|
|
Post by Pete Whitehead on Nov 7, 2012 9:23:49 GMT
who was the one to get it right? Presumably Tricky as he gave the number 332, although Tonyotim said he agreed with him so one of them either didn't vote or voted differently to their prediction |
|
Tony Otim
Green
Suffering from Brexistential Despair
Posts: 11,901
|
Post by Tony Otim on Nov 7, 2012 13:45:43 GMT
who was the one to get it right? Presumably Tricky as he gave the number 332, although Tonyotim said he agreed with him so one of them either didn't vote or voted differently to their prediction I'd worked out my prediction for the election game but then misremembered the number when I came to vote here quickly, but checked when I said I agreed with Tricky. Got it right where it counted though. |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 7, 2012 15:49:21 GMT
who was the one to get it right? I guessed Obama 328. But we don't know who's won Florida yet. Typical Florida, always holds everything else up (the 2000 election and all that). |
|
john07
Labour & Co-operative
Posts: 15,785 
|
Post by john07 on Nov 7, 2012 15:55:54 GMT
who was the one to get it right? I guessed Obama 328. But we don't know who's won Florida yet. Typical Florida, always holds everything else up (the 2000 election and all that). Hopefully it will not drag on as long as 2000 given that it is a dead rubber. |
|
The Bishop
Labour
Down With Factionalism!
Posts: 38,916
|
Post by The Bishop on Nov 7, 2012 16:05:33 GMT
I think we *do* know - it just hasn't been officially confirmed yet  |
|
tricky
Lib Dem
Building a stronger economy and a fairer society so everyone can get on in life
Posts: 1,420
|
Post by tricky on Nov 7, 2012 17:49:00 GMT
I did quite well on the Senate races too.
I read everything Nate Silver writes and agree strongly with his methods.
|
|
