|
Post by Merseymike on Jul 23, 2013 13:16:41 GMT
This discussion rather sums up the importance we give to party as a way of expressing our views.
Many other countries have far weaker senses of party and there is quite frequent shifting from one party to another, without necessarily large shifts in ideology
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 23, 2013 14:17:35 GMT
I think it's understandable that activists and even politicians may sometimes feel that they'd like to try out a different party for a while. I can particularly understand that some younger Greens who weren't originally in Labour, the LibDems, the SNP or Plaid might start to wonder whether effectively confining themselves to a niche party with little prospect of running much any time soon was really the best idea. Some who defect will quickly be disappointed that being in Labour or whatever is not as they'd expected and may come 'home' before long.
What I find much harder to understand though is why Adam chose to defect on polling day of all possible times.
|
|
|
Post by Tactical Green on Jul 24, 2013 7:38:01 GMT
I suspect polling day timing was asked of him by Labour to provide a story boost. Still pretty low and Cambridge Greens are utterly non existent, a gaping hole in a favourable area. He's also deleted his blog.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 24, 2013 8:40:51 GMT
I thought the Greens didn't accept councillor 'rats'? They make them sit as independents til they come up for re-election, IIRC?
|
|
|
Post by Pete Whitehead on Jul 24, 2013 8:41:25 GMT
He isn't a councillor
|
|
|
Post by East Anglian Lefty on Jul 24, 2013 9:50:10 GMT
The Greens already put a lot of faith in him and thanks to him their chances of staying on the city council fell to almost zero. His reasons for defection were pretty weak and didn't seem overly rooted in local factors. I'm not even sure I'd trust him with a clipboard. I don't think it's really true that his defection sank the Greens. Margaret Wright's illness did most of the damage to their hopes, and the replacement candidate's lack of a local profile did the rest. Adam's defection may have depressed morale amongst Green supporters a little, but its impact was fairly marginal. Much more important was the revivification of the Labour organisation in the ward. I wouldn't say the defection was rooted in local factors. Local personalities is another matter entirely.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 24, 2013 9:54:29 GMT
The Greens already put a lot of faith in him and thanks to him their chances of staying on the city council fell to almost zero. His reasons for defection were pretty weak and didn't seem overly rooted in local factors. I'm not even sure I'd trust him with a clipboard. I don't think it's really true that his defection sank the Greens. Margaret Wright's illness did most of the damage to their hopes, and the replacement candidate's lack of a local profile did the rest. Adam's defection may have depressed morale amongst Green supporters a little, but its impact was fairly marginal. Much more important was the revivification of the Labour organisation in the ward. I wouldn't say the defection was rooted in local factors. Local personalities is another matter entirely. I meant more towards the future and his own council seat, although perhaps a moot point as he seemed to leave Cambridge pretty quickly afterwards and might not have doen much even if he was still a Green cllr.
|
|
|
Post by East Anglian Lefty on Jul 24, 2013 10:06:18 GMT
I don't think it's really true that his defection sank the Greens. Margaret Wright's illness did most of the damage to their hopes, and the replacement candidate's lack of a local profile did the rest. Adam's defection may have depressed morale amongst Green supporters a little, but its impact was fairly marginal. Much more important was the revivification of the Labour organisation in the ward. I wouldn't say the defection was rooted in local factors. Local personalities is another matter entirely. I meant more towards the future and his own council seat, although perhaps a moot point as he seemed to leave Cambridge pretty quickly afterwards and might not have doen much even if he was still a Green cllr. In point of fact he'd already left Cambridge, because he'd moved to Rampton a couple of years before. Rampton is a small village about seven miles outside Cambridge with no public transport to speak of and Pogonowski didn't drive. He'd had difficult getting home from council meetings as a result and had also been criticised for making frequent expense claims for taxis. I think it's fair to say that would have made his re-election more difficult, although as I say it was the illness and subsequent death of Margaret Wright that really sank the Greens in Abbey.
|
|
|
Post by greenchristian on Jul 25, 2013 18:49:39 GMT
I thought the Greens didn't accept councillor 'rats'? They make them sit as independents til they come up for re-election, IIRC? Whilst it's not relevant to Adam Pogonowski , this varies across the country (as you would expect in a party with a decentralised structure). Solihull and Malvern Hills Green Parties, for example, have both accepted defecting councillors onto their groups before the councillors in question have been re-elected.
|
|
|
Post by froome on Jul 26, 2013 8:52:22 GMT
The Greens already put a lot of faith in him and thanks to him their chances of staying on the city council fell to almost zero. His reasons for defection were pretty weak and didn't seem overly rooted in local factors. I'm not even sure I'd trust him with a clipboard. I don't think it's really true that his defection sank the Greens. Margaret Wright's illness did most of the damage to their hopes, and the replacement candidate's lack of a local profile did the rest. Adam's defection may have depressed morale amongst Green supporters a little, but its impact was fairly marginal. Much more important was the revivification of the Labour organisation in the ward. I wouldn't say the defection was rooted in local factors. Local personalities is another matter entirely. I not local to Cambridge, but from what I have heard I would say that EAL's comments are spot on. I would also agree that personality issues have been an important factor here.
|
|
|
Post by bungle on Jul 30, 2013 20:57:35 GMT
|
|
andrea
Non-Aligned
Posts: 7,765
|
Post by andrea on Jul 31, 2013 20:50:38 GMT
|
|
Tony Otim
Green
Suffering from Brexistential Despair
Posts: 11,875
Member is Online
|
Post by Tony Otim on Aug 1, 2013 19:11:53 GMT
But probably only until next week, assuming Labour hold the seat in the by-election.
|
|
The Bishop
Labour
Down With Factionalism!
Posts: 38,829
|
Post by The Bishop on Aug 1, 2013 19:14:04 GMT
Wouldn't Labour still be a seat short then?
|
|
Tony Otim
Green
Suffering from Brexistential Despair
Posts: 11,875
Member is Online
|
Post by Tony Otim on Aug 1, 2013 19:38:27 GMT
Yep - you're right. There seem to be an extra 3 independants (1 from labour and 2 from LD) compared to my records. I must have missed something at some point.
|
|
|
Post by independentukip on Aug 1, 2013 22:15:34 GMT
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 2, 2013 7:01:15 GMT
it would be nice if they could say what the actual policy differences were.
|
|
|
Post by East Anglian Lefty on Aug 2, 2013 8:38:03 GMT
It would be nice if that sort of thing had any relevance in Fenland. The Bucknors used to be Labour way back when, Archer's been standing as an independent for years but is arguably to the right of the Tories and I think the others are ex-Tories. But that doesn't really matter - all the real political intrigue happens within the Tory group.
Multi-party politics might return to Fenland in 2015, but the local UKIP branch seem to be batshit insane even by Fenland standards, so that will depend upon them still being functional.
|
|
|
Post by Davıd Boothroyd on Aug 13, 2013 15:26:20 GMT
Two Respect councillors on Bradford City Council suspended - Mohammad Shabbir (Heaton ward) and Ishtiaq Ahmed (Manningham ward).
Apparently because they annoyed G Galloway by not supporting his bid to lose his deposit standing for Mayor of London.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 13, 2013 15:33:49 GMT
and so the collapse begins, gorgeous is oh so predictable ... awful MP for the gullible.
|
|