|
Post by Davıd Boothroyd on Jul 20, 2024 10:36:41 GMT
Possible records broken at the GE: Most seats changing hands - 303 Lowest conservative share Lowest cons number of seats Largest con-lab swing Most new MPs - 335Record definitely not broken: Most sitting MPs defeated (1931 record still intact) Is this entirely new MPs, so not including retreads? Yes. There were 15 retreads as well, making 350.
|
|
Foggy
Non-Aligned
Yn Ennill Yma
Posts: 6,139
|
Post by Foggy on Jul 20, 2024 15:51:46 GMT
While we're on the topic of past elections, is there a theoretical Tory target list for 2001 anywhere? I'd like to compare it with the 2028/2029 battleground list and figure out what kind of majorities they'd need to overturn in order to become the largest single party, and to win a majority government, to see if things really are worse than in 1997.
Of course the other factor is that the Conservatives won't be starting from second place in as many constituencies next time. It's that aspect, rather than number of seats or national share of the vote, which might mean 2024 ultimately comes to be seen as a more damaging defeat.
|
|
|
Post by mick745 on Jul 20, 2024 16:10:49 GMT
While we're on the topic of past elections, is there a theoretical Tory target list for 2001 anywhere? I'd like to compare it with the 2028/2029 battleground list and figure out what kind of majorities they'd need to overturn in order to become the largest single party, and to win a majority government, to see if things really are worse than in 1997. Of course the other factor is that the Conservatives won't be starting from second place in as many constituencies next time. It's that aspect, rather than number of seats or national share of the vote, which might mean 2024 ultimately comes to be seen as a more damaging defeat. I think there was an appendix listing these in Rallings and Thrasher "Official Results" book from that election.
|
|
|
Post by swingometer on Jul 20, 2024 16:19:12 GMT
While we're on the topic of past elections, is there a theoretical Tory target list for 2001 anywhere? I'd like to compare it with the 2028/2029 battleground list and figure out what kind of majorities they'd need to overturn in order to become the largest single party, and to win a majority government, to see if things really are worse than in 1997. Of course the other factor is that the Conservatives won't be starting from second place in as many constituencies next time. It's that aspect, rather than number of seats or national share of the vote, which might mean 2024 ultimately comes to be seen as a more damaging defeat. news.bbc.co.uk/hi/english/static/vote2001/crucial_seats/con_battleground.stm
|
|
Foggy
Non-Aligned
Yn Ennill Yma
Posts: 6,139
|
Post by Foggy on Jul 20, 2024 17:29:42 GMT
While we're on the topic of past elections, is there a theoretical Tory target list for 2001 anywhere? I'd like to compare it with the 2028/2029 battleground list and figure out what kind of majorities they'd need to overturn in order to become the largest single party, and to win a majority government, to see if things really are worse than in 1997. Of course the other factor is that the Conservatives won't be starting from second place in as many constituencies next time. It's that aspect, rather than number of seats or national share of the vote, which might mean 2024 ultimately comes to be seen as a more damaging defeat. news.bbc.co.uk/hi/english/static/vote2001/crucial_seats/con_battleground.stmThanks! I recall seeing a snazzier version of that board behind Peter Snow on the TV coverage but as I've mentioned before, didn't get online at home until two months later so I didn't know there was a web page with the same information. So, extrapolating from that, we can see the seat the Tories would've needed in order to become the largest party in 2001 was Leeds North East (majority just shy of 7,000) and in order to win outright, Amber Valley (majority of a little over 11 and a half thousand). The notion that they might win back the former now feels absurd. For the next general election, according to ElectionPolling.co.uk - which sorts by percentage and not by raw majority like the BBC did 23 years ago - the seat needed to become the largest party could be, erm, here (majority just shy of 5,000 but starting from third place) and in order to win outright, Guildford (majority under 8 and a half thousand). Yes, it's all a bit back-of-an-envelope and makes too many assumptions about uniform swing, but on this basis alone, things aren't looking as bad for the Tories as they were in 1997. Although we know from 2001 that they of course got nowhere near an immediate return to power.
