|
Post by evergreenadam on Dec 27, 2019 13:16:28 GMT
Largest electorate changes from 2010 to 2019. Constituency | Electorate 2010 | Electorate 2019 | Change | Leeds Central | 64,698 | 90,971 | +26,273 | Sheffield Central | 69,519 | 89,849 | +20,330 | Hackney N & Stoke Newington | 73,874
| 92,451 | +18,577 | Poplar & Limehouse | 74,956 | 91,760 | +16,804 | Hackney S & Shoreditch | 72,816 | 89,380 | +16,564 | Bristol West | 82,728 | 99,253 | +16,525 | Bermondsey & Southwark | 77,623 | 93,313 | +15,690 | Greenwich & Woolwich | 65,489 | 79,997 | +14,508 | Vauxhall | 74,811 | 88,647 | +13,836 | Devon East | 73,109 | 86,841 | +13,732 | Deptford | 67,058 | 80,617 | +13,559 | West Ham | 85,313 | 97,942 | +12,629 | Bedfordshire North East | 78,060 | 90,679 | +12,619 | Edinburgh North & Leith | 69,204 | 81,336 | +12,132 | Nottingham South | 67,441 | 79,485 | +12,044 | Ealing Central & Acton | 63,489 | 75,510 | +12,021 | Dulwich & West Norwood | 72,817 | 84,663 | +11,846 | Bedfordshire Mid | 76,023 | 87,795 | +11,772 | Saffron Walden | 76,035 | 87,017 | +10,982 | Slough | 77,068 | 87,632 | +10,564 |
There are 7 other seats with increases over 10,000. These are almost all inner city seats. Some of it is population increase, but I suspect much of it is new registrations, by mainly young people, on political grounds, who didn't bother to register and vote before. Bedfordshire is a bit strange - I don't think of Ampthill, Biggleswade and Sandy as being growth hotspots, although the constituencies contain some outer suburbs of Bedford, Luton, and Milton Keynes. There has been a lot of urban regeneration in these inner city seats, huge new blocks of flats for market sale or purpose built private student accommodation. Added to which rising rents and house prices and the switch in tenure of properties from owner occupied to private rental have made house sharing more common which has resulted in properties being lived in more intensively. The lack of new build housing has trapped an ever growing number of adults in inner city rental properties or sharing with their parents.
|
|
|
Post by evergreenadam on Dec 27, 2019 13:23:01 GMT
Largest electorate decreases from 2010. Constituency | Electorate 2010 | Electorate 2019 | Change | Oxford West & Abingdon | 86,458 | 76,953 | -9505 | Hull West & Hessle | 69,017 | 60,409 | -8608 | Dorset Mid & North Poole | 72,647 | 65,426 | -7221 | Stoke Central* | 60,995 | 55,424 | -5571 | Blackpool South | 63,025 | 57,688 | -5337 | Northampton North | 64,230 | 59,265 | -4965 | Northampton South | 66,923 | 62,172 | -4751 | Erith & Thamesmead | 69,918 | 65,399 | -4519 | Middlesbrough | 65,148 | 60,759 | -4389 | Swansea West | 61,334 | 57,078 | -4256 | Oxford East | 81,886 | 77,947 | -3939 | Doncaster Central | 75,207 | 71,389 | -3818 | Stoke North* | 72,052 | 68,292 | -3760 | Wythenshawe & Sale East | 79,923 | 76,313 | -3610 | Stoke South* | 68,031 | 64,499 | -3532 | Redditch | 68,550 | 65,391 | -3159 | Darlington | 69,352 | 66,395 | -2957 | Mansfield | 80,069 | 77,131 | -2938 | Ipswich | 78,371 | 75,525 | -2846 | Ceredigion | 59,043 | 56,250 | -2793 |
* Stoke figures are doubtful, but this does look right for one of our most depressed cities. This consists partly of the vagaries of electoral registration - Oxford and Northampton obviously - but mostly I think of genuine population decreases. There are another 42 seats with decreases of more than 1000, and 104 in total with a decrease (including Dumfries & Galloway with a decrease of 1) The Tories have generally done well in these seats since 2010, any coincidence?
