|
|
Post by andrewteale on Feb 10, 2021 17:37:03 GMT
Herefordshire 2019. Ind 18 (+10) C 13 (-16) It's Our County 8 (-4) Grn 7 (+5) LD 7 (+5). Changes based on 2015 (deep breath, here we go): C gain from Ind Holmer Grn gain from C Birch Bishops Frome and Cradley Grn gain from Ind Leominster South Grn gain from It's Our County Central Greyfriars Ind gain from C Bobblestock Castle Golden Valley North Golden Valley South Hagley Kerne Bridge Penyard Saxon Gate Stoney Street Weobley Ind gain from It's Our County Aylestone Hill Kings Acre Tupsley It's Our County gain from C College Hampton LD gain from C Hinton and Hunderton Ross East Ross North Ross West LD gain from It's Our County Ledbury West   Ross North was a postponed poll. The It's Our County councillor in Whitecross was elected while ineligible, and It's Our County held the resulting by-election.
|
|
minionofmidas
Non-Aligned
only here for the boundary review
Posts: 754
|
Post by minionofmidas on Feb 11, 2021 12:54:47 GMT
Belmont "rural" appears to be badly misnamed.
Without looking it up, I suppose it's the part of a former parish of Belmont that wasn't annexed by Hereford at some point, but it certainly looks weird now.
|
|
maxque
Non-Aligned
Posts: 6,274 
|
Post by maxque on Feb 11, 2021 14:25:13 GMT
Belmont "rural" appears to be badly misnamed. Without looking it up, I suppose it's the part of a former parish of Belmont that wasn't annexed by Hereford at some point, but it certainly looks weird now. No, Belmont Rural parish broke away from Clehonger parish in 2000 to cover the Belmont Estate. I suppose the name was picked by some marketing whiz. |
|
|
|
Post by Pete Whitehead on Feb 11, 2021 19:56:09 GMT
|
|
|
|
Post by Arthur Figgis on Feb 11, 2021 20:02:00 GMT
At least someone gets it. |
|
J.G.Harston
Lib Dem
Leave-voting Brexit-supporting Liberal Democrat
Posts: 8,327
|
Post by J.G.Harston on Feb 11, 2021 21:53:12 GMT
Isle of Axholme in the Midlands? |
|
Khunanup
Lib Dem
Portsmouth Liberal Democrats
Posts: 8,636
|
Post by Khunanup on Feb 11, 2021 23:01:24 GMT
At least someone gets it. Yeah, the Wirral is the true north West, but we knew that anyway... π |
|
Foggy
Non-Aligned
Er/ihn/ihm
Posts: 5,190
|
Post by Foggy on Feb 12, 2021 6:41:43 GMT
At least someone gets it. Yeah, the Wirral is the true north West, but we knew that anyway... π It says the Wirral's in the Westcountry, not the North West. Portsmouth, meanwhile, doesn't appear to have been put in any region whatsoever. |
|
|
|
Post by greenchristian on Feb 12, 2021 14:22:07 GMT
Yeah, the Wirral is the true north West, but we knew that anyway... π It says the Wirral's in the Westcountry, not the North West. Portsmouth, meanwhile, doesn't appear to have been put in any region whatsoever. Looking at the map more closely it appears to be part of France.  |
|
|
|
Post by π΄ππ’ππ© πͺππ΄π on Feb 12, 2021 15:21:06 GMT
The Heptarchy strikes back. |
|
minionofmidas
Non-Aligned
only here for the boundary review
Posts: 754
|
Post by minionofmidas on Feb 12, 2021 16:24:44 GMT
It says the Wirral's in the Westcountry, not the North West. Portsmouth, meanwhile, doesn't appear to have been put in any region whatsoever. Looking at the map more closely it appears to be part of France. Pompei was in Italy the last time I visited it. |
|
Khunanup
Lib Dem
Portsmouth Liberal Democrats
Posts: 8,636
|
Post by Khunanup on Feb 12, 2021 17:43:25 GMT
Yeah, the Wirral is the true north West, but we knew that anyway... π It says the Wirral's in the Westcountry, not the North West. Portsmouth, meanwhile, doesn't appear to have been put in any region whatsoever.Β I didn't say the North West, I said the north West... |
|
|
|
Post by andrewteale on Feb 12, 2021 22:09:38 GMT
Portsmouth 2019. Changes based on 2015: Lab gain from C St Jude LD gain from C Nelson St Thomas   Split wards are (not taking account of by-elections or defections): Central Southsea is 2LD/1Lab and the Liberal Democrats are defending in May. Eastney and Craneswater is 2C/1LD and the Liberal Democrats are defending in May. Fratton is 2LD/1Lab and the Liberal Democrats are defending in May. Paulsgrove is 2C/1Lab and Labour are defending in May. St Jude is 2Lab/1LD and the Liberal Democrats are defending in May.