|
|
andrewp
Non-Aligned
Posts: 9,642
Member is Online
|
Post by andrewp on Jul 20, 2024 17:51:31 GMT
Thanks! I recall seeing a snazzier version of that board behind Peter Snow on the TV coverage but as I've mentioned before, didn't get online at home until two months later so I didn't know there was a web page with the same information. So, extrapolating from that, we can see the seat the Tories would've needed in order to become the largest party in 2001 was Leeds North East (majority just shy of 7,000) and in order to win outright, Amber Valley (majority of a little over 11 and a half thousand). The notion that they might win back the former now feels absurd. For the next general election, according to ElectionPolling.co.uk - which sorts by percentage and not by raw majority like the BBC did 23 years ago - the seat needed to become the largest party could be, erm, here (majority just shy of 5,000 but starting from third place) and in order to win outright, Guildford (majority under 8 and a half thousand). Yes, it's all a bit back-of-an-envelope and makes too many assumptions about uniform swing, but on this basis alone, things aren't looking as bad for the Tories as they were in 1997. Although we know from 2001 that they of course got nowhere near an immediate return to power. I worked out a week or so ago that the seat Lab needed to hold in 2001 for an overall majority of 1 had a majority in 1997 of 7100 where as in 2028/29 the seat they need to hold for a majority of 1 has a majority in 2024 of 3400.
|
|
Foggy
Non-Aligned
Yn Ennill Yma
Posts: 6,139
|
Post by Foggy on Jul 20, 2024 18:25:58 GMT
Thanks! I recall seeing a snazzier version of that board behind Peter Snow on the TV coverage but as I've mentioned before, didn't get online at home until two months later so I didn't know there was a web page with the same information. So, extrapolating from that, we can see the seat the Tories would've needed in order to become the largest party in 2001 was Leeds North East (majority just shy of 7,000) and in order to win outright, Amber Valley (majority of a little over 11 and a half thousand). The notion that they might win back the former now feels absurd. For the next general election, according to ElectionPolling.co.uk - which sorts by percentage and not by raw majority like the BBC did 23 years ago - the seat needed to become the largest party could be, erm, here (majority just shy of 5,000 but starting from third place) and in order to win outright, Guildford (majority under 8 and a half thousand). Yes, it's all a bit back-of-an-envelope and makes too many assumptions about uniform swing, but on this basis alone, things aren't looking as bad for the Tories as they were in 1997. Although we know from 2001 that they of course got nowhere near an immediate return to power. I worked out a week or so ago that the seat Lab needed to hold in 2001 for an overall majority of 1 had a majority in 1997 of 7100 where as in 2028/29 the seat they need to hold for a majority of 1 has a majority in 2024 of 3400. In 2001 the House of Commons had 659 seats, so winning 330 meant a majority of 1. In 2028/29 it will presumably still have 650 seats, so winning 326 means a majority of 2. Your majority figures seem a little on the low side, but the point remains the same and the direction of travel is clear: the raw majorities the Tories need to overturn next time are not as large as the uphill task was in 2001, but still a pretty monumental ask in a single GE.
|
|
andrewp
Non-Aligned
Posts: 9,642
Member is Online
|
Post by andrewp on Jul 20, 2024 18:39:08 GMT
I worked out a week or so ago that the seat Lab needed to hold in 2001 for an overall majority of 1 had a majority in 1997 of 7100 where as in 2028/29 the seat they need to hold for a majority of 1 has a majority in 2024 of 3400. In 2001 the House of Commons had 659 seats, so winning 330 meant a majority of 1. In 2028/29 it will presumably still have 650 seats, so winning 326 means a majority of 2. Your majority figures seem a little on the low side, but the point remains the same and the direction of travel is clear: the raw majorities the Tories need to overturn next time are not as large as the uphill task was in 2001, but still a pretty monumental ask in a single GE. In 2001 the Lab losing their majority seat was Keighley ( maj. 7132 or 13.8%), next time it is Folkestone and Hythe ( maj. 3729 or 8.6%)
|
|
Foggy
Non-Aligned
Yn Ennill Yma
Posts: 6,139
|
Post by Foggy on Jul 20, 2024 20:07:25 GMT
In 2001 the House of Commons had 659 seats, so winning 330 meant a majority of 1. In 2028/29 it will presumably still have 650 seats, so winning 326 means a majority of 2. Your majority figures seem a little on the low side, but the point remains the same and the direction of travel is clear: the raw majorities the Tories need to overturn next time are not as large as the uphill task was in 2001, but still a pretty monumental ask in a single GE. In 2001 the Lab losing their majority seat was Keighley (maj. 7,132 or 13.8%), next time it is Folkestone and Hythe (maj. 3,729 or 8.6%) Ah, you're using a Lab defence list rather than a Tory target one. I see now, and that probably makes more sense actually.
