Tony Otim
Green
Suffering from Brexistential Despair
Posts: 11,913
|
Post by Tony Otim on May 27, 2015 10:51:23 GMT
INdeed, welcome - you're in the right place
|
|
|
Post by helenb on May 29, 2015 8:20:29 GMT
Thank you! Numbers, maps and history - what's not to like?
|
|
|
Post by carlton43 on Jun 2, 2015 20:39:46 GMT
CARLTON CHANGES HIS MIND
I have changed my vote from Yes to NO.
I have also stopped my flirtation with PR and reverted to my previous lifelong support for FPTP.
The past election delivered a decisive result again, as it usually does. I much prefer that to coalitions.
I like the two party structure and the Flip-Flop decision.
I don't like coalitions and the plethora of small parties.
I don't think we would be better administered by having a raft of minor party MPs in the HOC.
I regret having dallied with this nonsense and repent of it.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 2, 2015 20:53:44 GMT
CARLTON CHANGES HIS MIND I have changed my vote from Yes to NO. I have also stopped my flirtation with PR and reverted to my previous lifelong support for FPTP. The past election delivered a decisive result again, as it usually does. I much prefer that to coalitions. I like the two party structure and the Flip-Flop decision. I don't like coalitions and the plethora of small parties. I don't think we would be better administered by having a raft of minor party MPs in the HOC. I regret having dallied with this nonsense and repent of it. Are you... coming back to the Conservative Party?
|
|
|
Post by carlton43 on Jun 3, 2015 12:17:22 GMT
CARLTON CHANGES HIS MIND I have changed my vote from Yes to NO. I have also stopped my flirtation with PR and reverted to my previous lifelong support for FPTP. The past election delivered a decisive result again, as it usually does. I much prefer that to coalitions. I like the two party structure and the Flip-Flop decision. I don't like coalitions and the plethora of small parties. I don't think we would be better administered by having a raft of minor party MPs in the HOC. I regret having dallied with this nonsense and repent of it. Are you... coming back to the Conservative Party? My concerns over Cameron and the Modernizers are not over. I think Cameron fought a better campaign but was the recipient of an amazing set of propitious circumstances that led to a stunning win, not really of their own making but as collateral to other big events caused by the SNP and the LDs and to a lesser extent UKIP. I see a continuing need for UKIP and indeed a place for it in certain demographics and as a receptacle for NOTA/Protest. These votes and the UKIP movement can direct that heat to Immigration and Euroscepticism as it has been doing and to even greater effect. Without that grit of UKIP in the Coservative eye, I think Cameron would backtrack to more liberal stances and be more centrist and Europhile. So, No, not at present.
|
|
|
Post by carlton43 on Jun 3, 2015 12:31:14 GMT
To Swanarcadian.
I was surprised just how pleased I was on the night to see the Conservative outright victory. After two years of hoping for and expounding upon the need for a Labour minority administration so as to maximize the chances for further UKIP advance, I now know that at least half of me would have hated that to happen. I am conflicted as to whether I want UKIP to form into a major party or to see the Conservative Party pushed into a position where I would be happy to be back. It is sounding already more like my sort of party. It has its abrasive edge back now it does not have to team and ladle with LD opinion. I need convincing on ECHR, Green Policies, Foreign Aid, Defence Budgets, EVEL, Barnett Formula, retaining 650 MPs and much tighter Immigration Rules before I shall feel comfortable moving. Not all of those but quite a lot of them! And, I hate 'the Right To Buy' and don't want to see it expanded. I do want more Generating Capacity NOW and No Nuclear, more runways for Heathrow AND Gatwick NOW and total rethink on HSR2. I am difficult to satisfy!
|
|
|
Post by thirdchill on Jun 14, 2015 22:27:02 GMT
Not sold on the idea for General Elections, though a modified form of it for local elections would be reasonable.
It would not work just doing it over the whole council, that would break the ward link.