|
|
J.G.Harston
Lib Dem
Leave-voting Brexit-supporting Liberal Democrat
Posts: 14,840
|
Post by J.G.Harston on Dec 27, 2019 13:45:54 GMT
Here are the largest increases in published electorate since 2017. You can assume that most of these are due to the vagaries of electoral registration departments rather than real population movements. A lot of them are student seats - I wonder if departing students who registered in 2017 have not been removed from the register? Sheffield ERO got a new computer system in 2002-ish and since then have been very efficient at removing non-existant electors, so I'd expect the Sheffield Central figure to be correct. Sheffield Central Ward was touching 25,000 compared to 14,000 average when the ward review was triggered. When we got the new system thousands of ghosts were removed, resulting in the city electorate dropping from 420,000 to 380,000 overnight. There's an agreement that the city coroner's office notify ERO of deaths, so dead people get taken off promptly.
|
|
|
Post by John Chanin on Dec 27, 2019 13:56:25 GMT
Here are the largest increases in published electorate since 2017. You can assume that most of these are due to the vagaries of electoral registration departments rather than real population movements. A lot of them are student seats - I wonder if departing students who registered in 2017 have not been removed from the register? Or that students are now better enrolled following sharp falls in registration in student heavy constituencies immediately after the introduction of Individual Voter Registration? This is a good point I missed, but see the table of changes since 2010 which includes much the same seats. Yes there have been population increases in inner city and university seats over the last decade, but not I think enough to explain the large changes in electorate we see.
|
|
|
Post by John Chanin on Dec 27, 2019 17:02:03 GMT
Just to complete this analysis, here are the changes from the operative date for the creation of the present constituencies (2000 or 2001, slightly different in Wales and Scotland), excluding northern Ireland. It's taken me a while to do this, as I didn't have a spreadsheet with the figures used by the Boundary Commissions and had to create one. I've done the top and bottom 50 for exemplification. Constituency | Electorate | Change | Constituency | Electorate | Change | Poplar & Limehouse | 91,760 | +32,360 | Wantage | 90,875 | +16,101 | Hackney S & Shoreditch | 89,380 | +32,176 | Folkestone & Hythe | 88,273 | +15,761 | Hackney N & St Newington | 92,451 | +29,266 | Cambridgeshire South | 87,288 | +15,691 | Bermondsey & Southwark | 93,313 | +27,107 | Streatham | 84,788 | +15,433 | Bristol West | 99,253 | +24,991 | East Ham | 88,316 | +15,416 | Manchester Central | 94,247 | +24,647 | Swindon North | 82,441 | +15,335 | Sheffield Central | 89,849 | +24,588 | Aylesbury | 86,665 | +14,642 | Vauxhall | 88,647 | +22,888 | Sittingbourne & Sheppey | 83,917 | +14,568 | Northamptonshire South | 90,840 | +22,067 | Horsham | 86,730 | +14,453 | Bedfordshire North East | 90,679 | +21,779 | Wokingham | 83,953 | +14,202 | Bethnal Green & Bow | 88,169 | +21,746 | Islington North | 75,162 | +14,108 | Sleaford & North Hykeham | 94,761 | +21,703 | Wiltshire South West | 77,970 | +14,105 | Camberwell & Peckham | 89,042 | +21,278 | Corby | 86,151 | +14,098 | Cambridgeshire NW | 94,909 | +21,261 | Slough | 87,632 | +14,005 | Milton Keynes South | 96,343 | +20,661 | Norfolk Mid | 81,975 | +13,647 | West Ham | 97,942 | +19,958 | Buckingham | 83,146 | +13,586 | Greenwich & Woolwich | 79,997 | +19,524 | Tiverton & Honiton | 82,953 | +13,271 | Dulwich & West Norwood | 84,663 | +17,807 | Warwick & Leamington | 76,373 | +13,137 | Devon East | 86,841 | +17,773 | Brent Central | 84,204 | +13,131 | Bedfordshire Mid | 87,795 | +17,684 | Rochester & Strood | 82,056 | +13,024 | Derbyshire South | 79,365 | +17,235 | Bury St Edmunds | 89,644 | +13,004 | Ashford | 89,550 | +17,049 | Basingstoke | 82.926 | +12,939 | Saffron Walden | 87,017 | +16,615 | Deptford | 80,617 | +12,935 | Norfolk South | 86,214 | +16,523 | Cambridgeshire SE | 86,769 | +12,828 | Milton Keynes North | 91,535 | +16,223 | Dartford | 82,209 | +12,738 |
|
|
|
Post by John Chanin on Dec 27, 2019 17:34:25 GMT
