jamie
Top Poster
Posts: 6,917
Member is Online
|
Post by jamie on May 4, 2024 13:54:32 GMT
They're are questions to be asked about Laura Kuennssburg tweeting "results in London will be closer than the polls suggest", inline with the Tory machine and rumour mill. Her bias is out of order. Maybe it's there to balance the bloody awful anti-tory bias of the woman covering the Friday afternoon results? I am no fan of the Cons but she was just awful - harping on about the same labour claims every 5 seconds, interupting constantly with 'what about though' and just being so biased it was painful to watch. Which presenter was that?
|
|
andrea
Non-Aligned
Posts: 7,371
|
Post by andrea on May 4, 2024 14:00:53 GMT
Brent and Harrow now
|
|
johng
Labour
Posts: 4,601
|
Post by johng on May 4, 2024 14:02:24 GMT
Jo Coburn hosted on Friday I believe. Didn't find her to be biased - though not the biggest fan of programmes she hosts.
|
|
|
Post by carolus on May 4, 2024 14:02:59 GMT
Bent & Harrow: Lab 58,743 Con 66,151 LD 7,184 Green 6,984 Ref 3,636 Ind (Campbell) 4,512 SDP 1,702 AWP 2,158 Binface 1,265 BF 982 Ind (Michli) 1,349 Ind (Ghulati) 2,933 LRP 486
|
|
andrea
Non-Aligned
Posts: 7,371
|
Post by andrea on May 4, 2024 14:03:13 GMT
Hall 66,151 Khan 58,743
Increased majority for Hall here 2021 Bailey 65566 Khan 61778
|
|
|
Post by willpower3 on May 4, 2024 14:05:37 GMT
They're are questions to be asked about Laura Kuennssburg tweeting "results in London will be closer than the polls suggest", inline with the Tory machine and rumour mill. Her bias is out of order. Not that many. If it's a 10% or less victory for Khan then all of the above will have turned out to be right.
|
|
|
Post by carolus on May 4, 2024 14:05:41 GMT
I'm afraid I'm going out now, won't be able to record the remaining numbers.
|
|
|
Post by finsobruce on May 4, 2024 14:06:40 GMT
Jo Coburn hosted on Friday I believe. Didn't find her to be biased - though not the biggest fan of programmes she hosts.
She's married to Mark Flanagan who was Head of Comms at Downing Street...for both Labour and the Coalition.
|
|
|
Post by Peter Wilkinson on May 4, 2024 14:11:40 GMT
I would just like to note that if Hall were going to be even close to winning on the basis of anti-ULEZ sentiment, Khan shouldn't be beating her and Cox taken together in North East by a factor of over 3 to 1 - certainly, much of North East is inner London, extending in to Shoreditch and Clerkenwell, but it also extends right out to Chingford. It isn't that there is nothing to the doughnut effect when it comes to ULEZ - but, due north of inner London (and to some extent also due south), it only really starts fairly close to the Greater London boundary, with the strongest sentiment being several miles further out. Khan's policies may not be well attuned to zone 6, but Hall's policies are totally out of tune with zones 1 to 4. And I see Hall's substantial victory in Bexley and Bromley as rather confirming my previous remarks - both boroughs extend well out into zone 6, and only even touch zone 3 at Bromley's north-western corner. On the basis of previous results, I was rather expecting Brent and Harrow to be a narrow victory for Khan but am not exactly surprised to see Hall squeaking it instead. On this basis, I can see Hall as having a strong chance of winning (though on a smaller scale) in Havering and Redbridge, Ealing and Hillingdon, and Croydon and Sutton- but in all of these, it will depend on the balance of the different parts of the constituencies (as boroughs, apart from Bexley and Bromley I would expect Havering, Hillingdon, Sutton, Harrow and possibly Croydon to have gone for Hall, but Redbridge, Ealing and Brent for Khan).
|
|
andrea
Non-Aligned
Posts: 7,371
|
Post by andrea on May 4, 2024 14:16:01 GMT
Ealing and Hillingdon being announced now
Microphone is now working too well. Not helping my grasping of English numbers.