But for example in the metropolitan councils, joining two wards together and having 6 councillors elected in each ward by using D'Hondt. And then repeating the process over the whole of the council. So instead of having 20 wards, it would be 10 wards electing by D'Hondt.
Just been having a go at it using the D'Hondt calculator for Salford, using the 2015 local election results, UKIP and the Conservatives would probably get 1 councillor each in most of the wards (and 2 or 3 for the conservatives in their stronger areas). The odd 1 or 2 might go to other parties and the rest would go to labour.
|
|
therealriga
Non-Aligned
none
Posts: 2,855
Member is Online
|
Post by therealriga on Jun 29, 2015 15:46:43 GMT
In order to be in any way proportional, D'Hondt needs larger constituencies. At least 8 members. Look at the constituency results of Spanish elections or the 1996 regional election in Northern Ireland to see what I mean.
|
|
Richard Allen
Banned
Four time loser in VUKPOTY finals
Posts: 19,052
|
Post by Richard Allen on Jun 29, 2015 15:52:01 GMT
Can we please stop referring to D'Hondt as an electoral system.
|
|
|
Post by johnloony on Jun 30, 2015 1:35:57 GMT
Can we please stop referring to D'Hondt as an electoral system. No, because it is a useful verbal shorthand for "List-based proportional representation with allocation according to D'Hondt divisors". Anyway, one does not need 8 or more members elected per constituency to be "any way proportional". It only needs 2 or 3 per constituency in order to be significantly more proportional than FPTP. It needs more, if you want more precisely proportional results. It needs a single national constituency (or at least a nationwide top-up allocation) if you want to make it as proportional as possible, and to avoid the possibility in all cases of there being different parties with the plurality of seats and the plurality of votes.
|
|
|
Post by AustralianSwingVoter on Aug 22, 2016 6:44:27 GMT
2010 notional results (assuming everybody cast their vote the same way, which they wouldn't have done obvs) | Total seats | Con | Lab | LD | Nat | | | | | | | Highlands & Islands | 5 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 1 | Aberdeen & Angus | 9 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 3 | Forth | 7 | 1 | 4 | 1 | 1 | Strathclyde | 6 | 1 | 3 | 1 | 1 | Glasgow | 6 | 0 | 4 | 1 | 1 | Lanarkshire | 7 | 0 | 5 | 1 | 1 | Ayrshire & Galloway | 6 | 2 | 3 | 0 | 1 | Lothian | 5 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 1 | Edinburgh | 5 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 0 | | | | | | | Scotland | 56 | 9 | 26 | 11 | 10 | | | | | | | Clwyd-Gwynedd | 7 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 1 | Dyfed-Powys | 5 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 1 | Glamorgan | 9 | 1 | 5 | 2 | 1 | Cardiff | 5 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 