Serbian General Election 2016

[Deleted]

"CRTA also announced first estimates, based on a 62 percent sample, that showed the SNS list take 52.95 percent, followed by the SPS (12.14 percent), the SRS (7.48 percent), the DS (5.82 percent), the DSS-Dveri (4.78 percent)m the LDP-SDS-LSV (4.9 percent), and Enough is Enough (3.98 percent)."

www.b92.net/eng/news/politics.php?yyyy=2016&mm=04&dd=24&nav_id=97789

[Deleted]

[Deleted]

SNS 49,9
SPS 11,6
SRS 7,8
DS 5,9
DSS-Dveri 5,0
Dosta je bilo 5,2 ("Enough is Enough")
SDS-LSV-LDP 5,0

(but see the link in the tweet above)

[Deleted]

Preliminary Serbian result from the Republic Electoral Commission (RIK)  based on 97.45% of polling stations. 12 lists gets seats, 5 more than in the outgoing parliament. 
Seven by crossing the threshold + five ethnic minority lists.
www.b92.net/eng/news/politics.php?yyyy=2016&mm=04&dd=25&nav_id=97798

Government:
Serbian Progressive Party (SNS) 131 (-27 )
Serbian Socialist Party (SPS)/United Serbia (JS) 30 (-14)

Opposition:
Serbian Radical Party (SRS) 21 (returning)
Democratic Party (DS) 16 (-3)
"Enough is Enough" (DJB) 16 (new)
DP-LSV-SDS 13 (-5)
Democratic Party of Serbia-Dveri 13 (returning)

Ethnic minority lists (10):
Alliance of Vojvodina Hungarians 4 

Bosniak:
Bosniak Democratic Union (BDZ) 2 
Party of Democratic Action of Sandžak (SDA) 2

Albanian:
Party of Democratic Action (PVD) 1 

Green Party 1 (not sure who they are and how they got a minority seat - presumably an Islamic party)

#The Greens of Serbia ran in alliance with SPS/JS and the Communists.

[Deleted]

"Several opposition parties and coalitions announced on Monday they would set up a joint legal team to analyze all election materials.

The announcement was made after a meeting at the DSS party headquarters in Belgrade attended by leaders of the DSS-Dveri coalition, the Democratic Party (DS), the Movement Enough is Enough, and the SDS-LDP-LSV coalition."

www.b92.net/eng/news/politics.php?yyyy=2016&mm=04&dd=25&nav_id=97806

For whats it worth: OSCE says it was free and fair.

[Deleted]

The Social Democratic/SocLib "Alliance for a Better Serbia" (DP-LSV-SDS) is at 5.03 and Dveri–DSS right at the threshold with 5.00, so the final count could leave them below.

[Deleted]

Apr 25, 2016 15:27:45 GMT @odo said:

The Social Democratic/SocLib "Alliance for a Better Serbia" (DP-LSV-SDS) is at 5.03 and Dveri–DSS right at the threshold with 5.00, so the final count could leave them below.

Both lists are still above on 98.56. And SRS gets another seat from SPS/JS.

SNS 48.23 (131)
SPS-JS 10.98 (29)
SRS 8.09 (22)
DS 6.04% (16)
"Enough is Enough" 6.03 (16)

"Alliance for a Better Serbia" 5.04 (13)
DSS-Dveri 5.00 (13)

[Deleted]

Aleksandar Vucic hints that SNS might choose a small coalition with only the Alliance of Vojvodina Hungarians (SVM), which would have a then clear majority (135 of 250).
www.b92.net/eng/news/politics.php?yyyy=2016&mm=04&dd=27&nav_id=97828

"Serbia will get a new government at the latest 15 days after the National Assembly has been constituted. Earlier this week, he said this would happen after the party's own assembly, scheduled for May 28.
The National Assembly must hold its first sitting within 30 days of the publishing of final election results. The legal deadline to form a new government is 90 days after the assembly has been constituted."

RIK has until tomorrow to announce the final results. Its President Dejan Djordjevic said on Tuesday he will allow representatives of all electoral lists to access to election materials, and sending everyone copies of the minutes taken.

[greenhert]

@odo, having 135 seats out of 250 would give a 20 seat majority for a party or coalition over other parties, not a 10 seat majority (135-115=20).

[Deleted]

Apr 27, 2016 16:06:37 GMT greenhert said:

@odo , having 135 seats out of 250 would give a 20 seat majority for a party or coalition over other parties, not a 10 seat majority (135-115=20).

So what? I wrote the numbers, nothing to be confused about. "which would have a then seat majority (135 of 250)." (a then seat majority is nonsense, but the meaning is clear, no reason to correct it).