|
|
Post by kevinf on May 24, 2023 16:29:05 GMT
N Yorks
Randerson 28
Lab 25
Con 20
LibDem 15
Green 9
Thorne 3
|
|
|
|
Post by Robert Waller on May 24, 2023 19:24:19 GMT
N Yorks
Randerson 15
Lab 51
Con 10
LibDem 18
Green 5
Thorne 1
|
|
andrewp
Non-Aligned
Posts: 9,580 
Member is Online
|
Post by andrewp on May 24, 2023 20:32:27 GMT
North Yorkshire. Eastfield
Lab 42
Randerson 24
Con 15
LD 10
Green 5
Thorne 4
|
|
|
|
Post by corradino on May 24, 2023 21:24:50 GMT
North Yorkshire, Eastfield
Lab 34, Randerson 31, LibDem 15, Con 13, Green 5, Thorne 2.
|
|
|
|
Post by yellowperil on May 24, 2023 21:52:31 GMT
North Yorkshire, Eastfield: Con 15, Lab 40, LD 9, GP 5, Randerson 29, Thorne 2.
|
|
peterl
Green
Congratulations President Trump
Posts: 8,468
|
Post by peterl on May 24, 2023 22:29:16 GMT
North Yorkshire, Eastfield Lab 35, Randerson 29, LibDem 15, Con 10, Green 7, Thorne 4.
|
|
|
|
Post by johnloony on May 24, 2023 22:32:01 GMT
Lab 40 R 30 Con 15 Grn 6 LD 5 Ind 4
|
|
|
|
Post by rightleaning on May 25, 2023 5:30:48 GMT
North Yorkshire, Eastfield: Lab 34, Randerson 30, Con 18, LD 11, GP 5, Thomas 2.
|
|
|
|
Post by yellowperil on May 25, 2023 6:18:53 GMT
North Yorkshire, Eastfield: Lab 34, Randerson 30, Con 18, LD 11, GP 5, Thomas 2. The final candidate on your list is called Thorne, not Thomas . Now where did that mistake come from?  |
|
|
|
Post by iainbhx on May 25, 2023 6:34:10 GMT
North Yorkshire UA, Eastfield: Lab 40 ND Randerson 35 Con 12 LDm 7 Grn 4 Ind Thorne 2
|
|
|
|
Post by robbienicoll on May 25, 2023 21:48:09 GMT
|
|
|
|
Post by manchesterman on May 25, 2023 22:19:27 GMT
North Yorkshire, Eastfield: Lab 34, Randerson 30, Con 18, LD 11, GP 5, Thomas 2. The final candidate on your list is called Thorne, not Thomas . Now where did that mistake come from? are you doubting Thomas?  |
|
|
|
Post by Robert Waller on May 26, 2023 9:22:06 GMT
Congratulations to kevinf for the week's win - spotting not only Randerson's popularity but also that the LD would do quite well (I think she was the only one actually living in Eastfield). But none of us were very successful, really ... an odd and difficult byelection to start the competition. |
|
|
|
Post by yellowperil on May 26, 2023 10:50:40 GMT
Congratulations to kevinf for the week's win - spotting not only Randerson's popularity but also that the LD would do quite well (I think she was the only one actually living in Eastfield). But none of us were very successful, really ... an odd and difficult byelection to start the competition. Quite-It can only get better (one very much hopes!). Still, I'm always consoled when I do badly in part because I have seriously underestimated the Lib Dems' capacity for recovery in pretty hopeless looking areas. |
|
|
|
Post by manchesterman on May 26, 2023 12:31:20 GMT
Apparently Randerson is of the TUSC-ilk, so he must really have a very popular reputation locally!
|
|
|
|
Post by mattbewilson on May 26, 2023 12:46:10 GMT
Apparently Randerson is of the TUSC-ilk, so he must really have a very popular reputation locally! people don't care about ideology. They'll have voted for the person. Much like in Liverpool and Portsmouth with the independents there |
|
|
|
Post by kevinf on May 30, 2023 13:52:19 GMT
Re: Matt above. I think in Liverpool it’s a bit different.
Anyway, to Thursday’s by-election.
Labour 37, Lib Dem 30, Con 23, Green 10
|
|
|
|
Post by batman on May 30, 2023 15:37:45 GMT
CAMDEN, S.Hampstead : Lab 38 C 27 LD 23 Green 12
|
|
Tony Otim
Green
Suffering from Brexistential Despair
Posts: 11,892
|
Post by Tony Otim on May 30, 2023 19:34:37 GMT
Camden: Lab 45.2; LD 22.3; Con 19.7; Grn 12.8
|
|
|
|
Post by johnloony on May 31, 2023 12:40:59 GMT
Camden: Lab 56 LD 20 Con 16 Green 8
|
|