|
|
|
Post by minionofmidas on Jul 20, 2024 20:22:41 GMT
In 2001 the House of Commons had 659 seats, so winning 330 meant a majority of 1. In 2028/29 it will presumably still have 650 seats, so winning 326 means a majority of 2. Your majority figures seem a little on the low side, but the point remains the same and the direction of travel is clear: the raw majorities the Tories need to overturn next time are not as large as the uphill task was in 2001, but still a pretty monumental ask in a single GE. In 2001 the Lab losing their majority seat was Keighley ( maj. 7132 or 13.8%), next time it is Folkestone and Hythe ( maj. 3729 or 8.6%) Poignant given that Folkestone was a gain and Keighley the most surprising Tory hold
|
|
nyx
Non-Aligned
Posts: 1,043
|
Post by nyx on Jul 20, 2024 20:34:30 GMT
Possible records broken at the GE: Most seats changing hands - 303 Lowest conservative share Lowest cons number of seats Largest con-lab swing Most new MPs - 335Record definitely not broken: Most sitting MPs defeated (1931 record still intact) Is this entirely new MPs, so not including retreads? Yes. 335 entirely new, 300 MPs who were in parliament before the election, and 15 returning former MPs. Those fifteen are one SNP (Gethins), two Lib Dem (George and Munt), and twelve Labour (D. Alexander, H. Alexander, Creagh, Dakin, Frith, Nash, Norris, Onn, Platt, Reynolds, Snell, Turley)
|
|
|
Post by michaelarden on Jul 20, 2024 21:57:01 GMT
Is this entirely new MPs, so not including retreads? Yes. 335 entirely new, 300 MPs who were in parliament before the election, and 15 returning former MPs. Those fifteen are one SNP (Gethins), two Lib Dem (George and Munt), and twelve Labour (D. Alexander, H. Alexander, Creagh, Dakin, Frith, Nash, Norris, Onn, Platt, Reynolds, Snell, Turley) Oh god Snell's back - that passed me by until now.
|
|
|
Post by manchesterman on Jul 20, 2024 22:59:44 GMT
Seats where each party secured the most total votes:
Labour:
Tooting 29,209 Hornsey and Friern Barnet 28,535 Lewisham West and East Dulwich 27,406 Dulwich and West Norwood 27,356 Hove and Portslade 27,209 Walthamstow 27,172 Sefton Central 26,772 Bootle 26,729 Liverpool Walton 26,032 Beckenham and Penge 25,753 Stroud 25,607 Lewisham North 25,467 Liverpool West Derby 25,302 Rushcliffe 25,291 Mitcham and Morden 25,085 Edinburgh South 24,976 Hackney South and Shoreditch 24,724 Wallasey 24,674 Macclesfield 24,672 York Central 24,537 (fascinating the number of seats there that would've been considered marginal not all that long ago: Beckenham, Hove, Stroud, Rushcliffe, Macc! rather than a glut of seats in Merseyside, M/cr, Sheffield etc as would've been the case a decade or so ago)
Conservative:
Harrow East 25,466 Godalming and Ash 23,293 Richmond and Northallerton 23,059 Arundel and South Downs 22,001 Hertsmere 21,451 Ruislip, Northwood and Pinner 21,366 Rutland and Stamford 21,248 Newark 20,968 Wetherby and Easingwold 20,597 North East Hampshire 20,544 Tonbridge 20,517 Stockton West 20,372 Hexham 20,275 Weald of Kent 20,202 Mid Buckinghamshire 20,150 Mid Dorset and North Poole 20,090 North Bedfordshire 19,981 Droitwich and Evesham 19,975 Tatton 19,956 Chester South and Eddisbury 19,905
