|
Post by mick745 on Jun 20, 2015 7:20:28 GMT
Does anyone know how to extract divisions data from historical hansard? Everytime i click on the link i get an error message. I was trying to extract the members who voted in the vote of no confidence in march 1979.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 20, 2015 7:27:39 GMT
|
|
|
Post by mick745 on Jun 20, 2015 7:42:10 GMT
Thanks for that but i am sure at one time you could export the division lists straight into excel by clicking on the links such as from this page: hansard.millbanksystems.com/divisions/hthe links no longer work though. I guess they removed that feature.
|
|
|
Post by Davıd Boothroyd on Jun 20, 2015 9:06:10 GMT
Here's the result of 28 March 1979: PARTY | AYES | NOES | NOT VOTING | TOTAL | Labour | | 305 | 1 | 306 | Conservative | 281 | | | 281 | Liberal | 13 | | | 13 | Scottish National Party | 11 | | | 11 | Ulster Unionists | 5 | 2 | | 7 | Plaid Cymru | | 3 | | 3 | Scottish Labour Party | | 2 | | 2 | Independent Republican | | | 1 | 1 | Independent Ulster Unionist | 1 | | | 1 | SDLP | | | 1 | 1 | Ulster Democratic Unionist | 1 | | | 1 | United Ulster Unionist | 1 | | | 1 | Speaker and Deputies | | | 4 | 4 | Vacant seats | | | 3 | 3 | TOTAL | 313 | 312 | 10 | 635 | Exclude two tellers | 311 | 310 | | |
|
|
|
Post by johnloony on Jun 20, 2015 23:50:52 GMT
Here's the result of 28 March 1979: PARTY | AYES | NOES | NOT VOTING | TOTAL | Labour | | 305 | 1 | 306 |
Who was the Labour not voting? I probably should know but can't remember.
|
|
|
Post by Davıd Boothroyd on Jun 21, 2015 0:24:26 GMT
Doc Broughton.
|
|
|
Post by johnloony on Jun 23, 2015 2:58:01 GMT
From Wikipedia: If I remember correctly, the Conservative chief whip, Bernard Weatherill, offered to abstain in order to pair with Broughton, but the Labour chief whip released him from the obligation (presumably on the practical assesment that saving the government for another few weeks was less damaging than to allow Weatherill's career to be harmed). But in considering the three vacant seats, it occurs to me that they - in combination with the absent Broughton - can, in a sense, considered to be paired with each other and thus cancel each other out in a way which makes it not necessary for Weatherill to have made his offer. It would have been more awkward (although not, of course unconstitutional or improper) if all three (or more) vacancies had all been of the same party, thereby creating a temporary artificial imbalance in the House.
|
|
|
Post by mick745 on Jun 24, 2015 20:33:20 GMT
From Wikipedia: If I remember correctly, the Conservative chief whip, Bernard Weatherill, offered to abstain in order to pair with Broughton, but the Labour chief whip released him from the obligation (presumably on the practical assesment that saving the government for another few weeks was less damaging than to allow Weatherill's career to be harmed). But in considering the three vacant seats, it occurs to me that they - in combination with the absent Broughton - can, in a sense, considered to be paired with each other and thus cancel each other out in a way which makes it not necessary for Weatherill to have made his offer. It would have been more awkward (although not, of course unconstitutional or improper) if all three (or more) vacancies had all been of the same party, thereby creating a temporary artificial imbalance in the House. There must have been only 2 vacant seats then. Airey neave voted in the confidence motion and was murdered the day after. Alfred Broughton died a few days later.
|
|
|
Post by greatkingrat on Jun 24, 2015 20:51:18 GMT
At the time of the no confidence motion (28 Mar) the 3 vacant seats were Chipping Barnet, NE Derbyshire and Liverpool Edge Hill.
The Edge Hill by-election was held on 30 Mar, won by David Alton for the Liberals, then Neave and Broughton died, leaving 4 vacant seats at dissolution.
|
|
|
Post by mick745 on Jun 24, 2015 21:06:17 GMT
At the time of the no confidence motion (28 Mar) the 3 vacant seats were Chipping Barnet, NE Derbyshire and Liverpool Edge Hill. The Edge Hill by-election was held on 30 Mar, won by David Alton for the Liberals, then Neave and Broughton died, leaving 4 vacant seats at dissolution. Thank you for the explanation.
|
|
|
Post by Davıd Boothroyd on Jun 24, 2015 21:15:15 GMT
If I remember correctly, the Conservative chief whip, Bernard Weatherill, offered to abstain in order to pair with Broughton, but the Labour chief whip released him from the obligation (presumably on the practical assesment that saving the government for another few weeks was less damaging than to allow Weatherill's career to be harmed). The story is that, late on the afternoon of 28 March, Labour whip Walter Harrison formally asked Bernard Weatherill (the Conservative deputy chief whip, not chief whip) for a pair for Doc Broughton. Harrison claimed that Weatherill had promised he would pair in such circumstances. Weatherill could not remember doing so, and had been instructed that no pairs would be provided for the vote in any case. But such was the bond of trust between them that he said that if Harrison absolutely insisted that a pair had been promised, then Weatherill himself would be the pair and not vote. Such a move would have been career suicide for Weatherill. Harrison at that point said that he could not possibly ask Weatherill to do that. Notwithstanding that the story (told by Weatherill in 2004) has been turned into the centrepiece of a play performed on the largest stage at the National Theatre, I must confess that I don't think it's true. Well not really as two of the vacant seats were Labour and only one a Conservative.
|
|
|
Post by johnloony on Jun 25, 2015 2:28:27 GMT
Bang goes my theory then. I must have been getting confused between the date of the confidence vote and the date of the dissolution - which were, of course, different dates.
|
|
neilm
Non-Aligned
Posts: 25,023
|
Post by neilm on Jun 25, 2015 9:47:35 GMT
Changing the subject slightly, do we know how many government MPs are paired? It's not like 1997 when there weren't enough opposition members to go around.
|
|
|
Post by Davıd Boothroyd on Jun 25, 2015 10:11:01 GMT
Routine pairing was suspended during the dying days of the Major administration and has never resumed.
|
|
neilm
Non-Aligned
Posts: 25,023
|
Post by neilm on Jun 25, 2015 11:18:43 GMT
Aah, really? I know or know of several MPs with pairs so presumably they organise it themselves?
|
|
|
Post by East Anglian Lefty on Jun 25, 2015 12:00:38 GMT
When was formal pairing first set up? It's a gentlemanly enough concept that it seems fundamentally 19th century, but then again it requires a significantly organised whips set-up that it would surely have been difficult to do in an era of amateurs.
|
|