|
Post by mrpastelito on Jan 12, 2023 20:44:25 GMT
An assertion shared by virtually everyone who has eyes to see. Not a shocker you wear glasses, then. No need for glasses there - it's glaringly obvious even to the blind that Biden's more than past it. It borders on cruelty to regularly expose an obviously demented old man to ridicule in public even though most media outlets are doing their best to protect him.
|
|
|
Post by johnloony on Jan 12, 2023 21:18:09 GMT
Not a shocker you wear glasses, then. No need for glasses there - it's glaringly obvious even to the blind that Biden's more than past it. It borders on cruelty to regularly expose an obviously demented old man to ridicule in public even though most media outlets are doing their best to protect him. I think that Biden having a stammer and sometimes being not necessarily exceptionally articulate is sometimes interpreted as evidence of dementia or confusion, and it is not “obvious” to think otherwise.
|
|
|
Post by batman on Jan 12, 2023 21:18:53 GMT
"obviously demented" - really? I have heard plenty of speeches etc. from him which made perfect sense. He may be past it, but demented?
|
|
|
Post by aargauer on Jan 12, 2023 21:25:40 GMT
80 year olds can be vague and in mental decline without having dementia per se. That's my best guess of where Biden is.
|
|
|
Post by gwynthegriff on Jan 12, 2023 22:17:11 GMT
Not a shocker you wear glasses, then. No need for glasses there - it's glaringly obvious even to the blind that Biden's more than past it. It borders on cruelty to regularly expose an obviously demented old man to ridicule in public even though most media outlets are doing their best to protect him. I've seen lots of dementia in recent years. Biden is not "obviously demented".
|
|
|
Post by mrpastelito on Jan 12, 2023 23:17:48 GMT
No need for glasses there - it's glaringly obvious even to the blind that Biden's more than past it. It borders on cruelty to regularly expose an obviously demented old man to ridicule in public even though most media outlets are doing their best to protect him. I've seen lots of dementia in recent years. Biden is not "obviously demented". Then you haven't seen enough of Biden.
|
|
|
Post by grahammurray on Jan 12, 2023 23:27:32 GMT
I've seen lots of dementia in recent years. Biden is not "obviously demented". Then you haven't seen enough of Biden. Maybe he can aspire to the dizzying heights of "'Person. Woman. Man. Camera. TV."
|
|
maxque
Non-Aligned
Posts: 9,306
|
Post by maxque on Jan 12, 2023 23:34:25 GMT
I've seen lots of dementia in recent years. Biden is not "obviously demented". Then you haven't seen enough of Biden. Of course he looks senile when your only source of information is Russian propaganda.
|
|
|
Post by mrpastelito on Jan 12, 2023 23:42:26 GMT
Then you haven't seen enough of Biden. Maybe he can aspire to the dizzying heights of "'Person. Woman. Man. Camera. TV." At his stage of mental decay, Biden needs more detailed instructions: On the upside, he still appears to be able to read.
This man isn't fit to lead any country.
|
|
|
Post by mrpastelito on Jan 12, 2023 23:43:34 GMT
Then you haven't seen enough of Biden. Of course he looks senile when your only source of information is Russian propaganda.
|
|
maxque
Non-Aligned
Posts: 9,306
|
Post by maxque on Jan 12, 2023 23:54:10 GMT
Of course he looks senile when your only source of information is Russian propaganda. And then you back up my own argument by using a well-known pro-Russia rag, the Hindustani Times.
|
|
|
Post by grahammurray on Jan 12, 2023 23:59:57 GMT
Maybe he can aspire to the dizzying heights of "'Person. Woman. Man. Camera. TV." At his stage of mental decay, Biden needs more detailed instructions: On the upside, he still appears to be able to read.
This man isn't fit to lead any country.