[Top 5 included the incumbent Leader, Chancellor and Deputy Leader]
Liberal Democrats:
Westmorland and Lonsdale 31,061 Twickenham 30,185 Winchester 29,939 St Albans 29,222 Richmond Park 28,528 Esher and Walton 28,315 Harpenden and Berkhamsted 27,282 West Dorset 26,999 Lewes 26,895 Edinburgh West 26,645 North Shropshire 26,214 Kingston and Surbiton 25,870 Wokingham 25,743 South Cambridgeshire 25,704 Chichester 25,540 Cheltenham 25,076 St Ives 25,033 North Cornwall 24,904 Wimbledon 24,790 Chesham and Amersham 24,422 (only 2 seats where the vote exceeded 30,000 were for Lib Dem candidates)
Reform:
Clacton 21,225 Ashfield 17,062 Boston and Skegness 15,520 Great Yarmouth 14,385 Hornchurch and Upminster 13,317 Makerfield 12,803 Maldon 12,468 Castle Point 12,234 Amber Valley 12,192 South Basildon and East Thurrock 12,178 Rayleigh and Wickford 12,135 Louth and Horncastle 11,935 Brentwood and Ongar 11,751 Houghton and Sunderland South 11,668 Barnsley South 11,651 Cannock Chase 11,570 Dover and Deal 11,355 Basildon and Billericay 11,354 Braintree 11,346 Sherwood Forest 11,320
(interestingly only 3 of these seats in The North, whereas 11 seats in the South, with 6 in the Midlands)
Greens:
Brighton Pavilion 28,809 Bristol Central 24,539 North Herefordshire 21,736 Waveney Valley 20,467 Bristol East 14,142 Bristol South 10,855 Huddersfield 10,568 Hackney South and Shoreditch 9,987 Lewisham North 9,685 Hackney North and Stoke Newington 9,275 Walthamstow 9,176 Lewisham West and East Dulwich 9,009 Birkenhead 8,670 Dulwich and West Norwood 8,567 Bristol North West 8,389 Sheffield Central 8,283 Norwich South 8,245 Manchester Withington 8,084 Brighton Kemptown and Peacehaven 7,997 Bristol North East 7,837
(5 of the 20 seats in Bristol)
SNP:
Angus and Perthshire Glens 19,142 Perth and Kinross-shire 18,928 Inverness, Skye and West Ross-shire 15,999 Argyll, Bute and South Lochaber 15,582 Arbroath and Broughty Ferry 15,581 Dundee Central 15,544 Stirling and Strathallan 15,462 Aberdeen South 15,213 Edinburgh East and Musselburgh 15,075 Moray West, Nairn and Strathspey 14,961 Livingston 14,796 Aberdeen North 14,533 Cumbernauld and Kirkintilloch 14,369 West Aberdeenshire and Kincardine 13,987 Kilmarnock and Loudoun 13,936 East Kilbride and Strathaven 13,625 Glasgow South 13,542 Gordon and Buchan 13,540 Edinburgh North and Leith 13,537 East Renfrewshire 13,514
(Perth seems to be the new hub of SNP support?)
Plaid Cymru:
Dwyfor Meirionnydd 21,788 Ceredigion Preseli 21,738 Caerfyrddin 15,520 Ynys Mon 10,590 Llanelli 9,511 Cardiff West 9,423 Bangor Aberconwy 9,112 Caerphilly 8,119 Montgomeryshire and Glyndwr 5,667 Neath and Swansea East 5,350 Pontypridd 5,275 Rhondda and Ogmore 5,198 Merthyr Tydfil and Aberdare 4,768 Aberafan Maesteg 4,719 Cardiff North 4,669 Wrexham 4,138 Swansea West 4,105 Gower 3,942 Blaenau Gwent and Rhymney 3,844 Clwyd East 3,733
(only 4 seats where they secured over 10,000 votes)
|
|
|
Post by doktorb🏳️🌈🏳️⚧️ on Jul 21, 2024 2:31:08 GMT
Highest ever LD votes...?
|
|
The Bishop
Labour
Down With Factionalism!
