|
Post by Devil Wincarnate on Dec 12, 2019 0:02:50 GMT
This would be awful for the Lib Dems and, I reckon, too high for the Tories. I'm struggling to believe these figures.
|
|
CatholicLeft
Labour
2032 posts until I was "accidentally" deleted.
Posts: 6,287
Member is Online
|
Post by CatholicLeft on Dec 12, 2019 0:03:33 GMT
AP 0.9%, I think not.
|
|
|
Post by Robert Waller on Dec 12, 2019 0:09:58 GMT
Midnight.
What a Horlicks!
|
|
|
Post by lancastrian on Dec 12, 2019 0:10:01 GMT
It says GB voting intention, so they shouldn't even have 0.1%. The lack of Brexit Party is also odd. As is the Lib Dem share.
|
|
|
Post by lancastrian on Dec 12, 2019 0:11:39 GMT
"Survation polled 2395 people living in Great Britain by telephone between the 10th and 11th December 2019."
|
|
Vibe
Non-Aligned
Posts: 931
|
Survation
Dec 12, 2019 0:12:38 GMT
via mobile
Post by Vibe on Dec 12, 2019 0:12:38 GMT
I assume AP should be BP.
|
|
CatholicLeft
Labour
2032 posts until I was "accidentally" deleted.
Posts: 6,287
Member is Online
|
Post by CatholicLeft on Dec 12, 2019 0:14:03 GMT
I assume AP should be BP. Far too low in that case.
|
|
|
Post by lancastrian on Dec 12, 2019 0:17:51 GMT
It's Brexit Party 3.1%, and AP is "another party".
|
|
|
Post by Forfarshire Conservative on Dec 12, 2019 0:17:58 GMT
I assume AP should be BP. All other parties?
|
|
|
Post by thinwhiteduke on Dec 12, 2019 0:19:22 GMT
AP = All other parties presumably..
|
|
|
Post by archaeologist on Dec 12, 2019 8:06:45 GMT
There's an unusually high figure for Don't knows and Refuse to say = 20.8%. Also a high figure for those certain to vote = 77.6%.
|
|
The Bishop
Labour
Down With Factionalism!
Posts: 36,696
|
Post by The Bishop on Dec 12, 2019 11:15:39 GMT
Though for the record that is the lowest LibDem figure in any poll for several months.
|
|
|
Survation
Dec 12, 2019 19:33:31 GMT
via mobile
Post by Penddu on Dec 12, 2019 19:33:31 GMT
1.4% for Plaid would be 20+% in Wales...seems high...
|
|
|
Post by tonygreaves on Dec 12, 2019 19:57:02 GMT
Garbage. (I think).
|
|
|
Post by BossMan on Dec 12, 2019 21:23:57 GMT
Survation was closest to the actual result in 2017. Not that I'm suggesting we should read too much into that fact, but it's worth a mention. As someone mentioned elsewhere, the accolade seems to go to a different pollster with each election.
|
|
Vibe
Non-Aligned
Posts: 931
|
Survation
Dec 12, 2019 21:35:56 GMT
via mobile
Post by Vibe on Dec 12, 2019 21:35:56 GMT
Survation was closest to the actual result in 2017. Not that I'm suggesting we should read too much into that fact, but it's worth a mention. As someone mentioned elsewhere, the accolade seems to go to a different pollster with each election. By luck? With so many predictions, one of them has to get close - unless...!
|
|
|
Post by hullenedge on Jan 7, 2020 8:19:30 GMT
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 7, 2020 8:30:31 GMT
Far more interesting is never has it been more obvious the problem Labour have with men than 50 seat difference. The difference between a hung parliament and a majority of 70
|
|
carlton43
Non-Aligned
Posts: 48,537
Member is Online
|
Post by carlton43 on Jan 7, 2020 10:22:33 GMT
Far more interesting is never has it been more obvious the problem Labour have with men than 50 seat difference. The difference between a hung parliament and a majority of 70 And what did you intend to say?
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 16, 2020 12:38:15 GMT
There's a chat over on the Labour leadership thread. Take from most contributors seems to be LabourList probably isn't the most representative sample. Tim says he was polled by not on his preferences
|
|