And now the 50 biggest reductions. Lots of Scottish seats here. Constituency | Electorate | Change | Constituency | Electorate | Change | Glasgow North East | 61,075 | -9824 | Glenrothes | 65,762 | -3737 | Liverpool Walton | 62,628 | -9554 | Glasgow North West | 63,402 | -3685 | Middlesbrough | 60,759 | -8879 | Paisley & Renfrewshire Sth | 64,385 | -3653 | Liverpool Wavertree | 63,458 | -8798 | Rotherham | 61,688 | -3617 | Stoke Central | 55,424 | -7906 | Aberdeen South | 65,719 | -3613 | Aberdeen North | 62,489 | -7133 | Glasgow South | 70,891 | -3591 | Newcastle Central | 57,845 | -6958 | Bolton North East | 67,564 | -3460 | Glasgow North | 57,130 | -6599 | Dundee West | 64,431 | -3320 | Blackpool South | 57,688 | -6314 | Grimsby | 61,409 | -3185 | Dunbartonshire West | 66,517 | -5193 | Stoke South | 64,499 | -3130 | Edinburgh East | 69,424 | -5081 | Argyll & Bute | 66,525 | -3046 | Gateshead | 64,449 | -4954 | Doncaster Central | 71,389 | -2999 | Northampton North | 59,265 | -4947 | South Shields | 62,793 | -2980 | Liverpool West Derby | 65,640 | -4943 | Burnley | 64,343 | -2913 | Hull East | 65,745 | -4893 | Southgate | 65,055 | -2888 | Inverclyde | 60,622 | -4863 | Sheffield Heeley | 66,940 | -2849 | Dwyfor Meirionnydd | 44,362 | -4461 | Glasgow East | 67,381 | -2786 | Sheffield Brightside etc | 69,333 | -4286 | Wolverhampton SW | 60,895 | -2746 | Newcastle East | 63,796 | -4272 | Edinburgh South | 66,188 | -2696 | Bolton South East | 69,163 | -4185 | Birmingham Edgbaston | 68,828 | -2695 | Washington & Sunderland W | 66,273 | -3986 | Birkenhead | 63,762 | -2690 | Hull West & Hessle | 60,409 | -3960 | Houghton & Sunderland S | 68,828 | -2519 | Fife North East | 60,905 | -3908 | West Bromwich East | 62,111 | -2427 | Preston | 59,672 | -3886 | Blaenau Gwent | 50,736 | -2384 | Sunderland Central | 72,672 | -3785 | Edinburgh South West | 73,501 | -2286 |
|
|
|
Post by 🏴☠️ Neath West 🏴☠️ on Dec 27, 2019 17:48:19 GMT
Given the history of Tower Hamlets in electoral fraud, I do wonder how many of the 32,360 electors in Poplar and Limehouse actually (a) exist and (b) are entitled to vote.
|
|
|
Post by lancastrian on Dec 27, 2019 17:53:29 GMT
Interesting that so many places have shrinking electorates. The last census found very few local authorities with declining populations, with the biggest decrease only 4%, in Barrow which doesn't appear on the above list at all. The population was increasing in Stoke, Glasgow, Liverpool, Newcastle, Aberdeen and plenty of others on the list.
|
|
|
Post by John Chanin on Dec 27, 2019 18:05:29 GMT
Given the history of Tower Hamlets in electoral fraud, I do wonder how many of the 32,360 electors in Poplar and Limehouse actually (a) exist and (b) are entitled to vote. The 2011 census picked up the big increase in population in east London, much higher than the published mid year estimates. This is partly a young population with a high birth rate, but also substantial immigration, which in Tower Hamlets is from the commonwealth, and therefore people are eligible to vote. There is serious overcrowding in east London, where there is a very high percentage of renting, and nowhere for people to go. Having said which I have no confidence in the competence of Tower Hamlets council, but it is more likely to be failure to remove people from the register than fraud. After all there isn’t much point in fraud at General Elections in Tower Hamlets. There may have been some fraudulent entries on the register in 2018 when there were contested local elections. However this would only be a small percentage of the increase in electorate.
|
|
|
Post by Davıd Boothroyd on Dec 27, 2019 19:12:48 GMT
As you now need an NI number or equivalent to register to vote, registration frauds are extremely difficult to pull off, and considerably easier to detect. It's frankly very easy to throw around accusations of widespread electoral fraud but also a bit pathetic.
|
|
|
Post by 🏴☠️ Neath West 🏴☠️ on Dec 27, 2019 19:15:52 GMT
As you now need an NI number or equivalent to register to vote, registration frauds are extremely difficult to pull off, and considerably easier to detect. It's frankly very easy to throw around accusations of widespread electoral fraud but also a bit pathetic. Ah yes, magic NI numbers, where the problem has been known about since when Labour were last in government: www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/1550036/Fraud-fear-as-millions-of-NI-numbers-are-lost.html
|
|
|
Post by Davıd Boothroyd on Dec 27, 2019 19:26:17 GMT
You didn't read the piece did you?