Posts: 38,967
Member is Online
|
Post by The Bishop on Jul 21, 2024 11:02:52 GMT
A list for Independents/Others might also be interesting - I wonder how many (if any) of the top 20 would have been in "non-Muslim" seats (list topper Jeremy Corbyn aside)
|
|
|
Post by doktorb🏳️🌈🏳️⚧️ on Jul 21, 2024 11:33:32 GMT
Highest Independent votes
Islington North 24120 North Down 20913 Dewsbury and Batley 15641 Ilford North 15119 Leicester South 14739 Bethnal Green and Stepney 14207 Birmingham Perry Barr 13303 Chingford and Woodford Green 12445 Birmingham Ladywood 12137 Slough 11019 Bradford West 11017 Blackburn 10518 Ilford South 9643 Preston 8715 Oldham W, etc 8256 Bradford East 7909 Walsall Bloxwich 7600 Holborn St P 7312
|
|
The Bishop
Labour
Down With Factionalism!
Posts: 38,967
Member is Online
|
Post by The Bishop on Jul 21, 2024 12:04:21 GMT
Workers Party have at least two who would get into that list (11587 in Rochdale and 10582 in Birmingham Yardley) Any others?
|
|
|
Post by Pete Whitehead on Jul 21, 2024 12:14:49 GMT
Hodge Hill
|
|
|
Post by greatkingrat on Jul 21, 2024 12:27:24 GMT
All parties ranked by maximum vote
Liberal Democrat 31061 Labour 29209 Green 28809 Labour and Co-operative 27172 Conservative 25466 Speaker 25238 Sinn Fein 24844 Independent 24120 Plaid Cymru 21788 Democratic Unionist Party 21642 Social Democratic and Labour Party 21345 Reform UK 21225 Ulster Unionist Party 20273 Scottish National Party 19142 Alliance 18618 Traditional Unionist Voice 11642 Workers Party of Britain 11587 Independent Network 11019 Newham Independents Party 7180 Ashfield Independents 6276 Scottish Green Party 5554 People Before Profit Alliance 5048 One Leicester 3681 Liverpool Community Independents 3294 Swale Independents 3238 Linconshire Independents 3032 UK Independence Party 2638 Democracy for Chorley 2424 Independent Oxford Alliance 2381 Liberal 2336 English Democrats 2036 Social Democratic Party 1960 South Devon Alliance 1924 The North East Party 1581 The Yorkshire Party 1363 Consensus 1289 Kingston Independent Residents Group 1177 British Democratic Party 1160 Alba Party 1132 Aontú 1047 Propel 1041 English Constitution Party 1007 Independent Alliance (Kent) 926 True & Fair Party 845 Rejoin EU 821 Trade Unionist and Socialist Coalition 797 Portsmouth Independent Party 733 Heritage Party 708 Abolish the Welsh Assembly Party 669 Cross-Community Labour Alternative 624 Putting Crewe First, Independent Residents Group 588 Hampshire Independents 571 Shared Ground 568 Women's Equality Party 544 Scottish Socialist Party 541 Monster Raving Loony Party 529 Scottish Family Party 505 Taking The Initiative Party 503 Alliance for Democracy and Freedom 502 Christian Party, Proclaiming Christ's Lordship 496 Socialist Labour Party 496 Climate Party 489 Confelicity 488 Party of Women 482 Christian Peoples Alliance Party 460 British Unionist Party B.U.P. 456 Animal Welfare Party 410 Blue Revolution 397 Independence for Scotland Party 382 Chesterfield And North Derbyshire Independents (CANDI) 363 Workers Revolutionary Party 355 The Mitre TW9 349 Transform Party 331 Freedom Alliance 324 Communist Party of Britain 309 Count Binface Party 308 Social Justice party 285 The Peace Party 276 Rebooting Democracy 265 The Yoruba Party in the UK 261 Alliance for Green Socialism 259 Scottish Libertarian Party 259 National Health Action Party 247 Fairer Voting Party 240 Sovereignty 231 Common Good Party 215 Stockport Fights Austerity No To Cuts 193 New Open Non-Political Organised Leadership 186 Socialist Equality Party 178 Save Us Now 170 Communist League Election Campaign 167 Volt United Kingdom 163 UK Voice 150 Communist Future 131 The Socialist Party of Great Britain 122 Psychedelic Movement 99 The Common People 91 Libertarian Party 69 Independents for Direct Democracy 45
|
|
|
Post by uthacalthing on Jul 21, 2024 20:00:24 GMT
All parties ranked by maximum vote Scottish Libertarian Party 259 Libertarian Party 69 Scotland leading the way
|
|