0 | Gwent | 6 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 0 | | | | | | | Wales | 32 | 9 | 14 | 6 | 3 | | | | | | | Northumberland | 8 | 2 | 4 | 2 | | Tyne & Wear | 7 | 2 | 4 | 1 | | Durham | 7 | 1 | 4 | 2 | | Cleveland | 6 | 2 | 3 | 1 | | | | | | | | Cumbria | 6 | 3 | 2 | 1 | | North Lancashire | 8 | 4 | 3 | 1 | | East Lancashire | 6 | 3 | 2 | 1 | | West Lancashire | 5 | 2 | 2 | 1 | | Liverpool | 6 | 0 | 5 | 1 | | Warrington-St Helens | 5 | 1 | 3 | 1 | | Bolton-Bury-Wigan | 8 | 3 | 4 | 1 | | Oldham-Rochdale | 7 | 2 | 3 | 2 | | Manchester | 10 | 2 | 5 | 3 | | East Cheshire | 7 | 3 | 2 | 2 | | West Cheshire | 7 | 3 | 3 | 1 | | | | | | | | North Yorkshire | 9 | 5 | 2 | 2 | | East Yorkshire | 6 | 2 | 2 | 2 | | Leeds | 8 | 3 | 3 | 2 | | Bradford-Halifax | 7 | 3 | 3 | 1 | | Wakefield-Huddersfield | 8 | 3 | 4 | 1 | | Barnsley-Doncaster-Rotherham | 8 | 2 | 5 | 1 | | Sheffield | 5 | 1 | 2 | 2 | | | | | | | | Lindsey | 6 | 3 | 2 | 1 | | Lincoln, Holland & Kesteven | 5 | 3 | 1 | 1 | | North Nottinghamshire | 5 | 2 | 2 | 1 | | Nottingham | 6 | 2 | 3 | 1 | | North Derbyshire | 5 | 2 | 2 | 1 | | Derby | 6 | 3 | 2 | 1 | | Leicester | 5 | 2 | 2 | 1 | | Leicestershire & Rutland | 6 | 3 | 1 | 2 | | Northamptonshire | 7 | 4 | 2 | 1 | | | | | | | | Warwickshire | 6 | 3 | 2 | 1 | | Coventry & Solihull | 5 | 2 | 2 | 1 | | Birmingham | 10 | 3 | 5 | 2 | | Wolverhamton & Walsall | 5 | 2 | 2 | 1 | | Sandwell & Dudley | 7 | 3 | 3 | 1 | | South Staffordshire | 7 | 4 | 2 | 1 | | North Staffordshire | 5 | 2 | 2 | 1 | | Shropshire | 5 | 3 | 1 | 1 | | Hereford & Worcester | 8 | 5 | 1 | 2 | | | | | | | | Norfolk | 9 | 4 | 2 | 3 | | Suffolk | 8 | 4 | 2 | 2 | | Cambridgshire | 8 | 4 | 1 | 3 | | North Essex | 8 | 5 | 1 | 2 | | South Essex | 10 | 6 | 2 | 2 | | East Hertfordshire | 6 | 4 | 1 | 1 | | West Hertfordshire | 6 | 3 | 1 | 2 | | Bedfordshire | 6 | 3 | 2 | 1 | | | | | | | | Buckinghamshire | 8 | 5 | 1 | 2 | | Berkshire | 9 | 5 | 2 | 2 | | Oxfordshire | 7 | 4 | 1 | 2 | | East Surrey | 5 | 4 | 0 | 1 | | West Surrey | 6 | 4 | 0 | 2 | | East Kent | 8 | 4 | 2 | 2 | | West Kent | 10 | 6 | 2 | 2 | | East Sussex | 8 | 4 | 2 | 2 | | West Sussex | 9 | 5 | 1 | 3 | | North Hampshire | 6 | 4 | 0 | 2 | | West Hampshire | 7 | 4 | 1 | 2 | | South Hampshire | 7 | 4 | 1 | 2 | | | | | | | | Gloucestershire | 7 | 4 | 1 | 2 | | Bristol | 7 | 2 | 2 | 3 | | Wiltshire | 7 | 4 | 1 | 2 | | Dorset | 8 | 4 | 1 | 3 | | Somerset | 10 | 4 | 1 | 5 | | North Devon | 7 | 3 | 1 | 3 | | South Devon | 5 | 2 | 1 | 2 | | Cornwall | 6 | 3 | 0 | 3 | | | | | | | | West Essex | 9 | 4 | 4 | 1 | | London East Inner | 7 | 1 | 5 | 1 | | London Central | 9 | 3 | 4 | 2 | | East Middlesex | 8 | 3 | 3 | 2 | | Central Middlesex | 8 | 3 | 4 | 1 | | West Middlesex | 6 | 3 | 2 | 1 | | London South | 9 | 4 | 2 | 3 | | London South Inner | 8 | 2 | 4 | 2 | | London South East | 10 | 5 | 3 | 2 | | | | | | | | England | 545 | 243 | 171 | 131 | | | | | | | | GB | 633 | 261 | 211 | 148 | 13 |
