|
Post by Arthur Figgis on May 30, 2013 6:35:20 GMT
Lichfield, Fazeley: C 52, L 48.
|
|
Tony Otim
Green
Suffering from Brexistential Despair
Posts: 11,901
|
Post by Tony Otim on May 30, 2013 7:58:57 GMT
Hmmm... Toss a coin time here: Lichfield, Fazeley: Lab 52.4 Con 47.6
|
|
|
Post by Philip Davies on May 30, 2013 10:04:46 GMT
LICHFIELD - Fazeley Doug PULLEN (The Conservative Party Candidate) 47.3 Dave WHATTON (The Labour Party Candidate) 52.7 Similar to Tonyotim!
|
|
|
Post by Pete Whitehead on May 30, 2013 11:45:25 GMT
And almost a mirror image of mine Lichfield DC - Fazeley Con 52.5 Lab 47.5 Which I think means if Labour win you win the month (I did toy with going for the old 50/50 split and a a guaranteed 5 faults)
|
|
|
Post by middleenglander on May 30, 2013 22:55:48 GMT
Lichfield, Fazeley Robert Waller 0.015 faults, hempie & Pete Whitehead 1.0, Arthur Figgis & Lancastrian 2.0, andyajs 5.5, Mark Senior 8.0, tonyotim 10.8+10, PhilDav 11.4+10, Just Looking 26.0+10
For the month of May
252.3 Pete Whitehead 281.2 PhilDav 291.4 Robert Waller 301.7 Mark Senior 308.2 tonyotim
314.9 Arthur Figgis 353.2 Just Looking 531.9 hempie 730.3 Lancastrian 805.0 andyajs
Objections please by noon Saturday
New thread for June if there is the demand.
|
|
|
Post by Robert Waller on May 30, 2013 23:02:12 GMT
Thank you ME and yes please. I would like to try to improve on my Fazeley prediction! Fat chance of that.
|
|
Tony Otim
Green
Suffering from Brexistential Despair
Posts: 11,901
|
Post by Tony Otim on May 31, 2013 11:31:08 GMT
Congratulations to Robert for the week and Pete for another impressive month.
|
|
|
Post by Pete Whitehead on May 31, 2013 11:51:24 GMT
Thanks Tony, although I think it would be fair to describe my performance this month as the least unimpressive rather than the most impressive. I don't think there has been a month where we have been collectively wrong about the winning party in so many of the contests
|
|
|
Post by lancastrian on May 31, 2013 12:20:41 GMT
Yes please. I'll be entering properly next month( and not being late, hopefully).
|
|
|
Post by kylelewispaul on Dec 4, 2013 6:10:05 GMT
Maybe not. Looks from Oldham like your tendency to predict absurdly high UKIP votes may be paying off May be its a wrong prediction from voting, we can wait & watch that.
|
|