swanarcadian
Conservative & Unionist
Posts: 2,675
Member is Online
|
Post by swanarcadian on Jul 23, 2024 22:30:26 GMT
I have long favoured MPs representing Brits abroad in the British Parliament, rather like the French do with their expats and overseas territories.
|
|
john07
Labour & Co-operative
Posts: 15,801
Member is Online
|
Clacton
Jul 23, 2024 22:51:12 GMT
via mobile
Post by john07 on Jul 23, 2024 22:51:12 GMT
I have long favoured MPs representing Brits abroad in the British Parliament, rather like the French do with their expats and overseas territories. But the overseas territories are constitutionally part of France and elect their own deputies. The approach taken to allow expats to vote in the Constituency they last resided is a rather unsatisfactory fudge. It is presumably intended to harvest the votes from reactionary expats living in the Med?
|
|
|
Post by timrollpickering on Jul 23, 2024 23:14:37 GMT
I have long favoured MPs representing Brits abroad in the British Parliament, rather like the French do with their expats and overseas territories. But the overseas territories are constitutionally part of France and elect their own deputies. However more and more parliaments also include representatives for citizens living outside the state. Does anyone want to calculate just how many constituencies we now live in?
|
|
john07
Labour & Co-operative
Posts: 15,801
Member is Online
|
Post by john07 on Jul 23, 2024 23:50:26 GMT
But the overseas territories are constitutionally part of France and elect their own deputies. However more and more parliaments also include representatives for citizens living outside the state. Does anyone want to calculate just how many constituencies we now live in? I think a better solution would be to create an additional constituency (or constituencies) rather than allocate them to the last constituency they resided in.
|
|
J.G.Harston
Lib Dem
Leave-voting Brexit-supporting Liberal Democrat
Posts: 14,784
|
Post by J.G.Harston on Jul 24, 2024 0:08:55 GMT
UK retirees who live in Spain (like my Remoaner brother-in-law) really ought to STFU about Brexit. It's none of their business. And Irish people? Them as well. Two of the many issues which a well-crafted Voter Suppression Act ought to cover along with postal votes and the removal of people from the register if they miss three consecutive elections with a £10 fee for re-registering Not a Voter Suppression Act, but a proper Franchise Act: Franchise Reform Bill
Abstract To Establish An Adult Citizen Franchise
1: A person shall have the right to vote if both of the following apply: a) The person is an adult b) The person is a citizen of the United Kingdom
2: No amendments to these conditions shall be made by amending this Act, but by legislation relating to Adulthood and Citizenship.
3: The right to vote shall immediately cease if any of of the following occurs: a) The person ceases to be an adult b) The person ceases to be a citizen of the United Kingdom c) Upon conviction of an appropriate offense.
4: No amendments to these cases shall be made by amending the Act, but by legislation relating to Adulthood, Citizenshop, and Sentencing.
5: All persons who have the right to vote by the Act shall also have the right to stand for election, and engage in all parts of the electoral processes.
6: All previous Acts, or parts of Acts, relating to franchise rights are hereby repealed.
|
|
J.G.Harston
Lib Dem
Leave-voting Brexit-supporting Liberal Democrat
Posts: 14,784
|
Post by J.G.Harston on Jul 24, 2024 0:19:21 GMT
You shouldn't have to give up citizenship, but if you move abroad and are not planning on returning and pay no UK taxes, you shouldn't still get a vote. The franchise should not be based on if you are rich enough to pay taxes.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 24, 2024 0:32:25 GMT
Or only to people who are rich enough to go through the citizenship process. The process should be far less costly
|
|
john07
Labour & Co-operative
Posts: 15,801
Member is Online
|
Post by john07 on Jul 24, 2024 0:40:42 GMT
You shouldn't have to give up citizenship, but if you move abroad and are not planning on returning and pay no UK taxes, you shouldn't still get a vote. The franchise should not be based on if you are rich enough to pay taxes. It's nothing to do with being rich enought to pay taxes. I am not totally convinced that tax-dodgers living in the Cayman Islands need to be given specific rights to vote.
|
|
J.G.Harston
Lib Dem
Leave-voting Brexit-supporting Liberal Democrat
Posts: 14,784
|
Post by J.G.Harston on Jul 24, 2024 0:58:39 GMT
The franchise should not be based on if you are rich enough to pay taxes. It's nothing to do with being rich enought to pay taxes. I am not totally convinced that tax-dodgers living in the Cayman Islands need to be given specific rights to vote. They are not given specific rights to vote. They do not have their voting rights removed from them. If you want to make tax dodging an electoral offense resulting in termination of electoral rights through due sentencing, that's fine, make it a specific sentence for that crime.
