Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 28, 2013 13:13:45 GMT
41% of UKIP supporters think it's important UK is "a leading voice in the EU"
talk about a mixed message or more like that 41% will disappear when the GE is on ...
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 23, 2013 20:20:41 GMT
seems the Unite findings are just the first from the Ashcroft Megapoll of 15,700 people ..
the Unite sample was 700
Mike Smithson @msmithsonpb To find 712 Unite members @lordashcroft poll questioned 15,970 people. What other goodies can we expect from this mega-poll?
|
|
|
Post by Davıd Boothroyd on Sept 14, 2013 23:15:24 GMT
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 15, 2013 8:15:31 GMT
so the spin may be that Ed is not popular, big deal, the reality is that in marginals the Tories are in deep trouble and it seems the likes of Crosby are thinking this is Australia or the US.
|
|
The Bishop
Labour
Down With Factionalism!
Posts: 39,015
Member is Online
|
Post by The Bishop on Sept 15, 2013 8:50:55 GMT
Following the incredibly successful strategy of Romney last year, you mean? That's fine by us
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 15, 2013 8:55:04 GMT
indeed, well pile up the 50K of votes in say Surrey, makes no difference to the GE result. They employ these people on mega wages and yet can not see what this story tells, the privatisation of say the RM is not going to be popular in the marginals and no need to do it apart from for dogma reasons.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 15, 2013 9:01:16 GMT
"Dogmatic", Ian.
"Ed is unpopular, so what" is dangerous complacency. He's going to have to pass the Prime Minister Suitability Test - just as Kinnock and Brown failed in their time.
|
|
The Bishop
Labour
Down With Factionalism!
Posts: 39,015
Member is Online
|
Post by The Bishop on Sept 15, 2013 9:03:24 GMT
Even more complacent is the coalition belief that it is 1992 all over again and just repeating "Ed is crap" until the GE will do the trick.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 15, 2013 9:21:31 GMT
"Dogmatic", Ian. "Ed is unpopular, so what" is dangerous complacency. He's going to have to pass the Prime Minister Suitability Test - just as Kinnock and Brown failed in their time. As Bish says this is not 1992. Brown never lost because oif him but because we were generally unpopular, it is the policies that thank god people still decide on. Now here is a what if question. IF Thatcher was still PM in Apr 1992 would we still have lost. I am convinced we lost because Major was 'not Thatcher' not because of Kinnock.
|
|
The Bishop
Labour
Down With Factionalism!
Posts: 39,015
Member is Online
|
Post by The Bishop on Sept 15, 2013 9:30:18 GMT
Yep - lots of people almost felt as if they had already had a change of government in late 1990.
And even then, the right wing press at the absolute height of their power - with effectively no challenge from social media, unlike now - were only just able to get the Tories over the line. People who expect a repeat in 2015 are setting themselves up for disappointment.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 15, 2013 9:35:12 GMT
And as we have discussed this so called recovery is largely based in one area and thus in the marginals with reduced money from wages and increased costs people do not feel it.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 15, 2013 9:57:31 GMT
Mike Smithson @msmithsonpb
Constituency specific findings in @lordashcroft marginals poll knock on head the first time incumbency bonus theory for Tories
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 15, 2013 15:12:36 GMT
Here's another Twitter update. I'll refrain from posting too many in the future as I know that annoys the hell out of most people here.
@georgeeaton George Eaton On Ashcroft marginals poll (Labour ahead), worth remembering that 2008 equivalent showed a Tory majority of 146 seats. Long way to go.
As the Conservatives found in the last parliament (and Neil Kinnock in the early nineties), even enjoying leads of 20%-plus eighteen months to two years prior to an election doesn't always mean you're going to win.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 15, 2013 15:14:16 GMT
stop referring back because it is not relevant when the situation is massively different. Do you really believe for example Labour will get lower than 2010 or LD's will get as high ?
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 15, 2013 15:52:22 GMT
I think Labour's share will go up (it did in 1987 and 1992, after all), but looking at current polls I also think there's a good chance ours just might also. Plus I doubt the LibDems are going to do quite as badly as they are now.
|
|
Andrew_S
Top Poster
Posts: 28,241
Member is Online
|
Post by Andrew_S on Sept 15, 2013 15:55:44 GMT
The average Labour lead in the 15 opinion polls this month is 5%, so Ashcroft's national figures are exactly in line with that.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 15, 2013 17:14:28 GMT
I think Labour's share will go up (it did in 1987 and 1992, after all), but looking at current polls I also think there's a good chance ours just might also. Plus I doubt the LibDems are going to do quite as badly as they are now. not as badly but it is about being relative to 2010 of course and the way the votes are spread. I expect the LD's to hold up very well in some areas and have massive vote losses in areas where they are third in a marginal.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 15, 2013 19:18:50 GMT
I note now how quiet Burley is and seems to be only visible when campaigning against Cannock hospital possibly closing (oh the irony of that).
What did happen to the Tory anti TU group ?
|
|
|
Post by marksenior on Sept 15, 2013 20:12:52 GMT
One minor point , I see this poll has Lancaster/Fleetwood classified as a seaside resort constituency . Not particularly accurate though it would not fit better into the other groups .
|
|
|
Post by carlton43 on Sept 15, 2013 21:08:08 GMT
"Dogmatic", Ian. "Ed is unpopular, so what" is dangerous complacency. He's going to have to pass the Prime Minister Suitability Test - just as Kinnock and Brown failed in their time. As Bish says this is not 1992. Brown never lost because oif him but because we were generally unpopular, it is the policies that thank god people still decide on. Now here is a what if question. IF Thatcher was still PM in Apr 1992 would we still have lost. I am convinced we lost because Major was 'not Thatcher' not because of Kinnock. I am sure that you are wrong Ian. Kinnock was disliked and distrusted on a far wider basis than the marginal benefit the Tories derived, away from areas in the South, by ditching Mrs. T. In my analysis the tone of the Sheffield Rally was a pivotal event in shedding a significant number of potential Labour votes to other parties or mainly to 'not voting', whilst also tending to bring out more reluctant Tories or anti-Labour votes. I call it as I saw it in East Anglia, Noth Yorkshire and East Midlands.
|
|