The new voters' names are cross-referenced against the NI numbers. If (in some way no-one has ever detected) a fraudster was able to conjure up a new NI number on demand, it would be easily and obviously suspicious to find it appear at the same time as an electoral registration. If they tried to use pre-existing NI numbers they would be rumbled immediately if any of them turned out to belong to someone who returned to the UK and sought to register.
|
|
|
Post by evergreenadam on Dec 27, 2019 23:44:17 GMT
Just to complete this analysis, here are the changes from the operative date for the creation of the present constituencies (2000 or 2001, slightly different in Wales and Scotland), excluding northern Ireland. It's taken me a while to do this, as I didn't have a spreadsheet with the figures used by the Boundary Commissions and had to create one. I've done the top and bottom 50 for exemplification. Constituency | Electorate | Electorate Change | Constituency | Electorate | Electorate Change | Poplar & Limehouse | 91,760 | +32,360 | Wantage | 90,875 | +16,101 | Hackney S & Shoreditch | 89,380 | +32,176 | Folkestone & Hythe | 88,273 | +15,761 | Hackney N & St Newington | 92,451 | +29,266 | Cambridgeshire South | 87,288 | +15,691 | Bermondsey & Southwark | 93,313 | +27,107 | Streatham | 84,788 | +15,433 | Bristol West | 99,253 | +24,991 | East Ham | 88,316 | +15,416 | Manchester Central | 94,247 | +24,647 | Swindon North | 82,441 | +15,335 | Sheffield Central | 89,849 | +24,588 | Aylesbury | 86,665 | +14,642 | Vauxhall | 88,647 | +22,888 | Sittingbourne & Sheppey | 83,917 | +14,568 | Northamptonshire South | 90,840 | +22,067 | Horsham | 86,730 | +14,453 | Bedfordshire North East | 90,679 | +21,779 | Wokingham | 83,953 | +14,202 | Bethnal Green & Bow | 88,169 | +21,746 | Islington North | 75,162 | +14,108 | Sleaford & North Hykeham | 94,761 | +21,703 | Wiltshire South West | 77,970 | +14,105 | Camberwell & Peckham | 89,042 | +21,278 | Corby | 86,151 | +14,098 | Cambridgeshire NW | 94,909 | +21,261 | Slough | 87,632 | +14,005 | Milton Keynes South | 96,343 | +20,661 | Norfolk Mid | 81,975 | +13,647 | West Ham | 97,942 | +19,958 | Buckingham | 83,146 | +13,586 | Greenwich & Woolwich | 79,997 | +19,524 | Tiverton & Honiton | 82,953 | +13,271 | Dulwich & West Norwood | 84,663 | +17,807 | Warwick & Leamington | 76,373 | +13,137 | Devon East | 86,841 | +17,773 | Brent Central | 84,204 | +13,131 | Bedfordshire Mid | 87,795 | +17,684 | Rochester & Strood | 82,056 | +13,024 | Derbyshire South | 79,365 | +17,235 | Bury St Edmunds | 89,644 | +13,004 | Ashford | 89,550 | +17,049 | Basingstoke | 82.926 | +12,939 | Saffron Walden | 87,017 | +16,615 | Deptford | 80,617 | +12,935 | Norfolk South | 86,214 | +16,523 | Cambridgeshire SE | 86,769 | +12,828 | Milton Keynes North | 91,535 | +16,223 | Dartford | 82,209 | +12,738 |
Of those Folkestone & Hythe seems the most surprising. Has there really been that much new house building there?
|
|
|
Post by Davıd Boothroyd on Dec 28, 2019 1:14:16 GMT
I suspect that's a combination of Channel tunnel related development and ordinary growth. There are several other Kent constituencies on the list.
|
|
|
Post by carlton43 on Dec 28, 2019 1:21:57 GMT
I suspect that's a combination of Channel tunnel related development and ordinary growth. There are several other Kent constituencies on the list. The growth there and in Ashford is partially French driven for commerce set up and tax avoidance reasons. It is much quicker and easier and far cheaper to found a company in GB than in France, and cheaper to run it and maintain it here. Imagine Brexit will have a marked effect on the tendency?