|
|
edgbaston
Labour
Posts: 4,390
Member is Online
|
Clacton
Jul 24, 2024 1:22:50 GMT
via mobile
Post by edgbaston on Jul 24, 2024 1:22:50 GMT
UK retirees who live in Spain (like my Remoaner brother-in-law) really ought to STFU about Brexit. It's none of their business. And Irish people? Them as well. Two of the many issues which a well-crafted Voter Suppression Act ought to cover along with postal votes and the removal of people from the register if they miss three consecutive elections with a £10 fee for re-registering Not a Voter Suppression Act, but a proper Franchise Act: Franchise Reform Bill
Abstract To Establish An Adult Citizen Franchise
1: A person shall have the right to vote if both of the following apply: a) The person is an adult b) The person is a citizen of the United Kingdom
2: No amendments to these conditions shall be made by amending this Act, but by legislation relating to Adulthood and Citizenship.
3: The right to vote shall immediately cease if any of of the following occurs: a) The person ceases to be an adult b) The person ceases to be a citizen of the United Kingdom c) Upon conviction of an appropriate offense.
4: No amendments to these cases shall be made by amending the Act, but by legislation relating to Adulthood, Citizenshop, and Sentencing.
5: All persons who have the right to vote by the Act shall also have the right to stand for election, and engage in all parts of the electoral processes.
6: All previous Acts, or parts of Acts, relating to franchise rights are hereby repealed. Ridiculous, if you’re permanently settled in the UK you should get a vote, this isn’t Rome with citizens and serfs. You’re also cooking up all sorts of problems in Northern Ireland.
|
|
edgbaston
Labour
Posts: 4,390
Member is Online
|
Post by edgbaston on Jul 24, 2024 1:29:33 GMT
The franchise should not be based on if you are rich enough to pay taxes. It's nothing to do with being rich enought to pay taxes. I am not totally convinced that tax-dodgers living in the Cayman Islands need to be given specific rights to vote. They have 85k people, I would give them an MP, however this would also come along with the British government being able to democratically intervene somewhat more in their affairs to the disadvantage of the said tax dodgers. Bermuda can have an MP as well Anguilla, Turks/Caicos, the Virgin Islands and Montserrat can be grouped for 1 Gibraltar is a bit small but we can add on the troops in Cyprus to make up the numbers a bit for a Med MP The other 6 southern territories can be grouped for 1, in practice a Falkland Island MP The 3 crown dependencies should have an MP each too So 8 extra MPs with only 2 severely undersized
|
|
|
Post by doktorb🏳️🌈🏳️⚧️ on Jul 24, 2024 4:18:58 GMT
There could be some collars getting sweaty in Jersey and Guernsey if they find themselves as MPs subject to financial regulations.
I'd support the CDs and OTs being given 'observer status' of some kind. Maybe when Starmer finally gets around to turning the House of Lords into a democratically accountable second chamber, the remaining bits of Empire could be given seats as part of the new system.
|
|
|
Clacton
Jul 24, 2024 6:39:40 GMT
via mobile
Post by Devil Wincarnate on Jul 24, 2024 6:39:40 GMT
You shouldn't have to give up citizenship, but if you move abroad and are not planning on returning and pay no UK taxes, you shouldn't still get a vote. The franchise should not be based on if you are rich enough to pay taxes. German permanent residence (and any voting rights thereafter) requires evidence of continuous payment into social security/healthcare. It works.
|
|
|
Clacton
Jul 24, 2024 6:42:36 GMT
via mobile
Post by islington on Jul 24, 2024 6:42:36 GMT
UK retirees who live in Spain (like my Remoaner brother-in-law) really ought to STFU about Brexit. It's none of their business. And Irish people? Them as well. Two of the many issues which a well-crafted Voter Suppression Act ought to cover along with postal votes and the removal of people from the register if they miss three consecutive elections with a £10 fee for re-registering Not a Voter Suppression Act, but a proper Franchise Act: Franchise Reform Bill
Abstract To Establish An Adult Citizen Franchise
1: A person shall have the right to vote if both of the following apply: a) The person is an adult b) The person is a citizen of the United Kingdom
2: No amendments to these conditions shall be made by amending this Act, but by legislation relating to Adulthood and Citizenship.
3: The right to vote shall immediately cease if any of of the following occurs: a) The person ceases to be an adult b) The person ceases to be a citizen of the United Kingdom c) Upon conviction of an appropriate offense.
4: No amendments to these cases shall be made by amending the Act, but by legislation relating to Adulthood, Citizenshop, and Sentencing.
