Post by Andrew_S on Jun 7, 2015 21:11:24 GMT
Interesting IMO that the original recommendations for Staffordshire were as follows:
Burton: 58,282
Cannock: 66,529
Lichfield & Tamworth: 60,524
Mid Staffs: 62,291
South Staffs: 62,784
Stafford: 63,328
Staffs Moorlands: 69,258
Newcastle-under-Lyme: 65,649
Stoke Central: 78,225
Stoke North: 66,197
Stoke South: 66,841
I'm scratching my head as to which areas were included in this Mid Staffs seat. Maybe it was Stone, Rugeley and Burntwood. Perhaps it stretched all the way from just south of Stoke-on-Trent to the border with Warwickshire, an ever weirder shape than the eventual Mid Staffs constituency that was adopted.
Burton: 58,282
Cannock: 66,529
Lichfield & Tamworth: 60,524
Mid Staffs: 62,291
South Staffs: 62,784
Stafford: 63,328
Staffs Moorlands: 69,258
Newcastle-under-Lyme: 65,649
Stoke Central: 78,225
Stoke North: 66,197
Stoke South: 66,841
I'm scratching my head as to which areas were included in this Mid Staffs seat. Maybe it was Stone, Rugeley and Burntwood. Perhaps it stretched all the way from just south of Stoke-on-Trent to the border with Warwickshire, an ever weirder shape than the eventual Mid Staffs constituency that was adopted.