|
|
Post by yellowperil on Oct 5, 2023 6:30:41 GMT
Lambeth, Vauxhall: Con 11,Lab 45, LD 25, GP 18, SPGB 1.
Tamworth, Amington: Con 23, Lab 40, Ind 29, RefUK 6, UKIP 2.
|
|
andrewp
Non-Aligned
Posts: 9,580 
Member is Online
|
Post by andrewp on Oct 5, 2023 9:53:35 GMT
The challenge in all 3 of this weeks London contests was will either the Lib Dem’s or the Greens seriously challenge Labour and if so which of them? Does anyone have any insight on whether either of them were working any of the 3 wards hard?
|
|
The Bishop
Labour
Down With Factionalism!
Posts: 38,889
|
Post by The Bishop on Oct 5, 2023 11:20:20 GMT
Well the answer in the two Haringey contests at least seems to be - neither, really.
|
|
batman
Labour
Posts: 12,361
Member is Online
|
Post by batman on Oct 5, 2023 13:21:49 GMT
it's hard to believe that the Lib Dems were working South Tottenham hard given the result.
|
|
|
|
Post by Davıd Boothroyd on Oct 5, 2023 13:24:38 GMT
it's hard to believe that the Lib Dems were working South Tottenham hard given the result. Indeed, although would the result have been meaningfully different if they had been? |
|
|
|
Post by kevinf on Oct 5, 2023 18:14:41 GMT
it's hard to believe that the Lib Dems were working South Tottenham hard given the result. Yep, and my predictions were based on a backlash against the Labour resignations…which also failed to materialise. |
|
|
|
Post by finsobruce on Oct 5, 2023 18:55:51 GMT
it's hard to believe that the Lib Dems were working South Tottenham hard given the result. Yep, and my predictions were based on a backlash against the Labour resignations…which also failed to materialise. I almost fell off my chair when you predicted them getting 37% in White Hart Lane. 
Councillors resign all the time, and it doesn't really have an effect unless there is a particularly egregious reason.
|
|
|
|
Post by kevinf on Oct 5, 2023 22:22:14 GMT
Yep, and my predictions were based on a backlash against the Labour resignations…which also failed to materialise. I almost fell off my chair when you predicted them getting 37% in White Hart Lane.
Councillors resign all the time, and it doesn't really have an effect unless there is a particularly egregious reason.
Not sure…we’ve seen some big swings when voters see the by-election as unnecessary. I just massively over-estimate it each time! |
|
|
|
Post by robbienicoll on Oct 5, 2023 22:51:39 GMT
13 entries to start the month, all correct but unfortunately batman is timed out on the Haringey entries although I've included them both for completeness (7pm is the time out cut off for future reference). South Tottenham, Haringey: 100% Labour hold, with majorities ranging from 14% (kevinf) to 57% (Richard Cromwell). White Hart Lane, Haringey: 100% Labour hold, with majorities ranging from 11% (kevinf) to 57% (Richard Cromwell). Vauxhall, Lambeth: 100% Labour hold, with majorities ranging from 15% (johnloony and Toylyyev) to 53% (batman). Amington, Tamworth: 12 Labour hold, majorities ranging from 5% (kevinf) to 22% (corradino). Richard Cromwell Conservative gain with 1% majority. Results available at - docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1OtxpBsakoRqQTM9dubG5fBzDi5SZWoixfpbOlGlhv-E/edit?usp=sharing - good luck to all! |
|
|
|
Post by Robert Waller on Oct 5, 2023 23:12:12 GMT
|
|
|
|
Post by Robert Waller on Oct 5, 2023 23:48:52 GMT
... and congratulations to Tony Otim for winning Thursday - and the week as a whole! |
|
|
|
Post by corradino on Oct 6, 2023 0:06:09 GMT
And commiserations to Richard Cromwell and batman for winning battles spectacularly but still losing the war. I know how it feels all too well.
|
|
|
|
Post by yellowperil on Oct 6, 2023 1:24:35 GMT
And commiserations to Richard Cromwell and batman for winning battles spectacularly but still losing the war. I know how it feels all too well. I think John Loony is rather in that category, too? Perhaps not losing the war quite as much but one spectacular win. |
|
Tony Otim
Green
Suffering from Brexistential Despair
Posts: 11,892
|
Post by Tony Otim on Oct 10, 2023 19:57:30 GMT
Cheltenham: PAB 34.3; Grn 30.5; LD 18.2; Con 17.0
Suffolk: LD 64.8; Con 28.0; Lab 7.2
|
|
|
|
Post by corradino on Oct 10, 2023 21:14:33 GMT
Cheltenham, Prestbury: PAB 46, Green 24, Con 18, LD 12.
Suffolk, Woodbridge: LD 59, Con 28, Lab 13.
|
|
batman
Labour
Posts: 12,361
Member is Online
|
Post by batman on Oct 11, 2023 8:39:52 GMT
CHELTENHAM, Prestbury : PAB 54 Green 17 C 16 LD 13
SUFFOLK, Woodbridge : LD 64 C 26 Lab 10
|
|
|
|
Post by Richard Cromwell on Oct 11, 2023 9:31:00 GMT
Prestbury, Cheltenham| PAB | 46% | | GRN | 22% | | CON | 17% | | LDEM | 15% |
Woodbridge, Suffolk |
|
batman
Labour
Posts: 12,361
Member is Online
|
Post by batman on Oct 11, 2023 10:35:45 GMT
wow - I'd be cock-a-hoop to get that much in Woodbridge.
|
|
|
|
Post by kevinf on Oct 11, 2023 10:36:44 GMT
Cheltenham
PAB 45, LibDem 20, Con 18, Green 17
Suffolk
LibDem 65, Con 30, Lab 5
|
|
andrewp
Non-Aligned
Posts: 9,580
Member is Online
|
Post by andrewp on Oct 11, 2023 21:24:43 GMT
Cheltenham. Prestbury. PAB 44 Green 21 LD 19 Con 16
Suffolk, Woodbridge. LD 57 Con 26 Lab 17
|
|