5: All persons who have the right to vote by the Act shall also have the right to stand for election, and engage in all parts of the electoral processes.
6: All previous Acts, or parts of Acts, relating to franchise rights are hereby repealed.Lunatics? Members of the House of Lords? (Potentially overlapping categories admittedly.)
|
|
|
Clacton
Jul 24, 2024 6:43:13 GMT
via mobile
Post by Devil Wincarnate on Jul 24, 2024 6:43:13 GMT
I have long favoured MPs representing Brits abroad in the British Parliament, rather like the French do with their expats and overseas territories. But the overseas territories are constitutionally part of France and elect their own deputies. The approach taken to allow expats to vote in the Constituency they last resided is a rather unsatisfactory fudge. It is presumably intended to harvest the votes from reactionary expats living in the Med? The campaign to reduce the threshold on voting rights was a cross-party affair, with heavy Labour involvement. Plus, the Med expat vote probably has as many people who vote Labour every time despite holding eyewateringly right-wing views as it does Reform voters!
|
|
|
Post by Davıd Boothroyd on Jul 24, 2024 8:26:14 GMT
But the overseas territories are constitutionally part of France and elect their own deputies. The approach taken to allow expats to vote in the Constituency they last resided is a rather unsatisfactory fudge. It is presumably intended to harvest the votes from reactionary expats living in the Med? The campaign to reduce the threshold on voting rights was a cross-party affair, with heavy Labour involvement. Plus, the Med expat vote probably has as many people who vote Labour every time despite holding eyewateringly right-wing views as it does Reform voters! The main leader of the campaign, Harry Shindler, was a Labour supporter - but that doesn't mean it had Labour involvement in the campaign.
|
|
|
Post by East Anglian Lefty on Jul 24, 2024 8:29:07 GMT
You are a UK citizen, who chooses to live in a place which is under EU rules. So you would be substantially less affected by changes to the EU-UK relationship than most other UK citizens. I make my voting decisions on the basis of what I believe would be best for Britain. Americans abroad get a vote in US elections. And the French, Spanish, Brazilians...and on and on and on Those decisions are based on the understanding that people may live and work abroad but are still citizens of their countries. Are you saying that people should give up their citizenship when they go abroad? Observant readers may have noticed that I did not at any time suggest you should not have the right to vote. My comments were solely concerned with which policy decisions do and do not impact you.
|
|
|
Post by East Anglian Lefty on Jul 24, 2024 8:31:15 GMT
Not a Voter Suppression Act, but a proper Franchise Act: Franchise Reform Bill
Abstract To Establish An Adult Citizen Franchise
1: A person shall have the right to vote if both of the following apply: a) The person is an adult b) The person is a citizen of the United Kingdom
2: No amendments to these conditions shall be made by amending this Act, but by legislation relating to Adulthood and Citizenship.
3: The right to vote shall immediately cease if any of of the following occurs: a) The person ceases to be an adult b) The person ceases to be a citizen of the United Kingdom c) Upon conviction of an appropriate offense.
4: No amendments to these cases shall be made by amending the Act, but by legislation relating to Adulthood, Citizenshop, and Sentencing.
5: All persons who have the right to vote by the Act shall also have the right to stand for election, and engage in all parts of the electoral processes.
6: All previous Acts, or parts of Acts, relating to franchise rights are hereby repealed. Ridiculous, if you’re permanently settled in the UK you should get a vote, this isn’t Rome with citizens and serfs. You’re also cooking up all sorts of problems in Northern Ireland. I think the Government of Ireland Act would probably deal with the issues in Northern Ireland, but at the cost of creating a much bigger problem with the Republic.
|
|
|
Clacton
Jul 24, 2024 8:35:21 GMT
via mobile
Post by Devil Wincarnate on Jul 24, 2024 8:35:21 GMT
The campaign to reduce the threshold on voting rights was a cross-party affair, with heavy Labour involvement. Plus, the Med expat vote probably has as many people who vote Labour every time despite holding eyewateringly right-wing views as it does Reform voters! The main leader of the campaign, Harry Shindler, was a Labour supporter - but that doesn't mean it had Labour involvement in the campaign. Happy to be corrected. I had seen a communication from Labour International that read as if they had been directly involved. But it sounds like it was a personal initiative.
|
|
observer
Non-Aligned
Posts: 2,573
Member is Online
|
Clacton
Jul 24, 2024 8:43:56 GMT
via mobile
Post by observer on Jul 24, 2024 8:43:56 GMT
It is our business. We're UK citizens. You have every right to make comments. I have every right to ignore your hypocrisy. It's you that's the hypocrite
|
|