|
|
|
Post by yellowperil on Dec 28, 2019 9:22:59 GMT
I suspect that's a combination of Channel tunnel related development and ordinary growth. There are several other Kent constituencies on the list. The growth there and in Ashford is partially French driven for commerce set up and tax avoidance reasons. It is much quicker and easier and far cheaper to found a company in GB than in France, and cheaper to run it and maintain it here. Imagine Brexit will have a marked effect on the tendency? That's certainly a reason for added commercial activity but the population increase In Ashford and F&W is more related to commuting to London, and HS1 is partly responsible.
|
|
|
Post by hullenedge on Dec 28, 2019 19:11:44 GMT
The Gini (inequality) index for the English 2019 electorates is 5.7, which historically is v.good:-
1970 - 13.8, 1974 - 10.7, 1979 - 12.4, 1983 - 5.7, 1987 - 6.7, 1992 - 7.9, 1997 - 4.7, 2001 - 5.2, 2005 - 5.9, 2010 - 4.7, 2015 - 5.1 and 2017 - 5.3.
|
|
|
Post by John Chanin on Dec 28, 2019 19:29:32 GMT
The Gini (inequality) index for the English 2019 electorates is 5.7, which historically is v.good:- 1970 - 13.8, 1974 - 10.7, 1979 - 12.4, 1983 - 5.7, 1987 - 6.7, 1992 - 7.9, 1997 - 4.7, 2001 - 5.2, 2005 - 5.9, 2010 - 4.7, 2015 - 5.1 and 2017 - 5.3. Yes, the Boundary Commissions have increasingly emphasised the equality of seats, and have been more prepared to cross administrative boundaries to do so. Compare 1974, 1983, 1997, and 2010 which were the first elections on revised boundaries. Also, despite the changes I posted above, population movements this century have slowed substantially from the second half of the 20th century. The huge movement out of the inner cities to the suburbs and new towns, and the repopulation of rural areas by well off incomers, are completed. Obviously there are still some growth points, like Milton Keynes, and the revived centres of major cities, and some places where energy, economy, and people are wasting away, but they are much fewer. I think this explains why people are quite relaxed about the present boundaries, and there is no urgency to change them. Your figures show that seat inequality is still no worse than in 1983, directly after the biggest upheaval in the last 70 years (and probably much longer). Really it’s only the over-representation of Wales that is now a serious problem.
|
|
|
Post by greenhert on Dec 28, 2019 20:00:34 GMT
Nevertheless most of the press were talking about how senior Conservative ministers wanted Boris Johnson to press on with those boundary changes, even though they are based on considerably out of date electoral figures, and not enough Conservative MPs who will lose their seats as a result of said changes will rebel against them.
|
|
edgbaston
Labour
Posts: 4,454
Member is Online
|
Post by edgbaston on Dec 28, 2019 21:20:45 GMT
Nevertheless most of the press were talking about how senior Conservative ministers wanted Boris Johnson to press on with those boundary changes, even though they are based on considerably out of date electoral figures, and not enough Conservative MPs who will lose their seats as a result of said changes will rebel against them. If they all vote in self interest then the Tory MPs for 1. Anglesey 2. Aberconwy 3. Blyth Valley 4. Burnley 5. Bury South 6. Bolton North East 7. Camarthen West 8. Cheadle 9. Chelsea 10. Cities of London & Westminster 11. Clwyd South 12. Dudley North 13. Finchley 14. Gedling 15. Haltemprice 16. Heywood 17. Kenilworth 18. Middlesbrough South 19. Milton Keynes South 20. Moray 21. Morecambe 22. North Cornwall 23. North Dorset 24. North Herefordshire 25. North West Durham 26. Pendle 27. Penistone 28. Pudsey 29. Rushcliffe 30. Sedgefield 31. Shipley 32. Southampton Itchin 33. Stockton South 34. Stone 35. Sutton 36. Tatton 37. Tunbridge Wells 38. Uxbridge 39. Vale of Clwyd 40. West Brom East 41. West Brom West 42. Wimbledon 43. Workington should rebel and vote against. Of course this isn't gong to happen as you say... and *even if they all did* there are still 322 Tory MPs who will benefit or be only minorly affected by the changes; enough to carry the house. But it will be interesting to draw up a 'Turkey list' after the vote, if it happens, and see where their careers go. There are of course newly created safe seats many may bounce into.
|
|