|
Post by timrollpickering on Apr 10, 2018 12:07:06 GMT
ISTR Gordon was the seat that would have delivered a majority of 1 on a uniform swing. However Salmond was at the top of the North East list. www.heraldscotland.com/news/12773616.North_East_Scotland__List_candidates/Salmond's proposed dual candidacy prompted Labour to howl fake moral outrage about dual candidacies and propose to ban the option before the election. But the fact that it was hard to disguise this was motivated by stopping Salmond derailed the plans (although it passed for Wales).
|
|
neilm
Non-Aligned
Posts: 25,023
|
Post by neilm on Apr 21, 2018 1:26:54 GMT
Sproat was known as Deep Sproat, wasn't he?
|
|
Chris from Brum
Lib Dem
What I need is a strong drink and a peer group.
Posts: 9,732
|
Post by Chris from Brum on Apr 21, 2018 12:47:50 GMT
Sproat was known as Deep Sproat, wasn't he? To Private Eye, at least. This was presumed to be an allusion to the events that led to him changing his seat, but the details have never been made public, so this is pure speculation
|
|
john07
Labour & Co-operative
Posts: 15,785
|
Post by john07 on Apr 28, 2018 9:03:40 GMT
The reason he ran in South Hams is that you got enhanced redundancy from the House of Commons if you lost your seat in the election and it didn't matter if it was different to your existing constituency. Frank Hooley did much the same after being deselected in Sheffield Heeley. He contested Stratford-upon-Avon to secure his redundancy payments.
|
|
|
Post by greenhert on Apr 28, 2018 10:41:12 GMT
As did Eric Sever when he contested Meriden (whose most Labour-friendly parts had been moved to North Warwickshire, which was won by the Conservatives) after being deselected in Birmingham Ladywood the same year (1983).
|
|