Hall 75,396 Khan 73,2x7
|
|
jamesdoyle
Non-Aligned
Posts: 1,534
Member is Online
|
Post by jamesdoyle on May 4, 2024 14:24:39 GMT
Ealing and Hillingdon being announced now Microphone is now working too well. Not helping my grasping of English numbers. Hall 75,396 Khan 73,2x7 73257 for Khan
|
|
|
Post by evergreenadam on May 4, 2024 14:24:52 GMT
Ealing and Hillingdon being announced now Microphone is now working too well. Not helping my grasping of English numbers. Hall 75,396 Khan 73,2x7 Swing from Con to Lab, Hall won by less than Bailey.
|
|
Pimpernal
Forum Regular
A left-wing agenda within a right-wing framework...
Posts: 2,871
|
Post by Pimpernal on May 4, 2024 14:28:18 GMT
Maybe it's there to balance the bloody awful anti-tory bias of the woman covering the Friday afternoon results? I am no fan of the Cons but she was just awful - harping on about the same labour claims every 5 seconds, interupting constantly with 'what about though' and just being so biased it was painful to watch. Which presenter was that? Having just Googled her I think it probably was - though only half her photos look like the person I'm thinking of...
|
|
|
Post by batman on May 4, 2024 14:33:53 GMT
This wasn’t just a dog which didn’t bark, it was a dog which whimpered and went back to its basket. It was appalling expectation management by the Tories; it succeeded in putting the wind up us Labour comrades a bit but made them look silly. Of course some of the results in certain outer London boroughs will be good for the Tories but the demography of London makes it very hard for the Tories and they compounded this by choosing a very poor candidate. Khan is not popular in much of London but he has still won handily. I remain convinced that Paul Scully would have given him more of a run for his money. As it was voters were motivated to go out and vote against her, overwhelmingly for Khan. As neither main candidate was generally well liked, it was an election of very few posters outside the always high-turnout Richmond upon Thames, but still a very respectable turnout of voters.
|
|
andrea
Non-Aligned
Posts: 7,371
|
Post by andrea on May 4, 2024 14:34:37 GMT
City and East is ready
Khan 108,976 Hall 38,626
Last time Khan 99971 Bailey 58145
|
|
|
Post by nobodyimportant on May 4, 2024 14:35:28 GMT
Full Ealing + Hillingdon result: Animal Welfare 2809 Binface 1997 Lib Dem 10120 Ind Campbell 35?7 Reform UK 6983 SDP 2643 Green 10508 Ind Ghulati 2659 Con 75396 Lab 73257 Ind Michli 1919 London Real Party 542 Britain First 1761
896 rejected
|
|
|
Post by doktorb🏳️🌈🏳️⚧️ on May 4, 2024 14:39:13 GMT
This wasn’t just a dog which didn’t bark, it was a dog which whimpered and went back to its basket. It was appalling expectation management by the Tories; it succeeded putting the wind up us Labour comrades a bit but made them look silly. Of course some of the results in certain outer London boroughs will be good for the Tories but the demography of London makes it very hard for the Tories and they compounded this by choosing a very poor candidate. Khan is not popular in much of London but he has still won handily. I remain convinced that Paul Scully would have given him more of a run for his money. As it was voters were motivated to go out and vote against her, overwhelmingly for Khan. As neither main candidate was generally well liked, it was an election of very few posters outside the always high-turnout Richmond upon Thames, but still a very respectable turnout of voters.
|
|
andrea
Non-Aligned
Posts: 7,371
|
Post by andrea on May 4, 2024 14:39:17 GMT
Good afternoon everybody Can you hear me? yes, I think
we are in Barnet and Camden declaration
Khan 70,984 Hall 57,465
Last time Khan 67610 Bailey 65822
|
|
|
Post by nobodyimportant on May 4, 2024 14:40:10 GMT
City and East result
Animal Welfare 2671 Binface 1918 or 1980 Lib Dem 7551 Ind Campbell 4149 Reform UK 6898 SDP 2686 Green 13256 Ind Ghulati 2692 Con 38626 Lab 108977 Ind Michli 2473 London Real Party 924 Britain First 2019
1141 rejected
|
|
andrea
Non-Aligned
Posts: 7,371
|
Post by andrea on May 4, 2024 14:44:55 GMT
Croydon and Sutton
Lady is announcing, not declaring. It is not her job...
Hall 78790 Khan 59482
Bailey 78368 Khan 57317
|
|