|
|
Post by rcronald on Jul 5, 2024 3:50:44 GMT
Jess holds by about 1000 wow Mate, Labour needs to crack down on some Mosques… |
|
edgbaston
Labour
Posts: 4,362
Member is Online
|
Post by edgbaston on Jul 5, 2024 3:54:10 GMT
Jess holds by about 1000 wow Mate, Labour needs to crack down on some Mosques… ? It s a free country and secret ballot, explain |
|
|
|
Post by rcronald on Jul 5, 2024 3:57:29 GMT
Mate, Labour needs to crack down on some Mosques… ? It s a free country and secret ballot, explain In a democratic country, places of worship shouldn’t tell their attendees how to vote. Doesn’t matter if they’re Christians, Muslims, Jews, or Hindus. |
|
|
|
Post by woollyliberal on Jul 5, 2024 4:25:54 GMT
Jess holds by about 1000 wow Are you at the count? Come over and say hello. |
|
edgbaston
Labour
Posts: 4,362
Member is Online
|
Post by edgbaston on Jul 5, 2024 4:51:34 GMT
Jess holds by about 1000 wow Are you at the count? Come over and say hello. Which one are you though! Haha |
|
|
|
Post by doktorb🏳️🌈🏳️⚧️ on Jul 5, 2024 8:36:24 GMT
|
|
|
|
Post by Devil Wincarnate on Jul 5, 2024 10:13:38 GMT
Quite a few reports that it all got a bit nasty. |
|
|
|
Post by tonyhil on Jul 6, 2024 6:22:20 GMT
I've never been a fan - her campaign against John Hemming was a disgrace - but that was a great speech and I hope that she can continue to stand up to the forces of intolerance and misogyny in her community.
|
|
bd
Labour
Posts: 109 
|
Post by bd on Jul 6, 2024 16:21:09 GMT
x.com/jodymcintyremp/status/1809531341974704371?s=61&t=xb5vZ2qlkWNPHHmgSqjrbw Apparently the election was stolen. If the best evidence they have is the conclusions they drew from their sampling then they have a lot to learn. I have never known sampling to ever do anything other than overestimate our vote which is eternally frustrating. There’s strict internal Labour Party rules regarding postal votes these days. That’s not to say it could never happen but this feels pretty desperate stuff designed to stoke the sense of grievance on the part of the base. Equally postal voters do not always exactly reflect the rest of the electorate and there are quite legitimate ways of encouraging postal voters to vote particularly when you have extensive voter contact records.
|
|
|
|
Post by Defenestrated Fipplebox on Jul 6, 2024 16:29:42 GMT
Apparently the election was stolen. If the best evidence they have is the conclusions they drew from their sampling then they have a lot to learn. I have never known sampling to ever do anything other than overestimate our vote which is eternally frustrating. There’s strict internal Labour Party rules regarding postal votes these days. That’s not to say it could never happen but this feels pretty desperate stuff designed to stoke the sense of grievance on the part of the base. Equally postal voters do not always exactly reflect the rest of the electorate and there are quite legitimate ways of encouraging postal voters to vote particularly when you have extensive voter contact records. |
|
iang
Lib Dem
Posts: 1,813
|
Post by iang on Jul 6, 2024 16:41:09 GMT
This was virtually 20 years ago and neither of the wards concerned are part of Yardley. Aston at least is now part of Perry Barr, so it seems a rather strained argument
|
|
|
|
Post by batman on Jul 6, 2024 20:30:38 GMT
Donald Trump says hi.
|
|
|
|
Post by towerhamlets on Jul 6, 2024 20:39:59 GMT
Jess holds by about 1000 wow Mate, Labour needs to crack down on some Mosques… Nicht doch einfacher, die Regierung Löste das Volk auf und Wählte ein anderes? |
|
|
|
Post by eastmidlandsright on Jul 6, 2024 20:47:31 GMT
In any event there is quite obviously something very wrong with this constituency.
Estelle Morris - "not up to the job"
John Hemming - absolute joke even by the standards of the Lib Dems
Jess Phillips - Thick as two short planks
And now nearly an Islamist loon.
We should probably deprive the electorate here of the right to vote until they learn to take the job more seriously.
|
|
|
|
Post by greenchristian on Jul 6, 2024 23:44:13 GMT
x.com/jodymcintyremp/status/1809531341974704371?s=61&t=xb5vZ2qlkWNPHHmgSqjrbw Apparently the election was stolen. If the best evidence they have is the conclusions they drew from their sampling then they have a lot to learn. I have never known sampling to ever do anything other than overestimate our vote which is eternally frustrating. There’s strict internal Labour Party rules regarding postal votes these days. That’s not to say it could never happen but this feels pretty desperate stuff designed to stoke the sense of grievance on the part of the base. Equally postal voters do not always exactly reflect the rest of the electorate and there are quite legitimate ways of encouraging postal voters to vote particularly when you have extensive voter contact records. The start of your last paragraph is key. In my experience postal votes almost always show a different distribution of the vote to on the day votes. Partly it's because the demographics of postal voters are different and partly it's because very few postal voters are influenced by anything that happened in the later stages of the campaign. As far as the accuracy of tallying goes, my experience is that it's accurate enough to know whether you need to direct your people to watch the actual count like hawks, and is usually in the same ballpark as the provisional result (if I ever had a situation where it wasn't then I would be questioning the result at the provisional stage). |
|
|
|
Post by tonyhil on Jul 7, 2024 6:13:38 GMT
Postal votes are not counted separately from votes cast on the day. These days most Returning Officers make sure that during the verification process it is very difficult for scrutineers to see how postal voters have voted anyway. It may well be the case that the postal vote had a different outcome to votes on the day, but that can only be an assertion without evidence.
|
|
|
|
Post by iainbhx on Jul 7, 2024 6:34:12 GMT
Postal votes are not counted separately from votes cast on the day. These days most Returning Officers make sure that during the verification process it is very difficult for scrutineers to see how postal voters have voted anyway. It may well be the case that the postal vote had a different outcome to votes on the day, but that can only be an assertion without evidence. If you have good enough tallying during the verification of the on the day votes, then you can use simple arithmetic to determine the nature of the postal vote. Yardley LibDems have tallies going back decades - I suspect they would know the answer as would Labour, I'm not sure if the Wankers Party of Britain had enough nouse to take decent tallies. |
|
|
|
Post by doktorb🏳️🌈🏳️⚧️ on Jul 7, 2024 17:11:21 GMT
"People are desperate for me to say this was Muslim men"
|
|
Jack
Reform Party
Posts: 8,678
Member is Online
|
Post by Jack on Jul 8, 2024 14:20:10 GMT
"People are desperate for me to say this was Muslim men" Jess Phillips will criticise the behaviour of men for all sorts of reasons. Unless they're Muslim. |
|
|
|
Post by batman on Jul 8, 2024 15:01:16 GMT
That simply isn’t true. She confronted and opposed the reactionary school protesters.
|
|
