since 2011 "average" | since 2007 "top" | since 2007 "average" | Lib Dem | 206 | 36.0% | +4.8% | +8.2% | -6.4% | -5.4% | Labour | 157 | 27.4% | -1.6% | -3.0% | +8.6% | +8.5% | UKIP | 108 | 18.8% | from nowhere | from nowhere | from nowhere | from nowhere | Conservative | 102 | 17.8% | -22.0% | -24.0% | -21.0% | -21.9% | Total votes | 573 |
| -472 | -384 | -388 | -360 |
Swing Conservative to Lib Dem 13½% / 16% since 2011 and 7% / 8% since 2007 Moray, Buckie - Party | 2014 votes | 2014 share | since 2012 | since 2007 | Row 2 column 1 | Row 2 column 2 | Row 2 column 3 | Row 2 column 4 | Row 2 column 5 | Row 3 column 1 | Row 3 column 2 | Row 3 column 3 | Row 3 column 4 | Row 3 column 5 | Row 4 column 1 | Row 4 column 2 | Row 4 column 3 | Row 4 column 4 | Row 4 column 5 | Row 5 column 1 | Row 5 column 2 | Row 5 column 3 | Row 5 column 4 | Row 5 column 5 | Row 6 column 1 | Row 6 column 2 | Row 6 column 3 | Row 6 column 4 | Row 6 column 5 | Labour |
|
| | -13.8% | Total votes | Row 8 column 2 |
| Row 8 column 4 | Row 8 column 5 |
Swing
|
|
|
Post by Ben Walker on Jan 30, 2014 23:51:55 GMT
Anyone surprised? Thought Fabricated Hair was quite popular round his way, and him doing his rounds in the campaigning should've solidified his vote... I'm surprised. Good UKIP vote, so I'm cool for the night, would've been nice to have beaten Labour, but, meh.
|
|
myth11
Non-Aligned
too busy at work!
Posts: 2,840
|
Post by myth11 on Jan 31, 2014 0:00:14 GMT
i would have thought having Caroline WOOD who won the county ward in 2013 would have won this for labour so well done lib dems
|
|
|
Post by independentukip on Jan 31, 2014 0:14:30 GMT
I wonder why only those who support the 3rd placed party have commented on the Lichfield result!?
|
|