|
|
johnloony
Conservative
Posts: 13,315
Member is Online
|
Post by johnloony on Feb 13, 2021 12:28:14 GMT
Portsmouth 2019. Changes based on 2015: Lab gain from C St Jude LD gain from C Nelson St Thomas Is that one of those silly maps that includes large areas of sea in the wards, as if it can't tell the difference between sea and land? |
|
Khunanup
Lib Dem
Portsmouth Liberal Democrats
Posts: 8,636
|
Post by Khunanup on Feb 13, 2021 14:57:57 GMT
Portsmouth 2019. Changes based on 2015: Lab gain from C St Jude LD gain from C Nelson St Thomas Is that one of those silly maps that includes large areas of sea in the wards, as if it can't tell the difference between sea and land? Yes. All the wards other than Central Southsea, St Jude (though it does contain two sea-forts but non of the sea round them) and Fratton cover parts of The Solent, Portsmouth Harbour (all of it's in Portsmouth up to the high water mark), Langstone Harbour or Portcreek or a combination of more than one of those. |
|
|
|
Post by andrewteale on Feb 14, 2021 15:21:15 GMT
South Oxfordshire 2019. LD 12 (+11) C 10 (-23) Grn 5 (+5) Ind 3 (+3) Lab 3 (+2) Henley Residents Group 3 (+2). Changes based on 2015: Grn gain from C Benson and Crowmarsh (1) Berinsfield Sandford and the Wittenhams Wallingford (1) Woodcote and Rotherfield (1) Henley Residents Group gain from C Henley-on-Thames (2) Ind gain from C Didcot North East (1) Kidmore End and Whitchurch Sonning Common (1) Lab gain from C Didcot South (2) LD gain from C Benson and Crowmarsh (1) Cholsey (1) Didcot North East (2) Forest Hill and Holton Goring Thame (3) Wallingford (1) Wheatley   Split wards in 2019 were: Benson and Crowmarsh: LD/Grn Cholsey: C/LD Didcot North East: 1Ind/2LD Sonning Common: Ind/C Wallingford: Grn/LD Woodcote and Rotherfield: C/Grn
|
|
ilerda
Conservative
Posts: 284
|
Post by ilerda on Feb 18, 2021 13:59:17 GMT
Why can't we have this much data for UK elections? Down to groups of two or three streets it's possible to get percentages of vote for each party for the most recent Catalan parliamentary election.
Obviously there's an argument about privacy etc, and in an FPTP system is a gerrymanderer's dream, but from a psephological point of view it's absolutely fascinating.
Edit: if you follow the link and scroll down you'll see an interactive map for each main party. You don't need to speak Catalan to understand the colours.
|
|
|
|
Post by hullenedge on Feb 18, 2021 14:46:12 GMT
Why can't we have this much data for UK elections? Down to groups of two or three streets it's possible to get percentages of vote for each party for the most recent Catalan parliamentary election. Obviously there's an argument about privacy etc, and in an FPTP system is a gerrymanderer's dream, but from a psephological point of view it's absolutely fascinating. Edit: if you follow the link and scroll down you'll see an interactive map for each main party. You don't need to speak Catalan to understand the colours. Interesting but horrific. The sanctity of the ballot must come first. |
|
ilerda
Conservative
Posts: 284
|
Post by ilerda on Feb 18, 2021 14:59:10 GMT
Why can't we have this much data for UK elections? Down to groups of two or three streets it's possible to get percentages of vote for each party for the most recent Catalan parliamentary election. Obviously there's an argument about privacy etc, and in an FPTP system is a gerrymanderer's dream, but from a psephological point of view it's absolutely fascinating. Edit: if you follow the link and scroll down you'll see an interactive map for each main party. You don't need to speak Catalan to understand the colours. Interesting but horrific. The sanctity of the ballot must come first. I completely agree about sanctity of the ballot. I just find it incredible they can do this and we won't even do official results by electoral ward. We could always include the census protection of merging areas where the numbers are so small as to make data protection impossible. Particularly where just a few electors are in one constituency due to ward boundary changes. |
|
|
|
Post by hullenedge on Feb 18, 2021 15:21:35 GMT
Interesting but horrific. The sanctity of the ballot must come first. I completely agree about sanctity of the ballot. I just find it incredible they can do this and we won't even do official results by electoral ward. We could always include the census protection of merging areas where the numbers are so small as to make data protection impossible. Particularly where just a few electors are in one constituency due to ward boundary changes. I can't see any government passing legislation that divulges results at a micro-level. It's been requested and always declined. |
|
