colm
Non-Aligned
Posts: 69
|
Post by colm on Nov 20, 2018 1:08:43 GMT
I saw on Twitter that third parties had the lowest vote share in decades this midterm. Without a toxic candidate like Hillary, and Republicans learning to like or loathe Trump over 4 years, I wouldn't expect anywhere near as many third party voters. As to the above post, 3rd party voters were shown to favour Clinton over Trump quite considerably, even Libertarian voters. Theyre mostly not closet Republicans. I expect 2020 to be very similar to the 2004 election. I expect it to be very close to it in terms of turnout with both candidates significantly improving their raw vote totals. Could both candidates perhaps hit 70 million? I expect the third party vote to shrink to less than 2% and would not be surprised if the 2 party vote comes close to the 99% that Kerry and Bush acquired in 2004. You have to go back to '84 for when it was less than 1%.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 20, 2018 6:40:12 GMT
I saw on Twitter that third parties had the lowest vote share in decades this midterm. Without a toxic candidate like Hillary, and Republicans learning to like or loathe Trump over 4 years, I wouldn't expect anywhere near as many third party voters. As to the above post, 3rd party voters were shown to favour Clinton over Trump quite considerably, even Libertarian voters. Theyre mostly not closet Republicans. I expect 2020 to be very similar to the 2004 election. I expect it to be very close to it in terms of turnout with both candidates significantly improving their raw vote totals. Could both candidates perhaps hit 70 million? I expect the third party vote to shrink to less than 2% and would not be surprised if the 2 party vote comes close to the 99% that Kerry and Bush acquired in 2004. You have to go back to '84 for when it was less than 1%. Agree. And like then I’d only expect 2 or 3 states to flip. I personally think Virginia is just a state Trump will NoVa win
|
|
The Bishop
Labour
Down With Factionalism!
Posts: 38,983
Member is Online
|
Post by The Bishop on Nov 20, 2018 12:27:48 GMT
Why do we think this? Trump slashed the Democratic margin of victory in Maine - it was 16% in 2012! Even Bush 43 didn't take Maine's 2nd District. I don't get why people think Trump is somehow toxic in Maine and New Hampshire - Virginia for sure, but I don't see the argument in ME and NH. Quite possible that HRC was herself pretty toxic in these states, and another Dem candidate in 2020 has a good prospect of doing better. In which case Trump has missed his best chance?
|
|
|
Post by Devil Wincarnate on Dec 31, 2018 17:26:04 GMT
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 31, 2018 17:51:44 GMT
I can’t think of anything less appealing than a Trump-Warren contest.
|
|
Richard Allen
Banned
Four time loser in VUKPOTY finals
Posts: 19,052
|
Post by Richard Allen on Jan 1, 2019 0:39:17 GMT
Anybody dumb enough to announce on New Years Eve has no business holding public office, let alone the Presidency.
|
|
|
Post by Devil Wincarnate on Jan 1, 2019 0:56:25 GMT
Anybody dumb enough to announce on New Years Eve has no business holding public office, let alone the Presidency. On this note, I notice talk that "Beto" (all good next saviours have to be referred to by their first name, of course) is under attack for having the temerity to adopt a traditional Democrat programme rather than change all his principles to keep his new groupies happy.
|
|
jamie
Top Poster
Posts: 7,060
Member is Online
|
Post by jamie on Jan 1, 2019 1:51:21 GMT
On this note, I notice talk that "Beto" (all good next saviours have to be referred to by their first name, of course) is under attack for having the temerity to adopt a traditional Democrat programme rather than change all his principles to keep his new groupies happy. His groupies seem to be standing by him. The people attacking him are the hardcore Berniecrats who don't seem to have realised that not every 2016 Sanders supporter demands left wing ideological purity (and Bernie isn't ideological pure anyways; see immigration and guns).
|
|
jamie
Top Poster
Posts: 7,060
Member is Online
|
Post by jamie on Jan 1, 2019 1:53:13 GMT
Anybody dumb enough to announce drink beer on Instagram Live on New Years Eve has no business holding public office, let alone the Presidency. Updated.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 1, 2019 8:13:16 GMT
The last person to be president having lost a primary was George H.W. Bush.
2020 will be like 2004 - 3 or 4 states will flip.
|
|
john07
Labour & Co-operative
Posts: 15,806
|
Post by john07 on Jan 1, 2019 12:03:52 GMT
The last person to be president having lost a primary was George H.W. Bush. ‘Lost a primary’? Please explain.
|
|
Richard Allen
Banned
Four time loser in VUKPOTY finals
Posts: 19,052
|
Post by Richard Allen on Jan 1, 2019 12:21:03 GMT
The last person to be president having lost a primary was George H.W. Bush. ‘Lost a primary’? Please explain. I assume he means elected as President after having previously ran and failing to win their party's nomination.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 1, 2019 12:48:34 GMT
The last person to be president having lost a primary was George H.W. Bush. ‘Lost a primary’? Please explain. President having lost primary. Bush: lost 1980 primary; elected President in 1988. The point being that a retread may not be the Democrats' best choice for 2020.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 1, 2019 13:02:12 GMT
I can’t think of anything less appealing than a Trump-Warren contest. I can. 2016
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 1, 2019 13:06:46 GMT
I know it's early but primary polling for Maschettes doesn't look good for Warren. If you can't win on home turf...
|
|
|
Post by pragmaticidealist on Jan 1, 2019 13:12:00 GMT
On this note, I notice talk that "Beto" (all good next saviours have to be referred to by their first name, of course) is under attack for having the temerity to adopt a traditional Democrat programme rather than change all his principles to keep his new groupies happy. His groupies seem to be standing by him. The people attacking him are the hardcore Berniecrats who don't seem to have realised that not every 2016 Sanders supporter demands left wing ideological purity (and Bernie isn't ideological pure anyways; see immigration and guns). Given that he's a member of the New Democrat Coalition, it's impressive that he's as popular as he is on the more radical parts of the American left.
|
|
johnloony
Conservative
Posts: 24,616
Member is Online
|
Post by johnloony on Jan 2, 2019 1:42:53 GMT
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 2, 2019 5:44:45 GMT
Nationally: Reagan in 1976, Bush in 1980.
|
|
|
Post by Devil Wincarnate on Jan 2, 2019 11:17:09 GMT
|
|
Sharon
Labour & Co-operative
Posts: 2,564
|
Post by Sharon on Jan 2, 2019 16:01:47 GMT
|
|