Unlike his most recent opponent, Biden can read, write and count.
|
|
|
Post by frankyank on Jan 13, 2023 0:22:17 GMT
Not a shocker you wear glasses, then. No need for glasses there - it's glaringly obvious even to the blind that Biden's more than past it. It borders on cruelty to regularly expose an obviously demented old man to ridicule in public even though most media outlets are doing their best to protect him. Are you certain you’ve the right prescription? It seems pretty obvious to anyone who isn’t a troll, or consumes a media diet solely of partisan slop, that Biden does not have dementia. You can oppose him with all the vigour and vitriol you can muster, it’s your right as it is anyone else’s. But casting him as demented just makes you look pathetic. Perhaps that’s what you’re going for.
|
|
|
Post by eastmidlandsright on Jan 13, 2023 0:29:19 GMT
Not a shocker you wear glasses, then. No need for glasses there - it's glaringly obvious even to the blind that Biden's more than past it. It borders on cruelty to regularly expose an obviously demented old man to ridicule in public even though most media outlets are doing their best to protect him. The more important point is that you have Ron Klain, Jen O'Malley Dillon and the rest of the crew effectively operating with the powers of the presidency despite never having so much as run for public office at the lowest levels.
|
|
|
Post by ibfc on Jan 13, 2023 6:07:14 GMT
And then you back up my own argument by using a well-known pro-Russia rag, the Hindustani Times. How exactly is the Hindustan Times pro Russian or for that matter a rag? It’s one of the oldest English newspapers in India and was set up as a nationalist voice in colonial times. It’s still run by one of the oldest business families in the country and its editors are among India’s most respected. Its business paper has a long standing collaboration with WSJ. Would expect you to stop making orientalist commentary on stuff you know nothing about. And it’s the Hindustan Times; not the Hindustani times.
|
|
relique
Socialist
Posts: 1,716
Member is Online
|
Post by relique on Jan 13, 2023 7:08:29 GMT
The US threads are overflowing again. Might someone dig some trenches to contain them ?
|
|
|
Post by ibfc on Jan 13, 2023 7:14:48 GMT
I wouldn’t even mind a separate sub-section for US. I open the international sections in the hope of something in some of the other jurisdictions to only see the same old US stuff.
|
|
|
Post by greatkingrat on Jan 13, 2023 10:28:33 GMT
|
|
|
Post by batman on Jan 13, 2023 12:00:00 GMT
No need for glasses there - it's glaringly obvious even to the blind that Biden's more than past it. It borders on cruelty to regularly expose an obviously demented old man to ridicule in public even though most media outlets are doing their best to protect him. Are you certain you’ve the right prescription? It seems pretty obvious to anyone who isn’t a troll, or consumes a media diet solely of partisan slop, that Biden does not have dementia. You can oppose him with all the vigour and vitriol you can muster, it’s your right as it is anyone else’s. But casting him as demented just makes you look pathetic. Perhaps that’s what you’re going for. he doesn't have to try though
|
|
The Bishop
Labour
Down With Factionalism!
Posts: 38,925
Member is Online
|
Post by The Bishop on Jan 13, 2023 12:34:05 GMT
They won't because they are a disorganised rabble who are essentially badly behaved hicks rather than a genuine attempt to overthrow a government. They should be locked up alongside Lula. It's grim for Brazil that the best that they could bring up for the last election were Bolsonaro and Lula. Nutter versus crook. Admittedly not the worst of either type to have run for the presidency before. To bring this thread back on topic as much as anything Well you aren't *totally* wrong tbf (the Brazilian left would have hoped for better than a 77 year old with a previous criminal record) but this is still a bit "both-sidesy" (that term again) isn't it? Lula's conviction is widely seen as politically motivated, and to the extent corruption allegations about him are valid it is arguably as much a comment on its pervasiveness in Brazil as a whole. Whereas as far as Bolsonaro is concerned, where to start? I would certainly be interested in who you see as being worse than him in the past - indeed there is a case that his stance on the Amazon rain forests made him the most dangerous individual in the world (even more so than Putin)
|
|