| Total Seats | DUP | UUP | .SF... | SDLP | ALL | | | | | | | | Antrim | 7 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | Down & Armagh | 5 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | Londonderry, Fermanagh & Tyrone | 5 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 0 | | | | | | | | Northern Ireland | 17 | 6 | 2 | 5 | 3 | 1 |
Could someone do this for GE2015? It would be interesting how the Lib Dems would perform on these boundaries considering how many deposits they lost
|
|
|
Post by AustralianSwingVoter on Aug 22, 2016 6:46:59 GMT
If you want there to be a significant "backbench" contingent of MPs who are not on, or aspiring to be on, the government payroll vote, then Yes. One of the reasons why I support having about 2,000 MPs. All elected by FPTP in small single member constituencies. No, I support only 1000 seats
|
|
|
Post by AustralianSwingVoter on Aug 22, 2016 6:49:10 GMT
2010 notional results (assuming everybody cast their vote the same way, which they wouldn't have done obvs) | Total seats | Con | Lab | LD | Nat | | | | | | | Highlands & Islands | 5 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 1 | Aberdeen & Angus | 9 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 3 | Forth | 7 | 1 | 4 | 1 | 1 | Strathclyde | 6 | 1 | 3 | 1 | 1 | Glasgow | 6 | 0 | 4 | 1 | 1 | Lanarkshire | 7 | 0 | 5 | 1 | 1 | Ayrshire & Galloway | 6 | 2 | 3 | 0 | 1 | Lothian | 5 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 1 | Edinburgh | 5 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 0 | | | | | | | Scotland | 56 | 9 | 26 | 11 | 10 | | | | | | | Clwyd-Gwynedd | 7 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 1 | Dyfed-Powys | 5 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 1 | Glamorgan | 9 | 1 | 5 | 2 | 1 | Cardiff | 5 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 0 | Gwent | 6 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 0 | | | | | | | Wales | 32 | 9 | 14 | 6 | 3 | | | | | | | Northumberland | 8 | 2 | 4 | 2 | | Tyne & Wear | 7 | 2 | 4 | 1 | | Durham | 7 | 1 | 4 | 2 | | Cleveland | 6 | 2 | 3 | 1 | | | | | | | | Cumbria | 6 | 3 | 2 | 1 | | North Lancashire | 8 | 4 | 3 | 1 | | East Lancashire | 6 | 3 | 2 | 1 | | West Lancashire | 5 | 2 | 2 | 1 | | Liverpool | 6 | 0 | 5 | 1 | | Warrington-St Helens | 5 | 1 | 3 | 1 | | Bolton-Bury-Wigan | 8 | 3 | 4 | 1 | | Oldham-Rochdale | 7 | 2 | 3 | 2 | | Manchester | 10 | 2 | 5 | 3 | | East Cheshire | 7 | 3 | 2 | 2 | | West Cheshire | 7 | 3 | 3 | 1 | | | | | | | | North Yorkshire | 9 | 5 | 2 | 2 | | East Yorkshire | 6 | 2 | 2 | 2 | | Leeds | 8 | 3 | 3 | 2 | | Bradford-Halifax | 7 | 3 | 3 | 1 | | Wakefield-Huddersfield | 8 | 3 | 4 | 1 | | Barnsley-Doncaster-Rotherham | 8 | 2 | 5 | 1 | | Sheffield | 5 | 1 | 2 | 2 | | | | | | | | Lindsey | 6 | 3 | 2 | 1 | | Lincoln, Holland & Kesteven | 5 | 3 | 1 | 1 | | North Nottinghamshire | 5 | 2 | 2 | 1 | | Nottingham | 6 | 2 | 3 | 1 | | North Derbyshire | 5 | 2 | 2 | 1 | | Derby | 6 | 3 | 2 | 1 | | Leicester | 5 | 2 | 2 | 1 | | Leicestershire & Rutland | 6 | 3 | 1 | 2 | | Northamptonshire | 7 | 4 | 2 | 1 | | | | | | | | Warwickshire | 6 | 3 | 2 | 1 | | Coventry & Solihull | 5 | 2 | 2 | 1 | | Birmingham | 10 | 3 | 5 | 2 | | Wolverhamton & Walsall | 5 | 2 | 2 | 1 | | Sandwell & Dudley | 7 | 3 | 3 | 1 | | South Staffordshire | 7 | 4 | 2 | 1 | | North Staffordshire | 5 | 2 | 2 | 1 | | Shropshire | 5 | 3 | 1 | 1 | | Hereford & Worcester | 8 | 5 | 1 | 2 | | | | | | | | Norfolk | 9 | 4 | 2 | 3 | | Suffolk | 8 | 4 | 2 | 2 | | Cambridgshire | 8 | 4 | 1 | 3 | | North Essex | 8 | 5 | 1 | 2 | | South Essex | 10 | 6 | 2 | 2 | | East Hertfordshire | 6 | 4 | 1 | 1 | | West Hertfordshire | 6 | 3 | 1 | 2 | | Bedfordshire | 6 | 3 | 2 | 1 | | | | | | | | Buckinghamshire | 8 | 5 | 1 | 2 | | Berkshire | 9 | 5 | 2 | 2 | | Oxfordshire | 7 | 4 | 1 | 2 | | East Surrey | 5 | 4 | 0 | 1 | | West Surrey | 6 | 4 | 0 | 2 | | East Kent | 8 | 4 | 2 | 2 | | West Kent | 10 | 6 | 2 | 2 | | East Sussex | 8 | 4 | 2 | 2 | | West Sussex | 9 | 5 | 1 | 3 | | North Hampshire | 6 | 4 | 0 | 2 | | West Hampshire | 7 | 4 | 1 | 2 | | South Hampshire | 7 | 4 | 1 | 2 | | | | | | | | Gloucestershire | 7 | 4 | 1 | 2 | | Bristol | 7 | 2 | 2 | 3 | | Wiltshire | 7 | 4 | 1 | 2 | | Dorset | 8 | 4 | 1 | 3 | | Somerset | 10 | 4 | 1 | 5 | | North Devon | 7 | 3 | 1 | 3 | | South Devon | 5 | 2 | 1 | 2 | | Cornwall | 6 | 3 | 0 | 3 | | | | | | | | West Essex | 9 | 4 | 4 | 1 | | London East Inner | 7 | 1 | 5 | 1 | | London Central | 9 | 3 | 4 | 2 | | East Middlesex | 8 | 3 | 3 | 2 | | Central Middlesex | 8 | 3 | 4 | 1 | | West Middlesex | 6 | 3 | 2 | 1 | | London South | 9 | 4 | 2 | 3 | | London South Inner | 8 | 2 | 4 | 2 | | London South East | 10 | 5 | 3 | 2 | | | | | | | | England | 545 | 243 | 171 | 131 | | | | | | | | GB | 633 | 261 | 211 | 148 | 13 |
| Total Seats | DUP | UUP | .SF... | SDLP | ALL | | | | | | | | Antrim | 7 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | Down & Armagh | 5 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | Londonderry, Fermanagh & Tyrone | 5 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 0 | | | | | | | | Northern Ireland | 17 | 6 | 2 | 5 | 3 | 1 |
Same system based on 2015 election Con 274 +13 Lab 225 +14 UKIP 72 +72 SNP 33 +23 LD 26 -122 PC 3 nc NI 17 Surprisingly no seats for the Greens - they just missed out on the last seat in East Sussex. Labour won all 6 seats in Liverpool. Lib Dems win no seats in the East and West Midlands Full graph please?
|
|
|
Post by Pete Whitehead on Aug 22, 2016 7:07:55 GMT
I'll see if I can find it
|
|
|
Post by AustralianSwingVoter on Aug 22, 2016 8:23:48 GMT
I'll see if I can find it Thanks Pete!
