|
|
Post by Davıd Boothroyd on Jun 25, 2013 23:55:21 GMT
|
|
|
|
Post by erlend on Jun 26, 2013 10:44:02 GMT
Democratic Edward Markey 642,988 54.84% -10.98
Republican Gabriel Gomez 525,080 44.78% +13.79
Twelve Visions Party Richard Heos 4,518 0.39% n/a
Majority 117,908 10.06%
Turnout 1,172,586
Democratic hold Swing 11.2%
Source wiki
|
|
The Bishop
Labour
Down With Factionalism!
Posts: 38,925
Member is Online
|
Post by The Bishop on Jun 26, 2013 11:11:01 GMT
Well, its an improvement for the Dems on the last special election here  |
|
|
|
Post by erlend on Jun 26, 2013 11:18:31 GMT
Indeed. I assume that in ordinary elections the GOP do not spend much money in Massachussets and probably spent a fair amount this year.
|
|
|
|
Post by markgoodair on Sept 27, 2020 19:01:56 GMT
It looks increasingly likely that the Democrats could flip control of the Senate in November.
|
|
CatholicLeft
Labour
2032 posts until I was "accidentally" deleted.
Posts: 6,722
Member is Online
|
Post by CatholicLeft on Sept 27, 2020 19:43:12 GMT
It looks increasingly likely that the Democrats could flip control of the Senate in November. This is a somewhat random post in this thread. |
|
mondialito
Labour
Everything is horribly, brutally possible.
Posts: 4,961 
|
Post by mondialito on Sept 27, 2020 20:04:06 GMT
It looks increasingly likely that the Democrats could flip control of the Senate in November. This is a somewhat random post in this thread. ...and is also premature. While some races like Arizona and Colorado should be easy pick-ups, others are still tight. If the Dems flip the Senate, it may still only be by a small majority or relying on VP Harris as tiebreaker. |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 27, 2020 20:14:06 GMT
It looks increasingly likely that the Democrats could flip control of the Senate in November. This is a somewhat random post in this thread. Not a bad place for it. Anyway, this thread started not with an election but a special election. |
|