|
|
|
Post by Pete Whitehead on Aug 23, 2016 8:50:39 GMT
| Total | Con | Lab | UKIP | LD | Nat | | | | | | | | Highlands & Islands | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 3 | Aberdeen & Angus | 9 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 5 | Forth | 7 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 4 | Strathclyde | 6 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 4 | Glasgow | 6 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 4 | Lanarkshire | 7 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 5 | Ayrshire & Galloway | 6 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 3 | Lothian | 5 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 3 | Edinburgh | 5 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 | | | | | | | | Scotland | 56 | 6 | 14 | 0 | 3 | 33 | | | | | | | | Clwyd-Gwynedd | 7 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 1 | Dyfed-Powys | 5 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | Glamorgan | 9 | 2 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 1 | Cardiff | 5 | 2 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | Gwent | 6 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 0 | | | | | | | | Wales | 32 | 10 | 15 | 3 | 1 | 3 | | | | | | | | Northumberland | 8 | 3 | 4 | 1 | 0 | | Tyne & Wear | 7 | 1 | 5 | 1 | 0 | | Durham | 7 | 2 | 4 | 1 | 0 | | Cleveland | 6 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 0 | | | | | | | | | Cumbria | 6 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 1 | | North Lancashire | 8 | 3 | 3 | 1 | 0 | | East Lancashire | 6 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 0 | | West Lancashire | 5 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 0 | | Liverpool | 6 | 0 | 6 | 0 | 0 | | Warrington-St Helens | 5 | 1 | 3 | 1 | 0 | | Bolton-Bury-Wigan | 8 | 3 | 4 | 1 | 0 | | Oldham-Rochdale | 7 | 2 | 4 | 1 | 0 | | Manchester | 10 | 3 | 6 | 1 | 0 | | East Cheshire | 7 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 1 | | West Cheshire | 7 | 3 | 4 | 0 | 0 | | | | | | | | | North Yorkshire | 9 | 5 | 2 | 1 | 1 | | East Yorkshire | 6 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 | | Leeds | 8 | 3 | 4 | 1 | 0 | | Bradford-Halifax | 7 | 3 | 3 | 1 | 0 | | Wakefield-Huddersfield | 8 | 3 | 4 | 1 | 0 | | Barnsley-Doncaster-Rotherham | 8 | 1 | 5 | 2 | 0 | | Sheffield | 5 | 1 | 3 | 0 | 1 | | | | | | | | | Lindsey | 6 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 | | Lincoln, Holland & Kesteven | 5 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 0 | | North Nottinghamshire | 5 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 0 | | Nottingham | 6 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 0 | | North Derbyshire | 5 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 0 | | Derby | 6 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 | | Leicester | 5 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 0 | | Leicestershire & Rutland | 6 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 0 | | Northamptonshire | 7 | 4 | 2 | 1 | 0 | | | | | | | | | Warwickshire | 6 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 | | Coventry & Solihull | 5 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 0 | | Birmingham | 10 | 3 | 6 | 1 | 0 | | Wolverhamton & Walsall | 5 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 0 | | Sandwell & Dudley | 7 | 3 | 3 | 1 | 0 | | South Staffordshire | 7 | 4 | 2 | 1 | 0 | | North Staffordshire | 5 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 0 | | Shropshire | 5 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 0 | | Hereford & Worcester | 8 | 5 | 2 | 1 | 0 | | | | | | | | | Norfolk | 9 | 5 | 2 | 1 | 1 | | Suffolk | 8 | 5 | 2 | 1 | 0 | | Cambridgshire | 8 | 4 | 2 | 1 | 1 | | North Essex | 8 | 5 | 1 | 1 | 1 | | South Essex | 10 | 6 | 2 | 2 | 0 | | East Hertfordshire | 6 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 0 | | West Hertfordshire | 6 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 1 | | Bedfordshire | 6 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 | | | | | | | | | Buckinghamshire | 8 | 6 | 1 | 1 | 0 | | Berkshire | 9 | 6 | 2 | 1 | 0 | | Oxfordshire | 7 | 4 | 2 | 0 | 1 | | East Surrey | 5 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 0 | | West Surrey | 6 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 0 | | East Kent | 8 | 4 | 2 | 2 | 0 | | West Kent | 10 | 6 | 2 | 2 | 0 | | East Sussex | 8 | 4 | 2 | 1 | 1 | | West Sussex | 9 | 6 | 1 | 1 | 1 | | North Hampshire | 6 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 1 | | West Hampshire | 7 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 0 | | South Hampshire | 7 | 5 | 1 | 1 | 0 | | | | | | | | | Gloucestershire | 7 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 1 | | Bristol | 7 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 1 | | Wiltshire | 7 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 1 | | Dorset | 8 | 5 | 1 | 1 | 1 | | Somerset | 10 | 6 | 1 | 1 | 2 | | North Devon | 7 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 1 | | South Devon | 5 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 0 | | Cornwall | 6 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | | | | | | | | | West Essex | 9 | 3 | 5 | 1 | 0 | | London East Inner | 7 | 1 | 6 | 0 | 0 | | London Central | 9 | 4 | 5 | 0 | 0 | | East Middlesex | 8 | 3 | 5 | 0 | 0 | | Central Middlesex | 8 | 3 | 5 | 0 | 0 | | West Middlesex | 6 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | | London South | 9 | 4 | 3 | 1 | 1 | | London South Inner | 8 | 3 | 4 | 0 | 1 | | London South East | 10 | 5 | 4 | 1 | 0 | | | | | | | | | England | 545 | 258 | 196 | 69 | 22 | | | | | | | | | GB | 633 | 274 | 225 | 72 | 26 | 36 |
|
|
|
Post by AustralianSwingVoter on Aug 23, 2016 10:57:26 GMT
| Total | Con | Lab | UKIP | LD | Nat | | | | | | | | Highlands & Islands | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 3 | Aberdeen & Angus | 9 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 5 | Forth | 7 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 4 | Strathclyde | 6 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 4 | Glasgow | 6 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 4 | Lanarkshire | 7 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 5 | Ayrshire & Galloway | 6 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 3 | Lothian | 5 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 3 | Edinburgh | 5 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 | | | | | | | | Scotland | 56 | 6 | 14 | 0 | 3 | 33 | | | | | | | | Clwyd-Gwynedd | 7 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 1 | Dyfed-Powys | 5 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | Glamorgan | 9 | 2 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 1 | Cardiff | 5 | 2 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | Gwent | 6 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 0 | | | | | | | | Wales | 32 | 10 | 15 | 3 | 1 | 3 | | | | | | | | Northumberland | 8 | 3 | 4 | 1 | 0 | | Tyne & Wear | 7 | 1 | 5 | 1 | 0 | | Durham | 7 | 2 | 4 | 1 | 0 | | Cleveland | 6 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 0 | | | | | | | | | Cumbria | 6 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 1 | | North Lancashire | 8 | 3 | 3 | 1 | 0 | | East Lancashire | 6 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 0 | | West Lancashire | 5 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 0 | | Liverpool | 6 | 0 | 6 | 0 | 0 | | Warrington-St Helens | 5 | 1 | 3 | 1 | 0 | | Bolton-Bury-Wigan | 8 | 3 | 4 | 1 | 0 | | Oldham-Rochdale | 7 | 2 | 4 | 1 | 0 | | Manchester | 10 | 3 | 6 | 1 | 0 | | East Cheshire | 7 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 1 | | West Cheshire | 7 | 3 | 4 | 0 | 0 | | | | | | | | | North Yorkshire | 9 | 5 | 2 | 1 | 1 | | East Yorkshire | 6 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 | | Leeds | 8 | 3 | 4 | 1 | 0 | | Bradford-Halifax | 7 | 3 | 3 | 1 | 0 | | Wakefield-Huddersfield | 8 | 3 | 4 | 1 | 0 | | Barnsley-Doncaster-Rotherham | 8 | 1 | 5 | 2 | 0 | | Sheffield | 5 | 1 | 3 | 0 | 1 | | | | | | | | | Lindsey | 6 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 | | Lincoln, Holland & Kesteven | 5 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 0 | | North Nottinghamshire | 5 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 0 | | Nottingham | 6 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 0 | | North Derbyshire | 5 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 0 | | Derby | 6 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 | | Leicester | 5 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 0 | | Leicestershire & Rutland | 6 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 0 | | Northamptonshire | 7 | 4 | 2 | 1 | 0 | | | | | | | | | Warwickshire | 6 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 | | Coventry & Solihull | 5 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 0 | | Birmingham | 10 | 3 | 6 | 1 | 0 | | Wolverhamton & Walsall | 5 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 0 | | Sandwell & Dudley | 7 | 3 | 3 | 1 | 0 | | South Staffordshire | 7 | 4 | 2 | 1 | 0 | | North Staffordshire | 5 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 0 | | Shropshire | 5 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 0 | | Hereford & Worcester | 8 | 5 | 2 | 1 | 0 | | | | | | | | | Norfolk | 9 | 5 | 2 | 1 | 1 | | Suffolk | 8 | 5 | 2 | 1 | 0 | | Cambridgshire | 8 | 4 | 2 | 1 | 1 | | North Essex | 8 | 5 | 1 | 1 | 1 | | South Essex | 10 | 6 | 2 | 2 | 0 | | East Hertfordshire | 6 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 0 | | West Hertfordshire | 6 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 1 | | Bedfordshire | 6 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 | | | | | | | | | Buckinghamshire | 8 | 6 | 1 | 1 | 0 | | Berkshire | 9 | 6 | 2 | 1 | 0 | | Oxfordshire | 7 | 4 | 2 | 0 | 1 | | East Surrey | 5 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 0 | | West Surrey | 6 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 0 | | East Kent | 8 | 4 | 2 | 2 | 0 | | West Kent | 10 | 6 | 2 | 2 | 0 | | East Sussex | 8 | 4 | 2 | 1 | 1 | | West Sussex | 9 | 6 | 1 | 1 | 1 | | North Hampshire | 6 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 1 | | West Hampshire | 7 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 0 | | South Hampshire | 7 | 5 | 1 | 1 | 0 | | | | | | | | | Gloucestershire | 7 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 1 | | Bristol | 7 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 1 | | Wiltshire | 7 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 1 | | Dorset | 8 | 5 | 1 | 1 | 1 | | Somerset | 10 | 6 | 1 | 1 | 2 | | North Devon | 7 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 1 | | South Devon | 5 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 0 | | Cornwall | 6 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | | | | | | | | | West Essex | 9 | 3 | 5 | 1 | 0 | | London East Inner | 7 | 1 | 6 | 0 | 0 | | London Central | 9 | 4 | 5 | 0 | 0 | | East Middlesex | 8 | 3 | 5 | 0 | 0 | | Central Middlesex | 8 | 3 | 5 | 0 | 0 | | West Middlesex | 6 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | | London South | 9 | 4 | 3 | 1 | 1 | | London South Inner | 8 | 3 | 4 | 0 | 1 | | London South East | 10 | 5 | 4 | 1 | 0 | | | | | | | | | England | 545 | 258 | 196 | 69 | 22 | | | | | | | | | GB | 633 | 274 | 225 | 72 | 26 | 36 |
Thank you!
|
|
Eastwood
Non-Aligned
Politically restricted post
Posts: 2,122
|
Post by Eastwood on Aug 25, 2016 13:37:24 GMT
Slightly late to this party but the Lothian & Borders constituency is a very ugly design, with West Lothian having no road connection with the rest of the Mid / East / Borders part of the seat. A sort of "Pentland Banks"? Strathclyde is fairly awful too but at least it has the Erskine Bridge.
|
|
|
Post by Pete Whitehead on Sept 4, 2024 20:16:10 GMT
Slightly late to this party but the Lothian & Borders constituency is a very ugly design, with West Lothian having no road connection with the rest of the Mid / East / Borders part of the seat. A sort of "Pentland Banks"? Strathclyde is fairly awful too but at least it has the Erskine Bridge. It doesn't matter
|
|